
Evanston candidates push back against proposal for increased density, Envision Evanston
Candidates for Evanston mayor and City Council debated what the next four years, and the next 20 years, should look like in the city at a forum hosted at the former site of Second Church of Christ on Feb. 9.
The city's proposal for a new zoning ordinance, called Envision Evanston, quickly emerged as a lightning-rod topic for the candidates. The zoning proposal would permit increased density in the city, even outside the downtown, according to previous reporting.
At the forum, most candidates balked at a proposal to allow four-unit buildings to be built on lots currently designated for single-family homes. That provision is outlined in Envision Evanston 2045, for which the timeline for implementation has recently been dramatically extended.
In the April 1 election, all but one of the seats on the City Council is being contested, and challenger Jeff Boarini is taking on incumbent Mayor Daniel Biss for the mayoral seat.
The Envision Evanston proposal has turned into a political talking point for many of the candidates vying for a seat on the City Council, as some residents have protested its proposals to increase housing density. At the forum, 8th Ward City Councilmember Devon Reid was the sole candidate to publicly advocate for more housing to be built in that ward.
During the portion of the forum dedicated to mayoral candidates, Boarini threw political punches at Biss's record in his opening remarks.
'I'm running because Evanston deserves a mayor who focuses solely on Evanston and is not focused on his next political job,' Boarini said, perhaps poking at Biss's previous roles as a state senator and representative, as well his bid for governor in 2018.
Boarini also referenced the emergency evacuation of elderly Black residents from an apartment complex that left 24 without a permanent home after the city's inspectors deemed the property unsafe to live in. 'How do you justify your silence on that, and what can Black residents and other residents believe in your leadership to protect them from displacement?' Boarini asked.
Biss said, 'Those buildings were not unsafe because of anything the city did, but they were, unfortunately, so unsafe the city had to take action to keep the residents safe.'
'This is an unimaginable situation that the residents are being put through, and so we have a responsibility to do what we can to help them,' Biss added. 'We've provided a lot of support, rental assistance for two years for most residents, moving costs, storage costs, working with Connections for the Homeless and other entities across the community to help the residents being displaced find other housing, most of them in Evanston. And so this situation was created by a third party that's not part of the city.'
For his question, Biss took a lighter note.
'What's your favorite thing to do in Evanston on a Sunday afternoon?' Biss asked Boarini.
'It would be take a nap,' Boarini said, adding in other leisurely activities.
In regards to Envision Evanston, Boarini said the city should have taken more time than the year-long campaign for Envision Evanston so far. He also took a jab at Biss for his comments to another Evanston news publication, when he told it in December that it was 'immoral' to extend Envision Evanston's timeline.
'You have to get all the right people into the room at the beginning of any project, and that's how you achieve success, particularly the people who might object to what you're doing,' Boarini said when asked how he would implement Envision Evanston. 'Everyone who is a stakeholder must be involved, and so that's where I would have begun the process.'
Biss said his comments to the other publication were 'stupid' and they 'generated a headline that left an impression that I really regret.'
Biss fleshed out his comments at the forum:
'It's a mistake to go too fast because we need to get it right, because it's complicated, because there's a lot of different neighborhoods in Northwestern (sic), I mean Evanston, including some near Northwestern, where there's certain considerations, and others where there aren't. And each of those neighborhoods needs to have a different set of eyes on this,' Biss said.
'At the same time, it's a mistake to go too slow… what we're trying to achieve here is important,' Biss continued. 'I want an Evanston where District 65 teachers can afford to live, where our police officers, our civil servants, our nurses who work in the hospital, can afford to live. And that requires dealing with our affordability crisis across all income levels, and it requires a diversity of types of housing stock.'
The comprehensive plan also has language in it to help the city achieve its climate goals, revitalize downtown and to freeze or lower property taxes, Biss said.
City Council seats
Candidates for City Council seats, with the exception of 9th Ward City Councilmember Juan Geracaris, who is in the only uncontested race, also took questions on Envision Evanston.
In the 1st Ward, City Councilmember Clare Kelly is running for re-election against Stephen Hackney. Kelly has previously spoken against Envision Evanston's process as being 'rushed and reckless.'
In the 2nd Ward, incumbent City Councilmember Krissie Harris is facing off against Jacqueline Mendoza and Darlene Cannon.
In the 3rd Ward, current City Councilmember Melissa Wynne is not running for re-election. Three candidates, Gennifer Geer, John Kennedy and Shawn Iles are competing for that seat. Iles did not attend the forum.
In the 4th ward, incumbent City Councilmember Jonathan Nieuwsma is running unopposed on the ballot, but resident Margaret Welch is running a write-in campaign.
'We need to try something different downtown,' Welch said of booming developments which could greatly increase density to Evanston. 'I moved to Evanston because I wanted to live in a suburb.'
'It's not a dog whistle to say you want to live in a suburb,' Welch continued. 'I happen to know a Black woman who told me once that (they) grew up here and said, 'We don't go south (of) Howard (Street).' It's a little less dense, it's a little less noisy, it's a little more safe.'
Nieuwsma said downtown Evanston is heading in the right direction, and cited vacancy numbers from before and after the pandemic. 'I think encouraging residential development downtown is one very important thing we can do to bring back some vitality to our downtown,' he said.
In the 5th ward, candidates Carlis Sutton and incumbent Bobby Burns spoke about the incoming Foster School, affordable housing, and the emergency removal of residents from an apartment complex at 2018 Wesley Avenue.
In the 6th Ward, candidate Candance Chow is challenging incumbent City Councilmember Tom Suffredin. The two did not speak to each other in a single session as the other candidates had, however, because of scheduling conflicts.
Unlike much of Evanston, the sixth ward does not have a Metra or CTA Purple Line 'L' train station stop. Suffredin said that should be taken into consideration when the city considers developments involving parking lots, as much of the ward's residents drive.
'It's critical that the needs of areas of Evanston like Northwest Evanston are considered because it's unrealistic for people up here to be dependent on transit and be able to do all the things that people do in their cars,' Suffredin said.
In the 7th Ward, City Councilmember Eleanor Revelle is not seeking re-election. Parielle Davis and Kerry Alexander Mundy Williams are running against each other for the seat.
Mundy Williams said single-family homeowners felt blindsided by Envision Evanston and its zoning proposal.
'I think there are places where we can add density, but they need to be looked at very seriously. And I think that the single family homeowners who chose that lifestyle and pay property taxes and worked hard to buy their homes deserve to be heard when they say that they don't want something else happening in their neighborhood,' Mundy Williams said.
For a potential removal of single family zoning, Davis said the city should adopt that policy with the particular needs that Evanston has.
'(Zoning) decisions impact what we have the property taxes to do with regards to affordable housing, but also what we can do with regards to transportation and making public transit more accessible,' Davis said.
In the 8th Ward, City Councilmember Devon Reid is running against the former chair of the city's Land Use Commission, Matt Rodgers. Rodgers did not attend the forum.
'Unlike my colleagues on the north end of town, they (business owners) are actually calling for more density,' Reid said.
'They want to see more housing units along Howard Street, because they know that the more people that live on Howard Street, and the more that we can diversify the income demographics of our area, the more that their businesses will be supported, the better that Howard Street will be, the safer Howard Street will be.'
Still, Reid was skeptical as to whether an overhaul of the entire city's zoning code would be the 'panacea and the cure for all our affordable housing issues.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Atlanta Budget a Safeguard Against Potential Trump Cuts, Lawmakers Say
Atlanta City Council members say proposed cuts to federal aid programs many Black Atlantans count on and concerns about a national recession were on their minds last week when they approved another record-setting fiscal year budget. 'Everyone seems to assume we're going to have a recession,' council member Howard Shook told Capital B Atlanta on Wednesday. 'Things are so unpredictable in [Washington] that it's just hard to say what's going to happen.' Council members said they put more funding in this year's budget because they worry an economic downturn related to President Donald Trump's tariffs on foreign goods will have a domino effect on Atlanta's economy, and as a result will impact the city's tax revenue. They're also concerned about the effects anticipated reductions to federal aid included in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act will have on city operations. 'The budget is trying to grapple with the potential that some federal money is going to go away,' council President Doug Shipman told Capital B Atlanta on Wednesday. The federal budget bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 22 still has to be approved in the U.S. Senate and signed by Trump before becoming law. Major cuts to Medicaid, SNAP and other critical programs many low-income Black Atlantans rely on for medical coverage and for paying their bills are included. More than half of Georgia SNAP benefit recipients were Black in 2020, according to the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute. Roughly 25% of Black Georgians were enrolled in Medicaid in 2023, according to the State Health Access Data Assistance Center. Only about 10% of white Georgians were on Medicaid the same year. In its current form, the Big Beautiful Bill would also cut funding for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's rental assistance programs by more than $26 billion, or roughly 43%. Shipman said those cuts could have a devastating impact on federal funding for affordable housing efforts in Atlanta, which is one reason the City Council voted to increase funding in its next fiscal year budget. 'The city is having to take on more of the burden of the programs that have historically been federal in nature,' Shipman said. 'We're going to try to do our best to continue to support folks [with] rental assistance, affordable housing, [and] new units.' Capital B Atlanta has reached out to Mayor Andre Dickens' office for comment. Shook and other council members voted unanimously in favor of the estimated $3 billion budget for fiscal year 2026, which begins on July 1, despite concerns about running a deficit next year, which includes a general fund budget of about $975.4 million. The city was already projected to have a $33 million deficit for the current fiscal year budget, largely due to lack of attrition and overtime pay for the Atlanta Police Department, according to lawmakers. Dickens' office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution last week that it has already cut the anticipated deficit in half by limiting hiring for vacant city job openings. Shook said the city's workforce was reduced by about 400 positions to help balance the current fiscal year budget. He said the mayor's office has agreed to periodically report to the council the status of department spending next fiscal year to avoid running a deficit again. Balancing the budget has become an ongoing problem in Atlanta, a city of only about half a million residential taxpayers, that is responsible for providing municipal government services to an estimated 6.3 million metro area residents who work in or commute into the city. 'There's a very widespread recognition that FY26 will have to exist in and compete with a time of really unrivaled [macroeconomic] uncertainty,' Shook said. 'We're not going to wait for quarterly budget reports, as has been the custom.' The post Atlanta Budget a Safeguard Against Potential Trump Cuts, Lawmakers Say appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could L.A. ICE Riots Stop the BET Awards? Here's All the Tea
As ICE and the U.S. National Guard continues to ravage the city of Los Angeles, one of the most anticipated events of the year could be in danger of getting shut down. The BET Awards is set to take place Monday (June 9), but many folks fear President Donald Trump's recent antics will spill over to the Black award show. What started as peaceful protests against Trump's unlawful immigration raids quickly took a violent turn after the president sent the National Guard to L.A. without the governor's approval. Over the weekend, the violence escalated resulting in destroyed property, fires and tear gas being thrown at civilians… And who wants to throw a party in the middle of a riot? Organizers for the annual BET Awards insist the ongoing violence will have no impact on the show. In a statement to The Hollywood Reporter, a spokesperson said, 'BET remains committed to the safety of our guests and staff. We are working closely with LAPD and monitoring the situation.' Despite organizers' confidence that the event will go on, many folks online noted just how insane this past weekend has been for the city. 'LA so crazy and random right now,' @NapKingColeP said on X. 'ICE raids, national guard, protesting, BET Awards weekend, and the gay pride parade.' @_itsmelimel added there's 'sooo much sh*t goin on in LA.' She continued, 'ICE protests are going on and ppl are outsideeee celebrating the BET Awards. I am overstimulated.' One TikToker said right now, Los Angeles is very 'dystopian.' @itsneyha added, 'L.A. is continuing to hustle and bustle with DOTY performances and celebrities all in town for the BET Awards while there are literally protests closing down the 101 [freeway].' Widespread violence has taken over the city, and it's going exactly to Trump's plan. The president is set on looking 'tough' as his nation-wide crackdown on immigration continues. He and Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom have previously come to blows over the state's known sanctuary cities– a city that limits cooperation with ICE and other federal immigration agencies– and now, their beef has reached a new level. Trump took to his favorite social media platform Truth Social on Monday to call for even more violence against protesters. 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' he said. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth came out echoing Trump's sentiments. He threatened, 'If violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert.' He added in a separate tweet 'The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE.' Meanwhile, Gov. Newsom announced plans to sue the administration over the Guard deployment and state's rights, according to CBS News. As of now, the 2025 BET Awards will go on as scheduled starting at 8 p.m. ET Monday night.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How school choice policies evolved from supporting Black students to subsidizing middle-class families
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) (THE CONVERSATION) School voucher programs that allow families to use public funds to pay tuition to attend private schools have become increasingly popular. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia currently operate voucher programs. In addition, 15 states have universal private school choice programs that offer vouchers, education savings accounts and tax credit scholarships. More states are considering school choice and voucher programs as the Trump administration advocates for widespread adoption. School vouchers have a long history in the U.S. The first vouchers were offered in the 1800s to help children in sparsely populated towns in rural Vermont and Maine attend classes in public and private schools in nearby districts. After the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, in which justices ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional, segregationists used vouchers to avoid school integration. More recently, school voucher programs have been pitched as a tool to provide children from low-income families with quality education options. As a scholar who specializes in education policy, law and politics, I can share how current policies have strayed from efforts to support low-income Black children. History of school voucher programs Research from education history scholars shows that more recent support for school choice was not anchored in an agenda to privatize public schools but rooted in a mission to support Black students. Over time, as school voucher policies grew in popularity, they evolved into subsidies for middle-class families to send their children to private and parochial schools. School choice policies have also expanded to include education savings account programs and vouchers funded by tax credit donations. Vouchers can redirect money from public schools, many of which are serving Black students. Impact on public schools States looking to add or expand school choice and voucher programs have adopted language from civil rights activists pushing for equal access to quality education for all children. For example, they contend that school choice is a civil right all families and students should have as U.S. citizens. But school voucher programs can exclude Black students and harm public schools serving Black students in a host of ways, research shows. Since the Brown v. Board ruling, school voucher programs have been linked to racial segregation. These programs were at times used to circumvent integration efforts: They allowed white families to transfer their children out of diverse public schools into private schools. In fact, school voucher programs tend to exacerbate both racial and economic segregation, a trend that continues today. For example, private schools that receive voucher funding are not always required to adopt the same antidiscrimination policies as public schools. School voucher programs can also negatively impact the quality of public schools serving Black students. As some of the best and brightest students leave to attend private or parochial ones, public schools in communities serving Black students often face declining enrollments and reduced resources. In cities such as Macon, Georgia, families say that majority Black schools lack resources because so many families use the state's voucher-style program to attend mostly white private schools. Moreover, the cost of attending a private or parochial school can be so expensive that even with a school voucher, Black families still struggle to afford the cost of sending children to these schools. Vouchers can siphon school funding Research from the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank based in Washington, D.C., shows that voucher programs in Ohio result in majority Black school systems such as the Cleveland Metropolitan School District losing millions in education funding. This impact of voucher programs disproportionately affects schools in predominantly Black communities across the U.S. with lower tax bases to fund public schools. Another example is the Marion County School District, a South Carolina system where about 77% of students are Black. Marion County is in the heart of the region of the state known as the ' Corridor of Shame,' known for its inadequate funding and its levels of poor student achievement. The 17 counties along the corridor are predominantly minority communities, with high poverty rates and poor public school funding because of the area's low tax base due to a lack of industry. On average, South Carolina school districts spent an estimated US$18,842 per student during the 2024-25 school year. In Marion County, per-student funding was $16,463 during the 2024-2025 school year. By comparison, in Charleston County, the most affluent in the state, per-student funding was more than $26,000. Rather than focus on school choice and voucher programs that take money away from public schools serving Black students, I argue that policymakers should address systemic inequities in education to ensure that all students have access to a quality education. Establishing restrictions on the use of funds and requiring preferences for low-income Black students could help direct school voucher policies back toward their intent. It would also be beneficial to expand and enforce civil rights laws to prevent discrimination against Black students. These measures would help ensure all students, regardless of background, have access to quality education.