EDISON ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is Investigating Edison International on Behalf of Long-Term Stockholders and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
NEW YORK, May 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against Edison International (NYSE: EIX) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint that was filed against Edison on February 11, 2025 with a Class Period from February 25, 2021 through February 6, 2025. Our investigation concerns whether the board of directors of Edison have breached their fiduciary duties to the company.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Edison's claim that Southern California Edison Company ('SCE') used its Public Safety Power Shutoffs ('PSPS') program to 'proactively de-energize power lines to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires during extreme weather events', was false; (2) this resulted in heightened fire risk in California and heightened legal exposure to the Company; and (3) as a result, Defendants' statements about Edison's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you are a long-term stockholder of Edison, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore by email at [email protected], by telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no cost or obligation to you.
About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York and California. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit www.bespc.com. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook, and keep up with other news by following Brandon Walker, Esq. on LinkedIn and X.
Contact Information:
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.
Brandon Walker, Esq.
Marion Passmore, Esq.
(212) 355-4648
[email protected]
www.bespc.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should you buy an annuity? Here's 4 times when it doesn't make sense to do so
Annuities can be a solid tool for generating guaranteed income in retirement, but they're not for everyone. Despite promises of financial peace of mind, annuities come with some big trade-offs. They're complex, often expensive and restrict access to your funds. Before you tie up your money potentially for decades, it's worth asking yourself if an annuity truly fits your financial situation. In plenty of cases, it might not. Annuities are essentially a bet that you'll live long enough to make the upfront investment worth it. You give an insurance company a lump sum or series of payments, and in return, they promise to pay you income — sometimes for life. The longer you live, the better your investment pays off, because no matter how long you live, those guaranteed payments keep coming. However, if you have concerns about your health or your family history points to a shorter life expectancy, you may be better off keeping your money elsewhere. You could spend $100,000 or more to buy an annuity and only get a few years of payments before passing away — leaving little to nothing for your heirs. Some annuities include a standard death benefit, which pays out the remaining contributions minus fees and withdrawals. (You contribute $100,000, receive $60,000 in payouts and your heirs inherit $40,000 minus fees.) You can also add a death benefit rider to your annuity, but that protection comes at an added cost — one you could avoid by skipping an annuity altogether. Similarly, since annuities restrict access to your initial investment, it can be costly — if not nearly impossible — to access your money if your health rapidly declines and your financial outlook shifts. In short, if your health isn't solid, keep your cash more liquid and flexible somewhere else. Learn more: Here's what you should know about inheriting an annuity. An annuity is often described as a do-it-yourself pension. If you're lucky enough to have a traditional pension from your job when you retire, you may already have guaranteed lifetime income. Let's say you're set to get $3,000 per month from your pension, and your expenses are $4,000 per month. Maybe an annuity could cover the $1,000 gap — but so could a smart systematic withdrawal plan, not to mention the ultimate source of guaranteed income in retirement, Social Security. If your pension covers all your essential expenses, an annuity contract will only complicate your retirement plan. You're likely better off keeping additional funds in an IRA or a high-yield savings account for emergencies and nondiscretionary spending. Annuities are complex and a bit different than other financial products. Learn how annuity fees and commissions work and the common annuity terms that every investor should know. You may also want to consult with a financial advisor if you're considering an annuity. Annuities are for people who already have their basic financial house in order. If you're still working on building up your emergency fund or paying off considerable debt, buying an annuity could make your overall financial situation worse, not better. Why? Because annuities generally require a large upfront investment in order to produce any sort of meaningful income in retirement — think $100,000 and up. Most financial experts recommend putting no more than 25 percent of your savings into an annuity, so you should have plenty of money elsewhere before signing a contract. Because once you buy an annuity, getting your money out can be difficult. Annuity funds are notoriously difficult to access without getting hit with surrender charges and tax penalties. And once you annuitize your contract, meaning you start receiving payouts from the insurer, you may not be able to take an early withdrawal at all. Annuities also generally don't offer great growth potential or adjust payouts to keep pace with inflation (unless you pay extra). If you're still trying to build wealth, you're likely better off keeping your money in a Roth IRA or a brokerage account. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Annuities are most useful for people who want to outsource some of their retirement planning decisions — particularly when it comes to managing investment risk and timing withdrawals. The insurance company handles the investment, the payouts and manages the risk of outliving your money. But that convenience comes at a cost: high fees, rigid rules and less flexibility. If you feel confident managing your own portfolio, it's not very useful to pay an insurance company to do what you can already handle yourself. You're likely to get better returns and more control by keeping your money invested and drawing it down in a tax-efficient way. If you want a second opinion, a one-time session with a fee-only financial advisor could go a long way and cost only a few hundred dollars — a drop in the bucket compared to the potential hidden fees baked into many annuity contracts. While annuities aren't the right choice for everyone, there are valid reasons why they continue to be part of retirement planning conversations. The trade-offs are real, but so are the benefits — especially if you're focused on long-term financial security. First, not all annuities are expensive or inflexible. Multi-year guaranteed annuities (MYGAs): These are fixed-rate annuities that act more like CDs, but with deferred taxes. They're simple, low-cost and don't require giving up access to your money forever. Longevity annuities: These deferred income annuities are purchased at retirement but don't start paying out until later — usually around age 80 or 85. Because they're designed to cover only the later years of retirement, they require a much smaller upfront investment than annuities with lifetime payouts. Second, you might feel confident managing your investments now — but what about in your 80s or 90s? Cognitive decline is a real possibility, and not everyone has a reliable person to step in and manage their finances. An annuity can automate your income and help protect you from poor decision-making later in life. And finally, while annuities are often seen as rigid, there are ways to build flexibility into your contract. For example, you can add a long-term care rider if you're worried about your declining health. Many contracts also allow annual withdrawals of up to 10 percent before you fully annuitize, giving you access to a portion of your money if you need it. Ultimately, buying an annuity is a deeply personal decision. The best move is to talk through your options with a qualified financial advisor before moving ahead. Annuities are heavily promoted as a solution to retirement planning, especially by sales reps and agents who make commissions selling them. But in reality, they're far from a one-size-fits-all fix and there are plenty of times when buying an annuity simply doesn't make sense. If you're on the fence, ask yourself what problem you're actually trying to solve by purchasing an annuity. If it's peace of mind, reliable income or protection against market volatility, there might be simpler, cheaper ways to get there. Compare advisors: Bankrate's list of the best financial advisors Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ASX slips after Trump/Musk stoush
Cautious investors sold down the ASX on a quiet day of trading on Friday, despite the US and China resuming trade talks, as markets await critical jobs data out of the US. The benchmark ASX 200 index slipped for the second consecutive day of trading falling by 23.20 points or 0.27 per cent to 8,515.70. The ASX200 has now recorded four consecutive weekly gains. The broader All Ordinaries fell during Friday's trading, down 26.70 points or 0.30 power cent to 8,741.90. The Australian dollar also is down 0.21 per cent and is now buying 64.95 US cents. On an overall bleak day on the market, nine of the 11 sectors finished in the red with just energy, industrials and utilities gaining ground. Woodside Energy gained 0.97 per cent to $22.94, while Santos is up 0.61 per cent to $6.58 as the price of Brent crude oil continues to recover over the week's trading. Industrials also had a strong day led by Qantas Airways which jumped 3.46 per cent to $10.76 despite the news Virgin Australia is looking to re-list. Transurban shares also rose 0.63 per cent to $14.38, and Computershares Limited rose 0.83 per cent to $41.08. CBA shares slipped from its record highs down 0.79 per cent to $179.90, Westpac fell 0.24 per cent to $33.18 and ANZ traded 0.44 per cent lower to $29.50. NAB was the only big four bank to finish in the eking out a 0.18 per cent gain and to close Friday's trading at $38.58. eToro market analyst Josh Gilbert said initially there was optimism on the markets following 'very good' trade talks between Washington and Beijing. But this quickly changed after a public spat between former friends President Donald Trump and Tesla chief executive Elon Musk. 'This will provide a hit to overall market sentiment, particularly tech, but may not be long-lasting for anyone other than Tesla,' Mr Gilbert said. The overall lower volumes on the ASX comes as investors await the latest payroll data out of the US. 'The uncertain macro backdrop continues to provide a hurdle for risk-on sentiment, and cooling US economic data is leaving investors unassured,' Mr Gilbert said. 'With the labour market heavily in focus, the print this evening will be essential for market direction.' Mr Gilbert said negative economic data released throughout the week could actually help drive the ASX 200 higher. 'The weaker-than-expected GDP data this week also drives the expectation for further rate cuts, further supporting the market optimism,' he said. In corporate news, Worley shares fell 0.46 per cent to $13.08 despite the business announcing it had won a contract with Glenfarne to help support engineering work on its Alaska LNG pipeline. Shares in gold miner West Cobar Metals soared 60 per cent to $0.024 after announcing it has completed the acquisition of the Mystique Gold Project in Fraser Range, Western Australia. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
36 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How to Get Off the Investing Sidelines - Your Money Briefing
A turbulent spring in the stock market spooked some investors — and now, they're struggling to get back in . Host Julia Carpenter talks with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist Jason Zweig about how these same folks can reshape their investing strategy with some much-needed historical perspective. Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Julia Carpenter: Here's Your Money Briefing for Friday, June 6th. I'm Julia Carpenter for The Wall Street Journal. What do you think the opposite of FOMO or the fear of missing out is? FOGI. The fear of getting in, and FOGI is all too common among investors these days. Jason Zweig: When people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines nonstop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: After such an up and down few months in the stock market, spooked investors know they're probably playing it a little too safe, but what's the first step to jumping back in the fray? We'll talk with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, about how to conquer FOGI and maybe even how to use it to your advantage. That's after the break. Investors haven't had a quiet 2025. After the Trump Administration's tariff plan sent the market into a tailspin earlier this spring, some investors decided to pull out rather than play ball, and others had taken a step back even earlier. But now the market seas have calmed. So how do you get back in? Wall Street Journal's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, joins me to talk more. Jason, one of your readers, Michael McCowin, wrote to you and coined this new term: FOGI. Or fear of getting in. How did he arrive at this FOGI place? Jason Zweig: Well, he would say a couple of things. First of all, he got old, and he became a FOGI, an old FOGI. And secondly, he has pretty strong views. He's fortunate. He's a former professional investor. He has plenty of assets to see him through. He's 86, and he feels that the potential upside from staying in the market at this point is not as great as the potential downside of staying in and perhaps losing a lot of his money without time to recover. Julia Carpenter: And after such a turbulent period in markets, you talk to some investors who say they think they should be more fully invested, but they still are in that place that Michael is in, that sort of FOGI place. Why do you think so many investors feel this way? Jason Zweig: Uncertainty is always high except at total market turning points, like say, 2020 or in 1987. And when people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines non-stop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: FOGI is contagious. Jason Zweig: Yeah, it absolutely is. Julia Carpenter: And your column, which is linked in our show notes, does such a great job of giving us some much-needed historical perspective. How do the last few market cycles fit into the big picture of the last 80 years in markets? Jason Zweig: The key thing to put in perspective as an investor is that, the long run, tells us unambiguously that you should be rewarded for sticking with U.S. stocks if you can stick with them long enough. We've had over 60 instances of stocks losing 5% or more. We've had a couple dozen corrections where they went down 10 or 20%. And, just in the past few years, we've had two severe bear markets where stocks lost 20% or more. And, over time, the markets have always overcome that and delivered ample returns for people who could stick with it. However, it's not a guarantee. And, ultimately, if you try to force yourself to be the kind of investor you're not, you might end up worse off. People who really feel they need to sleep well at night should listen to that intuition, because if you compel yourself against your own gut to stick with the market during times that look tough, when times that actually feel tough come along, you may get shaken out. So, having a little bit higher allocation to cash or bonds might not be a bad thing for someone who is inclined to get spooked out of the market. Julia Carpenter: I wanted to ask you about a hindsight bias. What is it, and how should we be thinking about it as investors? Jason Zweig: Hindsight bias is a fallacy of human reasoning. It essentially trains us to think, after the fact, that what did happen is what we predicted would happen. And just think about presidential elections, for example. People say things like, "Oh, I knew all along it would be a landslide," or, "I knew all along it would be close." But if you go back and look at what they actually were saying before the election, they weren't saying that. And the advantage of what's just happened, particularly in April and the rebound in May, is that it's so fresh in all of our minds, that it's kind of hard to lie to ourselves. And it gives us a great opportunity to look back and say, "What was I actually saying and thinking? Oh, I was actually saying and thinking this was almost the end of the world, and it's turned out not to be, at least so far. So maybe the lesson I should learn is not to be so certain about my forecasts." Julia Carpenter: So thinking about investors like Michael, what would you tell them to consider as they weigh their options and try to conquer this fear of getting in? Jason Zweig: I like to say, if you must panic, panic slowly, panic gradually. Maybe take one percentage point of your allocation to stocks and reduce that each month. And, within a retirement account, where you don't have immediate tax consequences, you can do that quite easily. And making gradual change, first of all, will make you feel better, because you'll feel you're responding to the thing you're afraid of. But more importantly, it prevents you from overreacting to a fear you feel that ultimately doesn't turn out to be actual. Julia Carpenter: And just to emphasize to those who are still sort of spooked, Jason, managing investments is just one part of an overall financial plan, but it's an important one nonetheless. I wonder what would you say to someone about using the market to build wealth and this sense of security? Jason Zweig: So, the thing to keep in mind is that, while there are no guarantees, and it is not actually true that if you hold stocks long enough you're guaranteed to outperform all other assets, it's a bet about probabilities. It's highly likely that you will do extremely well if you hold stocks for the long term. And the fact that the probability isn't a hundred percent, I don't think should really discourage you from doing it. Just as it can rain on a day when the forecast is 100% sunshine, stocks can disappoint people who hold them for decades at a time, but in the long run, it is a very high probability bet. And putting most of your money in stocks, particularly when you're young and your labor income gives you a hedge against fluctuations in the value of your stock portfolio, is a good idea. It's the best bet for long-term investing, even if it's not quite a certain bet. Julia Carpenter: That's Jason Zweig, columnist for WSJ's: The Intelligent Investor. And that's it for Your Money Briefing. Tomorrow we'll have our weekly markets wrap up, What's News and markets, and then we'll be back on Monday. This episode was produced by Ariana Aspuru. I'm your host, Julia Carpenter. Jessica Fenton and Michael LaValle wrote our theme music. Our supervising producer is Melony Roy. Aisha Al-Muslim is our development producer. Scott Saloway and Chris Zinsli are our deputy editors. And Philana Patterson is The Wall Street Journal's head of news audio. Thanks for listening.
