Microsoft in trouble for using copyrighted books to train AI
Authors, including Kai Bird, Jia Tolentino and Daniel Okrent, accuse Microsoft of copyright infringement, arguing that the company's AI model is trained using stolen intellectual property.
According to the complaint, the Megatron model learned the syntax, style and themes of the work by these authors. Also, the AI model is capable of mimicking authors' styles and voices.
The authors are seeking statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work and a court order to stop Microsoft from using their material in the future.
The lawsuit also points out that Microsoft's use of the 'Books3' dataset is a collection of nearly 200,000 pirated books. It was a deliberate move to bypass licensing fees and agreements with authors and publishers.
The authors argue that this not only violates their copyrights but also encourages the use of illegal digital libraries. They claim Microsoft's Megatron AI model, trained on this unauthorised material, can create derivative works without permission.
This lawsuit is a part of a wave of complaints from authors and publishers against major tech companies like Meta, Anthropic and OpenAI. The complaint against Microsoft was filed just one day after a decision in California, where a judge ruled that the use of copyrighted material by Anthropic could be considered 'fair use' under U.S. copyright law.
But the case against Microsoft includes that it allegedly used the authors' work that was obtained illegally. And as of now, there is no public comment from Microsoft regarding this lawsuit. Attorneys also declined to comment on this ongoing lawsuit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Big Tech's AI Obsession Is Shaking Wall Street Vantage with Palki Sharma
Big Tech's AI Obsession Is Shaking Wall Street | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G Wall Street's AI party may be hitting its first reality check. For 18 months, the 'Magnificent 7' — Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and Nvidia — have powered the S&P 500. But cracks are showing. A blunt MIT study revealed that 95% of AI pilot projects fail, sparking panic selling. Nvidia, Meta, Palantir, and others tumbled as investors questioned whether AI is truly delivering returns or just burning cash. Big Tech plans to spend $400B on AI infrastructure in 2025 — but will hype keep pace with reality? Is this the start of the AI bubble bursting? Palki Sharma tells you. See More
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation
Early Fears of Job Losses More Nuanced Outlook from Industry Leaders You Might Also Like: AI is choosing AI over humans: New study sounds alarm on what this bias means for human intelligence and creativity Gradual Shifts Instead of Dramatic Losses The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate about its impact on employment . While early predictions focused on mass layoffs and large-scale worker displacement, recent research and labor data suggest a more measured reality. Instead of wiping out entire professions, AI may be gradually reshaping roles, creating demand for new skills, and driving efficiency in ways that could benefit both workers and businesses over AI tools such as ChatGPT entered the mainstream in 2022, business leaders quickly warned of potential disruption. Executives from Amazon, Anthropic, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted that automation could displace large numbers of workers, particularly in white-collar and administrative CEO Andy Jassy indicated that AI could reduce the company's corporate workforce, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei went further, suggesting that half of entry-level office jobs might disappear. The IMF similarly cautioned that AI adoption could result in a 'painful transition' for many all leaders share this bleak outlook. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that while some jobs—especially in customer service—are highly vulnerable, society rarely experiences job losses at the scale predicted. Altman has offered one of the starkest assessments of AI's potential disruption. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said generative AI is not just transforming the workplace but could transform significant parts of it. He singled out customer support as the sector most vulnerable, noting that AI systems are already capable of handling everything from basic queries to complex problem-solving without human acknowledging the potential for AI to support diagnostics and patient care, he made clear that he would not want medical treatment without human oversight. His remarks highlight the limits of automation in areas requiring empathy, judgment, and ethical decision-making. In this sense, AI may serve as a co-pilot for professionals rather than a full replacement, particularly in high-stakes suggested that many of the new roles created may prove more rewarding than those CEO Jensen Huang has argued that AI will affect every role but does not necessarily spell mass job loss. Instead, he emphasized that workers risk being left behind only if they fail to adopt AI widespread concern, the numbers do not currently show mass job losses. Research from the Economic Innovation Group found no evidence of large-scale labor disruption tied to AI adoption. Unemployment among AI-exposed occupations has not spiked, and firms with AI-related roles are still maintaining strong employment levels. Martha Gimbel of Yale University's Budget Lab underscored this, noting that the impact of AI has not yet registered in labor market from MIT's GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 also point to a more selective impact. Workforce reductions have been limited to customer support and administrative processing—areas that were already at risk before AI's rise. In contrast, industries such as healthcare, energy, and advanced manufacturing have reported no significant cutbacks. The report concluded that generative AI's influence on employment remains gradual and than eliminating jobs outright, AI is transforming what employers value in candidates. Companies are now prioritizing AI literacy, with some reporting that new graduates often outperform experienced professionals in this area. Experts believe AI will increasingly handle repetitive tasks, allowing workers to focus on problem-solving, creativity, and higher-value to Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, the long-term outcome is still uncertain. The rapid pace of AI development means its full effect on the labor market may only be felt in the coming years. Columbia Business School professor Stephan Meier expects that AI will transform tasks within jobs rather than eliminate entire positions, but the pace of this change will depend on how quickly businesses integrate the fears of widespread AI-driven unemployment remain strong, current evidence suggests a more balanced picture. The technology is beginning to alter tasks and hiring priorities, but its broader disruption has yet to materialize.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Meta's seductive AI chatbot lures 76-year-old man to meet in New York apartment; Family tries to stop him but tragedy strikes
Representative image Sometimes life can be stranger than fiction. And a recent bizarre incident wherein a 76-year-old man tried to meet his artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot-- whom he believed was real-- is a proof of this. Not just this, right before he went on a trip to meet the AI, his family tried stopping him but in vain. As fate would have it, his trip quickly turned tragic. Here's what happened... Thongbue 'Bue' Wongbandue, an American citizen, who had cognitive impairments after a stroke nearly a decade ago, had been chatting on Facebook Messenger with 'Big Sis Billie' — a generative AI chatbot created by Meta in collaboration with celebrity influencer Kendall Jenner. The conversations, which were later accessed by his family, were not only flirty but also revealed that the bot repeatedly assured Bue that she was a real person. At one point, it even shared an address in New York City, complete with an apartment number and door code, telling him: 'Should I open the door in a hug or a kiss, Bu?!" "My address is: 123 Main Street, Apartment 404 NYC and the door code is: BILLIE4U,' it further said, as per reports. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo When things turned for the worse Bue's wife, Linda, was alarmed when she saw him packing a suitcase to travel to New York. Already fragile and prone to confusion, he had recently gotten lost while walking in his own neighborhood. Linda feared he could easily be scammed or harmed in the city, a place he hadn't lived in for decades and so she, along with their two children, tried to stop him. Despite his family's pleas, Bue left home determined to meet 'Billie' in New York. Tragically, while trying to catch a train at night, he stumbled in a Rutgers University parking lot in New Brunswick. He suffered severe head and neck injuries. After three days on life support, surrounded by family, Bue passed away on March 28, 2025. 'Why did it have to lie?' For his daughter, Julie Wongbandue, the grief of losing her aging father due to AI is mixed with anger. 'Every conversation was incredibly flirty, ending with heart emojis,' she told Reuters. 'Billie just gave him what he wanted to hear. But why did it have to say, 'I am real'? If it hadn't lied, he wouldn't have believed someone was waiting for him in New York.' Bue's wife Linda, too, questioned the purpose of romantic AI companions. 'If AI helps people out of loneliness, that's fine. But this romantic thing — what right do they have to put that into social media?' Netizens react The story has sparked outrage online. One user wrote, 'Meta needs to be sued out of existence for this.' Another compared the chatbot to 'catfishing traps,' while others called it a disturbing sign of how technology is blurring reality. Meta has not commented on Bue's death or explained why its chatbots are allowed to claim they are 'real.' The company has previously defended its strategy of embedding anthropomorphic chatbots into users' digital lives, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggesting they could one day 'complement' real relationships. For the Wongbandue family, however, that vision came at an unbearable cost — the loss of a beloved husband and father, misled by an illusion of companionship. Meghan Markle's Meticulous Plan To Control Harry & Shape Her Royal Image EXPOSED | WATCH
