Bar Council stands by foreign law firm policy amid SILF resistance
The move comes amid criticism from the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF), which the BCI has accused of monopolising access to international legal work and misrepresenting the broader interests of the Indian legal community.
The expert panel, chaired by eminent corporate lawyer Cyril Shroff, includes senior legal figures such as Ajay Bahl, Suhail Nathani, Sandip Bhagat, Mahesh Agarwal, and Amit Kapur. It has been tasked with collecting and incorporating stakeholder suggestions while reaffirming the BCI's commitment to fairness, accountability, and legal sovereignty.
The Bar Council has invited written submissions from law firms, professionals, and the public within 15 days. The points of reference for the consultation are available on the official BCI website, according to the BCI statement issued on Thursday...
The BCI's response targets what it describes as SILF's 'obstructionist stance,' asserting that the group represents only a small clique of large, established firms and not the majority of India's 90-95% small and mid-sized practices. These emerging firms, the BCI argues, have long been excluded from cross-border legal opportunities due to the gatekeeping and foreign affiliations maintained by SILF's dominant members.
The Bar Council emphasised that its amended 2025 Regulations are designed to democratise access to global legal practice, particularly for young lawyers and underrepresented law firms seeking international exposure.
Contrary to SILF's claims, BCI clarified that foreign law firms are not permitted to practice Indian law, appear before courts or tribunals, or handle litigation-related matters.
The 2025 Regulations, as clarified by the BCI, impose strict boundaries on foreign participation:
No practice of Indian law in any form is allowed. No appearances in Indian courts, tribunals, or quasi-judicial authorities (Rule 8(2)(b)). Permitted activities are confined to advisory roles involving foreign law, public/private international law, or international arbitration. Prohibited activities include conveyancing, title verification, and legal drafting related to Indian proceedings (Rule 8(2)(c)). International arbitration participation is allowed only where disputes involve foreign law or non-Indian parties (Rule 8(2)(e)). All foreign firms must first obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Government of India (Rule 4(a)).
In a bid to make policymaking more inclusive, BCI has also announced a National Conference of Indian Law Firms to be held in Mumbai in September 2025. The event will provide a platform for nationwide participation, particularly from regional and smaller firms traditionally excluded from SILF's centralised control.
Simultaneously, the BCI is working to create a central registry of law firms and their lawyers, which will eventually enable a democratically elected national body to represent India's legal profession--a contrast to SILF, which the BCI notes has not held internal elections for decades.
The BCI alleged that SILF's core motivation stems from fear of losing its exclusive foreign work pipeline. 'Many of these same firms already maintain foreign offices or unofficial tie-ups with foreign law firms,' said the Council. 'Their opposition is not to foreign entry per se, but to the possibility that foreign clients may choose to engage with newer and smaller Indian firms instead.'
BCI has firmly rejected claims that the amended rules compromise India's legal independence. 'The Regulations explicitly protect Indian legal sovereignty. No foreign lawyer or firm will be allowed to interpret, argue, or practice Indian law,' the statement reads.
Any attempt to circumvent the provisions by Indian or foreign entities will attract regulatory action, including monetary penalties, suspension of registration, disqualification, and possible disciplinary or criminal proceedings, the BCI stated in the statement.
The BCI has reiterated that the Regulations are legally valid, currently in force, and not under abeyance or judicial challenge. They are designed to uplift the entire legal profession, especially young, talented advocates who seek a global presence.
While the Council expressed its openness to genuine concerns, it condemned misinformation campaigns and fear-mongering. 'The BCI is committed to reform--not for the few, but for the many,' it stated. 'The future of Indian law must be inclusive, competitive, and global.' (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Khalistani terrorist Pannun's endorsement of Trump's tariffs not pro-Punjab but betrayal: Report
Pro-Khalistani terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's support for US President Donald Trump's increased tariffs on Indian exports and even suggesting a 500 per cent hike aligns with economic harm to the Sikh community and implies that his anti-India theatrics take precedence over Sikh well-being, a report said. "For a man who claims to champion Sikh rights, backing a policy that directly threatens the lifeblood of Punjab's hardworking Sikh farmers and dairy workers is nothing short of bewildering. Or worse: hypocritical," the Khalsa Vox report stated. His support for Trump's tariffs is "not pro-Sikh, pro-Punjab" but a betrayal, it added. Punjab's economy relies mainly on agriculture and dairy. Its products, including basmati rice, textiles and processed foods, form an important chunk of India's exports to the US. The tariffs imposed by Trump would make these products expensive in the US markets. Furthermore, if India opens its agricultural markets due to tariffs, the American dairy and farm giants will enter Indian markets. Supported by heavy subsidies, American dairy and farm giants can undercut small-scale Sikh farmers of Punjab and cooperatives like Amul, according to the report. This does not have an economic impact only, but it also poses a threat to cultural traditions that link Sikh identity to the land and farming. The report said: "Consider the dairy sector, the quiet backbone of Punjab. Generations of Sikh families rely on it for sustenance and stability. If US dairy giants take over, what happens to these small farmers? The promise of Sikh self-reliance, often invoked by Pannun himself, collapses under the weight of cheap imports." Exports predict a 40-50 per cent reduction in Indian exports to the US if tariffs increase, and the Sikh community will be impacted the most. Khalsa Vox, in the report, stated: "Pannun's position exposes a troubling contradiction. His rhetoric drips with anti-India fervour, but his policy stance aligns squarely with economic harm to Sikhs themselves. By cheering on a trade war that undermines Punjab's farmers, he prioritises political vendettas over community upliftment. If his loyalty truly lies with Punjab, why endorse policies that jeopardise Sikh livelihoods? The answer seems plain: for Pannun, anti-India theatrics take precedence over Sikh well-being." Punjab's future lies in policies that protect farmers, bolster dairy cooperatives, and ensure fair trade and not in political grandstanding that sacrifices livelihoods for personal agendas, it said. "Pannun's endorsement of Trump's tariffs is not pro-Sikh. It is not pro-Punjab. It is, at its core, a betrayal."
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bihar SIR: Deliberate attempt being made to spread misinformation, says Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar
The Election Commission of India (ECI) held a press conference to address issues over the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and the controversy surrounding it. Addressing the media, Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar said, 'Under the Indian Constitution every Indian citizen who has reached the age of 18 years should vote.' Rahul Gandhi 'Vote Adhikaar Yatra': Follow LIVE updates from Bihar on August 17, 2025 'For ECI neither anyone is Opposition nor ruling party. There is no discrimination between parties, all are the same,' the CEC said. Regarding the involvement of political parties in the SIR, he said, 'For the last 2 decades, all political parties have been demanding corrections in the Electoral Rolls. And to address this, the ECI has begun the Special Intensive Revision of Voter Rolls.' 'To remove errors in the Draft List all voters and political parties are contributing,' he added. Mr. Kumar said that there were several claims and objections given, and there is a period to file these claims and objections. '28370 claims and objections have been given. 15 days are left for filing objections and claims. The ECI asks all political parties, BLAs to submit claims and objections in these 15 days,' he said. 'On the ground level, all BLOs, BLAs and voters are working together, and they are also giving testimonials. But these testimonials are either not reaching the political parties, or a deliberate attempt is being made to spread misinformation,' the CEC said. 'When all voters in Bihar are standing with ECI, then no aspersions can be cast on the poll body or voters,' he added. Regarding the demand for machine-readable voter rolls, Mr. Kumar said, 'The Supreme Court in 2019 said that voter privacy can be breached. The ECI is not scared of false accusations. The ECI has been and will stand with voters of all communitues.'
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bridging the talent gap: Why industry and academia must work hand in hand
Written by Dr Sanjiv Gupta The buzzword in most technical institutes is 'jobs are not available', while in corporate offices it is 'skilled staff is not available.' Indian industry faces a major challenge: the availability of talent to meet emerging requirements. Talent fuels growth. It drives innovation and keeps companies alive. A recent study across the HEI sector (Higher Educational Institutes) reconfirmed that the gap between availability and requirement persists across parameters—academic, social, human and soft skills. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasised the need to revise teaching pedagogy towards experiential learning, which can be imparted through practical laboratory work and field projects. With my unique experience of thirty-seven years in the corporate sector and eight years in academics, I have noticed a common refrain among teachers: the curriculum must change to enhance collaborative student participation. Yet, when data was collected through a questionnaire, it revealed that over 70% of teachers had never visited an industry except for routine student trips. Faculty with teaching experience ranging from two to thirty years agreed that before reworking pedagogy, teachers themselves need firsthand exposure to the industrial world. The key question is: does experiential learning apply only to students, or should it extend to teachers as well? While it is widely asserted that students need hands-on training before employment, little thought has gone into training teachers to stay updated on innovations and new technology. If a faculty member learns something new, hundreds of students benefit. Basic concepts illustrated through real-life examples are easier to grasp. Students retain classroom learning better when they encounter its challenges in the real world. A survey under the Centre's flagship PARAKH programme (Performance Assessment, Review and Analysis of Knowledge for Holistic Development) revealed that while schools offer skill-based courses from Grade 9 onwards, very few students opt for them. Similarly, many teachers resist enrolling in professional training programmes. This inertia may prompt the government to design a structured, ongoing professional development model. One solution is to introduce a clause in industry-academia Memorandums of Understanding mandating refresher training for faculty in industry for at least a week annually. Another is to ensure regular interaction between faculty and corporate leaders on the latest technologies. Industry, in turn, must open its doors and mentor faculty, helping them understand technological trends. India's economy is racing toward the $5 trillion mark, and the manufacturing sector alone must achieve 15% annual growth. The emerging Industry 4.0 ecosystem is defined by automation, digitisation and data-driven decision-making. Add to this the rapidly shifting geopolitical and macroeconomic environment, and the need for strong industry-academia partnerships becomes urgent. AI, machine learning, blockchain, augmented reality, and digital twins are already part of everyday life. The future will demand quick redefinition of roles, responsibilities, expectations and deliverables. Employers today seek skills beyond technical expertise: leadership, teamwork, ethical decision-making, creativity, communication, ownership, cognitive agility and empathy. But the big question remains—how do we inculcate and measure these skills? While some, like ethical decision-making and communication, can be taught in classrooms, others—like creativity and ownership—cannot be boxed into a textbook. An equally large challenge lies in evaluating these skills. India's diverse markets and sectors make it difficult to design a uniform framework. Here, Bloom's Taxonomy offers guidance, helping educators set learning objectives and assess outcomes. Such an approach could also provide recruiters with reliable benchmarks when evaluating candidates. To bridge the talent gap, four immediate measures are critical: first, the curriculum must be revised annually to incorporate emerging technologies, with students encouraged to participate in capstone projects and hackathons; second, faculty must undergo continuous professional development, with progress linked to their annual reports; third, a clear methodology is needed to inculcate and evaluate soft skills among students; and fourth, classrooms must become more inclusive, reflecting both industry realities and diverse learner profiles. The future hinges on academia and industry working in trust and alignment, with institutional success measured not just by research papers but by the entrepreneurs it nurtures. (The writer is Professor of Practice J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology, Faridabad)
