Icy ground
The aim of the summit is a ceasefire in the Russian-Ukraine war. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has complained that he has not been invited to the two-man summit and insisted that Kyiv rejects any loss of territory and must approve any deal. The Putin-Trump meeting follows three hours of discussions between the Russian leader and US envoy Steve Witkoff which Trump said was 'highly successful' and progress had been made. During his campaign for a second presidential term, Trump vowed to end this war 'on Day One.' When he failed, he said he was joking' and called this 'an exaggeration.'
Trump has given Putin until today to end the war or face 'very serious tariffs and Sanctions' which would cripple Russia's oil exports and cut financial connections.
Ukraine and its European allies oppose ceding territory occupied by Russia since 2014, including Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhia. Putin argues Ukraine must relinquish some of these regions. He has called for an end to US and European aid to Ukraine and renunciation of Kyiv's bid to join NATO. Trump has said a deal would involve 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.'
A deal is likely to require Ukraine to surrender Crimea and adjacent territory. Crimea has been a contentious issue since 1954 when the Soviet Union transferred Crimea to Ukraine which was a then Soviet state. The 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union into independent states has changed regional dynamics in favour of the Western powers and caused Putin concern.
The NATO issue precipitated this unnecessary war. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev and US Secretary of State James Baker agreed that, following the reunion of NATO-member West Germany with the former Soviet East, NATO would not move 'one inch' eastwards. However, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Albania, Croatia, Montenegro and North Macedonia joined the Western alliance between 1999 and 2020. Putin repeatedly complained that NATO'S military presence was being built up in countries neighbouring and within Ukraine. From 2008, Putin repeatedly warned that Ukraine's membership in NATO was a Russian 'red line.' Nevertheless, in 2021, US President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg urged Ukraine to join NATO in defiance of Russia which responded by deploying forces on the Ukrainian border and invaded in 2022.
It is in the interest of both Russia and Ukraine to reach a ceasefire. According to the British Defence Ministry a million Russian troops have been killed or wounded since the war began. Ukraine has suffered 400,000 casualties, with 60,000-100,000 military deaths.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) verified a total of 46,085 civilian casualties in Ukraine as of May 31, 2025. Of them, 13,341 have been killed and 32,744 people were reported to have been injured. Casualties are expected to be higher.
While Trump promotes an end to the Ukraine war as it is taking place in Europe, he has given Israel a greenlight to occupy all the Palestinian territory of Gaza in West Asia. Despite warnings from Britain, France, and other European countries and from Israeli opponents to the Gaza war, Trump has said, 'That's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' United Nations official Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council last week that Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu's plan would 'risk catastrophic consequences.' Gaza's 2.3 million Palestinians have suffered Israeli blockade since March 2nd, denying them water, food, medicine and fuel. The death toll from starvation since the war began has risen to 217, including 100 children, and thousands more are suffering severe to acute malnutrition which could cripple many for life. The UK-based charity Save the Children condemned Israel's blockade as 'a devastating milestone that shames the world' and argued that the Israel is using starvation as a 'weapons of war – a war crime under international law.'
Trump is the only world leader who can put pressure on Netanyahu as the US provides Israel with funds and weapons it requires to wage wars as well as protection from international sanctions for war crimes. Although a ceasefire would lead to the release of 50 Israeli captives of Hamas in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners of Israel and to an end to the war, Netanyahu has, instead, won cabinet approval for the occupation of Gaza City and enclaves in the south which amount to about 14 per cent of Gaza's territory. If he goes ahead at least of a million Palestinian civilians would be driven from these areas and faced with a dilemma over where to go as there is no safe place of refuge in Gaza. More than 61,000 Palestinians have been killed and 152,350 wounded since Israel launched its 22-month war on the strip following an attack by Hamas which killed 1,230 and abducted 250.
Photo: TNS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
32 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
UAE mediation efforts succeed with new exchange of 168 captives between Russia and Ukraine
The United Arab Emirates has announced the success of mediation efforts in a new exchange of war captives between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Ukraine, which included 84 Ukrainian captives and 84 Russian captives, bringing the overall number exchanged through UAE mediation efforts to 4,349. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) expressed its appreciation to the two countries for their cooperation with the UAE's mediation endeavors. This reflects the confidence and appreciation of both countries for the UAE's role in supporting all efforts to resolve the crisis between Russia and Ukraine. The Ministry emphasised that the success of this mediation, the sixteenth, reflects the distinguished ties between the UAE and the two countries. Furthermore, the Ministry reaffirmed the UAE's commitment to ensuring the success of all efforts aimed at finding a peaceful solution to the conflict in Ukraine, and mitigating the humanitarian impacts as a result of the crisis, including on refugees and captives. WAM
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Lawfully present immigrants help stabilise ACA plans
Bernard J. Wolfson, Tribune News Service If you want to create a perfect storm at Covered California and other Affordable Care Act marketplaces, all you have to do is make enrolment more time-consuming, ratchet up the toll on consumers' pocketbooks, and terminate financial aid for some of the youngest and healthiest enrollees. And presto: You've got people dropping coverage; rising costs; and a smaller, sicker group of enrollees, which translates to higher premiums. The Trump administration and congressional Republicans have just checked that achievement off their list. They have done it with the sprawling tax and spending law President Donald Trump signed on July 4 and a related set of new regulations released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that will govern how the ACA marketplaces are run. Among the many provisions, there's this: Large numbers of lawfully present immigrants currently enrolled in Obamacare health plans will lose their subsidies and be forced to pay full fare or drop their coverage. Wait. What? I understand that proponents of the new policies think the government spends too much on taxpayer subsidies, especially those who believe the ACA marketplaces are rife with fraud. It makes sense that they would support toughening enrolment and eligibility procedures and even slashing subsidies. But taking coverage away from people who live here legally is not health care policy. It's an echo of the federal immigration raids in Los Angeles and elsewhere. 'It's creating a very hostile environment for them, especially after having to leave their countries because of some very traumatic experiences,' says Arturo Vargas Bustamante, a professor of health policy and management at UCLA's Fielding School of Public Health. 'For those who believe health care is a human right, this is like excluding that population from something that should be a given.' In Covered California, 112,600 immigrants, or nearly 6% of total enrollees, stand to lose their federal tax subsidies when the policy takes effect in 2027, according to data provided by the exchange. In the Massachusetts and Maryland marketplaces, the figure is closer to 14%, according to their directors, Audrey Morse Gasteier and Michele Eberle, respectively. It's not clear exactly how much financial aid those immigrants currently receive in ACA marketplaces. But in Covered California, for example, the average for all subsidised enrollees is $561 per month, which covers 80% of the $698 average monthly premium per person. And immigrants, who tend to have lower-than-average incomes, are likely to get more of a subsidy. The immigrants who will lose their subsidies include victims of human trafficking and domestic violence, as well as refugees with asylum or with some temporary protected status. And 'Dreamers' will no longer be eligible for ACA marketplace health plans because they will not be considered lawfully present. Immigrants who are not in the country legally cannot get coverage through Covered California or most other ACA marketplaces. The nearly 540,000 Dreamers in the United States arrived in the US as kids without immigration papers and were granted temporary legal status by President Barack Obama in 2012. Of those, an estimated 11,000 have ACA health plans and would lose them, including 2,300 in Covered California. Supporters of the policy changes enshrined in the CMS rule and budget law think it's high time to rein in what they say are abuses in the system that started under the Biden administration with expanded tax credits and overly flexible enrollment policies. 'It's about making Obamacare lawful and implementing it as drafted rather than what Biden turned it into, which was a fraud and a waste-infused programme,' says Brian Blase, president of Arlington, Virginia-based Paragon Health Institute, which produces policy papers with a free-market bent and influenced the Republican-driven policies. But Blase doesn't have much to say about the termination of Obamacare subsidies for lawfully present immigrants. He says Paragon has not focused much on that subject. Jessica Altman, executive director of Covered California, expects most immigrants who lose subsidies will discontinue their enrolment. 'If you look at where those populations fall on the income scale, the vast majority are not going to be able to afford the full cost of the premium to stay covered,' she says. Apart from the human hardship cited by Bustamante, the exodus of immigrants could compromise the financial stability of coverage for the rest of Covered California's 1.9 million enrollees. That's because immigrants tend to be younger than the average enrollee and use fewer medical resources, thus helping offset the costs of older and sicker people who are more expensive to cover. Covered California data shows that immigrant enrollees targeted by the new federal policies pose significantly lower medical risk than US citizens. And a significantly higher percentage of immigrants in the exchange are ages 26 to 44, while 55- to 64-year-olds make up a smaller percentage. Still, it would be manageable if immigrants were the only younger people to leave the exchange. But that is unlikely to be the case. More red tape and higher out-of-pocket costs — especially if enhanced tax credits disappear — could lead a lot of young people to think twice about health insurance. The covid-era enhanced tax credits, which have more than doubled ACA marketplace enrollment since their advent in 2021, are set to expire at the end of December without congressional action. And, so far, Republicans in Congress do not seem inclined to renew them. Ending them would reverse much of that enrollment gain by jacking up the amount consumers would have to spend on premiums out of their own pockets by an average of 66% at Covered California and more than 75% nationally. And an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office shows that a consequent exodus of younger, healthier people from the marketplaces would lead to even greater costs over time. Enhanced tax credits aside, consumers face additional hurdles: The annual enrolment period for Covered California and other marketplaces will be shorter than it is now. Special enrolment periods for people with the lowest incomes will be effectively eliminated. So will automatic renewals, which have greatly simplified the process for a majority of enrollees at Covered California and some other marketplaces. Enrollees will no longer be able to start subsidised coverage, as they can now, before all their information is fully verified. 'Who are the people who are going to decide to go through hours and hours of onerous paperwork?' says Morse Gasteier. 'They're people who have chronic conditions. They have health care issues they need to manage. The folks we would expect not to wade through all that red tape would be the younger, healthier folks.' California and 20 other states this month challenged some of that red tape in a federal lawsuit to stop provisions of the CMS rule that erect 'unreasonable barriers to coverage.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta said he and his fellow attorneys general hoped for a court ruling before the rule takes effect on Aug.25. 'The Trump administration claims that their final rule will prevent fraud,' Bonta said. 'It's obvious what this is really about. It's yet another political move to punish vulnerable communities by removing access to vital care and gutting the Affordable Care Act.'
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Uefa Super Cup: 'Stop killing children' banner labelled 'cowardice' as calls for Israel ban grow
The Union of European Football Associations (Uefa) is being accused of "virtue signalling" and "empty gestures" after displaying a banner ahead of the Super Cup final in apparent support for Palestinian civilians and children without mentioning Israel or its ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip. A "Stop killing children stop killing civilians" banner was unfurled ahead of the match between Paris Saint-Germain and Tottenham Hotspur in Italy on Wednesday. Two Palestinian refugee children also took part in the medal ceremony alongside Uefa president Aleksander Čeferin, following an invitation from the Uefa Foundation for Children. Most fans interpreted the banner to refer to Palestinian victims of Israel's war, which has killed over 61,000 people, the majority women and children. "The message is loud and clear," the European football's governing body posted on X. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But many argued that it was not. "A call to who? Who is killing children? who is killing civilians?" asked Rohan Talbot, director of advocacy and campaigns at NGO Medical Aid for Palestinians. "To name the crime but not to name the perpetrators is cowardice," commented Amnesty UK. This is meaningless. You displayed a banner that said stop killing children and civilians. Are you referring to Israel? Stop gaslighting. Hold Israel accountable for killing journalists, children, doctors, football players. — Ahmed Eldin | احمد الدين (@ASE) August 14, 2025 "Vague, lofty slogans like these are lazy, meaningless, and ambiguous enough that even Israel can exclaim them as it slaughters children and civilians," posted writer Tariq Kenney-Shawa. "Enough bullshit virtue signaling. Calling Israel out by name and booting them from the @UEFA are bare minimum first steps," he continued. PR move Others accused Uefa of platforming Palestinian refugee children to deflect from mounting calls by football fans and clubs to boycott Israel. When reached out to for comment, Uefa directed MEE to a media release about the children invited to the ceremony. "These two Palestinian children are refugees because Israel has been occupying their land and ethnic cleansing their people for 77 years - and you still won't hold them accountable for it," wrote sports journalist Leyla Hamed. "You can't platform them while protecting their aggressors." Others called it a "public relations" move, highlighting that Maccabi Tel Aviv would play in a European league match a day after the Super Cup finals on Thursday. "Don't you dare parade Palestinian children as PR cover while letting the very team tied to those who want them dead wear your badge," posted journalist Ahmed Eldin. As Martin Luther King said: 'Cowardice asks the question: Is it safe?' To name the crime but not to name the perpetrators is cowardice. Israel is carrying out war crimes and a genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza. — Amnesty UK (@AmnestyUK) August 14, 2025 Uefa's posts also sparked renewed calls for "concrete action" from the league, with many urging the football body to ban Israel from competing. Social media users denounced what they described as "hypocrisy", questioning why Russia was swiftly banned over its invasion of Ukraine while Israeli clubs continue to compete despite its ongoing military offensive in Gaza. Some performative bullshit there from UEFA 'stop killing children' but doesn't ban Israeli football associated teams from their competitions. Hypocritical from their stance on Russia too. — Jasmine 🍉 (@_jasminehahn) August 13, 2025 'Russia was cut off IMMEDIATELY upon attacking Ukraine," said one commenter. "You've been dragging your feet TWO YEARS on Gaza and now just coming out with passive messages instead of being deliberate and decisive against Israel's genocide.' The Salah effect? Uefa establishes partnerships with Medecins du Monde, Medecins sans Frontières and Handicap International, charities 'providing vital humanitarian help for the children of Gaza, who are enduring what UN Secretary General António Guterres has described as, 'a… — Henry Winter (@henrywinter) August 12, 2025 On Tuesday, the Uefa Foundation for Children announced it had expanded its humanitarian efforts to "relieve the suffering of children in Gaza", partnering with three charities providing humanitarian aid. The move was said by some social media users to be a result of "the Salah Effect", referring to a post by the Liverpool and Egypt forward Mohamed Salah on Saturday, who criticised the football association for paying tribute to Palestinian footballer Suleiman al-Obeid - who was killed in and Israeli attack while seeking aid in Gaza - without mentioning the circumstance of his death. According to the Palestinian Football Association, at least 400 footballers have been killed by Israel in Gaza. Nearly 300 sports facilities, including stadiums, gyms and club buildings, have been destroyed.
