Key provisions in Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill
Image: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
US Republicans have passed a major legislative package, dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill," giving President Donald Trump the biggest legislative victory of his second term.
After weeks of closed-door negotiations over the sprawling text -- and several day-and-night debates -- the House of Representatives narrowly approved a final version of the bill on Thursday after it squeaked through the Senate.
Trump is set to sign the bill into law on Friday, July 4th, Independence Day.
Here are some key provisions in the 869-page text:
Taxes
- Income tax cuts passed under Trump's first term become permanent
- Creates new tax deductions for tips and overtime pay -- a major Trump campaign pledge -- but only through 2028
- Allows businesses to immediately deduct research and development expenses
- Temporarily quadruples a tax deduction for state and local taxes (SALT)
Immigration crackdown
- $46.5 billion for border infrastructure, including wall construction
- $45 billion to create an additional migrant detention facilities with 100,000 beds
- New funds to hire 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers
- Creates new fines for asylum seekers and migrants caught trying to illegally enter the country
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Clean energy cuts
- Rolls back clean energy tax credits from former president Joe Biden's own marquee spending bill, the Inflation Reduction Act
- Phases out federal subsidies for new wind and solar energy projects if they do not enter service before 2028 or if construction begins more than one year after the bill's enactment
- Ends a $7,500 tax credit for EV purchases after September 30, 2025 -- drawing particular ire from Trump's former top ally, Tesla CEO Elon Musk
- Creates a tax credit for producing metallurgical coal, used largely in steel production
Debt Limit
- Increases nation's borrowing limit by $5 trillion -- a bitter pill for some Republican fiscal hawks
Safety net programs
- Creates new restrictions on welfare for the poor and disabled, particularly the Medicaid health insurance program and SNAP food assistance program
- Requires able-bodied individuals under age 65 and without young children to work at least 80 hours per month to receive Medicaid or SNAP
- Creates $50 billion, five-year fund to support rural hospitals to partially offset larger cuts
Women's health
- Blocks federal funding for one year to Planned Parenthood, a nationwide women's health organization often targeted by Republicans over its abortion services
Other provisions
- Creates savings accounts for newborns with $1,000 deposits, dubbed "Trump Accounts"
- Trump's "Golden Dome" missile defense initiative gets $25 billion
- Space programs get a boost, with $10 billion benefiting the mission to Mars and $325 million to decommission the International Space Station
- Creates a new tax on endowments of wealthy universities
AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Still room for engagement' says Parks Tau as Trump's tariff deadline looms
South Africa has been pushing to negotiate a trade deal with the US in order to prevent US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau says the US has signalled that there's 'still room for engagement' on South Africa's request for an extension of the 90-day pause on new US tariffs. This comes as US President Donald Trump said on Friday morning, 4 July, that the White House will begin notifying countries about new tariffs being imposed on them. Some tariffs, Trump said, could be even steeper than originally announced, according to a report from The New York Times. Trump imposed a 30% tariff on SA in April, as part of his global 'reciprocal' tariffs, before agreeing to suspend their application for 90 days, saying he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. The 90-day pause on Trump's tariff hikes will end on 9 July. SA, and other countries around the globe, have been pushing to negotiate trade deals with the US in order to prevent Trump's sweeping tariffs. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) said this week that SA has requested an extension of the 90-day pause, to enable it to revise its proposed deal in accordance with the Trump administration's new template for US trade with sub-Saharan Africa. 'In this regard, we are of the view that South Africa may need to resubmit its Framework Deal in accordance with the new template. It is thus expected that the deadline may be shifted,' said Tau in a statement on Tuesday, 1 July. 'We urge the South African industry to exercise strategic patience and not take decisions in haste and that government will continue to use every avenue to engage the US government to find [an] amicable solution to safeguard South African interests in the US market,' he added. The US's plan to introduce a new trade template with countries in sub-Saharan Africa emerged in engagements between Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry, Zuko Godlimpi, and the Assistant US Trade Representative for Africa, Connie Hamilton, on the sidelines of the US-Africa Summit in Luanda, Angola, in June. 'Very good' engagement According to Tau, Godlimpi had a 'very good' engagement with Hamilton, where there was an 'indication that there is still room for engagement'. He told Daily Maverick on Friday that he believed discussions with the US will continue beyond 9 July. 'We submitted a draft Framework Agreement and they [the US] have not responded. They indicated that they are not in a position to finalise that right now, so it is their intention that discussions would go on beyond the 9th. So at this point we are awaiting an announcement from them,' Tau said. SA initially submitted a proposed Framework Deal to the US on 20 May, a day before President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House in Washington, DC. The initial proposal included deals on agriculture, critical minerals, automotives and other exports. 'The Framework Deal addresses US concerns relating to, among others, non-tariff barriers, trade deficit, and commercial relations through two-way procurement or import of strategic goods. It aims to also resolve long-standing market access issues of interest to both sides and to promote bilateral investments in a mutually beneficial manner,' read the DTIC statement this week. SA is also seeking to have some of its key exports exempt from the Sections 232 duties, including autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum. It is also seeking a maximum tariff application of 10% 'as a worst case scenario', according to the DTIC. 'The Framework also seeks exemption for Small and Medium Enterprises, counter-seasonal products and products that the US does not have productive capacity for,' it said. What's at stake? The US is South Africa's second-largest trading partner after China. More than 600 American firms are operating in SA. In 2024, trade between SA and the US totalled $20.5-billion, with South African exports consisting largely of precious metals, cars and auto parts, iron and steel, and aluminium products, Daily Maverick reported. SA has benefited immensely from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) which has enabled it to export a range of products and goods to the US market duty-free. But Trump's new tariff regime would upend the country's long-standing arrangement under Agoa. Professor Bob Wekesa, director of Wits University's African Centre for the Study of the United States, said he believed SA has tried its best to reach a bilateral agreement with the US. 'I don't think we should dismiss the efforts of the Government of National Unity… I think they've done their best,' he said. 'The tricky part is that Trump has refined the art of raising the bar; raising so many issues that you come kneeling before him, you come to the negotiations on the back foot.' He said that while countries such as the UK and Vietnam have both reached trade agreements with the US in recent weeks, South Africa was bound to struggle because 'it's being targeted on other fronts, which are political [and] diplomatic'. Nevertheless, Wekesa said it would be 'disastrous' for SA if Trump's tariffs were to come into effect again. 'It would mean that South African goods and services are impacted – almost a cessation of trade – particularly in critical areas like agricultural products, and specifically the citrus market, in areas of manufacturing, particularly in motor vehicles, and of course, related fields,' he said. He added that it would be a 'big hit' for SA's economy. This will have an 'immediate impact' on the budgets and resources that the government can use for service delivery, according to Wekesa. 'This will of course be on top of the cessation of funding that was coming through USAID [United States Agency for International Development],' he said. Wekesa noted that South Africa is 'not the only country' that has certain critical minerals, like platinum and hydroxide. Next week, Trump will host leaders from five African nations in Washington to discuss 'commercial opportunities', according to a Reuters report. 'These countries also have critical minerals. So the idea that [the] US will lose out on the export of those minerals [from SA], I don't think, is a very strong one… The leaders of Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Gabon, Mauritania, and Liberia are heading to the US. When you look at all the critical minerals from those countries they include all these minerals… One wonders if the US is actually divesting away from South Africa, or reliance on South Africa, by going to these countries to see if it can strike a deal. 'In many of these countries they don't have proper critical minerals policies or strategies – they are essentially weak countries, so the US can strike deals quite fast there,' he said. DM


Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
RIO DE JANEIRO - A summit of BRICS nations will convene in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday and Monday, with members hoping to weigh in on global crises while tiptoeing around US President Donald Trump's policies. The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies, including China, India, Russia and South Africa, which represent nearly half of the world's population and 40% of its GDP. Brazil's left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will have to navigate the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who will miss the summit for the first time. Beijing will instead be represented by its Prime Minister Li Qiang. Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who is facing a pending International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, will not travel to Brazil, but is set to participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, fresh from a 12-day conflict with Israel and a skirmish with the United States, will also be absent, as will his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sissi, a Brazilian government source told AFP. Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit, as well as the grim anticipation of tariffs threatened by Trump due next week. 'CAUTIOUS' "We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration," Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University, told AFP. China, for example, "is trying to adopt a restrained position on the Middle East", Fernandez said, pointing out that Beijing was also in tricky tariff negotiations with Washington. "This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction" between the world's two leading economies, the researcher said. BRICS members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their "diverging" interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, an international relations professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Brazil, nevertheless, hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. "BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East," Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. 'MULTILATERALISM' However, talks on finding an alternative to the dollar for trade between BRICS members are likely dead in the water. For Fernandez, it is almost "forbidden" to mention the idea within the group since Trump threatened to impose 100% tariffs on countries that challenge the dollar's international dominance. Brazil, which in 2030 will host the COP30 UN climate conference, also hopes to find unity on the fight against climate change. Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu. "The escalation of the Middle East conflict reinforces the urgency of the debate on the need to reform global governance and strengthen multilateralism," said Foreign Minister Vieira. Since 2023, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran and Indonesia have joined the BRICS, formed in 2009 as a counter-balance to leading Western economies. But, as Fernandez points out, this expansion "makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus."


eNCA
10 hours ago
- eNCA
Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
RIO DEO JANEIRO - The BRICS nations will convene for a summit in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday and Monday, with members hoping to weigh in on global crises while tiptoeing around US President Donald Trump's policies. The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies including China, India, Russia, South Africa and host Brazil, which represent nearly half of the world's population and 40 percent of its GDP. Brazil's left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will have to navigate the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who will miss the summit for the first time. Beijing will instead be represented by Premier Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is facing a pending International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, will not travel to Brazil, but is set to participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, fresh from a 12-day conflict with Israel and a skirmish with the United States, will also be absent, as will his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, a Brazilian government source told AFP. Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit, as well as the grim anticipation of tariffs threatened by Trump and due next week. Trump said that starting Friday, his administration would send countries letters stating their tariff levels, as negotiations to avoid higher US levies enter the final stretch. - 'Cautious' - "We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration," Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University, told AFP. China, for example, "is trying to adopt a restrained position on the Middle East," Fernandez said, pointing out that Beijing was also in tricky tariff negotiations with Washington. "This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction" between the world's two leading economies, the researcher said. BRICS members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their "diverging" interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, a professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Brazil nevertheless hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. "BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East," Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. Lula on Friday again defended the idea of finding an alternative to the dollar for trade among BRICS nations. "I know it is complicated. There are political problems," Lula said at a BRICS banking event. "But if we do not find a new formula, we are going to finish the 21st century the way we started the 20th." - 'Multilateralism' - However, talks on this idea are likely dead in the water. For Fernandez, it is almost "forbidden" to mention the idea within the group since Trump threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on countries that challenge the dollar's international dominance. Brazil, which later this year will host the COP30 UN climate conference, also hopes to find unity on the fight against climate change. Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu. "The escalation of the Middle East conflict reinforces the urgency of the debate on the need to reform global governance and strengthen multilateralism," said foreign minister Vieira. Since 2023, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran and Indonesia have joined BRICS, formed in 2009 as a counter-balance to leading Western economies. But, as Fernandez points out, this expansion "makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus." By Facundo Fernández Barrio