
Councillor off Albany St panel after ‘ill-judged outbursts'
A councillor who lashed out at businesses has been forced off a hearings panel deciding on a contentious central Dunedin cycleway.
Cr Jim O'Malley, who was due to chair today's panel considering the Albany St project, stood aside after property developer Greg Paterson said his "ill-judged outbursts" showed he was biased and not fit for the job.
Mr Paterson's objection came after Cr O'Malley last month hit back at concerns from property investor Jason La Hood about the Albany Street Connection project.
Cr O'Malley told the Otago Daily Times at the time he was so tired of accusations from those "same businessmen" he had considered quitting local politics.
Property owners and local businesses have previously raised concerns about improper consultation on the project.
Mr Paterson, who submitted on the project in addition to Mr La Hood, said it was important any future decisions regarding Albany St were made by a committee comprised of "fair-minded objective councillors".
"To that end, I would submit Jim O'Malley should recuse himself from not only chairing, but also being a member of the committee as it is clear from his many somewhat ill-judged comments/outbursts in the press as of late that he is no longer able to apply or display any objectivity in relation to the decision-making process."
There was a public perception that Cr O'Malley was "determined to 'ram home' the complete removal of all of the carparks" in the street, Mr Paterson said.
"It is vital for the ratepayers of Dunedin and for the future of the city that important decisions are seen to be made in a fair, considered and balanced manner to which due process has been properly followed and for that reason I believe Jim O'Malley must recuse himself from any further involvement in the decisions going forward as to the Albany Street Connection."
In a statement, Cr O'Malley said to avoid the potential for legal action he had decided to recuse himself.
He maintained had he stayed on the panel he would have remained objective.
"A committee member and especially the chair must leave any matters that are not related to the evidence presented at a hearing at the door.
"If I had remained to consider this item, I would have done that," Cr O'Malley said.
The Albany St project aims to provide a safe walking and cycling connection between the shared Te Aka Ōtākou harbour path, Dunedin's tertiary area and the CBD.
In late 2023, the hearings committee voted 2-1 to proceed with the then recommended proposal to remove 68 carparks in the area.
The council last month announced it had reintroduced nine carparks to the design, public consultation on suggested parking restrictions for the new carparks concluding last week.
A report released this week said the most common themes in the responses received included "disappointment that a new consultation was required, and that the cycleway had not progressed already".
A total of 53% of respondents were in support of four new five-minute carparks near the University of Otago's Central Library, and 57% favoured the five proposed opposite Hyde St.
A submission from the Otago University Students' Association (OUSA) said, while it supported the overall direction of the project, it was concerned aspects did not adequately reflect the lived experience of students and might "lead to increased costs, stress and displacement for those already struggling with housing, transport and living costs".
The nine reintroduced carparks would not meaningfully compensate for the loss of unrestricted or flexible-duration carparks in the street, it said.
Many students did not have access to off-street parking — often renting older flats lacking driveways or garages — lived in overcrowded housing and worked irregular hours to make ends meet.
Students depended on being able to park close to where they lived or studied.
"By removing or heavily restricting parking without offering an accessible, affordable alternative, the council risks making Albany St and its surrounds functionally unlivable for many students."
OUSA recommended the council retained at least the current number of unrestricted or all-day carparks in residential sections of Albany St and adjoining streets.
Submissions on the project, as well as on proposed Sunday paid parking changes, will be heard at a meeting today.
tim.scott@odt.co.nz

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Firms call for govt to step in over paint issue
The Dunedin City Council's "overly risk-averse" approach to lead paint in soils added $200,000 to the cost of a six-unit new build in the city, a group representing developers says. In a publicly released letter, the group is now calling on the government to intervene. The 10-page letter, signed by Terramark, TL Survey Services and Patersons and addressed to Housing Minister Chris Bishop, lays out a litany of complaints about the city council. "DCC are concerned that historic use of lead-based paints on residential properties categorises them as 'potentially contaminated'," the letter says. "We consider the DCC's application of the [national environment standards] for inorganic lead in soils is inappropriate, overly risk-averse and adds unjustified complexity, delays and costs to new housing projects." The letter also included a cost breakdown from two Terramark clients who had recently developed near affected land. It said the total cost of dealing with the lead in soil was $206,472 for a development of six two-bedroom units, while the cost to develop two sites for a new build comprising 18 units was $302,000 for lead remediation. "While there is no denying lead contamination can have adverse effects on human health, there is no evidence to support the approach taken by the DCC is actually reducing that. "Development actually reduces the potential contamination pathways. Doing nothing ensures the risk to human health remains higher — entirely the opposite of what the national environment standard is trying to achieve." The letter said the group had examples of homeowners terminating plans for minor house extensions once they discovered the potential cost and delays due to the DCC's interpretation of the national environmental standards. Terramark resource management planner Darryl Sycamore told the Otago Daily Times the three firms were compelled to write the letter out of "sheer frustration". "The council is over-interpreting the rules. It's impacting development, and it's pushing people who are developers to move to other regions." The firms' concerns were echoed by consultant environmental scientist Andrew Nichols, of Dunedin, who told the Otago Daily Times the city council should change its approach. Mr Nichols, whose work includes reviewing land contamination reports, said there was "precisely zero" public health data showing New Zealand residential soil was a public health risk due to its lead content that would justify the removal of the soil. He said the actual documented risks were from inhaling lead in petrol and from children chewing toys with lead paint — neither of which were issues today, let alone related to lead in soils. "This strict interpretation of HAIL [Hazardous Activities and Industries List] obligations as it applies to residential activities is great for me and others as contaminated-land professionals," Mr Nichols said. "But is an absurdity; a solution created for a problem that doesn't exist in residential development. It must change," he said. The firms' letter calls on Mr Bishop, who is also minister for the Resource Management Act, to intervene to establish a nationally consistent approach to the implementation of the national environmental standards. "In particular, we respectfully request the minister advise the DCC that their current implementation is flawed and to cease that practice without delay." Mr Bishop told the Otago Daily Times he had received the letter. "Councils are required to implement the national environmental standard for managing contaminants such as lead in soil. "Councils interpret and regulate the standards based on their local context. While I am primarily responsible for the RMA, councils are responsible for its day-to-day implementation. I encourage developers to work directly with the council." Mr Bishop said new legislation would be introduced to Parliament later this year to replace the RMA. Dunedin City Council acting general manager customer and regulatory Paul Henderson said councils received updated guidance from the Ministry for the Environment, as well as the findings of an independent review by Stantec. "It says homes and other structures built prior to 1945 could be potential or unverified HAIL sites, due to the use of lead-based paint. "This is because lead can, over time, find its way into soil surrounding such buildings, creating a potential risk to human health. "Only a small number of pre-1945 painted wooden or roughcast houses are demolished each year in Dunedin, and we continue to assess the impact in our city as being minor." While he acknowledged "a small number of developments" were likely to face additional costs as a result, he said they would not be of the order suggested, and "we didn't expect the new approach will have a significant impact on homeowners or development in Dunedin".


Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Liquidators appointed to orchard but secrecy surrounds details
Liquidators have been appointed for Ardgour Valley Orchards, near Tarras, but information is scant on what exactly is happening. An advertisement in the Otago Daily Times earlier this week said liquidators had been appointed for Ardgour Valley Orchards GP and Ardgour Valley Orchards LP. The liquidation decision was made by the special resolution of the shareholders on August 10, and the limited partnership, also on August 10. Liquidators Diana Matchett and Colin Gower, of BDO in Christchurch, had been appointed and had given notice all creditors should make a claim by September 5. Ardgour Valley Orchards was situated on part of Ardgour Station. Ardgour Station in Tarras has been sold to Santana Minerals for gold mine operations on the Rise and Shine claim but the 38ha where the trees were situated was not part of the sale. Bruce and Linda Jolly sold the farm, which had been in the family for 70 years, for $25million to the mining company. The orchard was started by Mr Jolly and his wife Linda along with Ross and Sharon Kirk. The orchard was owned by a group of 15 shareholders and run by a management team, according to the company website. The Jollys and a company linked to the Kirks have more than 75% of the shares in Ardgour Valley Orchards GP. Mr Jolly could not be contacted. The orchard had 15,000 apricot trees and 15,200 cherry trees. They had grown the new brand of Summer apricot this season, with about 100 tonnes exported. The website said upwards of 200 people worked at the orchard at peak times. A call to Ardgour Valley Orchards referred all questions to Ms Matchett, who did not reply to phone and email messages.


Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to Editor: inquiry, 1080, airport
Today's letters to the Editor include discussion about the inquiry into the government response to the Covid-19 pandemic, 1080 drops by DOC, and an airport in Central Otago. It is reported that former ministers have refused to attend a Royal Commission of Inquiry hearing. (ODT 14.8.25) That is probably well advised, as we have seen the venom expressed by a few members of our society who sometimes have anonymously created a web of hatred and misleading theory over the actions of the Labour government trying to protect us from the effects of this new and unknown pandemic. Yes there were mistakes made, and some suffered the emotional loss of not being with their dearest as they died. Some found the mandates offensive, and some were concerned about loss of personal freedom. The hearing will give some more insight into the causes and effects of a worldwide pandemic such as this. The steps taken were, I believe, in good faith and given that this pandemic was a new and unknown viral variation, the government under advice, took the only steps it could. It is worthwhile reading the article "Analysing past pandemics to inform future responses" (ODT 13.8.25). This outlined just how quickly the Spanish Flu of 1918 spread; and remember, no commercial airlines. It was estimated that worldwide 50 million people died. New Zealand lost 9000 in six weeks. That is equivalent to 40,000 today. Preparedness and survival during the next pandemic will depend on readiness and mandates such as vaccines and movement control, so we should be grateful for the work that our epidemiologists are doing. You may be alive and angry, but please consider those who survived because of strong mitigation by our leaders who tried to do the right thing. David Blair Port Chalmers [Abridged — length. Editor.] Take care I have observed that for some time there has been a crashed car down the bank on one of the corners of Three Mile Hill. There is a temporary speed limit of 30kmh on a section of the corners which has now become semi-permanent, with the recommended speed signs being replaced by circular 30 signs. The question arises as to why the crashed car has not been removed? On the subject of the temporary speed restriction, I have endeavoured to reduce my normal speed and stick to the limit. This has inevitably caused some impatient motorists to tailgate and on one occasion, the person passed me on a blind corner with another car coming the other way. My message is to drive with care over Three Mile Hill, especially in winter. John Batt Wakari Surcharge woes This government is not spending wisely, as they claim. Telling thousands of retailers that they are not allowed to add a surcharge for credit and contactless etc payments will result in employing lots of people to administer/prosecute those that don't comply which is wasteful. By telling banks that they can't charge retailers extra for that service when there are very few of them to check up on is much better. Banks make huge profits: they can carry that extra cost. Retailers that are struggling won't have to increase their costs to cover what the banks are charging for that service, thus not increasing the pressure on the cost of living. What is the government afraid of? Robert Morey Dunedin Centenary North Otago Rural Women New Zealand will be celebrating the centenary of the founding of the organisation with a luncheon at the Brydone Hotel on August 29. Guest speaker will be ODT business and rural editor Sally Rae. Registration of interest from current and former members: Judy Kingan jaydeekgn@ The reason why use of 'super toxin' opposed RE the ODT article "Doc claims predators bigger threat than 1080" (9.8.25). Having monitored several 1080 poison drops, one in particular defies all the robust science I have read and what I have witnessed. In 2002 Ecological Networks carried out, at the request of Doc, a study on the effects of 1080 poison on tomtits in the Waianakarua Scenic Reserve. Three days after the drop I and a few others had a casual walk through the poisoned area and picked up 16 dead tomtits along with dead brown creeper, a grey warbler and blackbirds. More decomposed bird carcasses were found in later months. The only dead predators found were half a dozen possums: no rats, cats, mice, ferrets, stoats, hedgehogs or weasels but plenty of dead deer and birds. All tomtits were offered to the Doc for autopsy: they declined saying 'we only have funding for one autopsy a year'. Sometime later I was invited along with other interested parties to a Maf biosecurity meeting in Christchurch to discuss a pest management strategy in Christchurch at which Doc didn't turn up. I took to the meeting a map of all the grid-referenced dead birds found in the Waianakarua Scenic Reserve to show a senior Landcare scientist in attendance and asked him to extrapolate the total bird deaths in the 4000ha reserve. He said he had heard of that operation; he came up with a figure that astounded me — 10,000. Is it any wonder I and many others continually oppose the use of this poison known as a super toxin? Lewis Hore Oamaru Plot loss It seems Dunedin City Council has more interest in creating playgrounds in George St than in creating essential parking or drop-off areas for hospital staff. Have we not lost the plot here? Graham Kitchin Oamaru Common sense hoped for in airport debate There has been quite a lot of plotting to build a new international airport somewhere in Central Otago. Christchurch City Holdings seem hell-bent on a new airport at Tarras. But when you land there you would require a bus to Queenstown which would take 90 minutes or more. Not acceptable. It is my contention that these plans are seriously flawed. Firstly the government, I'm sure, would possibly like fewer airports in the South Island not more. I doubt if it would support this pie-in-the-sky plan. Secondly it would seem to me to be far more practical to expand the Dunedin airport, particularly internationally, and then arrange domestic flights to Wanaka, Queenstown or anywhere. If you fly into San Francisco and want to go inland this is achieved with a domestic service rather than building a new international airport inland. I hope common sense prevails. Andrew Burton Lowburn Letters changes The Otago Daily Times welcomes letters. They are a vital part of the newspaper, and an important forum for readers to express their views. To make it easier for us to receive your letters we have created a new email address — letters@ — for you to write to us at. The old system, whereby letters were sent to an "editor" address, meant that letters were being missed due to the sheer volume of emails received. Letters will receive an automatic reply to say that the ODT has received your submission and that it is under consideration. Letters longer than 250 words may require abridgement; in some cases they will be rejected because they are too long. Our letters rules are at the bottom of the page. Rest assured, all letters sent to the ODT are read. However, we will seldom enter into discussion about selection or editing. We look forward to receiving your letters at letters@ — Editor