When crying racism becomes dangerous
Perhaps the most serious accusation you can throw at anyone in our racially divided country is to accuse them of racism… because the automatic presumption of innocence is often turned on its head and the accused must prove they are not guilty.
In South Africa today, with its well-documented history of white racism – and don't argue about that, because apartheid was exactly that – it's understandable that the majority of accusations of racism are levelled against whites, or non-Africans.
There is even an often-touted belief that it is impossible for victims of racism to be racist themselves, which is an absurd construct.
When allegations of racism turn out to be wrong – incorrect at best or deliberately trumped-up at worst – then a stigma still remains and the victims often struggle to clear their names, even when found not guilty in formal proceedings.
Such seems to be the case with the head of Pretoria High School for Girls, Phillipa Erasmus, who was hung out to dry earlier this year by the Gauteng department of education over claims that white pupils were making racist comments on a supposed 'whites-only' WhatsApp group.
ALSO READ: Playing race card is red herring
After 12 white girls were suspended and a supposed investigation conducted by the department, the allegations of racism has turned out to be false.
Yet, as lawyer and activist Richard Wilkinson correctly points out, the department seems to want to get rid of Erasmus on any charges, now that the racism claims have imploded.
Now she has been found guilt of misconduct for, among other things, allowing her husband to help tend to the school gardens – for free.
This state of affairs is absurd.
Crying racism when there is none – like crying wolf – hurts those who are its real victims… and can encourage more racism in future.
ALSO READ: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven
Let's not ignore that reality.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Ethekwini municipal official shot dead returning home in KZN
Gunmen fatally shot a 51-year-old Ethekwini municipal official on Thursday evening, 3 July 2025, while he was driving home to Mhlasini, KwaZulu-Natal. Gunmen ambushed the victim, a Deputy Superintendent in the Department of Roads and Stormwater, in Redcliffe. The Reaction Unit South Africa (RUSA) Operations Centre received multiple calls for assistance at approximately 18:51, reporting a shooting at the intersection of Hazelmere Drive and Quarry Road. RUSA officers and paramedics rushed to the scene and found the man slumped in his blue Hyundai i10. He had been shot several times and died before first responders arrived. The gunmen shot the victim's 32-year-old girlfriend in the buttocks and grazed his work colleague on the back while they were in the car. The three were on their way home when three men standing by the roadside suddenly opened fire. The passengers fled the vehicle as the attackers approached and kept shooting at the driver. The gunmen fled on foot in an unknown direction. Police recovered 13 spent 9mm cartridges from the scene. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Mbenenge tribunal: Use of emojis and their meaning take centre stage
JOHANNESBURG - Evidence leader in the judicial conduct tribunal investigating allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President, Selby Mbenenge, has asserted that it's incorrect to suggest that the top judge and high court secretary, Andiswa Mengo, always used emojis with the intention to convey the standardised meaning attached to them. Advocate Salome Scheepers began with her cross-examination of information communications technology (ICT) expert, Dr Vincent Mello, before the fact-finding body in Sandton, Johannesburg. Mello is the second witness to be called in defence of the senior judge in the misconduct probe against him after Mengo accused him of making unwanted sexual advances towards her between 2021 and 2022, mostly on the social media platform WhatsApp. However, Mbenenge said he understood Mengo's usage of the emoji with the monkey covering its eyes to be flirtatious. But Scheepers said the meaning attached to it in the Unicode data laboratory and Emojipedia is different. 'Ms Mengo informed me that she was going to be in East London and I asked her if we could be intimate. Her response was to quote a biblical verse, but at the same time attached two emojis depicting a monkey closing its eyes with its hands, which I understood to be flirtatious.' 'Nowhere in Unicode or in Emojipedia, the meaning flirtatious is attached to this emoji. Is that correct?' Replied Mello: 'Yes.'
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
Controversy unfolds in sexual harassment tribunal involving Judge President Selby Mbenenge
Unathi Sogoni, a stenographer at the Makhanda High Court and former friend of sexual harassment complainant Andiswa Mengo, was the third witness brought by Judge President Selby Mbenenge's counsel. Image: Supplied /Judicial Conduct Tribunal Controversy appeared to be the launching point before the third witness in the sexual harassment tribunal hearing against Judge President Selby Mbenenge continued on Friday. Unathi Sogoni, a stenographer at the Makhanda High Court and a former friend of complainant Andiswa Mengo, is the third witness brought by Mbenenge's counsel. Before she could start her testimony, advocate Griffiths Madonsela asked the permission of the Judicial Conduct Tribunal chairperson - retired judge Bernard Ngoepe - to deal with a matter separate from the merits of Mengo's case before the Tribunal. Ngoepe and the panel dealt with the issue related to an incident on June 2, where Mengo received death threats. Last month, Mengo received a handwritten note left at her desk at court on Friday, in which it was said, 'a bullet is waiting for you'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ngoepe shot down Mbenenge's counsel's attempt to lead evidence or introduce elements to the tribunal regarding the June incident. Mengo has levelled allegations of sexual harassment against Mbenenge, which include WhatsApp conversations and untoward face-to-face commentary and interactions. On Friday, arguing for the testimony of Sogoni to be heard, Madonsela submitted that the witness's evidence is relevant and he intended to lead her evidence in respect solely on the aspect of power relationships between judges and secretaries. He attributed the calling of Sogoni as a witness due to the previous witness, Lisa Vetten, 'being called very late in the day'. 'When all other witnesses had already testified, (then) her summary was only provided to us. We had no way of knowing that the issue of power relations would arise. Nowhere, any time before did the complainant testify… so we could not have put that version,' argued Madonsela. Prudently asked for clarity by the panel if power dynamics were the only issue that Sogoni would be led on, Madonsela responded in the affirmative. Evidence leader Salome Scheepers, however, objected to this, saying that the paragraphs Madonsela said he intended to canvass evidence on are irrelevant. 'I am of the view that it is not relevant. These lines here are completely different from what the case is before us. It's not placed before us here that the complainant is a seducer. Nothing like that was ever led or put to the complainant,' said Scheepers. In part echoing the objection, advocate Nasreen Rajab-Budlender for Mengo, said the over-simplification of Vetten's evidence was 'concerning'. 'Vetten is an expert on gender. Sogoni is not an expert. She is not an expert on gender, she is not an expert on power imbalance. This panel does not need to know about power dynamics from someone who we know has a fractious relationship with the complainant. 'I submit that you have already heard evidence that deals with power imbalance, and you dealt with that. You heard that the respondent's concern was to place evidence before this tribunal that concerned the relationships between judges and secretaries. You already had three witnesses come and tell you about that, who are actually secretaries. Sogoni is not a secretary; she is a stenographer,' said Rajab-Budlender. She further argued that if Mengo were to be recalled, as was suggested, Rajab-Budlender said she held the opinion that there were many times she felt that Mengo should be recalled. 'There were many things that were not put to the complainant, and if this complainant is recalled, then I submit that she must be asked about all of those things and she must be given an opportunity to contradict that,' said Rajab-Budlender.
