Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial
Federal prosecutors want to bring his smuggling case to trial as soon as possible. But if he's released from pretrial detention, immigration officials intend to arrest and deport him before a trial even begins, according to government lawyers.
Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty, and his trial is set to begin January 27, 2026. He could be in another country by then.
The administration spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back to the country after admitting he was wrongfully deported in March. Yet he was abruptly flown back to the United States from El Salvador last month to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee. At a press conference announcing his return, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Abrego Garcia would face 'American justice.'
In recent court hearings in two different states, where judges are presiding over a criminal case and his wrongful removal lawsuit, Justice Department lawyers said they would only move forward with his criminal prosecution if he remains in custody while awaiting trial.
If he is released on bail, they would let Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest him and send him out of the country, again.
Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis hauled Trump administration officials to court this month to understand what, if anything, the government intends to do with Abrego Garcia when he's released from pretrial custody.
Department of Homeland Security officials admitted that ICE intends to arrest him, but they don't yet know where he will be deported. Government attorneys had previously announced plans to deport him to a 'third country' instead of his native El Salvador.
'There's been no decision made, as he is not in ICE custody,' Thomas Giles, assistant director for ICE enforcement and removal operations, testified last week.
ICE intends to take custody of Abrego Garcia 'as soon as possible,' Giles said.
Where he will await his removal from the country will depend on available space in immigration detention centers, according to Giles.
Last month, Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes determined there is no legal basis to keep him in pretrial detention. She set potential conditions for his release, including wearing an ankle bracelet and living with his brother in Maryland.
The federal judge overseeing his criminal case will decide next week whether to uphold that ruling.
On July 16, Tennessee District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. said his decision will not be determined by what ICE wants to do. 'Frankly we don't know what is going to happen to him in that regard,' the judge said.
But he said he was 'having a hard time understanding' arguments from federal prosecutors that there were no conditions under which Abrego Garcia — who does not have a criminal record — could be out of jail while awaiting trial.
Holmes also appeared to reject the government's characterization of Abrego Garcia as a dangerous MS-13 gang member, human trafficker and serial abuser following claims from administration officials and government attorneys that 'defy common sense.'
Under cross examination from defense attorney Sean Hecker, Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Peter Joseph admitted that he did not know that one of the government's central informants in the case gave conflicting statements about Abrego Garcia's alleged gang ties in several interviews with federal agents.
He also testified that he didn't know that the informants were in contact with other potential cooperators — at least three of whom sought deals with the government to legally remain in the United States in exchange for their testimony.
Three of the witnesses are related, and Joseph admitted it was 'always a possibility' that they coordinated their stories to secure a better deal for themselves.
'They're family,' Crenshaw shot back. 'Family talk.'
But it won't be Crenshaw's decision that decides whether Abrego Garcia walks free.
That will be up to Judge Xinis in Maryland. She is expected to decide whether to block the Trump administration from deporting him a second time.
Xinis has signaled that she will order the government to give him at least two days' notice, should the judge overseeing his criminal case release him from pretrial custody.
Abrego Garcia was 16 years old when he fled gang violence in El Salvador and illegally entered the United States in 2011.
Abrego Garcia, now 29, was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both American citizens, and two children from a previous marriage, when ICE agents arrested him in March.
After government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error, federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns, and Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed the Trump administration had 'illegally' defied that order.
Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States as they characterized him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member.
But emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show Trump administration and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines causing major headaches for the White House.
Erez Reuveni, a 15-year veteran of the Justice Department who was working in the Office of Immigration Litigation, was closely involved with several high-profile immigration cases in the first months of Donald Trump's presidency when he was fired in April.
He supplied members of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a massive trove of internal messages showing the lengths the administration was taking to label Abrego Garcia a member of MS-13 as they tried to figure out if they were violating court orders by keeping him in El Salvador.
Before the case exploded into a national story at the center of the president's anti-immigration agenda, administration officials spent several days discussing the feasibility of returning Abrego Garcia or ensuring that he would be protected from the gang violence he fled as a teenager.
The messages also revealed simmering tensions between Justice Department attorneys who worked the cases in court and lawyers for Homeland Security who were directed to advance the president's agenda, regardless of legal risks.
Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia was , according to his legal team. His attorneys alleged he experienced 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' while locked up inside.
'Last time they put Kilmar Abrego Garcia on a plane, he didn't know where that plane was going until it landed at the airport in El Salvador,' his attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg told reporters last week. 'That's more or less what they want to do again, and that's what we're here to stop.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Far-right Israeli politicians and settlers discuss luxury ‘Gaza riviera' plan
A group of far-right Israeli politicians and settlers met in parliament this week to discuss a plan to displace Palestinians from Gaza, annex the territory and turn it into a hi-tech, luxury resort city for Israelis. The scheme, titled 'The master plan for settlement in the Gaza Strip', envisions the construction of 850,000 housing units, construction of hi-tech 'smart cities' that trade cryptocurrency, and a metro system that runs across the territory. It took its inspiration from an idea shared by the US president, Donald Trump, in February, when he pledged to turn Gaza into the 'riviera of the Middle East'. The text of the plan, which boasts of the economic benefits to Israel, said: 'The right of the people of Israel to settle, develop and preserve this land is not just a historical right – it is a national and security obligation.' The plan, seen by the Guardian, would require Gaza's existing population of about 2 million to be emptied out. Legal experts warn that forcible displacement on such a scale would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. Michael Sfard, one of Israel's leading human rights lawyers, said: 'This is a plan for ethnic cleansing. Under international law, this would amount to a crime against humanity because deportation is a war crime when committed on a small scale and a crime against humanity when it is committed on a massive scale.' The plan was discussed on Tuesday in the Knesset during a conference called 'The riviera in Gaza: from vision to reality'. Among the speakers was the minister of finance, Bezalel Smotrich, and the settler activist Daniella Weiss. The conference drew criticism from other politicians, including Gilad Kariv, of the Democrats party, who accused Smotrich of calling for war crimes to be committed. Weiss told the Guardian over the phone: 'Gazans will not remain there. They will go to other countries. Supporters of Hamas we will fight. But those who want to live a normal life, they will have to leave Gaza because of the 7 October attack.' Palestinians would be relocated to Egypt and other unspecified 'African countries', she added. Weiss said she had a list of 1,000 Israeli families who had already signed up to live on land in Gaza once Palestinian residents were pushed out. 'My plan is to make [Gaza] paradise, to make it Singapore,' she said. Weiss represents a small, but increasingly influential group of radical settlers within Israel who seek to illegally occupy the Gaza Strip. Their calls to create Israeli settlements have grown stronger since the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack, which killed about 1,200 people, and the Israeli war in Gaza, which has killed more than 60,000 so far. The war has levelled much of Gaza and destroyed basic civilian infrastructure. The riviera plan would build luxury resorts on the ruins of Gaza once Israel stopped bombing it. Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has denied any plans to resettle residents of Gaza, though his defence minister, Israel Katz, has suggested transferring residents to a 'humanitarian city' in southern Gaza. Legal experts have called the plan a blueprint for crimes against humanity and the Israeli military itself pushed back on the idea, which it said would be a security nightmare. Trump has also floated the idea of expelling the population of Gaza, suggesting at one point that neighbouring Jordan could take in those displaced. Trump suggested the US could assume control over Gaza to 'develop' the strip – which drew the ire of human rights organisations around the world. While the conference was beng held, Gaza's starvation crisis continued to worsen. At least 113 people have died of hunger in Gaza, 45 of whom died in the last four days, health authorities said. Aid organisations have blamed Israel's virtual blockade of aid into the strip for the growing levels of extreme hunger. Human rights experts said the suggestion of displacing Gaza's residents inside and outside the territory should not be viewed in isolation. Rather, this was part and parcel of a displacement policy. 'When an occupying power creates a coercive environment by, for instance, withholding food, and that coercive environment leaves no choice to the civilian population but to move, then this can amount to the war crime of forced displacement,' said Janina Dill, the co-director of the Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict.
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Hulk Hogan – a life in pictures from wrestling fame to Trump rallies
The controversial wrestling star died at the age of 71 after a cardiac arrest at his home in Florida. He was one of the most successful wrestlers of the 1980s before starring in films such as Mr Nanny, Rocky III and Suburban Commando. He was also a vocal supporter of Donald Trump, taking part in campaign rallies for the president Hulk Hogan, wrestling star and actor, dies aged 71
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Where to watch the ‘One Night in Idaho' documentary
On 13 November 2022, the tight-knit community in the Idaho town of Moscow were left reeling after the murder of four college students. University of Idaho undergraduates Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Madison Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20, were stabbed to death at their home in the middle of the night. Their two other roommates, Bethany Funke and Dylan Mortensen, were the only people in the house to survive. After a seven-week manhunt, the now-convicted mass murderer Bryan Kohberger was found at his family home. For three years, he professed his innocence before switching his plea to avoid the death penalty, just weeks before he was due to stand trial. The police revealed little about the investigation owing to a gag order in place, which was lifted by the judge ahead of the sentencing. But many questions remain unanswered, including the motivations behind his attack. In a bid to put the victims and their families front and centre, directors Liz Garbus and Matthew Galkin have made a four-part documentary titled One Night in Idaho: The College Murders. It follows the family and friends of the victims in the aftermath and explores the impact of social media sleuths during high-profile cases. Here's everything you need to know about it, including where to stream. What is 'One Night in Idaho: The College Murders' about? The four-part series recounts the night of the murders, where four students were stabbed in their off-campus house in the quiet town of Moscow. Exploring the aftermath of the killings, it features the grieving family, friends and wider community. The documentary features exclusive interviews with Stacey and Jim Chapin (parents of Ethan Chapin), and Karen and Scott Laramie (parents of Madison Mogen), none of whom have previously been interviewed about the murders. The directors of the series – Liz Garbus and Matthew Galkin – wanted to shake up the true crime format by putting the victims at the forefront, rather than the suspect. Across four episodes, One Night in Idaho also explores the impact and damage of internet sleuths who became obsessed with the case, some of whom attempted to sneak into the University's classes and dorms, and others even into the roped-off house. Where to watch 'One Night in Idaho' in the UK All four episodes of One Night in Idaho are now available on Amazon Prime Video. If you're not already a member, you can sign up for a 30-day free trial. After that, a Prime membership costs £8.99 per month or £95 per year. Alternatively, you can subscribe to Prime Video alone for £5.99 per month.
