Gian-Carlo Carra will not seek fifth term this fall, after 15 years on city council
Social Sharing
Ward 9 Coun. Gian-Carlo Carra says he will not seek re-election this fall, after 15 years on city council.
Carra, who was first elected in 2010, said in a statement in his monthly newsletter Friday he made his decision with "wistfulness, but also clear conviction and fierce pride."
An urban designer, Carra lists "transit, active modes, main streets, and industrial sector mobility improvements" as investments he's proud to have made during his time on council.
He also points to his efforts as the chair of emergency management, working with the city and the province to improve flood resilience. His ward was among those hit hard by a major flood in 2013.
Frustrated with politics
Carra says he is "deeply frustrated" with a UCP government decision that he argues "wiped out" years of work building collaboration with neighbouring municipalities toward "long-term, sustainable growth."
The UCP government last year decided it would stop providing funding for the Edmonton and Calgary growth management boards. Both those boards have since ceased operations.
Carra reflects that he sees the referendum on the 2026 Winter Olympics as a "dividing line" between two political eras, and lists losing the Olympic bid as the greatest disappointment of his political career.
In his statement to constituents, Carra also shared his concern with the current tenor of politics.
He argues elected officials are increasingly focused on "playing internal political games rather than engaging in the demanding, often unglamorous work of real-world governance."
The upcoming election
Carra joins a number of sitting councillors not seeking re-election. That list includes Ward 14's Peter Demong, Ward 3's Jasmine Mian, Ward 4's Sean Chu, Ward 8's Courtney Walcott and Ward 12's Evan Spencer.
Calgarians will go to the polls on Oct. 20.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
30 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
'Don't want to antagonize:' G7 protesters vow restraint, question if police will follow suit
Article content Activists protesting the G7 gathering say they'll assemble peacefully, but some doubt police will refrain from violently suppressing their right to demonstrate. Article content An organizer with an alliance of 25 activist groups across the country that's bringing some of its members to Calgary said they avoid provoking police backlash, but might not confine their activities to three designated protest zones being set up for them in Calgary — near the airport, at Municipal Plaza and in Victoria Park. Article content Article content Article content 'Depending on the security situation, we might do a march and we'll see what the implications of leaving the designated zones are, but we don't want to put public safety at risk,' said Yasmeen Khan, North American vice-chair of the International League of Peoples' Struggle in Canada (ILPS). Article content Article content 'We should be able to bring a voice to the wider public but, at the same time, we don't want to antagonize.' Article content Police have said they have no legal mandate to confine protesters to the assigned zones, but add they won't tolerate law-breaking outside them. Article content Khan said she expects modest numbers from her alliance's groups to come to Calgary — maybe as few as 100, mostly activists from around Western Canada — though demonstrators from other groups as well as Calgary-based will add to those numbers. Article content They'll highlight a host of issues, including Indigenous struggles, housing, migrant and national liberation struggles, wages, climate change and international support for Israel's onslaught on Gaza. Article content Article content 'I don't think we're expecting thousands of people but we're hoping to bring together a political consciousness in Calgary,' she said, adding there's a simmering desire to join that movement in conservative Calgary. Article content 'There are people in the community who are waiting to come together, to be galvanized.' Article content Activists target the G7, said Khan, because they don't believe its leaders seek to address the problems facing regular people. Article content 'It's a sham sense of democracy and decision-making,' said Khan. Article content Activists will hold demonstrations and a 'people's forum' at Municipal Plaza from June 14 to 15, she said, and there could be other protests in the following days during the G7, which runs from June 15 to 17. Leaders from Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Italy and France, Japan and the European Union will gather at Kananaskis Village to seek consensus on peace and security, economic stability and the war in Ukraine.
Globe and Mail
33 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill
If the first six months are any indication, the reign of U.S. President Donald Trump is going to be a rough one for Canadian investors. First, the stock market plunged earlier this spring as Mr. Trump's tariffs started a global trade war. Stocks have mostly recovered, but a new threat has emerged in the form of legislation that would allow Washington to ramp up the taxation of Canadians holding U.S. stocks. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not yet law – it passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a single vote but must still pass in the Senate – and may change in scope. For now, it has the potential to more than double the tax applied to dividends from U.S. companies received by Canadian investors and corporations. The ultimate effect of the tax changes could be costly in total but perhaps not so bad on an individual basis. Regardless, it's too early to make changes in your investment portfolio. 'Currently, we're not making any moves, and I'm recommending everyone do the same thing and just wait to see what the information actually is,' said Justin Bender, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital. 'Then we can assess and see if there's any changes necessary.' Wealth managers brace for proposed U.S. tax bill's impacts on Canadian clients What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Ultimately, Section 899 of the legislation could introduce a withholding tax of 20 to 50 per cent of dividends received by Canadians. There are estimates that this extra tax could cost individual investors, pension funds and others billions of dollars. The point of Section 899 is to give the U.S. a weapon to punish what it considers to be unfair taxes in other countries. Thought to be a target is our digital services tax, which mainly applies to U.S. tech giants generating revenue in Canada. Estimates from Mr. Bender show a worst-case additional drag on returns of 0.46 percentage points from U.S. stocks and U.S. equity exchange-traded funds when the higher withholding tax is fully phased in over four years. Think of this cost as being in addition to the management expense ratio of an ETF or mutual fund. If your return from a U.S. equity fund was a net 10 per cent with the management expense ratio (MER) included, then a higher withholding tax could ultimately leave you with as little as 9.54 per cent. Note that fund returns are always published on a net basis, with the MER included and, where applicable, foreign withholding taxes already deducted. Under existing U.S. tax law, there is a base withholding tax rate of 30 per cent for foreign investors holding U.S. stocks. A Canada-U.S. tax treaty generally reduces this rate to 15 per cent. No withholding tax applies to U.S. dividends paid into registered retirement savings plans and registered retirement income funds by U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. There's no clear sense of whether this exemption would continue to apply under Section 899. In a non-registered account, you can offset the 15-per-cent withholding tax by claiming an offsetting foreign tax credit. In a TFSA, registered education savings plan, first home savings account or registered disability savings plan, the withholding tax cannot be recovered; it is also non-recoverable in RRSPs and RRIFs if you hold a Canadian-listed U.S. equity ETF. Canadian investors have a massive level of exposure to U.S. stocks directly and through funds. About $60-billion is invested in just four TSX-listed ETFs that track the S&P 500 index. But investing in the S&P 500, and the even more tech-focused Nasdaq, is much more about growth than dividend income. The dividend yield on the S&P 500 right now is about 1.3 per cent, half the level of the yield on Canada's S&P/TSX composite index. 'It's very low, which is why this tax maybe isn't as much of an issue as people are making it out to be,' Mr. Bender said. 'Some extra withholding taxes are probably not going to blow up your financial plan.' Mr. Bender added that the impact is further diminished by the fact that most investors have diversified their U.S. exposure with bonds and Canadian stocks, plus international markets in many cases. Investors who use ETFs for exposure to U.S. stocks can buy funds listed on U.S. exchanges as well as those located in Canada. Among Canadian-listed funds, there are those that hold U.S. stocks directly and those that are effectively a wrapper for a U.S.-listed fund in the same corporate family. Mr. Bender said each of these three ETF types would be affected similarly by higher U.S. withholding taxes. Are you a young Canadian with money on your mind? To set yourself up for success and steer clear of costly mistakes, listen to our award-winning Stress Test podcast.
National Post
34 minutes ago
- National Post
Danielle Smith reignites feud with Guilbeault over his plans for Canada's national parks
OTTAWA — Steven Guilbeault may no longer be federal environment minister, but Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she still sees him as a threat to the province's oil and gas industry. Article content Smith said on her weekly radio show this weekend that Guilbeault, now heritage minister, has an 'overt motive' to establish new federally-protected parks in the path of pipelines and other energy infrastructure. Article content Article content Article content She added that she wouldn't consent to the creation of any new federal parks in Alberta. Article content 'I do not want to see one additional acre of territory that's within Alberta turned into a federal park … we certainly don't need Steven Guilbeault telling us what is important to protect in Alberta,' said Smith. Article content 'If there is critical habitat that Albertans want to protect … we'll put in provincial parks.' Article content Guilbeault, a former Greenpeace activist, was shuffled out of the environment portfolio in March by Prime Minister Mark Carney but kept his role as minister responsible for Parks Canada. Article content This puts him in charge of implementing the Liberals' campaign promise to create at least 10 new national parks and protect 30 per cent of public lands by 2030. Article content According to Parks Canada's website, the agency is currently vetting four proposed national parks and protected areas, including a northern Manitoba watershed on the Hudson Bay, one possible destination for future oil shipments. Article content Neither Guilbeault's office nor Parks Canada gave an immediate response to Smith's comments about future federal parks blocking energy infrastructure. Article content This isn't the first time that mistrust has flared between Smith's United Conservative Party government and Parks Canada. Article content Greater Edmonton UCP MLA Brandon Lunty put forward a private member's bill in late 2023 barring municipalities and Parks Canada from expanding urban parks without the province's consent. The bill was signed into law in 2024. Article content Lunty told the National Post that he decided to champion the bill when he caught wind of bilateral discussions Edmonton's city council was having with federal officials about an urban park in the capital region. Article content 'It seemed like they were down the road a bit on those conversations and I kept coming back to the question of, well, what about the provincial perspective on this?' said Lunty.
