logo
China's Next-Gen Fusion Reactor Could Achieve First Plasma in Just 2 Years

China's Next-Gen Fusion Reactor Could Achieve First Plasma in Just 2 Years

Yahoo09-05-2025
China is racing forward in its effort to pave the way in fusion energy science, and state-sponsored media reported earlier this week that one of the country's next-gen reactors is now under construction.
The Burning Plasma Experiment Superconducting Tokamak, or BEST, is an intermediary reactor between China's first-generation reactor and the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR)—a fusion plant demonstrator.
BEST is planned to go online in 2027, and aims for net energy gain similar to the SPARC reactor currently under construction by Commonwealth Fusion Systems in the U.S.
The promise of fusion energy is hard to overstate. With the ability to leverage the energy-producing physics that powers our Sun, humanity could tap into a near-limitless wealth of carbon-free energy, forever ending our dependence on the fossil fuels that are quickly poisoning the planet.
Of course, such immense promise comes with a few caveats, chief among them being that creating a fusion reaction and sustaining that reaction for net energy output is one of the hardest engineering challenges humans have ever attempted to solve. The challenge is so immense that 35 countries (including the U.S., China, Russia, and several countries in the European Union) have joined forces to build International Thermonuclear Experiment Reactor (ITER)—a magnetic confinement tokamak (a.k.a. donut-shaped) reactor that hopes to see first plasma by 2035—in southern France. While that's the world's best foot forward when it comes to fusion research, individual countries are also pursuing their own thermonuclear energy goals. And none are doubling down harder than China.
Xinhua, a state-sponsored media outlet, reports that country's Burning Plasma Experiment Superconducting Tokamak, or BEST, is now in its final assembly in Hefei, China. This reactor builds on the work of China's first-generation tokamak, the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), which is also located at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science. According to South China Morning Post, another state-sponsored media outlet, the BEST reactor—which plans to go online in just two years—will be an intermediary step between EAST and the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR), the latter of which is a large-scale demonstrator for fusion power plants.
From assembly to first plasma in just two years is remarkably fast, but Song Yuntao—the project's chief engineer from the Institute of Plasma Physics—claim that this fits with China's overall aggressive timeline for achieving utility-scale fusion.
'We have fully mastered the core technologies, both scientifically and technically,' Yuntao told the South China Morning Post.
And he isn't bluffing—China is currently developing several fusion projects across the country. For instance, IEEE Spectrum notes that the country is building an x-shaped facility in Sichuan that resembles the U.S. National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory—the first lab to achieve fusion ignition (net energy output) back in 2022. They're also building a 40-hectare complex for fusion research, along with a fusion-fission hybrid power plant in central China.
As IEEE Spectrum notes, fusion is the perfect technology for fulfilling President Xi Jinping's 'Great Rejuvenation' agenda, which focuses on securing domestic energy, reducing emissions, and leading the world in advanced technologies. The U.S., on the other hand, is taking another approach by largely letting private industry invest in fusion, which is why the South China Morning Post compares China's BEST reactor with the reactor built by Commonwealth Fusion Systems—a spinoff from MIT. The company's reactor, SPARC, also aims to demonstrate net output by 2027.
The oft-quoted phrase related to fusion development is that 'it's 30 years away—and it always will be.' However, with a technological race heating up between the U.S. and China, that phrase might soon need revising.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google to Sign EU's AI Code of Practice
Google to Sign EU's AI Code of Practice

Epoch Times

time11 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

Google to Sign EU's AI Code of Practice

Europe Parent company Alphabet's global affairs president and chief legal officer announced the decision, with some reservations, in a blog post. Google will sign the European Union's artificial intelligence code of practice, despite some reservations, the global affairs president of the firm's parent company, Alphabet, said in a blog post on Wednesday. 'We will join several other companies, including U.S. model providers, in signing the European Union's General Purpose AI Code of Practice,' Kent Walker, who is also Alphabet's chief legal officer, said.

Will online safety laws become the next tariff bargaining chip?
Will online safety laws become the next tariff bargaining chip?

The Verge

time13 hours ago

  • The Verge

Will online safety laws become the next tariff bargaining chip?

President Donald Trump and other Republicans have railed for years against foreign regulation of US tech companies, including online safety laws. As the US fights a global tariff war, it may bring those rules under fire — just as some of them are growing teeth. Over the past weeks, Trump has touted a blitz of trade deals, seeking concessions from countries in exchange for lower tariffs. This has coincided with the rollout of new child safety measures in the European Union and United Kingdom, most recently a new phase of the UK's Online Safety Act (OSA), which effectively age-gates porn, bullying, and self-harm promotion, as well as other categories of content considered harmful to kids. Several major tech platforms have willingly implemented age verification systems or limited access to forums that might contain adult content. But they've lobbied against such measures in the US, and they've generally opposed foreign laws that might disproportionately impact US firms. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a tech-funded nonprofit, has referred to Europe's key competition and content moderation rules as 'non-tariff attacks' and complained they unfairly target American businesses and 'extract exorbitant fines.' During tariff negotiations, Trump has been open about pushing countries to drop laws that he dislikes. The EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA) have arguably taken the brunt of the ire so far, as have digital services taxes, which Canada removed under pressure from Trump last month. But the OSA came up recently in the context of Trump's own online platform, Truth Social, which could plausibly be subject to the law. 'If they censor me, you're making a mistake' At a July 28th press conference with Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, a reporter asked about 'new powers' that could be used to censor sites like Truth Social. Starmer said the UK was not trying to censor people online, simply protect kids from harmful content, but Trump made a subtle threat in a lighthearted tone. 'I cannot imagine him censoring Truth Social,' Trump said. 'I only say good things about him and his country, so if they censor me, you're making a mistake.' Trump quickly touted his own online content regulation bill, the Take It Down Act, which has been similarly criticized as a potential vehicle for censorship. Tech companies' objection to age verification and other child safety rules have been more muted than their criticism of the DMA and DSA in general. They may not see an existential threat in implementing age verification processes, compared with a potential antitrust investigation and breakup or the DSA's huge fines for not addressing harmful content. But the US hasn't landed on a clear vision for internet safety regulation, creating a mismatch between its laws and those abroad. Mariana Olaizola Rosenblat, a policy advisor on technology and law at the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, says that in the 'vacuum' of a US legislative standstill and trivial self-regulation, 'foreign jurisdictions have been left with little choice but to act.' That leaves room for tension, depending particularly on how heavily UK regulator Ofcom enforces the OSA — in other words, how much trouble it causes tech companies. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Lauren Feiner Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Features Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Law Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Regulation Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Speech

Google will sign EU's AI Code of Practice
Google will sign EU's AI Code of Practice

Engadget

time14 hours ago

  • Engadget

Google will sign EU's AI Code of Practice

Google says it will sign the European Union's new AI Code of Practice, which provides a framework for compliance with the EU's AI Act. The act itself was passed in 2024, but its many provisions will take months to years to come into effect. The non-binding Code of Practice is a voluntary measure intended to help ensure that companies generally meet the obligations laid out by the Act in the meantime. In a blog post announcing Google's participation, the tech giant shared some skepticism about the AI Act's impact on the technology in the EU. The statement reads in part, "While the final version of the Code comes closer to supporting Europe's innovation and economic goals than where it began — and we appreciate the opportunity we have been provided to submit comments — we remain concerned that the AI Act and Code risk slowing Europe's development and deployment of AI." Just recently, Meta said it would not be signing the Code of Practice. The company's chief global affairs officer, Joel Kaplan, called the Code an "over-reach." In a statement, Kaplan said, "Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI." The EU's AI Act is the first of its kind from a major regulator and is comprehensive in its approach. Meanwhile, the United States is in the earliest stages of determining its approach to AI regulation. Obligations under the EU's AI Act are being implemented in a staggered fashion, though rules governing general‑purpose AI (GPAI) models will apply on August 2, 2025. Any models brought to market before then must be fully compliant with the rules by August 2, 2027. The current implementation timeline lists assessment and enforcement steps as far out as August 2031. If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store