
Adams: It's a regret that end to armed campaign took decades to bring about
He also said he regretted the number of lives lost during the Troubles as he reflected on the upcoming 20th anniversary of the IRA statement.
The IRA formally ended its 35-year paramilitary campaign on July 28 2005 when former republican prisoner Seanna Walsh read a statement.
Graffiti on a wall in west Belfast at the time of the Provisional IRA's announcement (Paul Faith/PA)
While a number of ceasefires had been announced and collapsed since 1994, the 2005 statement saw the start of the decommissioning of weapons.
The statement said that members had been instructed to use exclusively peaceful means, and not to engage in any other activities whatsoever.
Mr Adams described the move as seismic, and an 'indication of confidence' by 'all the IRA' and not just its leadership.
'The statement came after there had been some sort of internal process, a huge vote of confidence in people,' he said.
One of the big regrets that I have is that so many people were killed, and particularly people who weren't involved and particularly children, that's a real concern Gerry Adams, former Sinn Fein president
'It took decades for it to be put together.
'You have to go back to Father Alec Reid, Father Des Wilson, myself, John Hume and the endeavour to put together an alternative to armed struggle.
'It took all that time to do that, but that's what the IRA said in its statement, that they believed there was now a peaceful way to pursue republican and democratic objectives, and ordered its volunteers to not be engaged in any other activity whatsoever, and authorised contact with the International Commission on Decommissioning.
'It took decades and one of my regrets is that it took so long. In my humble opinion it took so long because the two governments, particularly the British government, only sought peace on its terms, which meant defeat the IRA, it meant defeat republicanism and that doesn't work, our people are resolute.'
Gerry Adams, centre, with Martin McGuiness of Sinn Fein, right, and SDLP leader John Hume after talks in Downing Street (Fiona Hanson/PA)
He added: 'The proof of it is that 20 years later the IRA isn't a feature. Some may want to make it a feature, invent, fabricate and so on, but that's the proof of it.'
Asked whether he felt the IRA should issue an apology for all the lives lost by their actions, Mr Adam pointed to a statement in 2002 on the anniversary of Bloody Friday, a series of bombs across Belfast which claimed nine lives.
It included an offer of 'sincere apologies and condolences' to the families of all 'non combatants' killed or injured by IRA actions.
'I think in fairness that the record will show that the IRA leadership have apologised on a number of occasions about specific incidents or operations which it was involved in, particularly around the issue of civilian casualties or fatalities,' he said.
'One of the big regrets that I have is that so many people were killed, and particularly people who weren't involved and particularly children, that's a real concern.
'I say that from a community and a family which lost loved ones in the course of all of this.'
However, Mr Adams added that while he thinks it is important to look back over the last 20 years, it is also important to look forward to the next 20 years and a referendum on a united Ireland.
'One thing we can say with certainty is there is going to be a referendum on the future, the Irish Government doesn't want it, the British Government doesn't want it, unionists don't want it but there is going to be the day when people will vote for the future,' he said.
'Our responsibility, and for everyone who is concerned about the future, need to be part of the conversation well in advance of that vote. Whether it is about public services, health services, the economy, flags, emblems, taking all of those issues and trying to find solutions to them that allows everyone to be comfortable in the new Ireland.
'You rarely get the opportunity to write the future, and we now have that opportunity and its contained in the Good Friday Agreement.'
'I do know that there will be a united Ireland so whether it happens the day after I die or a couple of years before then.
'It is not inevitable, the forces against it are quite strong but if we work at it.
'If we continue to do the sensible, intelligent things that we have been trying to do, then – although I would love to live in a united Ireland – it matters little to me whether it happens after I die or before it. To be able to say in my own heart to say, 'I played a part in bringing that about', that'll do me.'
Mr Adams was speaking ahead of an Feile An Phobail arts event this weekend to mark the anniversary.
He will take part in a discussion alongside Mr Walsh, chaired by Sinn Fein Galway TD Mairead Farrell, at the Balmoral Hotel in Belfast on Saturday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
‘I create fake IDs of your MP so you can get round Online Safety Act'
'It will be funny when Keir Starmer 's driving licence is leaked online,' said Tim Knight, the creator of Use-Their-ID, a website that generates IDs of any sitting MP in response to the Online Safety Act. Type in a postcode, and in just seconds you can get something that looks uncomfortably real – a photo, a signature, a date of birth, a home address. Like the prime minister's ID, all of it is fake, of course – but people are trying to use it to bypass age verification checks online. Use-Their-ID is part prank, part protest against the controversial law, which aims to stop children from seeing harmful content relating to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography. Since the Online Safety Act came into effect last Friday, more than 100,000 driving licences have been generated on Knight's website. Explaining the idea behind it, the 39-year-old told Metro that it is 'inevitable' that sooner or later, there will be a major data leak and British passports and driving licences will be released online. He added: 'My gut reaction was, well, if the government is going to require me to send my ID all over the internet to view anything that it deems to be 'adult content', that sounds like a privacy and a security nightmare. 'Websites that are implementing age verification checks are incentivised to do it as cheaply as possible – which means outsourcing it to a third party. 'Then it just goes to the cheapest bidder, right? And that means that these checks will not be being done securely and safely or thoroughly. '[The Online Safety Act] is a disaster for privacy online, but also security… It is a big overreach from the government.' Personal information leaks are not the only element of the process that he is worried about. Knight said that people are 'being cut off from a good selection of online resources' because they are too concerned about their privacy to upload their IDs. He pointed to website like Spotify, which now forces ID checks before its users can listen to music with explicit lyrics. The Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, has said that unless the website is made exempt, it would likely be barred under the law. 'All sorts of websites – like suicide prevention resources, so not the porn sites that the government is talking about – are building verification checks,' the creator said. 'They are suddenly having to build walls to keep out children. And we are also seeing websites around the internet blocking UK traffic altogether. If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that. — Peter Kyle (@peterkyle) July 29, 2025 'So we are just being cut off from a good selection of resources on the internet.' It is not just Knight who is protesting the Online Safety Act. Only a week since it was enforced, nearly 500,000 people signed a petition asking for it to be repealed. In response, the government said it had 'no plans' to scrap it. Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, said that those who want it gone are 'on the side of predators'. Like Knights, critics argue that the legislation is too vague and far-reaching. He added: 'MPs seem to have come up with this legislation based on their gut feeling – and not really listening to experts. 'The entire tech industry – and I do not just mean American social media companies – are all face-palming right now at how silly the legislation is. 'It has turned the UK into a bit of a laughing stock.' Knight created Use-Their ID as a 'joke'. He thought it would be 'funny when the inevitable data leaks do happen and MP's ID cards show up' online. As a software engineer, he builds web applications for a living, so he does 'actually know about the security side of things'. In the last week, people have praised his site, describing it as an 'excellent use of his skills'. Comments from supporters read 'thank you immensely' and 'thank you for caring', with one of them saying: 'Thank you so much for the ID website, it is both bloody funny and an excellent idea. 'Best of luck if anyone comes after you.' A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology told Metro: The law is clear: platforms must not promote ways to circumvent requirements of the Act , and those who fall short will face serious enforcement action. 'Ofcom is already assessing platform compliance to ensure robust safeguards are in place to prevent circumvention, and investigations are underway into 37 sites.' check our news page.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Letter: Malcolm Dean obituary
As a young researcher trying to understand the British media's obsession with social security 'scroungers' in the 1970s I came to appreciate the invaluable answers that the Guardian journalist Malcolm Dean gave to my endless questions. He was a crucial resource in my studies, later published in book form as Images of Welfare (1982). Over subsequent years we had frequent conversations, many of which surfaced, I'm sure, as 'academics are saying …' inserts into his social policy leaders. His own book, Democracy Under Attack (2011), was an informed insider discussion of the ways social policy matters reached public awareness through the media. His experience, knowledge and insight are much missed, and his generous contribution to my own understanding will always be deeply valued.


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Planned Palestine Action protest will not try to overwhelm police
Defend Our Juries said it planned to bring together at least 500 people for its planned demonstration against the ban on Saturday with organisers 'very confident' they have recruited enough participants, a spokesperson for the campaign group said. A formal announcement will be made on Tuesday as to whether that figure has been reached and the demonstration will go ahead. More then 200 people were arrested at a wave of protests across the UK in response to the proscription last month, as part of the campaign co-ordinated by Defend Our Juries. Join hundreds of others on August 9th – go to for full information. This action is conditional on reaching our target of at least 500 — Defend our Juries (@DefendourJuries) August 4, 2025 Many of the protesters were detained after writing and holding up the message 'I oppose genocide I support Palestine Action' on placards or pieces of cardboard. A Defend Our Juries spokesperson told the PA news agency: 'It is wrong to characterise this (planned demonstration) as a plan to overwhelm the police and court systems. 'If we are allowed to protest peacefully and freely, then that is no bother to anyone.' In a further statement on its website, the campaign group said the Government had 'overreached itself' by banning Palestine Action and it was 'vital' that its campaign succeeded. People were arrested at two protests in central London last month (Yui Mok/PA) 'Our groups and movements are coming together like never before, finding unity under repression,' it added. 'By refusing to give into fear and by standing together, we will face down this assault on us all.' No location for the protest has so far been shared, but it is understood that it will take place in London and will be the only demonstration that Defend Our Juries organises on Saturday. The Metropolitan Police have been approached for comment. Those interested in joining the demonstration have been asked to come to briefing calls on Tuesday or Thursday, while some have had non-violence training arranged for them, Defend Our Juries said. The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident it subsequently claimed, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. A High Court ruling on Wednesday decided that Palestine Action's co-founder Huda Ammori had several 'reasonably arguable' beliefs in her challenge over the group's ban that would be heard at a three-day hearing in November, but a bid to pause the ban temporarily was refused. The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.