A large gulf has now developed between Yessers and the SNP
Firstly, the SNP for some years have stopped putting over their case for independence and are focused on the Union parties. When you are focused on the other parties, you fail to get your message across to the electorate and the media don't pick up on your cause. The result is a loss of MPs and MSPs, which can result in the loss of control of government.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: John Swinney needs to rethink his strategy over Scottish independence
Secondly, Tuesday's article by James Dornan MSP left me wondering where he's been hiding, certainly these last few weeks but moreover during the last 11 years since the independence referendum in 2014 (Tell voters we will hold new indyref no matter what Westminster says, Jun 10).
Since September 18 2014, we've had three first ministers and six prime ministers. Each first minister has pleaded the case for a Section 30 order on numerous occasions without success. The SNP even went to the Supreme Court to try and get something done but the answer is always 'NO!' I'm afraid to tell James that although his intentions are good, they stand as much chance as the snowball in hell.
That doesn't mean that I disagree with the full article, or for that matter the sentiment of the piece. However, asking for a Section 30 is like watching a dog chase its tail. The only difference is that my dog usually catches his and it's much more fun to see. Yes, James, we need to put independence front and centre as you say in your article, and we've been telling the SNP that for some years now without success.
So, I'm asking on behalf of the electorate: why isn't it happening?
I also agree that the SNP should legislate for a second independence vote. But James, why wait until after the election and after a further request to the Prime Minister for a Section 30 has been refused? The best time to do it would be now, when there is about 54% support for it, as it would show us voters exactly where the SNP stand. Also, the petition from the Scottish Sovereignty Research Group for Scotland to be recognised as a non-self-governing country has been lodged with the United Nations. So what has the present SNP government to lose?
READ MORE: Kelly Given: Independence needs more than John Swinney's safety-first politics
At best the UN backs our claim. Then the worst that can happen is that Starmer says no and the UN overrules him and gives Scotland the power to hold a referendum anyway.
Starmer can't go to the English Supreme Court and argue that we can't hold one without his say so, as the union of parliaments didn't happen so he and England have no legal authority.
Above all that, if the Unionists get a majority at the next election then the first thing they would have to do is to revoke the referendum act, and by that time the UN may be telling Scotland how to proceed anyway.
If the legislation is there, then who are we in the indy movement going to back at the next Holyrood election? The ball is in your court, James.
Alexander Potts
Kilmarnock
FROM an enthusiastic supporter in Ireland, I offer this advice: work towards a majority of independence supporting seats at Holyrood, a majority of independence supporting local councils and a majority of Scottish Westminster seats. Then, having achieved that, go for UDI! Ye have nothing to lose and everything to gain!
Pádraig De Búrca
via thenational.scot
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
33 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Tories ‘got it wrong' when they backed 2045 net zero target, Findlay says
Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay insisted his party is the only one 'telling the truth' on net zero – as he announced the Conservatives in Scotland would scrap the target of reaching this goal by 2045. Tory MSPs had voted for legislation in 2019 which commits Scotland to achieving net zero by that date. But Mr Findlay now says they had been 'wrong' to do so. 🗣️ @RussellFindlay1: "The only just transition is an affordable transition – one that protects North Sea jobs and cuts energy bills for families and businesses. "We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target. "It is unaffordable and unachievable." #SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 14, 2025 His comments came as a new policy paper published by the party said reaching this target would result in 'unaffordable costs for struggling families across Scotland and put at risk our oil and gas industry and farmers' businesses'. UK Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has already said the UK target of reaching net zero by 2050 – five years later than the Scottish date – is 'impossible'. While Scottish Tories had previously backed the 2045 date, Mr Findlay told the PA news agency: 'I think yes, we did get it wrong'. When Conservative MSPs at Holyrood supported the 2045 date, he said they had done so 'so on the basis of what was known in those moments'. But he added: 'The situation has become clearer, it is evident to everybody watching this, to everybody in the Scottish Parliament, if they were being honest. 'Both Labour, the SNP and the rest of them would admit that the 2045 target isn't just unaffordable it's unachievable – that's the reality. 'So we're telling the truth to the Scottish public.' Mr Findlay continued: 'We want to reach net zero fairly and quickly. We understand the climate crisis emergency but we cannot harm our own economy and force householders who are already struggling to pay the bills with yet more great costs. 'Whether it be ripping out their gas boilers and putting in costly heat pumps, or forcing them to get rid of their cars and buying very expensive electric alternatives. 'This has got to be about the balance between ensuring we reach net zero properly and speedily, but recognising that it cannot come at a crippling cost to those people out there who are having to pay for it.' Asked later by journalists if his party was pandering to climate sceptics, Mr Findlay said they were 'absolutely not', adding the Tories were the only party 'telling the truth' on the issue. His comments came as the Scottish Conservatives promised to give every household in Scotland a £100 discount on their energy bills – with this to be funded from money accrued from the ScotWind auction, where areas of the seabed were leased for offshore wind power projects. The paper also said the Tories would make pylons 'an option of last resort for energy infrastructure projects' – with the party promising legislation to give people 'greater decision-making authority over local infrastructure projects' by abolishing the Scottish Government's existing energy consents union. Speaking about the changes as he addressed the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mr Findlay said: 'We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target. It is unaffordable and unachievable.' He added that instead of spending money on 'SNP eco-projects', the Tories would 'use it to protect oil and gas workers' livelihoods'. Mr Findlay continued: 'We would take £100 off every household energy bill in Scotland from the proceeds of leasing our waters to wind farms.
South Wales Guardian
40 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Tories ‘got it wrong' when they backed 2045 net zero target, Findlay says
Tory MSPs had voted for legislation in 2019 which commits Scotland to achieving net zero by that date. But Mr Findlay now says they had been 'wrong' to do so. 🗣️ @RussellFindlay1: "The only just transition is an affordable transition – one that protects North Sea jobs and cuts energy bills for families and businesses. "We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target. "It is unaffordable and unachievable."#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 14, 2025 His comments came as a new policy paper published by the party said reaching this target would result in 'unaffordable costs for struggling families across Scotland and put at risk our oil and gas industry and farmers' businesses'. UK Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has already said the UK target of reaching net zero by 2050 – five years later than the Scottish date – is 'impossible'. While Scottish Tories had previously backed the 2045 date, Mr Findlay told the PA news agency: 'I think yes, we did get it wrong'. When Conservative MSPs at Holyrood supported the 2045 date, he said they had done so 'so on the basis of what was known in those moments'. But he added: 'The situation has become clearer, it is evident to everybody watching this, to everybody in the Scottish Parliament, if they were being honest. 'Both Labour, the SNP and the rest of them would admit that the 2045 target isn't just unaffordable it's unachievable – that's the reality. 'So we're telling the truth to the Scottish public.' Mr Findlay continued: 'We want to reach net zero fairly and quickly. We understand the climate crisis emergency but we cannot harm our own economy and force householders who are already struggling to pay the bills with yet more great costs. 'Whether it be ripping out their gas boilers and putting in costly heat pumps, or forcing them to get rid of their cars and buying very expensive electric alternatives. 'This has got to be about the balance between ensuring we reach net zero properly and speedily, but recognising that it cannot come at a crippling cost to those people out there who are having to pay for it.' Asked later by journalists if his party was pandering to climate sceptics, Mr Findlay said they were 'absolutely not', adding the Tories were the only party 'telling the truth' on the issue. His comments came as the Scottish Conservatives promised to give every household in Scotland a £100 discount on their energy bills – with this to be funded from money accrued from the ScotWind auction, where areas of the seabed were leased for offshore wind power projects. The paper also said the Tories would make pylons 'an option of last resort for energy infrastructure projects' – with the party promising legislation to give people 'greater decision-making authority over local infrastructure projects' by abolishing the Scottish Government's existing energy consents union. Speaking about the changes as he addressed the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mr Findlay said: 'We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target. It is unaffordable and unachievable.' He added that instead of spending money on 'SNP eco-projects', the Tories would 'use it to protect oil and gas workers' livelihoods'. Mr Findlay continued: 'We would take £100 off every household energy bill in Scotland from the proceeds of leasing our waters to wind farms. 'We will also give residents new legal powers to oppose mega-pylons.'
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Russell Findlay distances himself from Kemi Badenoch defector comments
Kemi Badenoch faced journalists in Edinburgh on Friday after her first address to the Scottish Tory conference since taking over the job. Her first appearance came amid a stream of defections from the Tories, mainly to Reform UK, with one MSP – Jamie Greene – moving to the Liberal Democrats. While Mr Findlay has generally been conciliatory when elected members announce plans to move, Ms Badenoch said the departures were a 'good thing' because those who left 'don't believe in conservatism'. Speaking to the PA news agency on Saturday, after his own inaugural address to the Scottish party conference, Mr Findlay said: 'I'm always disappointed when I see anyone choosing to the leave the party for whatever reason. 'The reasons are varied and I can't get inside the minds of everyone who might choose to do so.' Asked if he agreed with the 'good riddance' attitude of Ms Badenoch, he said: 'I would never say that about anyone that chooses to go elsewhere. 'It's more of a disappointment than anything else.' The UK party leader also told journalists she did not understand how someone could vote for the Scottish Government's blocked gender reform proposals in 2022 and call themselves a conservative, in a direct attack on Mr Greene. But two of the party's MSPs, frontbencher Dr Sandesh Gulhane and former leader Jackson Carlaw, voted for the legislation. Asked if he believed the pair were conservatives, Mr Findlay said: 'Of course they are conservatives and they have realised that they got that vote wrong.' The Scottish Tory leader also hit out at Mr Greene, who has accused him of 'undoing Ruth Davidson's broad-church conservativism in favour of right-wing propaganda' on the same day Mr Findlay sat down with the former leader.
