
CDC and FDA: Deaths in listeria outbreak linked to frozen supplement shakes rise to 14
The death toll has risen in a multistate listeria outbreak linked to frozen supplement shakes, according to the Food and Drug Administration.
The increase in deaths from the outbreak comes nearly three months after Lyons Magnus, a food service industry provider headquartered in Fresno, California, recalled 4-ounce cartons of Lyons ReadyCare and Sysco Imperial Frozen Supplemental Shakes for possible risk of listeria contamination. The products were produced by Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc. in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Lyons Magnus distributed the products, under the Lyons ReadyCare and Sysco Imperial brand names, throughout the U.S., primarily to long-term care facilities. The products were not sold at retail stores and none of the shakes should be available on the market, the FDA said.
The FDA and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had identified 38 people who were sickened by listeria poisoning and 12 people who died across 21 states, the agencies said in February 2025. Of the 38 people sickened, 37 were hospitalized.
On Friday, May 16, The CDC and FDA increased the number of deaths to 14 and the number of those sickened to 42 (41 were hospitalized). The outbreak investigation has ended, the agencies said.
USA TODAY Recall Database: Search vehicle, product and food recalls
The CDC began investigating an outbreak of illnesses among residents in long-term care facilities and nursing homes in 2018 – with continued investigation of cases in 2021 and 2023 – but could not find enough evidence to identify a food culprit.
When six new illnesses were reported in October 2024, the CDC reopened the investigation. In February 2025, the frozen shakes were identified as a possible cause, and the CDC took samples from Prairie Farms, which were found to contain the outbreak strain of Listeria monocytogenes.
These are the 21 states the FDA and CDC reported having known listeria outbreaks related to this recall:
Listeriosis, or listeria poisoning, is a foodborne bacterial infection most commonly caused by the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes.
About 1,600 people get sick and 260 die each year from listeriosis, according to the CDC. Most people can be infected with listeria and not become seriously ill. But infections during pregnancy can lead to miscarriage, stillbirth, premature delivery, or life-threatening infection of the newborn, says the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Listeriosis can also lead to cause death in people over the age of 65 or those with weakened immune systems.
Signs and symptoms of listeriosis can appear as soon as hours after eating contaminated food and as long as weeks later, the USDA says. People in the higher-risk categories who experience flu-like symptoms within two months after eating contaminated food should seek medical care and tell their health care provider.
Among the symptoms:
Mike Snider is a reporter on USA TODAY's Trending team. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Guardant Health Stock Surged Nearly 9% Higher Today
The company's Shield multi-cancer detection test won an important designation from a top regulator. This should help bring it to market quicker. 10 stocks we like better than Guardant Health › Precision oncology specialist Guardant Health (NASDAQ: GH) was something of a stock market star on Tuesday. On the back of very positive news in the regulatory sphere, the company's shares jumped almost 9% higher today. This made it quite the outperformer on the exchange, as the bellwether S&P 500 index's gain was a relatively modest 0.6%. This morning before market open, Guardant announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had granted the healthcare company's Shield multi-cancer detection (MCD) test its Breakthrough Device designation. This instantly confers a high status on Shield, as the FDA's designation is given only to a small clutch of medical devices that can either diagnose or treat a disease more effectively than other products. In Shield's case, it is quite a versatile diagnostic device that can screen for a wide range of cancers, including colorectal, lung, and ovarian. It is designed to evaluate people 45 years of age or older who are at a typical average risk for cancer. According to Guardant, Shield has 98.6% specificity and 75% sensitivity in detecting certain cancers. In its news release touting the FDA's move, Guardant quoted its co-CEO AmirAli Talasaz as saying that it "shows the promise of the Shield MCD test to detect multiple cancers at an early stage with just a single, routine blood draw." "We look forward to partnering with the agency and other stakeholders to bring this breakthrough to patients quickly," he added. Another big plus of the Breakthrough Device designation is that it's part of an FDA initiative aimed at getting useful medical products to market faster. Talasaz and his team at Guardant might just get their wish with Shield before long. Before you buy stock in Guardant Health, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Guardant Health wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,385!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $842,015!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 987% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Guardant Health. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Guardant Health Stock Surged Nearly 9% Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Red Light, Real Results? These Red Light Face Masks Actually Work
LA Times Studios may earn commission from purchases made through our links. Your coworker's face is glowing red on Zoom, not metaphorically. Your dermatologist's waiting room looks like a futuristic spa. And on TikTok, 20-somethings and 50-somethings alike are strapping LED-lit shields to their faces like they're prepping for battle. The question we're all asking, though, is whether red light face masks actually work? Or are they just vibey headlamps for your face? Let's flip on the facts. Red light therapy (RLT) uses low-wavelength red and near-infrared light to penetrate the skin at a cellular level. It's not magic, but the mechanism behind it might as well be: wavelengths between 630–850 nanometers stimulate your mitochondria (yes, the powerhouse of the cell) to produce more ATP, your cells' energy currency. Translation? More energy for your skin to repair, regenerate, and radiate. A review in Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery concluded that red and near-infrared light 'can stimulate collagen production, enhance fibroblast proliferation, and accelerate wound healing.' Another clinical study found that consistent red light use measurably improved wrinkles, tone, and firmness in just 12 weeks. Light therapy isn't new, it's been studied for decades. What researchers found is that light in a narrow band of red and near-infrared wavelengths can safely stimulate health benefits by acting directly on the mitochondria in your cells. According to red light tech company Joylux, 'It is believed that mitochondria, in their excited state, release ATP (adenosine triphosphate) and NO (Nitric Oxide). Increased ATP means more energy to build collagen and repair tissue. Increased NO means improved blood flow, which helps the necessary nutrients and oxygen travel throughout our body.' So yes, the glow is real and cellular. Though most people grab a red light mask to battle fine lines or acne, the benefits go deeper. 'Red light stimulates cellular repair, increases blood circulation, enhances collagen production, supports tissue regeneration, and improves natural hydration,' according to Joylux. In fact, red light therapy is now being explored not only for facial skin health but for broader concerns like wound healing, pain relief, hair growth, and intimate wellness. It's showing promise in addressing issues related to menopause, inflammation, and even muscle recovery. Not all LED masks are created equal. Some are scientifically sound; others are overpriced plastic cosplay. Here's the glow-down on the best red light masks right now: Best for: Collagen and elasticityMade famous by Emily in Paris, and even more by real dermatologists, uses dual wavelengths (633nm red + 830nm near-infrared) to boost collagen and reduce wrinkles. It's flexible, FDA-cleared, and has solid independent clinical backing.💸 $379 at CurrentBody Best for: Acne + anti-aging multitaskersWith 100 red and 62 blue LEDs, this celebrity-endorsed mask tackles breakouts and fine lines in one go. A staple in both luxury skincare clinics and influencer vanities.💸 $455 at Revolve Best for: Beauty minimalists and budget-conscious glow-gettersSkin Gym's Pro LED Mask delivers serious results with a luxe design that wouldn't look out of place at an aesthetician's studio. Featuring red, blue, green, yellow, and purple light modes, this device targets everything from fine lines to breakouts and dullness.💸 $299 at SkinGym Best for: Sensitive skin and rosaceaGentle, flexible, and FDA-cleared, this mask is often recommended by dermatologists for calming inflammation and boosting elasticity. A true derm-favorite for delicate skin.💸 $395 at Omnilux Best for: Targeted wrinkle reduction and enhanced skin radianceThe Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Light Therapy Face Mask is an FDA-cleared device that combines red and near-infrared light therapy to address signs of aging. Crafted from flexible, medical-grade silicone, it comfortably conforms to the face, delivering a hands-free, 10-minute treatment designed to reduce fine lines, wrinkles, and discoloration. 💸 $349 at Ulta If you're expecting overnight miracles, you'll be disappointed. But if you're down for the long game (think 3–5 sessions a week, for 6–12 weeks), the science says yes. According to a 2023 analysis in Lasers in Medical Science, red light therapy is 'statistically significant in reducing wrinkle depth and improving skin tone across all skin types.' That said, cheaper knockoffs on Amazon with vague 'LED' claims and no mention of wavelength specifics? Skip them. This isn't just hype. With growing clinical evidence, FDA clearances, and serious investment from brands, red light therapy is poised to become as standard as retinol in your skincare routine. And in a world where beauty intersects with recovery, stress relief, and biohacking, it's hitting the sweet spot of science and self-care. Click here to learn more about Joylux


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Doritos, Mountain Dew could get warning labels in this state
Doritos, Mountain Dew could get warning labels in this state Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to indicate if he plans to sign the bill into law. Show Caption Hide Caption FDA redefines what foods can be labeled as 'healthy' Foods will be required to contain certain ingredients and be under specific limits for added sugar, saturated fat and sodium to be marketed as "healthy." Scripps News A bipartisan bill out of Texas, awaiting Gov. Greg Abbott's signature, could change food and drink packaging as we know it nationwide. Texas Senate Bill 25 passed unanimously in the state senate before being forwarded to Abbott's desk on June 1, where it is under review. Among provisions for education on nutrition and health, one set of proposed regulations would require that packaging for food or drink items contain warnings about ingredients "not recommended for human consumption." The commonly used ingredients listed in the bill are legal to use in the U.S., but most are subject to some sort of ban or more stringent regulation in other countries State lawmaker Rep. Lacey Hull told Bloomberg that Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called her to voice his support for the bill, which aligns with initiatives in his "Make America Healthy Again" movement. HHS press secretary Emily G. Hilliard told USA TODAY in an email that, "Secretary Kennedy encourages states to promote healthy practices and enhance consumer transparency in food labeling. Americans deserve to know what's in their food so they can make informed choices for themselves and their families." While the bill managed to reach across a contentious political aisle, it is not universally popular. John Hewitt, Senior Vice President of State Affairs for the Consumer Brands Association, urged the governor not to sign it in a statement shared with USA TODAY, saying, "The ingredients used in the U.S. food supply are safe and have been rigorously studied following an objective science and risk-based evaluation process. The labeling requirements of SB 25 mandate inaccurate warning language, create legal risks for brands and drive consumer confusion and higher costs." Gov. Abbott has yet to indicate if he plans to sign the bill into law. In a statement to USA TODAY on Tuesday, June 3, press secretary Andrew Mahaleris said, 'Governor Abbott will continue to work with the legislature to ensure Texans have access to healthy foods to care for themselves and their families and will thoughtfully review any legislation they send to his desk.' What's in Texas Senate Bill 25 about food labels? Texas Senate Bill 25 would require that specific warning labels be placed on products intended for human consumption if they use certain ingredients like bleached flour, food dyes, sweeteners, oils and preservatives. Because manufacturers generally aim for uniformity and efficiency, as reported by Bloomberg, they will often expand practices employed to comply with state laws nationwide, meaning this change could impact the packaged food industry on a larger scale. The bill would require that manufacturers display the warning label prominently if their product contains one of 44 listed ingredients, most of which have some form of ban, warning or regulation in other Western countries despite being legal in the U.S. The proposed label reads as follows: "WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom." Manufacturers, and in some cases retailers, would also be required to post a similar statement on websites on which applicable products are offered for sale. This requirement would not apply to products not intended for human consumption; food prepared, served, or sold in restaurants or retail locations; drugs or dietary supplements; or agricultural products on which pesticides or other such chemicals were used in their production, storage or transportation. Regulations set by federal agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Surgeon General would supersede these state-level rules, meaning products already overseen or required to utilize certain labels by these agencies would not need an additional warning. The FDA deeming ingredients safe or setting new guidelines for their use would also exempt them from labeling. Which ingredients are listed in the bill? acetylated esters of mono- and diglycerides (acetic acid ester) anisole azodicarbonamide (ADA) butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) bleached flour blue 1 (CAS 3844-45-9) blue 2 (CAS 860-22-0) bromated flour calcium bromate canthaxanthin certified food colors by the United States Food and Drug Administration citrus red 2 (CAS 6358-53-8) diacetyl diacetyl tartaric and fatty acid esters of mono- and diglycerides (DATEM) dimethylamylamine (DMAA) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) ficin green 3 (CAS 2353-45-9) interesterified palm oil interesterified soybean oil lactylated fatty acid esters of glycerol and propylene glycol lye morpholine olestra partially hydrogenated oil (PHO) potassium aluminum sulfate potassium bromate potassium iodate propylene oxide propylparaben red 3 (CAS 16423-68-0) red 4 (CAS 4548-53-2) red 40 (CAS 25956-17-6) sodium aluminum sulfate sodium lauryl sulfate sodium stearyl fumarate stearyl tartrate synthetic trans fatty acid thiodipropionic acid titanium dioxide toluene yellow 5 (CAS 1934-21-0) yellow 6 (CAS 2783-94-0) Which foods could be impacted? Packaged and processed foods of all kinds could be impacted by the bill. If it passes, consumers will begin seeing the warning on labels developed and copyrighted beginning in 2027. Chips, candy and snack products like Doritos, Ruffles, Lay's flavored chips, microwaved popcorn, M&Ms, Sour Patch Kids and Skittles would need to be labeled, along with cereals like Froot Loops and Cap'n Crunch. Sweets like Twinkies or Hostess snack cakes and packaged cookies like Oreos and Chips Ahoy! contain the offending ingredients, along with frozen dinners, instant noodles, some breads and even processed meats like sausages and hot dogs. Drinks like Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Capri Sun, Hawaiian Punch and Juicy Juice would also be affected. RFK Jr.'s push for ingredient reviews, tighter regulations In April, the FDA and RFK announced plans to "phase out" petroleum-based synthetic dyes previously allowed under FDA regulations from the U.S. food and drug supply by the end of 2026. No formal agreement or legislation was passed officially banning the substances. Instead, HHS and the FDA have a "mutual understanding" with the food industry that the dyes will be progressively removed, according to Kennedy. Are food dyes getting banned in the US?: What know to about 8 dyes being phased out During an April 22 press conference, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency intended to revoke the approval of some dyes and work with industry leaders to substitute petrochemical dyes with "natural" ones. A press statement released by the FDA also said it plans to establish a "national standard and timeline for the transition from petrochemical-based dyes to natural alternatives." The FDA will authorize four new natural color additives and expedite the approval of more, according to its statement. The agency will also partner with the National Institutes of Health to research the effect food additives have on children's health and development.