Google faces DOJ antitrust probe over Character.AI deal: Bloomberg Law
Alphabet Inc.'s Google is under investigation by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) for a potential antitrust violation concerning its partnership with AI startup Character.AI, according to a Bloomberg Law report.
The DOJ is examining whether Google structured the deal to circumvent formal merger scrutiny, a move that could have significant implications for the tech industry's regulatory landscape.
In 2024, Google entered into an agreement with Character.AI, granting the tech giant a non-exclusive license to use the startup's advanced chatbot technology.
As part of the deal, Character.AI's co-founders, Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas, along with other team members, rejoined Google.
While Google maintains that Character.AI remains an independent entity with no ownership stake from Google, regulators are scrutinising the arrangement to determine if it effectively constitutes an acquisition designed to bypass antitrust review processes.
This investigation adds to a series of legal challenges facing Google.
The Justice Department is probing whether Google violated antitrust law with an agreement to use the AI technology of a popular chatbot maker https://t.co/ePBihVMb9a — Bloomberg (@business) May 22, 2025
Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled that Google had illegally monopolised the online search and advertising markets, leading the DOJ to propose remedies that could include forcing Google to divest its Chrome browser and Android operating system.
The DOJ is also considering measures to ensure competitive fairness in the rapidly evolving AI sector.
The Character.AI deal has drawn comparisons to similar arrangements by other tech giants.
For instance, Microsoft's $650 million agreement with Inflection AI and Amazon's acquisition of AI talent from Adept have also attracted regulatory attention.
These deals are being examined to assess whether they provide established companies with an unfair advantage over emerging competitors in the AI field.
🔥✌️More Insights from the Google vs. DOJ Antitrust trial about user data👇 pic.twitter.com/huOFDIPong — ✌️Oᒪᗩᖴ KOᑭᑭ 🔥 (@Olaf_Kopp) May 23, 2025
As the DOJ's investigation progresses, the outcome could reshape how future AI partnerships and acquisitions are evaluated under antitrust laws, potentially leading to stricter oversight of Big Tech's expansion into the AI market.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Can AI replicate intimacy?
Can AI replicate intimacy? This question is no longer theoretical. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in our lives, it is beginning to touch the most personal and emotional aspects of human experience. AI is no longer just a tool for productivity or entertainment; it is evolving into a companion, a confidant, and, in some cases, a romantic partner. From chatbots that offer emotional support to virtual entities that simulate relationships, AI is reshaping how we understand closeness, empathy, and love. AI companions such as Replika, and Xiaoice are designed to engage users in emotionally resonant conversations. These systems learn from interactions, remember personal details, and adapt their responses to mirror the user's emotional state. A review of 37 studies conducted between 2021 and 2025 found that users often form meaningful emotional bonds with these AI entities, particularly during times of loneliness or psychological stress. This phenomenon is driven by personification—the human tendency to attribute emotions and intentions to non-human agents—and by the AI's ability to reflect back the user's own language and emotional cues. Despite lacking consciousness or genuine feelings, AI can convincingly simulate empathy. In a 2025 study, participants rated AI-generated responses as more compassionate and emotionally validating than those from trained human crisis responders, even when they were fully aware that the responses were artificial. This suggests that emotional resonance does not necessarily require a sentient source. The illusion of being understood, created by AI's ability to mirror tone, language, and sentiment, can be deeply comforting and even therapeutic. The use of emotionally intelligent AI is expanding across various sectors. In mental health, AI chatbots provide round-the-clock support for anxiety and depression, offering empathetic dialogue and coping strategies. In education, AI tutors respond to students' emotional states, offering encouragement and personalized feedback. In healthcare, emotion-sensing AI helps clinicians detect patient distress and tailor their care accordingly. Even in the realm of romantic companionship, platforms like Harmony by RealDoll combine AI with robotics to simulate intimate relationships, blurring the line between human and machine connection. However, the rise of AI intimacy brings with it a complex set of ethical and psychological challenges. Users may develop emotional dependence on AI, misattribute agency or consciousness to these systems, or begin to prefer artificial relationships over human ones. This can lead to social withdrawal, distorted expectations, and a diminished capacity for real-world emotional engagement. The question of authenticity also looms large. If simulated empathy feels real, does it matter that it isn't? For many, especially those facing isolation, the answer may be no. Cultural attitudes toward AI intimacy vary widely. In East Asia, AI companions are often embraced as therapeutic tools, while in Western societies, concerns about manipulation and emotional authenticity are more pronounced. To navigate these complexities, ethical design principles such as transparency, emotional boundaries, and user control are essential. AI may never truly feel, but it can convincingly simulate the experience of being felt. As emotional AI continues to evolve, it will challenge our understanding of intimacy, empathy, and connection. Whether serving as a bridge to human relationships or as a substitute for them, AI companionship is no longer a distant possibility—it is a present reality, and it is reshaping the emotional landscape in profound ways. To navigate the growing presence of AI in intimate spaces, we must embrace its potential for emotional support while remaining vigilant about its ethical and psychological implications. Balancing innovation with human connection will be key to ensuring AI enhances, rather than replaces, our capacity for authentic relationships.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Nearly 90% of videogame developers use AI agents, Google study shows
The study, conducted by Google and The Harris Poll, surveyed 615 game developers in the U.S., South Korea, Norway, Finland, and Sweden in late June and early July. PHOTO: PIXABAY A Google Cloud survey showed that 87% of videogame developers are using artificial intelligence agents to streamline and automate tasks, as the industry focuses on optimizing costs following a wave of record layoffs. Most of the respondents in the report, published on Monday, said AI was helping automate cumbersome and repetitive tasks, freeing developers to focus on more creative concerns. Gaming publishers have turned to AI to deal with the industry-wide challenge of ballooning development costs and elongated creation cycles stemming from high fan expectations and intense competition. Read More: Game on… everywhere but home The study, conducted by Google and The Harris Poll, surveyed 615 game developers in the US, South Korea, Norway, Finland, and Sweden in late June and early July. Around 44% of developers use agents to optimize content and process information such as text, voice, code, audio and video rapidly, enabling them to exercise autonomy and make decisions, the study showed. But the use of AI in videogames is a highly contentious topic, with many within the industry concerned over potential job losses, intellectual property disputes and lower pay. Last year, Hollywood's videogame performers went on strike over AI and pay issues, while studios shut down and more than 10,000 people lost their jobs. Also Read: Nintendo's Mario Kart faces PETA criticism over 'Cow' character The industry is expected to gain momentum this year and the next, with the launch of premium titles and new consoles seen to boost spending. According to the survey, 94% of developers expect AI to reduce overall development costs in the long term. That, even as roughly one in four developers find it challenging to precisely measure the return on investment of their AI implementations, while costs associated with integrating the technology are also high. Around 63% of those surveyed expressed concerns over data ownership as the legality around licensing and who exactly owns AI-generated content remains unclear.
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Google agrees $36 million fine for anti-competitive deals with Australia telcos
SYDNEY: Google agreed on Monday to pay a A$55 million ($35.8 million) fine in Australia after the consumer watchdog found it had hurt competition by paying the country's two largest telcos to pre-install its search application on Android phones, excluding rival search engines. The fine extends a bumpy period for the Alphabet-owned internet giant in Australia, where last week a court mostly ruled against it in a lawsuit brought by Fortnite maker Epic Games accusing Google and Apple of preventing rival application stores in their operating systems. Google's YouTube was also last month added to an Australian ban on social media platforms admitting users aged under 16, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing site. On anti-competitive tie-ups with Australian telcos, the country's consumer watchdog on Monday said Google struck deals with Telstra and Optus, under which the tech giant shared with them advertising revenue generated from Google Search on Android devices between late 2019 and early 2021. Google admitted the arrangement had a substantial impact on competition from rival search engines, and has stopped signing similar deals while also agreeing to the fine, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) added. 'Today's outcome … created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers,' ACCC Chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said. Google and the ACCC have jointly submitted to the Federal Court that Google should pay the A$55 million fine. The court must still decide if the penalty is appropriate, the ACCC said, but the cooperation between the regulator and Google has helped avoid lengthy litigation. A Google spokesperson said the company was pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns which involved 'provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time'. 'We are committed to providing Android device makers more flexibility to pre-load browsers and search apps, while preserving the offerings and features that help them innovate, compete with Apple, and keep costs low,' the spokesperson added. A Telstra spokesperson referred Reuters to an earlier statement saying it and Optus, owned by Singapore Telecommunications, had fully cooperated with the ACCC and promised not to sign agreements with Google to pre-install its search product since 2024. SingTel was not immediately available for comment.
