2 Women, 2 Killings: A Murder Like Raja Raghuvanshi's Shook Bengaluru 22 Years Ago
Last Updated:
Raja Raghuvanshi's murder in Shillong, allegedly plotted by his wife Sonam and her lover, mirrors the 2003 Bengaluru case where Shubha killed her partner with her lover's help
The gruesome murder of Indore man Raja Raghuvanshi during what was supposed to be a romantic honeymoon in Shillong, Meghalaya, sent shockwaves across the country. As police unspooled the chilling plot involving his newlywed wife Sonam and her alleged lover, Raj Kushwaha, many were reminded of a hauntingly similar crime that unfolded over two decades ago in Bengaluru – one that remains etched in public memory for its cold calculation and betrayal.
On November 30, 2003, 27-year-old software engineer Girish was engaged to Shubha Shankarnarayan, a seemingly well-mannered and soft-spoken 21-year-old woman. Their families, long-time neighbours in Bengaluru's Banashankari area, had known each other for years. What should have been a happy union took a sinister turn within just four days.
On the night of December 3, Shubha invited Girish for dinner near the HAL Airport. After their meal, she suggested they stay back to watch planes land, a romantic setting with deadly intent. As Girish gazed skyward, he was suddenly attacked from behind with a blunt weapon. Shubha rushed him to Manipal Hospital, but he succumbed to his injuries before help could arrive.
Initially, Shubha told police that a stranger had ambushed them. But the investigators weren't convinced. Something about her story didn't add up.
Digging into her phone records, detectives discovered she had exchanged 74 calls and messages that night with a man named Arun, her alleged lover. Further investigation revealed a deadly conspiracy of Shubha being in love with Arun and resenting her family's decision to marry her off to Girish.
With the help of three accomplices – Arun, Venkatesh, and Dinkar – Subha orchestrated the murder. All four were arrested and, in 2010, sentenced to life imprisonment by a Sessions Court. The Karnataka High Court upheld the verdict, but in 2014, the Supreme Court granted Shubha bail. The story later inspired a Kannada film, Ring Road Shubha, notably produced by an all-women crew.
Fast forward to May 2024, newlyweds Raja and Sonam Raghuvanshi had travelled from Indore to Meghalaya for their honeymoon, seemingly beginning a new chapter in life. After checking out of a guest house in Shillong on May 22, the couple headed toward Sohra (Cherrapunji), famous for its rain-drenched cliffs and deep valleys. They never returned.
Days later, Raja's rented scooter was found abandoned on the edge of a forest trail. On June 2, his mutilated body was recovered from a deep gorge near Weisadong Falls. Scattered near the body were torn clothes, broken mobile phone parts, and a blood-stained raincoat – signs that this was no hiking mishap.
While Sonam was initially presumed missing, she resurfaced on June 8 in a shocking twist. She walked into a police station in Uttar Pradesh and confessed that she had, indeed, plotted Raja's murder. According to police, Sonam revealed she had never wanted to marry Raja, but family pressure left her with few choices. Her heart, she said, belonged to Raj Kushwaha, an accountant at her father's textile firm.
Sonam and Raj, in collusion with three hired killers, lured Raja to a secluded area in Sohra. There, as per her confession, he was ambushed, brutally assaulted, and thrown into the gorge to erase all traces. What was meant to be a scenic honeymoon had instead been the staging ground for a calculated murder.
In both crimes, the thread of betrayal runs deep. Women engaged or newly married against their will, chose to eliminate their partners with the help of lovers rather than confront societal or familial pressure. The use of secluded locations, fabricated stories, and digital footprints that ultimately unraveled the truth – each detail underscores the chilling similarities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Plea Claims "Extra-Judicial Ban" On 'Thug Life' In Karnataka, Supreme Court Issues Notice
Hearing a petition which claimed an "unconstitutional and extra-judicial ban" had been imposed on Kamal Haasan's film 'Thug Life' in Karnataka, the Supreme Court has issued a notice to the state government. The notice, the court said, was being issued considering the urgency of the situation. The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce had threatened to ban the release of the film over the actor's statement that Kannada was "born out of Tamil". Certain groups have also threatened theatres in Karnataka and asked them not to screen the film, because of which it was released worldwide on June 5, but not in the state. The Karnataka High Court had earlier suggested that Mr Haasan apologise. The actor has said his statement was misunderstood and that he deeply respects the Kannada language, but has not issued an outright apology. Hearing the petition on Friday, the partial working day bench of the Supreme Court noted it has been argued that the film, which was duly certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), is not being allowed to be screened in the state of Karnataka. "The so-called ban under threats of violence comes from terror and arson against cinema halls targeting linguistic minorities. Considering the urgency shown, we issue notice to the respondent," the bench said. The plea states that the "ban" stems not from any lawful process, but from a deliberate campaign of terror, including explicit threats of arson against cinema halls and incitement to large-scale communal violence targeting linguistic minorities. It also alleges that the inaction of the State against the non-state actors allegedly inciting violence has led to the violation of Articles 14 (right to equality), 19(1)(a) (right to freedom of speech and expression), 19(1)(g) (right to practice any profession) and 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of the filmmakers, exhibitors and the viewing public.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bengaluru auto driver threatens woman over extra fare, demands she speak Kannada; woman reacts: ‘Mujhe darr lag raha hai'
Language tensions and overcharging by auto-rickshaw drivers are two issues that Bengaluru residents are, unfortunately, becoming all too familiar with. Yet again, the city finds itself at the center of this debate after a video of a heated argument between a woman and an auto-rickshaw driver went viral online. The video, posted by a woman named Anya S, shows her confronting the driver for allegedly demanding Rs 390 for a ride that, according to her Rapido app, was supposed to cost Rs 296. In the clip, Anya can be heard standing her ground, telling the driver, 'Don't scream at me. I'll only pay what the app says.' At one point, clearly feeling uneasy, she tries to call over another auto-rickshaw driver, saying, 'Aap yahan aao, mujhe darr lag raha hai (Come here, I'm feeling scared).' Anya later uploaded the full video to Instagram, adding a heartfelt note in the caption. 'This isn't about refusing to learn the local language – of course I want to learn Kannada. But when people behave like this, it makes me question myself. It makes me think, why should I make the effort when they don't know how to treat me with basic respect?' She made it clear she wasn't against paying extra when deserved, writing, 'I'm someone who happily pays extra when I've had a good ride. But not when someone tries to bully or threaten me into it.' Her larger point was about belonging – 'We're part of this city. We live here, we work here, we contribute to its economy. And that means we deserve fairness, dignity, and safety – no matter what language we speak.' 'If you've ever felt unsafe or second-guessed yourself in moments like this – you are not wrong. You are not alone. And you have every right to say no,' she wrote. A post shared by Anya S (@anyadamnson) As the video racked up over a million views, reactions poured in. Rapido itself responded, assuring action: 'At Rapido, customer safety and dignity are our highest priorities, Anya… the reported captain has been permanently barred from our platform. Additionally, we are working on implementing stronger protocols for our captains to prevent such incidents in the future.' Wanting to avoid the usual North vs South divide, Anya addressed it head-on in the comments: 'This isn't about North vs South, or locals vs outsiders. It's about being fair to one another, no matter where we're from… Let's build a space where respect goes both ways, and experiences can be shared without creating rifts.' Bengaluru locals also reacted to the post. One commented, 'I want to apologize for the unacceptable behavior of some individuals who are tarnishing our reputation… On behalf of all educated Kannadigas, we extend our sincerest apologies. Hope you're safe and okay.' Others echoed frustration about rising aggression and language policing, asking, 'Are we seriously going to start fighting over language too? How low can it get?' Unfortunately, this isn't an isolated incident. Just a few months ago, another Instagram user shared a similar ordeal with a Rapido auto-rickshaw driver demanding extra money, hurling abuses when denied.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Supreme Court seeks Karnataka's reply over de facto ban on Thug Life release
Supreme Court seeks Karnataka's response on plea over de facto ban on Kamal Haasan's film Thug Life release. Petition says film not screened despite having required certification Theatres allegedly facing threats over screening Thug Life in Karnataka Supreme Court asks Karnataka government to file detailed response The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice to the Karnataka government, seeking its response to a plea alleging a de facto ban on the release of the film Thug Life, starring actor-politician Kamal Haasan, despite the film being certified and having sought police protection. A Bench comprising Justices PK Mishra and Manmohan took note of the petitioner's claim that although the film had received certification from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), it was not being permitted to screen in Karnataka due to threats of violence against theatres. The Court remarked, 'Considering the urgency shown, we issue notice to the respondent.' The petition, filed by Bengaluru resident M Mahesh Reddy, alleged that the film was facing a de facto ban due to threats from fringe organisations and the inaction of state authorities. 'The State has completely capitulated. They have joined hands with extremist elements. One of the theatres was seized while women and children were still inside! No FIR was registered. The theatre management were running for cover,' argued Advocate A Velan, representing the petitioner. The row comes in the wake of recent remarks by Kamal Haasan, who stated that 'Kannada was born out of Tamil', triggering sharp backlash and calls for a boycott of his film in Karnataka. According to the petition, after Victory Cinema in Bengaluru announced its intention to screen the film, Karnataka Rakshana Vedike (KRV) President TA Narayana Gowda allegedly threatened to 'set theatres on fire' if any Haasan film was released in the State. The plea also highlights a social media post from the same period that called for a repeat of the 1991 anti-Tamil riots and warned of violence following the film's scheduled release on June 5. Despite widespread concern over the post and the alleged threats, no case has been registered so far, the petitioner informed the Court. The situation reportedly escalated when members of the KRV attempted to lay siege to Victory Cinema on June 1. Following this, the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) declared a 'ban' on the film, allegedly under pressure from various groups. The petitioner further claimed that although the film's producer had approached the Karnataka High Court seeking police protection, the focus of the hearing shifted to whether Haasan ought to apologise for his past statements. The petitioner has described this development as an act of appeasement, arguing that it made the High Court route ineffective for safeguarding fundamental rights. In the High Court, Haasan declined to apologise, stating instead that he was in discussions with the KFCC on the issue. The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice to the Karnataka government, seeking its response to a plea alleging a de facto ban on the release of the film Thug Life, starring actor-politician Kamal Haasan, despite the film being certified and having sought police protection. A Bench comprising Justices PK Mishra and Manmohan took note of the petitioner's claim that although the film had received certification from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), it was not being permitted to screen in Karnataka due to threats of violence against theatres. The Court remarked, 'Considering the urgency shown, we issue notice to the respondent.' The petition, filed by Bengaluru resident M Mahesh Reddy, alleged that the film was facing a de facto ban due to threats from fringe organisations and the inaction of state authorities. 'The State has completely capitulated. They have joined hands with extremist elements. One of the theatres was seized while women and children were still inside! No FIR was registered. The theatre management were running for cover,' argued Advocate A Velan, representing the petitioner. The row comes in the wake of recent remarks by Kamal Haasan, who stated that 'Kannada was born out of Tamil', triggering sharp backlash and calls for a boycott of his film in Karnataka. According to the petition, after Victory Cinema in Bengaluru announced its intention to screen the film, Karnataka Rakshana Vedike (KRV) President TA Narayana Gowda allegedly threatened to 'set theatres on fire' if any Haasan film was released in the State. The plea also highlights a social media post from the same period that called for a repeat of the 1991 anti-Tamil riots and warned of violence following the film's scheduled release on June 5. Despite widespread concern over the post and the alleged threats, no case has been registered so far, the petitioner informed the Court. The situation reportedly escalated when members of the KRV attempted to lay siege to Victory Cinema on June 1. Following this, the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) declared a 'ban' on the film, allegedly under pressure from various groups. The petitioner further claimed that although the film's producer had approached the Karnataka High Court seeking police protection, the focus of the hearing shifted to whether Haasan ought to apologise for his past statements. The petitioner has described this development as an act of appeasement, arguing that it made the High Court route ineffective for safeguarding fundamental rights. In the High Court, Haasan declined to apologise, stating instead that he was in discussions with the KFCC on the issue. Join our WhatsApp Channel
