Franchising Middlesbrough buses would be too costly, says mayor
"People in Stainton and Thornton, on the west of the town, many of whom are elderly, have great problems getting to James Cook hospital, because there isn't a service there," he said.Branson said bus services were a particular issue in south Middlesbrough, which had been described as a "transport desert".His motion was supported by Liberal Democrat councillor Tom Livingstone, who said the town's bus services were "totally unacceptable and not fit for purpose at the moment", according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In February, Hartlepool Borough Council also wrote to the Tees Valley Combined Authority urging it to franchise services and introduce specific contracts to private firms to run routes.At the time, Houchen rejected the idea and claimed it would be "gambling with taxpayers' money".
Responding to Middlesbrough Council's call for franchised bus services, Houchen said a new system could see hundreds of millions handed to large companies and described it as "bureaucracy with a price tag"."I remain open to new ideas, but only those that don't involve breaking promises to local people by raising their taxes," he said."No such alternative model has yet been provided."The government recently confirmed Tees Valley would receive £1bn in transport funding but Houchen said the money could only be used for infrastructure investment, not for running services or subsidising fares.
But the Middlesbrough Mayor, Labour's Chris Cooke, said ending deregulation would save money in the long run."I think the price we worry about, the subsidy costs that may have to come and the cost of the franchising, will pale in significance to the costs we will pay time and time again as [the bus companies] know they have a monopoly over the entire service," he said.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
Domino's Pizza profits dive as people cut back on takeaways
Domino's Pizza said the takeaway market had 'become tougher' as it blamed weaker consumer confidence in the run-up to the autumn budget and rising wage costs for lower than expected sales and a slump in profits. The takeaway specialist said it now expected full-year underlying profits of between £130m and £140m, about £6m below the average of analysts' expectations. Domino's said it was taking market share but its franchise partners were being more cautious about opening new outlets because of higher employment costs. Employers' national insurance payments and the legal minimum wage were increased in April. The company opened 11 stores in the six months to the end of June, fewer than expected, and is now forecasting openings in the mid-20s for the full year. In April it said it hoped to open 'in excess of 50 new stores'. Andrew Rennie, the chief executive of Domino's, said: 'There's no getting away from the fact that the market has become tougher both for us and our franchisees, and that's meant that the positive performance across the first four months didn't continue into May and June. 'Given weaker consumer confidence, increased employment costs and uncertainty ahead of the autumn statement, franchisees are taking a more cautious approach to store openings for the time being.' He said the group was looking at more automation to help keep costs down. Shares in the UK-listed group slid more than 13% in morning trading on Tuesday as it reported flat total order numbers in the first six months. Underlying sales dipped 0.1% as it struggled to beat the strong sales last year during the men's Euro 2024 football tournament. Underlying pre-tax profits slid almost 15% to £43.7m as system sales, which include total sales made at franchise outlets and new outlets opened during the year, rose 1.3% to £778m. The poor performance at Domino's follows similar difficulties at the bakery specialist Greggs, which reported a 14% fall in half-year profits last week amid weaker than hoped for sales. It said that profits had been hit as consumers shunned pastry bakes and hot food in favour of cold drinks during the hot weather. The rival pizza franchise Papa Johns has also closed more than 70 outlets, while Pizza Hut's 140 restaurants were rescued from insolvency in January. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Katie Cousins, an equity analyst at Shore Capital, said: 'We note ongoing headwinds from low consumer confidence and slowing income tracker data, particularly for [those on low income], along with potential impacts of weight-loss injections on the sector.' Mark Crouch, a market analyst for eToro, added: 'Despite [Domino's] revenue growing and higher like-for-like sales, profits have dropped sharply, and store openings have slowed, a troubling combination for a growth-focused franchise model. 'If fast affordable food is feeling the pinch, what does that say about the broader consumer landscape? Investors may see a resilient brand, but the numbers point to structural headwinds that go beyond pizza.'
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
Plans for AI data centre campus proposed which could create 1500 jobs
A proposal of application notice by the UK-based firm Apatura has been submitted to both Stirling Council and Falkirk Council. Apatura have proposed to create an AI data centre campus with a 300MW capacity on land next to the A9 and between Plean and Torwood, outside Stirling. Along with the AI data centre plans also outline a proposal to build a car park, roads, access, associate works along with various landscaping. READ MORE: Labour's 'cruel' asylum returns deal with France comes into force The application says that AI data centres are 'vital' to the UK's digital and economic infrastructure and help process large amounts of information by using artificial intelligence which helps power organisations like NHS online services and national security operations. Apatura said the proposed campus would represent a 'major investment' in both the local and regional economy if approved, as they estimate it would generate £2.1 billion total capital investment. The firm added that with £189 million projected for the construction spend earmarked for the local supply chain it would create around 15000 jobs across Scotland annually, with 395 of them being made locally across the four-year construction period. Plans for the centre have entered a 12-week pre-application consultation process with a public consultation meeting planned for September 3 and October 7 at Glenbervie House & Country Estate organised by Apatura. The proposed site at Old Plean comprises approximately 43.1 hectares in total and is located within the administrative area of Stirling Council and Falkirk Council. Bannockburn councillor, Alasdair Macpherson, whose ward includes the proposed site, said that it's 'vital that the community take a real interest in this consultation', saying that, if approved, the proposal could 'bring cutting edge technology and very exciting jobs to the local area.' Cllr Macpherson added: 'It's my job as local councillor to ensure that if the developers decide to submit a formal application that the proposal is compliant with the Local Development Plan, the local community extracts the maximum benefit from the development and disruption is kept to a minimum, if it was to eventually get consent'. With more than 15 years' worth of industry experience, Apatura develops and operates large-scale energy and digital infrastructure with a focus on projects that 'unlock lasting value' for local communities. The firm specialises in clean power, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and data centre–ready sites.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
FCA bans star investor Neil Woodford and issues fine of nearly £46m
The Financial Conduct Authority has provisionally banned a former star City fund manager and fined him and his former company almost £46 million. The financial watchdog said Neil Woodford put investors' money at risk. It said it will ban Mr Woodford from holding senior manager roles and from managing funds for retail investors. Mr Woodford will be fined £5.89 million and Woodford Investment Management (WIM) will be fined £40 million. Mr Woodford and WIM have referred the case to the Upper Tribunal for appeal. The former manager's flagship fund, Woodford Equity Income Fund (WEIF), was wound down in 2019 after investors tried to withdraw cash faster than the fund could pay out, amid concerns over its high exposure to illiquid and unquoted shares. The value of the WEIF had fallen from a high of more than £10.1 billion in May 2017 to £3.6 billion before its suspension. About 300,000 investors still had cash trapped in the fund when it was suspended. On Tuesday, the FCA said it had concluded that Mr Woodford and the fund 'made unreasonable and inappropriate investment decisions' between July 2018 and June 2019. The fund's sale of liquid assets and acquisition of illiquid ones meant WEIF was unable to meet rules in place at the time, whereby investors should have been able to access their funds within four days. 'WIM and Mr Woodford did not react appropriately as the fund's value declined, its liquidity worsened and more investors withdrew their money,' the FCA said. 'The FCA has concluded that Mr Woodford held a defective and unreasonably narrow understanding of his responsibilities.' The regulator said it found that Mr Woodford and his company's failings 'led to a significantly increased risk of the fund being suspended'. Steve Smart, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: 'Being a leader in financial services comes with responsibilities as well as profile. Mr Woodford simply doesn't accept he had any role in managing the liquidity of the fund. 'The very minimum investors should expect is those managing their money make sensible decisions and take their senior role seriously. 'Neither Neil Woodford nor Woodford Investment Management did so, putting at risk the money people had entrusted them with.'
