
Signs You're Dressing Like an American Tourist Abroad
If you've ever seen the iconic Modern Family clip where Mitchell is increasingly bothered that people in France know he's American just by looking at him — that is, until he purchases an outfit from a local store and fits in with the locals — you'll understand the plight of American tourists. Sometimes, even with the right language skills or a demure presence, our clothes alone give us away.
This is because Americans have a specific way of dressing, stylists say, whether they're visiting Europe, Asia or another locale. And while fashion is different in every city and every country (and among different groups in said place), Americans still manage to stick out no matter where they are.
Below, stylists from around the world share the styles that make Americans stand out from locals and how to dress like an international traveler instead.
'People in America really like the idea of dressing comfortably,' said Brooke Crum, a fashion stylist who also organizes bespoke shopping tours for visitors in Japan. This often results in Americans wearing athletic wear while out and about on vacation, Crum said.
When thinking of workout clothes, Crum said one item comes to mind first. 'What's one thing not to wear? Leggings, full stop,' Crum stated.
'People wouldn't stare, it's not like 'Oh, this is an American person,' but I think the way that some people style leggings is more of wearing it for comfort. So it's a racerback tank with just long leggings, and in Japan ... if you're going to the yoga studio, wear the yoga pants. If you're going to run, wear the tracksuit,' said Crum. 'Clothes have their purpose and athletic wear is for athletics,' she stated.
When people in Japan do wear workout clothes outside of an exercise situation, they style them intentionally, she said.
'It's more of an elevated, casual approach. So if you're going to wear a jersey, put a blazer over it, Crum said — or, you could style a track jacket with a pair of jeans.
Crum said it's also more common for people in Japan to wear muted, monochromatic athletic wear instead of bright separates, which makes for a more put-together look.
According to Anne-Victoire Lefèvre, a fashion consultant based in Paris, it's also common to see visiting Americans in baseball caps or carrying backpacks, two things that also fall into the athletic wear category.
Speaking of dressing casual, Nathalie Oliver, a private stylist at Le Bon Marché department store in Paris, said that while Americans are often too casual during the day (in athletic wear and the like), they are too dressy come evening.
For women, being too dressy could mean wearing a special-occasion dress and a pair of heels or going all out in a fancy skirt, blouse and wedges.
'Men are probably the worst dressed Americans ... from what I'm seeing,' Oliver said.
'I think that most of them have the same outfit, which is a polo shirt, a pair of chino [pants] and a pair of sneakers,' she said, adding that a navy blazer, chino pants and white shirt is another common combination for guys.
To look Parisian, Oliver suggests that travelers aim for less sophisticated outfits in the evenings and try not to be too Ivy League (for example, by wearing the navy blazer combination).
For women, try a silky dress with a bulky jacket draped over your shoulders (brownie points if it's a stylish men's jacket). Or, try a pair of denim pants, high heels and a blouse. For men, linen shirts, cotton pants and a pair of low loafers are a go-to for Parisian locals.
Aim for clothing in neutral colors during the summer months, like off-white, beige and camel, added Oliver.
Going all out applies to other aspects of Americans' presentation as well. American women are much more likely to have on a full face of makeup, unlike Parisian women, especially in the summer, Oliver stated.
'I always notice that American ladies, they are real nicely made up, doing the makeup with the foundation, it's very sophisticated, and most of ladies in Paris ... they're not really like this,' said Oliver.
What's more, Americans often have their hair and nails done perfectly, too, 'which is fantastic to me, because I know that I have some American friends and they're waking up at 5 to be perfect at 7 to leave the house and go to work ... it's not our way of life, to be honest,' Oliver noted.
'I think we're more paying attention to accessories ... I would say outfit is important, but shoes and accessories are, for French ladies, the thing, the best part of the outfit,' she said.
Lefèvre pointed out that Americans' more comfortable outfits often include T-shirts or sweaters with logos, or carrying a tote bag with the logo and name of a museum you recently visited.
'I think we avoid logos and choose timeless pieces that you can mix with your whole wardrobe,' Lefèvre stated.
If you don't want to be instantly labeled an American tourist, avoid logo-ridden clothing or bags and 'wear black, or just a classic white shirt with a top under and jeans,' she said, 'And comfy ballerina [shoes] for women.'
This creates a more chic look, Lefèvre noted.
Dressing Too Beachy
'I'm not saying that all Americans are like this or dress like that, but the general vibe we get is a mix between beach and activewear,' explained Laura Carrillo, a stylist and fashion designer based in Mexico City.
'I think that's because most people think Mexico is just a country of beaches and towns, but our cities thrive with metropolitan energy and culture,' she said.
So, just because you're traveling to a country that's known for its beaches doesn't mean you should only pack beachwear — especially if you're going somewhere that isn't close to the beach, like Mexico City.
'The culture of 'fashion' is relatively new to our country, but it's coming fast and hard,' Carrillo said, 'We have a longstanding heritage with artisans and we are quickly marrying them into something unique.'
When it comes to dressing like the locals in Mexico City, Carrillo said it's not that easy.
'It's a different culture and energy. We have to remember that Mexico isn't Condesa or Roma [fashionable neighborhoods in Mexico City]; it's hard to put your finger on exactly what a local would dress like,' she said.
Instead of trying to fit in, Carrillo said tourists should try to focus on not standing out too much as a visitor.
'A lot of [Americans] have style and carry themselves as they would at home,' Carrillo said. She advised visitors to 'dress how you would at home and embrace Mexico as you would your own country.'
Don't be afraid to try out new styles and get inspiration from the world around you.
If you happen to be a fan of 'American' styles, that's OK, too. You can always blend those looks with other styles to create a unique look.
'I think you just have to play with fashion,' said Oliver. 'And if [you look] in the mirror, and you think you are beautiful ... go out like this.'
Fashion is subjective, meaning no one look is going to be a home run for everyone.
'I really think it's important that people stay true to their own style, whether it's casual or it's elegant, or it's polished,' stated Crum.
If you know something works on you and makes you feel confident, lean into it... and consider elevating it a little. 'Like, if wide-leg denim pants are great on you, wear those ... wear them in khaki, wear them in dress pants. Find different versions of them that accentuate your look or elevate your look,' Crum said.
It's also important to have a collection of basics that fit you well — like white shirts, black shirts, jeans and blazers — to pull from, Crum added. 'Then you can layer those really easy.'
You can even find fashion inspiration while traveling, whether you're out shopping at a vintage store or simply taking in the culture around you. 'Look at people in the street, be in a terrace, have a drink in different places and different areas,' Oliver suggested.
'[You] just have to sit there and look around, and you see a lot of style, a lot of people, and maybe it can help you to find the style you like,' Oliver said, adding that she also finds style inspiration this way.
But it's important that you source ideas and inspiration, not an exact look.
'I know that with my customers, every selection is different because there's a different body, different sizes, different eye, different occupation ... so, you don't do copy and paste — there's no point to do that,' Oliver said.
HuffPost.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers No Longer Understand the American Family
Imagine if our national economy, culture, and politics were rooted in the idea that the default American household is white and Christian. There would be no Spanish-language campaign ads and TV shows, no interracial families depicted in commercials, no fill-in-the-blank Heritage Day at ballparks. Workplaces would see no need to accommodate holiday schedules for Muslims or Jews. That was a good bet more than 50 years ago, when the country was 88 percent white and 90 percent Christian, and less than 5 percent of the population was foreign-born. Since then, politicians and business leaders have figured out they will lose out if they deny the existence of the new, far more diverse, face of America. They may be motivated more by votes and dollars than by principles, but they've broadened their pitches to reflect (at least in part) the modern American household. And yet, when it comes to the family structure itself, the system (public and private) is stuck in an earlier era, one which assumes a 'traditional' household made up of a married couple and their offspring. Lawmakers proudly brand themselves 'pro-family,' and vow to fight for 'working families.' There's Family Day at attractions and entertainment venues, and family discounts on everything from phone service to cars, retail and college tuition. The best value for consumables is the 'family-sized' version that will rot before a single person can finish it. Solo diners are shooed to the bar at restaurants, with tables reserved for couples or families. Single people subsidize family health insurance plans, pay higher tax rates for the same joint income of a married couple, and can't get Social Security death benefits awarded to a widowed spouse. Companies that brag about being 'family-friendly?' Ask a single person: That means they work nights and weekends. The fix has been in, for a long time, in favor of those who marry and have children. In times past, this was just a temporary irritant, since most people indeed ended up marrying (in their early 20s, back in 1970) and having a family. But that family prototype is no longer dominant—and all indications suggest we're not going back to the way things were. Why are policy-makers in denial about the country we have become? 'It's not that [leaders] don't understand that families have changed very much from what they used to be. It's that they don't want to confront the reasons why families have changed,' said Stephanie Coontz, author of five books on gender and marriage. It's not that people don't want to couple—most do, she added—but marriage is not necessary anymore, especially for women who no longer need a man for financial support and don't need to stay in an unhappy or abusive relationship. They want intimacy, but with equality, and 'women have the ability to say, if I don't get that, I'll hold out,' said Coontz, the director of research and public education for the Council on Contemporary Families and emeritus faculty of History and Family Studies at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington. There's a misguided longing, especially among conservatives, to return to a storied American family that never really existed, Coontz argues in her book The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. In reality, drug abuse, alcohol consumption, and sexually transmitted diseases were more prevalent in the 1950s, but economic conditions (in part because of government support for families) make the mid-20th century family look idyllic in retrospect, Coontz argues in the book. 'There's this ideology, it's really more of a worldview, that if you get married, you really will live happily ever after, and be healthier and morally superior' to unmarried people, said social scientist Bella DePaolo, author of Single at Heart: The Power, Freedom and Heart-Filling Joy of Single Life. But when it comes to how people actually behave and the choices they make, 'the place of marriage in our lives has been slipping,' she said. 'Fewer people are getting married—fewer people want to marry. That is threatening to people who want things to stay the same.' The statistics back her up: in 1970, 71 percent of households were made up of married couples; by 2022, that group became a minority, comprising just 47 percent of households. 'Non-family' households were an offbeat 19 percent of homes in 1970; the most recent Census Bureau statistics show that 36 percent of households now are 'non-family.' Married couples with children made up a solid plurality (40 percent) of 1970 homes. Now, such families comprise just 18 percent of households—strikingly, barely more than the category of women living alone, who make up 16 percent of American households, according to the Census Bureau. Even the current White House doesn't reflect the household ideal pushed by social conservatives. President Donald Trump is on his third marriage (with five kids from three wives); his wife Melania Trump is reportedly a part-time resident of the White House, and Trump hangs out with First Bro Elon Musk (who himself is reputed to have more than a dozen children from different mothers). There's been a steady trend towards later marriage, and even away from marriage entirely. The Pew Research Center, using data from the American Community Survey, points out that in 1970, 69 percent of Americans 18 and older were married, and 17 percent were never married. By 2010, just half of Americans over 18 were married, and a startling 31 percent had never been married. Those trends have caused agita among conservatives worried about the changing model (or the 'breaking down' of that model, as they characterize it) of the American family. Fiscal hawks rightfully worry, too, about demographic trends that indicate we will have an increasing number of old people drawing Social Security and Medicare, and not enough young people paying into the system. This is a legitimate concern; fertility rates in the United States reached an historic low in 2023. But the response to these phenomena has not been an examination of how public policy could be reoriented to the new reality of American households, but rather to try to force Americans back to an earlier, mythic demographic era. There's a deep, anti-social vein running through the strategies of those who'd force today's square-peg Americans back into the round hole of their nostalgic fantasies. There's the tactic of insulting or shaming unmarried women ('childless cat ladies,' as Vice President J.D. Vance called them). There's blaming feminism in general. 'We have this low birth rate in America … it just hit me right now because who's going to sleep with these ugly ass broke liberal women?' singer and Trump acolyte Kid Rock said on Fox News. Conservative essayist John Mac Ghlionn lays blame at the sparkly-booted feet of Taylor Swift, who—while being very successful and wealthy, he concedes in a column in Newsweek—is a terrible role model for young girls because 'at 34, Swift remains unmarried and childless.' Worse, the author screams in print, Swift has had a lot of famous boyfriends, and 'the glamorous portrayal of her romantic life can send rather objectionable messages.' The sneering message is clear: stop being so promiscuous or career-driven, and you'll attract a man who will give you what you want—marriage and children. Except that's not what women (necessarily) want. A 2024 Pew Research Center study found that just 45 percent of women 18-34 want to be parents someday. That's substantially less than the 57 percent of young men who feel that way. An earlier Pew study found that half of uncoupled men were looking for either a committed relationship or casual dating; 35 percent of single women said the same. And while women who were seeking relationships were more likely than men to say they wanted a committed union, instead of a casual arrangement, the survey results knock down the old trope of women being almost universally on the prowl for men who will offer them a ring and children. Bribing people to have children is another misguided approach, with the Trump administration mulling a laughably low 'baby bonus' of $5,000 to American women who have children. Yes, having kids is costly; the per-child cost can top $310,000, according to a Brookings Institution study. But it's not just a function of money. A growing percentage of adults under 50, in a 2024 Pew Research Center study, say they don't plan to have kids (47 percent are nixing the idea now, compared to 37 percent in 2018). The reason? 57 percent of those who aren't planning to have kids say they simply don't want to. 'I don't think you can solve what is ostensibly a cultural problem with financial incentives. That just doesn't work,' said Daniel Cox, director of the Survey Center on American Life at the American Enterprise Institute. 'I do think that the increasing costs of daily living, and the increase in housing costs, are all playing a role in (people) feeling more financially vulnerable and less secure,' he said. But structural issues—including women's fear of losing their autonomy or having their career advancement thwarted because of childcare demands—are leading to 'some real trepidation' towards marriage, he said. So, what is to be done? Instead of trying to make people want what they demonstrably don't want, government and business could instead adapt to the modern American household and the economy it has produced. There are about a thousand separate rights Americans acquire when they get married—everything from visitation rights at hospitals, to Social Security survivor benefits, to joint health insurance plans, said Gordon Morris, board chairman for the advocacy group Unmarried Equality. And that, he says, needs to change to reflect the fact that nearly half of U.S. adults are unmarried. Paying for Social Security and Medicare doesn't need to be fixed with a forced baby boom, either. One solution is to embrace immigrants, DePaolo said, since they (working legally) will contribute income and Social Security taxes. Another simpler fix, Morris said, is to remove the income cap for Social Security/Medicare contributions. 'It's a problem that's easy to solve, economically, Politically, it's very hard,' he acknowledged. But first and fundamentally, he argued, policymakers need to accept that the country is changing demographically—and that's not just about race or religion or national origin. Some of the most profound changes afoot in society revolve around the whens and whys Americans are getting married and having children. 'The problem is, there's an assumption that you're supposed to get married and you're supposed to have children. That assumption has got to change,' he said. The new reality, after all, has already arrived.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Barron Trump didn't marry Princess Leonor of Spain
Claim: In 2025, Barron Trump married Princess Leonor of Spain in a royal wedding held at a European palace. Rating: In May 2025, a rumor spread across social media claiming that Barron Trump, the youngest son of former U.S. President Donald Trump, had married Princess Leonor of Spain. The story was pushed by several YouTube videos, one of which was titled, "Barron Trump & Princess Leonor's Grand Royal Wedding at a Magnificent Palace," and reached over 146,000 views. The video's description read: Step into a world of elegance and history as we unveil Barron Trump & Princess Leonor's Grand Royal Wedding at a Magnificent Palace. Set in a timeless European palace, this royal ceremony captures the grace, tradition, and grandeur of old-world nobility. From the majestic processional to the heartfelt vows, every moment feels like a scene from a fairytale. Witness the union of American and Spanish heritage in a wedding unlike any other. Similar videos about the alleged wedding of Barron Trump and Princess Leonor appeared in early 2025, including titles such as "Barron Trump & Princess Leonor's Singing - Double Happiness | Royal Wedding at the Royal Palace," "Barron Trump and Princess Leonor's Royal Wedding at the Spanish Royal Palace," and "Barron Trump Marries Princess Leonor – A Royal Love Story Come True." Most of these videos featured sentimental music, portraying the pair singing romantic duets. Similar clips spread on other social media platforms, including TikTok and Facebook. However, none of these videos was based in reality. First, there were no credible news reports or official announcements from either the Spanish royal family or the Trump family confirming any such relationship or marriage between the two individuals. Princess Leonor, born in 2005 and currently heir to the Spanish throne, has been the subject of significant media attention, and any real engagement or marriage would have made news headlines. Additionally, the videos spreading the claim were explicitly labeled AI-generated, and many of the clips used in these videos displayed clear signs of artificial creation, including distorted facial features, unnatural skin textures, and inconsistent lighting or backgrounds. Therefore, we have rated this claim as false. The videos seemed to originate from the Lovely Trump Family YouTube channel (archived), which featured multiple videos with the same narrative (see screenshot below): (YouTube channel Lovely Trump Family) One YouTube video that featured a romantic song and allegedly showed scenes from Barron Trump's wedding reached over 1.8 million views as of this writing. It was captioned: Experience the magical royal wedding as Barron Trump and Princess Leonor of Spain perform a series of heartfelt songs at their grand wedding celebration. With their soulful voices, they sing beautiful ballads like "Our Forever Begins," "A Love Meant to Be," and "Promise of Forever." Each song is a tribute to true love, faith, and the journey of two hearts coming together. Set against the stunning backdrop of a royal palace and a luxurious setting, their emotional performance captures the essence of a fairytale romance. The enchanting lyrics, heartfelt melodies, and the radiant smiles of Barron and Princess Leonor create an unforgettable moment, making this royal wedding a truly magical event. Witness the joy, love, and celebration of two souls united in a grand and elegant ceremony. Like the other videos, it included an "AI Disclaimer" stating, "This video was created using AI technology for entertainment purposes. The voices, visuals, and performances of Barron Trump and Princess Leonor are generated using advanced AI software and do not represent real-life events." Despite this disclaimer, many users in the comments appeared to take the content at face value, praising the supposed couple and reacting as if the wedding had genuinely taken place. Additionally, a Google search for "Barron Trump Princess Leonor wedding" returned no relevant results beyond AI-generated content. ( In addition to disclaimers labeling the videos as AI-generated, the content itself contained numerous visual cues that it was artificially created. These included distorted facial features, unnatural skin textures, and lighting inconsistencies that are common artifacts of AI. For example, in one scene, a car's license plate appeared with jumbled, nonsensical characters that did not resemble any real-world format. In another scene purportedly showing a crowd at the alleged wedding, many of the attendees' faces were blurred, asymmetrical and unnaturally rendered. (YouTube channel Lovely Trump Family) The rumor appears to have originated purely from speculative posts on social media. One of the earliest and most widely shared examples came from an X user in October 2024, who wrote, "Barron Trump and the Princess of Spain Leonor are a match made in heaven. Same age, no previous relationships, good values, good looking and with a powerful family," reaching over 7 million views. The post was not based on any confirmed relationship, interaction or credible report involving the two individuals. Snopes has previously debunked several false claims involving Barron Trump, including a viral rumor that he was rejected by Harvard University and AI-generated videos that falsely portrayed him singing on America's Got Talent.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Love Island USA' Season 7: How to watch, release date, schedule and more
The new season of Love Island USA premieres this week, kicking off six weeks of steamy reality romance that you can stream from the comfort of your couch (with the AC blasting). Season 7 sees a new group of sexy singles jet off to the villa in Fiji, where they'll look to couple up and win hearts both on and off the island to compete for $100,000. Vanderpump Rules star Ariana Madix is returning as the host for Season 7 to help guide the audience through what is sure to be plenty of drama, and of course, some dramatically good looks. Ready to dive right in to one of the steamiest reality shows of the summer? Here's everything you need to know about Love Island USA, including where to stream, release schedule, cast members and more. Love Island USA drops this Tuesday, June 3, at 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT. The American edition of Love Island streams exclusively on Peacock. True to the franchise's form, new episodes of Love Island USA will premiere six days a week starting Tuesday, June 3, at 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT. New episodes will premiere on the platform every day of the week but Wednesdays during the Season 7 run. Ariana Madix will return as the host of Love Island USA for Season 7. The former Vanderpump Rules star took over for Modern Family's Sarah Hyland on Season 6 of the series. Jeremiah Brown, Chelley Bissainthe, Yulissa Escobar, Ace Green, Austin Shepard, Belle-A Walker, Taylor Williams, Olandria Carthen, Nicolas Vansteenberghe and Huda Mustafa make up the Season 7 Love Island USA cast. For Love Island USA, new episodes will drop six days a week on Peacock starting June 3. Last season had 36 episodes over a six-week period, and this season will likely follow a similar format — though with Love Island, you never really know how long the show will last until we're approaching the end. Love Island USA is a spinoff of the smash hit U.K. reality show. The main difference — beyond hosts, contestants and the amount of prize money the winning couple is awarded — is which accents you'd like to hear as contestants get their chat on around the bonfire.