
Edinburgh Council faces an ‘impossible task' on homelessness without more support
Councillors are set to vote next week on whether to suspend the allocations of council houses in almost all cases until March 2027.
A suspension has been in place since April, which has seen virtually all available council houses directed towards people and households presenting as homeless.
Shelter Scotland said the proposal 'reflects the scale of the crisis' that has been brought on by underinvestment in housing.
And two Edinburgh MPs have said the council faces a wide range of pressures in handling the crisis.
Even with the extension, a council report estimated 517 households per night will still be in unsuitable accommodation in March 2027.
Shelter said the city needed to do more to supply temporary and permanent homes.
The city's housing crisis has been worsened in recent months by a need to move homeless households out of unlicensed HMOs, a policy started during Covid.
A report before councillors at next week's meeting of the Housing, Homelessness and Fair Work Committee presented an option of suspending housing allocations to March 2026.
However, officers said that this would leave over 800 families in unsuitable accommodation every night.
Shelter Scotland director Alison Watson said: 'The City of Edinburgh Council is facing an impossible task without enough homes or resources.
'The situation has not emerged overnight; it is the result of decades of underinvestment in social housing and a failure to provide councils with the tools they need to fulfil their legal duties.
'The decision to suspend the normal letting policy reflects the scale of the crisis and the urgent need to protect the 3,691 children currently stuck in temporary accommodation, as well as to prevent rising levels of rough sleeping.
'However, with the council forecasting that it will still be breaking unsuitable accommodation laws 517 times every night at the end of this suspension, it is clear the council needs to do more to deliver suitable temporary and permanent homes.
'No council should have lawbreaking on this scale as part of its long-term plans. That's why all levels of government, including Scottish and UK, must provide the resources and investment to deliver the social homes our capital city desperately needs.'
Edinburgh South MP and Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said that the issues Edinburgh faces are long running, and come down to the issue of supply and demand.
He told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: 'We've been talking about this for two decades. It's a supply and demand issue.
'It's an issue with Scotland and major parts of the UK, where populations have been growing, and the supply of housing has not kept up with that demand.
'The council has to decide what they want the city to be, and how they reply to that.
'If you ask the University of Edinburgh, they would say they need more student accommodation.
'If you ask the Fringe, they'd say you need more temporary accommodation, particularly in peak tourist times within the city. If you were asking the airport, they want more hotel beds.
'It depends on who you're asking the question to. The bottom line is that Edinburgh has a huge supply problem, and the biggest part of that problem is affordable housing.'
He also said that the council had little power to change the situation, and that they were 'doing what they can do' in the situation they are in.
And Edinburgh East MP Chris Murray commented that the city needs to see less student accommodation and top-market new builds, and more accessibly priced flats.
He said: 'Fundamentally, every issue in Edinburgh goes back to population growth. It's a good problem to have, the population of the city went up 15% in 10 years.
'That's because we're dynamic and we've got a great future. But we are not building houses.
'We're basically only building student accommodation, and very big new build homes at the top of the market at any scale.
'We're not building new flats, family housing. And also, rents are really out of control. Rent controls sound good – but they do not work.
'Edinburgh has had the fastest rent increases in Europe because they do not work. We just need to build more homes.'
Green councillor Ben Parker said: 'Edinburgh Greens won't be backing the recommendation to extend the suspension of housing allocations until 2027.
'Of course, the council must do more to tackle the homelessness crisis, but this can't come at the expense of council tenants to whom we also have a duty of care.
'Troublingly, the committee report does not make clear the impact this decision would have on existing tenants, and that's something we hear about from people right across the city, day to day.
'Whether it's families trapped in overcrowded homes or people who have been waiting on Council housing waiting lists for decades, we cannot allow them to be seen as collateral damage in our wider approach to tackle the housing emergency.
'We are also deeply disappointed by the lack of engagement with the third sector and other partners by the Council in managing the suspension of allocations so far.
'For years, Greens have been pushing for a radical overhaul of the way that we fund the housing system in Edinburgh, and I'm pleased that we will be discussing some of these possible solutions during the same committee meeting.'
Edinburgh Council was contacted for comment.
Councillors will make a final decision on whether to extend the housing allocations policy at the next meeting of the Housing, Homelessness, and Fair Work committee on August 12.
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
36 minutes ago
- Metro
Thousands of mice, rats and birds have plagued Parliament for the last five year
Thousands of pests have been caught in the corridors of Westminster, Metro can reveal. Pest controllers have had to tackle over 3,000 reports of mice, rats, insects and birds in Parliament, data from the House of Commons and Lords shows. Issues with unpleasant critters appear to be on the up as well, with the first six months of 2025 seeing almost as many call-outs as the whole of 2022. Westminster's pest team logged more than 3,000 reports of pests in the Parliamentary Estate since 2020. An army of mice is causing MPs and Lords the most issues, with more than 1,000 incidents to do with the small rodents. The problem has become so bad that Labour peer Lord Gardiner of Kimble called for cats to be brought in to tackle the vermin in July. They aren't the only challenge, though. Pesky moths flapping around have triggered more than 150 reports in the last five years. Others pests have also been caught scuttling around the corridors of Westminster. Dozens of rats and other 'mammals' have also been discovered in recent years. Parliament's pest control team has also been dispatched to eradicate scores of unspecified 'insects' and flies in the lobbies and grounds. Despite already employing baits, traps and hawks to prevent pests, issues appear to be on the rise. During the first two years of the Covid pandemic, there were fewer than 400 pests reported in the Lord's and shared spaces. But in 2022, that was at 578, and by last year it had hit 773. In the first six months of 2025, pest controllers have already tackled 516 reports. The pest control data was uncovered through Freedom of Information requests filed by Metro. The House of Lords provided numbers dating back to 2020, covering not just the House of Lords but also spaces shared with the House of Commons in Parliament. The House of Commons only revealed its pest incidents from August 2024 onwards. Some of the data covered in both responses might be duplicates of the same pest report, the House of Lords stressed. The Parliamentary Estate itself is massive, covering 16 football pitches, over 1,000 rooms and three miles of passageways. With buildings that date back to the tenth century, and its location next to the River Thames, the site has always been vulnerable to pests. It was revealed last year that Parliament has paid over £100,000 a year for pest control since 2014. In 2023-24 that figure rose to £136,000 – £10,000 higher than the previous 12 months, according to Daily Mail. More Trending A spokesperson for UK Parliament stressed it is a safe and hygienic place to work. They told Metro: 'With an area of over 250,000 m2, the number of pest control callouts for the Parliamentary Estate remains broadly in line with expectations, given the size and complexity of our building portfolio – one of the largest in Westminster and representing dozens of sites. 'We are committed to maintaining a humane and ethical pest control programme, focussed on preventative measures and the use of various control methods 'Increases in costs can be attributed to both inflation and increased building work on the Estate, though value for money remains a key consideration and we continue to follow all regulatory obligations.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man arrested at pro-Palestine protest after police misread 'Plasticine Action' T-shirt MORE: 'Brazen' drug dealers selling cocaine during Mass at the UK's biggest Catholic cathedral MORE: MPs being landlords would be comical if it wasn't so offensive


STV News
36 minutes ago
- STV News
Consultation launched on changes to Scotland's parole system
Scotland's justice secretary has said she wants a consultation on the parole process to help make the system 'fair, transparent and trusted'. Angela Constance spoke out as the Scottish Government launched a consultation on possible changes to how the current system works. Parole allows for criminals who have served part of a jail sentence to be freed from prison early, under conditions of licence and the supervision of a social worker. The consultation, which will last for 12 weeks, is specifically focused on improving the transparency of the system and communicating better with victims and their families. It comes as ministers are also considering a plea from the families of murdered women, Suzanne Pilley and Arlene Fraser, that in cases where killers have refused to reveal the location of their victims' remains, this must be taken into account when parole is being considered. Constance reiterated her 'firm commitment to this change' when she met the women's families earlier this month. The justice secretary said that the new consultation is aimed at delivering a system that 'puts people first while ensuring decisions are based on public safety'. As part of the consultation, people are being asked for their views on whether parole boards should publish minutes in full from meetings where they make decisions about prisoners' parole, and if information published should be anonymised. The consultation considers if victims and survivors who have registered to be informed about a prisoner's releases should have an automatic right to attend and observe oral hearings by the Parole Board for their case – and if other people, such as the media or the public, should be able to attend. In addition, people are being asked to have a say on whether victims should have the right to make oral representations to the Parole Board ahead of cases being considered, Speaking as the consultation got underway, Constance stressed: 'The parole system must command the confidence of everyone it affects and work well for victims, their families, justice partners, and those seeking rehabilitation. 'We know it could be improved, so we want to make further reforms based on the views of those it affects.' The justice secretary continued: 'This consultation is an opportunity to gather all perspectives to deliver a parole process that is fair, transparent, and trusted. We want a system that puts people first while ensuring decisions are focused on public safety. 'I encourage everyone with experience of the parole process to share their views. These insights are essential to shaping a system that reflects our shared values of justice, safety, and dignity.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Glasgow Times
36 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
SNP speak out in row over Glasgow congestion charge
A row has developed between Labour and the SNP since it was revealed the council is looking at pursuing plans to introduce a congestion charge on drivers entering the city. It has come up against opposition with the Labour Group opposed, the Chamber of Commerce speaking against it, and Monica Lennon, a Central Scotland Labour MSP, stating it would discriminate against people who need to use services in Glasgow like hospitals and higher education. READ NEXT:Business leaders and MSP hit out at congestion charge plan The SNP group, which is in charge of the council, said it is right to look at raising a charge but that it would be years before it can be implemented. A Glasgow SNP Group spokesperson said: 'Glasgow City Council has no specific proposals to introduce a congestion charging scheme any time in the near future as Monica Lennon should be aware. 'It is of course right that the council should continue to explore all future opportunities to tackle congestion and raise revenues that can both improve our road network and our city's public transport offer. 'But any charging initiative, from which we would seek to exempt Glasgow residents, remains at an exploratory stage and is several years away.' After a discussion at a council committee, Johnny Carson, Labour group deputy leader, said 'These plans are wrong for our city. 'The council should be focused on fixing our expensive, unreliable and disjointed public transport system and securing the fair funding Glasgow deserves from the Scottish Government.' He said the Scottish Government has had an extra £5.1 billion from the Labour Government at Westminster. The SNP, however, said other parts of the UK have had better deals. READ NEXT:Opposition to plans for a Glasgow congestion charge on drivers revealed On the need to raise revenue, the SNP councillors suggested the UK Labour government could look at providing Glasgow with additional funding for public transport projects. The group spokesperson said: 'If Monica Lennon feels so strongly about improving public transport in the Glasgow city region, she should publicly demand her Labour bosses at Westminster award us the same transport funding packages that have been made available to our comparator city regions in England.'