Karnataka students in Iran, B-PAC team in Israel, seek to return amid tensions
According to the Non-Resident Indian (NRI) Forum Karnataka, Nadeem Hussain, one of the nine students, and his parents who reside in Bengaluru, contacted the forum expressing anxiety over the situation and seeking help to return immediately.
A statement from the forum noted that its vice chairperson, Aarti Krishna, has written to the Ministry of External Affairs urging quick intervention to bring back the students.
'We are in constant touch with the officials concerned and staff over the phone, and are personally monitoring the situation and taking action,' the statement read.
Waiting to fly out
Meanwhile, 18 members of the B-PAC team, who went on a study tour to Israel, have been forced to stay back in Tel-Aviv due to the shutdown of airports in Israel.
The team, whose tour was from June 6 to 14, was scheduled to return on the 14th. However, following the missile and drone strikes between both the countries, Israel closed down its airports and moved fleets of their major airlines out of the country.
'Our return has been delayed due to the airports closing down. But we all are taken care of by the Israel Consulate and the Indian Embassy here,' said Matilda D'Souza, Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee member and part of the B-PAC team, speaking to The Hindu from Tel Aviv.
According to her, the group includes members of political parties including Congress, BJP, JDS and AAP, apart from a few with no political associations. The group was visiting as part of the B.PAC Civic Leadership Incubator Programme.
'We have been provided with good accommodation and food. Hopefully we will be able to fly out soon,' Ms. D'Souza said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Manipur Governor Ajay Bhalla gets additional charge of Nagaland Governor
Guwahati: Following the death of Nagaland Governor La. Ganesan, President Droupadi Murmu has appointed Manipur Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla to discharge the functions of the Governor of Nagaland . Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency A Rashtrapati Bhavan Press Communique mentioned that consequent upon the demise of La. Ganesan , Governor of Nagaland, the President of India has appointed Bhalla, Governor of Manipur, to discharge the functions of the Governor of Nagaland, in addition to his own duties. Bhalla, who was former Home Secretary, took the oath of office as the Governor of Manipur on January 3 this year (2025). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Manipur has been under President's Rule since February 13, four days after the resignation of N. Biren Singh from the Chief Minister's post. La. Ganesan died in Chennai on Friday evening at the age of 80. Live Events
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nagaland government declares seven-day state mourning for Governor La Ganesan
Guwahati: The Nagaland government has declared seven days of state mourning from Saturday as a mark of respect to state Governor La Ganesan, who died in a hospital in Chennai. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency A notification of Chief Secretary, Sentiyanger Imchen, said on Saturday that as a mark of respect to the departed La Ganesan, the Nagaland government has declared seven days of state mourning from August 16 to 22. During this period, the National Flag would be flown at half-mast on all buildings where it is regularly flown. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Container Houses Indonesia (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo Nagaland Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio deeply condoled the death of Governor La. Ganesan. In a condolence message, the Chief Minister said that he worked tirelessly to strengthen the bonds of unity and promote development in Nagaland. "Despite holding the highest office in the state, he remained simple, humble, and deeply connected to the grassroots. His modest nature endeared him to the people and will continue to inspire generations. In my time of working with him, I came to know him as a man of integrity, principle, great wisdom, and moral strength, steadfast in his commitment to upholding the values of the Constitution. His life was a testament to selfless service, calm leadership, and an enduring devotion to the ideals of justice and unity," CM Rio said. Live Events The Chief Minister said that the void left by his passing will be deeply felt, but we take comfort in the legacy of service, courage, and leadership he leaves behind. His contributions to the state and the Nation would be remembered with respect and gratitude, he said. La. Ganesan was appointed as the Governor of Manipur, and he served the gubernatorial post of the state from August 27, 2021, to February 19, 2023. He was given an additional charge as Governor of West Bengal from July 18, 2022, to November 17, Ganesan was appointed as the Governor of Nagaland and took the oath on February 20, 2023.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Déjà vu in Delhi! India knows the sting of tariffs
US President Donald Trump's decision to impose punishing tariffs on India might seem unprecedented — until you flip the calendar back 36 years. In 1989, Washington tried to pry open the Indian economy by threatening tariffs, leading to a 12-month bitter stand-off between the two nations. Eventually the US backed down, but the conflict left a scar on the bilateral relationship. A look back at the Super 301 episode can help us better understand the dynamics at play today. In the late 1980s, the US was engaged in an intense trade war with Japan, its primary economic rival at the time. Washington developed an arsenal of diplomatic and economic weapons for its war including Super 301, a legal mechanism upgraded in 1988. It authorised the US President to identify countries with 'unfair' trade practices and punish them with retaliatory tariffs. Once the statute came into force, President George HW Bush did not limit its use to Japan. His administration sought to address America's rising trade deficit by using the threat of Super 301 to strong-arm several countries, including American allies like Europe, South Korea and Taiwan. Parallels with the current administration are evident. In his first term, Trump used tariffs to battle China; now he uses them on friends and foes alike. Once Washington develops a policy tool to coerce one country, it becomes all too tempting to use that tool indiscriminately and sometimes unthinkingly. It is an important facet of US hegemony, regardless of who occupies the White House. Many countries tried to avoid Super 301 by hastily cutting deals with Washington to open their markets or voluntarily restricting their exports. In June 1989, the Bush administration declared that it would target three countries — Japan, Brazil and India. New Delhi was taken by complete surprise. Its relations with Washington had been improving in the previous few years. Its trade surplus with the US was relatively paltry. Washington's two central demands, that India allow American investments and foreign insurance companies, seemed arbitrary. Unlike Japan and Brazil, India refused to even enter into negotiations with the US. Then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi said he wouldn't let the US dictate how to run the country. American heavy-handedness sparked intense outrage in the Parliament, further tying the govt's hands politically. At the same time, the American threat of tariffs posed serious risks for the Indian economy. US share in India's exports at the time was about one-fifth, the same as it is today. India was much less dependent on foreign trade in 1989 than it is today, but it was also a much smaller and more vulnerable economy. India failed to enlist world opinion to its side. Western countries, including even Japan, agreed with Washington that India was too restrictive of foreign investments. Today, Indian diplomats looking for international solidarity against US tariff assault may discover a similar situation. Many countries may deplore Trump's ham-fisted tactics, while endorsing his goals of lowering Indian protectionism and weaning it away from Russian oil. PM VP Singh, elected in December 1989, tried to placate Washington through a tightrope act. While India continued to refuse negotiations on the two demands under Super 301, it offered concessions on other economic fronts. Americans were not satisfied with Indian offerings. In April 1990, Japan and Brazil were dropped from the Super 301 list, leaving India as the sole target. Washington issued a two-month ultimatum to New Delhi. American 'bullying' was loudly condemned by Indian media and politicians. In the end, the showdown never arrived. At the expiration of the ultimatum deadline, the Bush administration determined that following through with its threats was not worth it. It declared that while India was an 'unfair trader', it was not in American interest to take retaliatory actions. The Super 301 process against India was discontinued. The Bush administration backed down without much loss of face because Washington's trade campaign was global and India was only a small piece of it. Same remains true today. Although the tariffs are a major issue for New Delhi, they are just one battle among dozens that Trump is fighting on multiple fronts. The Indo-US relationship quickly bounced back, buoyed by alignment of certain economic and geopolitical interests. However, the Super 301 episode left a bad taste in the Indian mouth. It was yet another reminder that American power can unexpectedly become capricious and overbearing. In the last few years, many commentators have expressed befuddlement at why New Delhi resists moving closer to Washington despite its persistent conflict with Beijing. Its reticence partly stems from its fear that greater dependence on the US will leave it more vulnerable to Washington's volatile high-handedness that manifests from time to time. Trump's tariff assault has again affirmed the wisdom behind India's caution. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
