Families of murdered MPs reject Kneecap's ‘half an apology'
Brendan Cox, whose wife Jo Cox was murdered in 2016, said Kneecap's statement of regret on Monday was 'only half an apology' and lacked genuine reflection.
'It's fine to say that you're sorry for it, but the way that they have actually spoken about it is to suggest that it's a conspiracy, that they have been targeted unfairly and for me that then doesn't come across as, unfortunately, particularly genuine,' he told BBC Radio Ulster.
'The apology that they've given I don't think has grappled enough with the gravity of what they said,' he added.
'It wasn't a throwaway remark – it was a very clear incitement to violence.'
Mr Cox said he would be open to meeting the band 'if that was part of a genuine journey' to reject political violence.
But he warned that their response felt more about 'saving their bookings or their tour' than true remorse.
Kneecap denied inciting violence, calling the clip 'deliberately taken out of context', but did say: 'To the Amess and Cox families, we send our heartfelt apologies.'
Katie Amess, daughter of Conservative MP Sir David Amess – killed in 2021 – called the group's comments 'absolutely devastating'.
'To hear people lauding it – and hoping it will be done again is just absolutely shattering,' she told GB News.
'You're speaking to thousands of people that are young, that are impressionable.
'It's not art – it is verbatim telling people to go on and commit a murder.'
She added: 'It's not a game. It's not funny. This is serious.
'They need to apologise and think before they speak about the actions that could come from these horrible words.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
2 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Irish leaders welcome clarity on EU-US trade deal and pharma tariffs cap of 15%
Taoiseach Micheal Martin said the trade agreement represented a 'significant win' for the EU while Tanaiste Simon Harris said it offered an 'important shield' for Irish exporters. The EU struck a trade deal with the US on July 27, five days before Mr Trump said a 30% tariff would kick in for the bloc. The deal sees 15% tariffs on most EU goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US. There are 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircrafts and aircraft parts, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. In the aftermath of the deal, it was not clear whether 15% would remain the rate for the pharma sector or be increased. The EU-US statement published on Thursday said that as of September 1, the US will apply a maximum tariff rate of 15% on generic pharmaceuticals, their ingredients and chemical precursors. 'The United States intends to promptly ensure that the tariff rate, comprised of the MFN (Most Favored Nation) tariff and the tariff imposed pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, applied to originating goods of the European Union subject to Section 232 actions on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber does not exceed 15%.' Mr Harris, Ireland's deputy premier and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, welcomed the assurances for the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors. 'We welcome clarity that the deal includes a single, all-inclusive 15% tariff on EU goods,' Mr Harris said. 'We also now have assurance that this rate will extend to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. 'This provides an important shield to Irish exporters that could have been subject to much larger tariffs pending the outcomes of Section 232 US investigations into these sectors.' Mr Harris said this offered a 'first step' to a more 'comprehensive and formal agreement with the US in the future'. 'Our intention now is to see what other carve outs can be made in areas of interest for Irish exporters.' Irish premier Micheal Martin said the statement brought 'greater clarity and certainty' to what the EU-US agreement would mean in practice. 'This is especially important for enterprises that either import from or export to the US,' he said. 'Given the scale of the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors in Ireland, it is important that the Joint Statement confirms that 15% is a ceiling that will apply to EU exports in these areas in all circumstances, including when the current US Section 232 investigations are concluded. 'While I have been clear all along that I do not support tariffs, this is a significant win for the EU. 'Given the significance of the airline sector to Ireland, a specific carve-out for aircraft and aircraft parts is also welcome. 'There are areas where further work remains to be done, including a potential carve-out for med-tech products and spirits. 'I hope this will be advanced as quickly as possible. We will continue to advocate for these sectors given their significant importance to our domestic economy.' Paul Sweetman, chief executive of the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland, welcomed the joint statement as providing 'greater clarity to business on the future of the transatlantic trading partnership, worth over four billion dollars daily'. 'The framework brings more certainty and allows for further work to grow our mutually beneficial economic relationship,' he said. 'In supporting the US-Ireland and US-EU trading relationships into the future, we must also focus on enhancing competitiveness. 'Now is the time to make smart policy and investment decisions to deliver critical infrastructure projects, meet future skills needs, bolster our RD&I ecosystem, and secure Ireland's position as a digital regulatory hub. 'AmCham will continue to work closely with the Irish Government, the US administration and our EU and US partners in growing investment on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Powys County Times
2 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Irish leaders welcome clarity on EU-US trade deal and pharma tariffs cap of 15%
Ireland's premier and deputy premier have welcomed clarity on the EU-US trade deal, which sees the US commit to capping tariffs on pharma goods at 15%. Taoiseach Micheal Martin said the trade agreement represented a 'significant win' for the EU while Tanaiste Simon Harris said it offered an 'important shield' for Irish exporters. The EU struck a trade deal with the US on July 27, five days before Mr Trump said a 30% tariff would kick in for the bloc. The deal sees 15% tariffs on most EU goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US. There are 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircrafts and aircraft parts, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. In the aftermath of the deal, it was not clear whether 15% would remain the rate for the pharma sector or be increased. The EU-US statement published on Thursday said that as of September 1, the US will apply a maximum tariff rate of 15% on generic pharmaceuticals, their ingredients and chemical precursors. 'The United States intends to promptly ensure that the tariff rate, comprised of the MFN (Most Favored Nation) tariff and the tariff imposed pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, applied to originating goods of the European Union subject to Section 232 actions on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber does not exceed 15%.' Mr Harris, Ireland's deputy premier and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, welcomed the assurances for the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors. 'We welcome clarity that the deal includes a single, all-inclusive 15% tariff on EU goods,' Mr Harris said. 'We also now have assurance that this rate will extend to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. 'This provides an important shield to Irish exporters that could have been subject to much larger tariffs pending the outcomes of Section 232 US investigations into these sectors.' Mr Harris said this offered a 'first step' to a more 'comprehensive and formal agreement with the US in the future'. 'Our intention now is to see what other carve outs can be made in areas of interest for Irish exporters.' Irish premier Micheal Martin said the statement brought 'greater clarity and certainty' to what the EU-US agreement would mean in practice. 'This is especially important for enterprises that either import from or export to the US,' he said. 'Given the scale of the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors in Ireland, it is important that the Joint Statement confirms that 15% is a ceiling that will apply to EU exports in these areas in all circumstances, including when the current US Section 232 investigations are concluded. 'While I have been clear all along that I do not support tariffs, this is a significant win for the EU. 'Given the significance of the airline sector to Ireland, a specific carve-out for aircraft and aircraft parts is also welcome. 'There are areas where further work remains to be done, including a potential carve-out for med-tech products and spirits. 'I hope this will be advanced as quickly as possible. We will continue to advocate for these sectors given their significant importance to our domestic economy.' Paul Sweetman, chief executive of the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland, welcomed the joint statement as providing 'greater clarity to business on the future of the transatlantic trading partnership, worth over four billion dollars daily'. 'The framework brings more certainty and allows for further work to grow our mutually beneficial economic relationship,' he said. 'In supporting the US-Ireland and US-EU trading relationships into the future, we must also focus on enhancing competitiveness. 'Now is the time to make smart policy and investment decisions to deliver critical infrastructure projects, meet future skills needs, bolster our RD&I ecosystem, and secure Ireland's position as a digital regulatory hub. 'AmCham will continue to work closely with the Irish Government, the US administration and our EU and US partners in growing investment on both sides of the Atlantic.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Conservative asylum policy: the moderate Tory tradition faces extinction
The traditional test of effectiveness in a leader of the opposition is whether the holder of that office looks like a prime minister in waiting. It is famously hard to achieve when fronting a party that was recently expelled from office. Kemi Badenoch is struggling with that challenge in most areas, but especially with regard to immigration and asylum. Mrs Badenoch has warned that 'Britain is being mugged' by foreigners who treat the country as 'the world's softest touch'. She has urged Conservative-run local authorities to follow the example of Epping council, which this week was granted an injunction by the high court to prevent asylum seekers being housed in hotels. On that point she had already been upstaged by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, who joined protests at the hotel in question, mingling in a crowd alongside notorious far-right activists. Rival parties have been quick to point out that the Conservatives' appalling record of managing the asylum system in general, and the accommodation question in particular, disqualifies them from commenting on the subject. Nigel Farage has called Mr Jenrick a 'fraud' on the grounds that he was the responsible minister in September 2023, when the number of asylum claimants housed in hotels peaked at 56,042. Official figures released on Thursday show that that number was down to 32,059 at the end of June this year – lower than in March but higher than a year ago. Labour insists that it is bringing the situation under control, noting that the backlog of asylum cases is falling. Over time, that should ease pressure for temporary accommodation. But the government struggles to make a case for patience and incremental change when the terms of debate are framed by opportunists and demagogues waging a campaign of social division. There is little space for a rational conversation about fair asylum processes when prominent politicians depict all claimants as criminals and cast the entire system as a conspiracy to transfer public resources from native-born Britons to undeserving foreign interlopers. Those paranoid, xenophobic assumptions are not new, but their capture of mainstream politics has accelerated recently. In part, that expresses the cowardice of a Labour government that projects more anxiety about Britain somehow becoming an 'island of strangers' than it does for the systemic corrosion of refugee rights. But it is also a symptom of moral collapse in a Conservative party that finds its function as the official opposition eclipsed by Reform UK, with Mr Farage playing the role of prime minister in waiting. Mrs Badenoch looks intellectually and strategically paralysed by her predicament. She claims not to make common cause with Reform while refusing to articulate any ideological distinction between the two parties. Mr Jenrick openly manoeuvres to replace her as leader and, in the process, erases any remaining distinction between traditional Conservatism and radical anti-immigrant nationalism. A party that was once a broad church is folding itself up into a narrow hardline sect. Mr Jenrick's defeat in last year's leadership contest suggests that there is – or was then – a substantial portion of the party that mistrusts his agenda. Some MPs may even be appalled by his antics. If so, the time to speak up is long overdue. Otherwise their continued silence can be taken as acquiescence in the total extinction of moderate Conservatism as a force in British politics.
