Govt cannot insist toilets in petroleum retail outlets be opened for public: HC
The order came on a petition filed by the Petroleum Traders Welfare and Legal Service Society and five retailers challenging the move of the government and local bodies to convert these toilets as public toilets.
They contended that private toilets they maintained at their retail outlets for emergency use by customers were often being forced to be opened for public use. The Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation and many local bodies even pasted posters in some of the retail outlets, giving the impression that these were public toilets.
Many members of the public and even those who arrived in tourist buses were thus seeking access to the toilets, disrupting regular functioning of the outlets and sometimes leading to altercations within the high-risk premises.
Citing protection under Article 300A of the Constitution, the retailers contended that toilets they built within their premises were private property.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Karnataka faces discrimination in distribution of resources from Centre, says Siddaramaiah
Karnataka Chief Minister on Friday said that the state is facing discrimination in the distribution of resources from the Centre . Independence Day 2025 Op Sindoor to water cutoff: PM Modi slams Pak in I-Day speech GST reforms by Diwali to cut daily-use taxes: PM Modi Terrorism, tech, more: PM's I-Day speech highlights He also said that there is growing concern that Constitutional bodies like the Income Tax Department , Enforcement Directorate , CBI , and others are not working to uphold the true values of democracy and cooperative federalism as enshrined in the Constitution. He said, every responsible citizen must raise their voice in this regard. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions Trek Kit India Learn More Undo The Chief Minister made these observations while delivering his address at the 79th Independence Day celebrations here. Siddaramaiah said his government has built its own development model, which is widely recognised as the "Karnataka Model of Development", and that its 'guarantee schemes' have got global recognition. Live Events "The Basavadi Sharanas of the 12th century firmly believed that one must live by one's word. Guided by this principle, our government has built its own development model, now widely recognised as the Karnataka Model of Development," he said. "It is a matter of pride that even Philemon Yang, the President of the United Nations General Assembly, visited Karnataka and wholeheartedly praised our Guarantee Schemes, giving them global recognition," he added. Noting that surveys by leading national institutions have revealed a stark truth that the wealthiest 10 per cent of our population hold 80 per cent of the nation's wealth, yet they contribute only about 3 per cent of the GST collected, he said, the remaining 90 per cent ordinary people who work daily for food and clothing shoulder nearly 97 per cent of GST payments. "How can any economy sustain itself under such circumstances? How can we fulfil the spirit of our Constitution? How can we reduce this growing inequality? These questions troubled us deeply. It is with the intention of finding answers to these questions that we launched the Guarantee Schemes and other welfare programmes," he added. Highlighting that the guarantee schemes are transforming the trajectory of Karnataka's development, the CM said, soon after assuming office in May 2023, we began implementing these schemes in the form of Anna Bhagya, Shakti, Gruha Lakshmi, Gruha Jyothi, and Yuva Nidhi. "So far, we have allocated more than Rs 96,000 crore for their implementation. Recently, we celebrated a milestone in the Shakti scheme with 500 crore free trips taken by women using government buses. These schemes, free from the exploitation of middlemen and delivered directly to the people, have not only raised per capita income but, according to several studies, have increased women's participation in the workforce by 23 per cent," he said. In a major boost to public transport, the implementation of the Shakti scheme has been complemented by the Transport Department's induction of 5,049 new buses of various models and the recruitment of 8,473 personnel, significantly enhancing service capacity and reach across the state, he added. Highlighting that Karnataka now ranks first in the country in per capita income, Siddaramaiah said, over the past decade, the state has achieved a growth of 101 per cent in this indicator from Rs 1,01,858 at constant prices in 2013-14 to Rs 2,04,605 in 2024-25. "Our government is spending more than Rs 1.12 lakh crore on welfare measures including Guarantee Schemes, subsidies, incentives, scholarships, social security pensions, and other social programmes," he said. Noting that to truly understand people's living conditions, the government decided to conduct a social and educational survey of the backward classes through the Backward Classes Commission, the CM said, only accurate data can shape policies that transform lives and future schemes which can provide special representation and targeted justice. "To ignore this would be to betray both our Constitution and our freedom struggle. Hence our government is serious about internal reservation within the Scheduled Castes and conducting a socio-educational survey of the backward classes," he added. Siddaramaiah during his speech said, the nation will forever remember, with indebtedness, those who were martyred in the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam and in the subsequent conflict between India and Pakistan. "We bow our heads in humble respect to their indomitable courage and supreme sacrifice," he said.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Adjudicatory Board for major ports notified in the gazette
Advt By , ETInfra The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways has notified the constitution of the Adjudicatory Board for major ports in the gazette, as prescribed in the Major Port Authorities Act, 2021, that governs 11 of the 12 state-owned ports. Justice Ashish Jitendra Desai , former Chief Justice, Kerala High Court, has been named the first Presiding Officer of the Adjudicatory Viswanath, former Secretary, Department of Consumer Affairs, and former Member, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) and Dr Sanjeev Ranjan, former Secretary, Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, and Technical Member, National Company Law Tribunal have been named members of the Adjudicatory Presiding Officer and the members of the Adjudicatory Board will hold office for a period of five years or till attaining the age of 70 years, whichever is the constitution of the Adjudicatory Board, based in Mumbai, brings the curtains down on the erstwhile Tariff Authority for Major Ports (TAMP), the rate regulator for the 11 major ports, which was shut following the enactment of the new law to govern major Adjudicatory Board's functions include adjudicating disputes between major ports and Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) operators, appraising and reviewing stressed PPP projects as well as suggesting measures for their revival and handling complaints from port users on the services provided by major ports or private notification of the Adjudicatory Board in the gazette has been hailed by the private ports and terminal operators.'We have been waiting for the constitution of the Adjudicatory Board all these years,' said R Ravi Kumar, Secretary General, Indian Private Ports & Terminals Association (IPPTA), a lobby group for private terminal operators.'Although, the Conciliation and Settlement Committee has done a commendable job in resolving some of the disputes, there have been delays in finalising the issues as port authorities tend to wait for the approval of the government before the conciliation awards are implemented. Glad that the Board has been constituted. It is hoped that proceedings of the Adjudicatory Board in settling the disputes between the Port Authorities and the PPP operators will be faster and the decisions implemented quickly. It is noteworthy that appeals against the decisions of the Adjudicatory Board will lie only in the Supreme Court. This would render speedy closure to issues,' Ravi Kumar added.
NDTV
18 hours ago
- NDTV
Exclusive - "India Shouldn't Allow Itself To Be Used By US Against China": Top Economist On Tariffs
New Delhi: India should not allow itself to be used by the US in the West's misguided trade war with China, a top American economist told NDTV. Professor Jeffrey D Sachs, who teaches at Columbia University, also pointed at huge flaws in how US President Donald Trump worked on issues like tariffs. "Well, in general, a one-person rule in the United States determining which countries pay which tariffs is absolutely beyond the law in the US. If you look at our Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, it says tariffs are the responsibility of the US Congress. But Trump declares emergency after emergency that are, from a legal point of view, outrageous and invalid. We should not have a one-person rule in the US," said Mr Sachs, who has advised governments in Latin America, Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Asia, and Africa. He agreed the 50 per cent tariff imposed by Mr Trump on India may affect bilateral ties which have been assiduously built up over the last several decades. "Of course it has a negative consequence, but it merely bears out what I have been saying to dear Indian friends for years, which is that the United States uses other countries. It does not act responsibly towards other countries, so be careful. India should not allow itself to be used by the US, for example, as somehow in the US' misguided trade war with China," said Mr Sachs. "India, I think according to at least some people, was going to become the replacement for China. The US would fight China, and it would welcome India to replace the Chinese supply chains. I said that I regarded that as unrealistic, that the US would not allow a major expansion of exports from India anymore than it would allow them from China today. "I think that these events should give warning or pause to Indian officials. Yes, I'm not saying to arbitrarily break relations with the US, but also don't rely on them. India needs to rely on a diversified base of partners - Russia, China, ASEAN, Africa, and elsewhere, and not see itself as mainly focusing on the US market, which is going to be unstable, slow-growing, and basically protectionist," said the economist most famous for his work on reforms and with international agencies to promote poverty reduction, disease control, and debt reduction of poor countries. According to him, a strong India-China trade and investment in technology relations would be very beneficial for both the neighbours. "So if you look at green energy or at digital or at AI or at advanced chips, China is a good partner for India. Of course, I would be told immediately, yes, but India-China relations are strained for other reasons. But my own view is, solve those, because the benefits of the two giants really having good economic and trade and investment and finance relations would be wonderful for the two, and I think very good for the world," Mr Sachs told NDTV. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be going to China soon to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, which marks a kind of thaw in ties since the Galwan face-off. Mr Trump is also meeting his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin today. On whether Mr Trump's move to push 50 per cent tariffs on India might end up bringing India and China closer, Mr Sachs there is a real possibility. "Absolutely. I think Trump is the great unifier of the rest of the world, that is. I think Trump is the greatest friend of the BRICS. By attacking Brazil, Russia, India and China simultaneously, he has brought all of the leaders together. There have been a flurry of calls between Lula, Putin, Prime Minister Modi, President Xi in recent days because of Trump. So he's played a very constructive role. Not the one he thought he was playing, but a very constructive role in my view," the professor said. On the sensitive issue of India buying Russian oil, Mr Sachs said the whole point is that one person should not decide who trades with whom. "The unilateral US measures are illegal under international law. That may sound a little quaint these days, but we actually have rules. We have international law... I don't think what Trump's doing is legal from the point of view of American law, nor do I think it's legal from the point of view of international law. Nor should the US tell India with whom to trade, nor is the whole premise correct that the US has the right to punish Russia and its partners because of the war in Ukraine. That's another issue, but the war in Ukraine in my view was caused by the United States, not caused by Russia. "This is a war over NATO enlargement. This is very important to understand. This war goes back to 30 years of US provocation because America is very arrogant, not only Trump, the whole political class. "And for 30 years they've said we can go where we want, when we want, how we want in security terms, including putting military bases on Russia's borders. That's why there's a war in Ukraine. And then to sanction India because of US provocations, well, the whole thing's absurd. "So I think we went down a very bad road. The US is flailing around because Russia's winning on the battlefield, and Russia said no to the US, you don't dictate to us our security terms," Mr Sachs said.
