Rare Mahatma Gandhi oil portrait sold for ₹1.75 crore at UK auction: 'Testament to Gandhi's power'
The painting, which had never before been offered at auction, had been on offer for an online auction with a guide price range between 50,000 and 70,000 pounds and was the top lot of the Travel and Exploration sale, which concluded on Tuesday.
The portrait artist, Clare Leighton, was introduced to Gandhi when he visited London in 1931 to attend the Second Round Table Conference.
"Thought to be the only oil painting of Mahatma Gandhi, which he sat for, this was a very special work, which had never before been offered at auction,' said Rhyanon Demery, Bonhams Head of Sale.
"Completed in London by the artist Clare Leighton, mainly known for her wood engravings, this work was a testament to Gandhi's power to connect with people far and wide, and presented a lasting document of an important moment in history,' she said.
The portrait remained in the artist's collection until her death in 1989, after which it was passed down through her family.
'It is no wonder that this work sparked such interest across the globe,' added Demery.
At the time of painting it, Leighton was in a relationship with the political journalist Henry Noel Brailsford. A passionate supporter of Indian independence, Brailsford had travelled to the country in 1930, later publishing the book 'Rebel India' in support of the Indian independence cause, the year he first met Gandhi at the Round Table Conference.
Bonhams said that it was through this connection that Leighton was introduced to Gandhi. She was one of the very few artists admitted to his office and was allowed to sit with him on multiple occasions to sketch and paint his likeness, the auction house revealed.
In November of 1931, Leighton showcased her portrait of Gandhi in an exhibition at the Albany Galleries in London.
Journalist Winifred Holtby attended the opening and wrote about the event in her column for the trade union magazine 'The Schoolmistress', stating; 'Members of Parliament and ex-Members, artists, journalists and art critics, stood among exquisite Indian women in bright saris, and the dignified figures of some of the chief Hindu representatives at the Conference. Mrs Naidu, the statesman-poet, was there... and Sir Purshotamdas Thakurdas, one of the Mahatma's colleagues."
Gandhi himself did not attend the party, but it was noted that he was vitally present in the works on display, which included the portrait of him in oil.
Describing the painting in more detail, Holtby stated at the time: "The little man squats bare-headed, in his blanket, one finger raised, as it often is to emphasise a point, his lips parted for a word that is almost a smile. That is very much as I saw him when he came as guest to a big luncheon in Westminster at which I was present a little while ago.
'He was the political leader there, the subtle negotiator, the manipulator of Congress, the brilliant lawyer, the statesman who knows just how to play on the psychology of friends and enemies alike."
The following month, Gandhi's personal secretary Mohadev Desai wrote a letter to Leighton, a copy of which is attached to the backing board of the portrait.
It reads: "It was such a pleasure to have had you here for many mornings doing Mr Gandhi's portrait. I am sorry I didn't see the final result, but many of my friends who saw it in the Albany Gallery said to me that it was a good likeness. I am quite sure Mr Gandhi has no objection to its being reproduced."
There does not appear to be any record of Leighton's oil portrait of Gandhi being exhibited again until 1978, when the Boston Public Library staged an exhibition of Leighton's work. However, according to the artist's family, the portrait was thought to have been on public display in 1974 when it was attacked with a knife by a person.
A label attached to the backing board confirms that the painting was restored in 1974 by the Lyman Allyn Museum Conservation Laboratory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
Monuments stand in silence
It was another Sunday – May 10, 1857 – at the Delhi Telegraph office, nestled beside the British Magazine. The sun was just starting to heat the streets, and as per the custom, the office was to close by 9am. However, this Sunday was not like any other. The needle of time had shifted. Major Charles Todd, the British commander on site, stood by the telegraph machine, waiting for news to flash in from Meerut. Two Eurasian signallers, William Brendish and John Pilkington, bent down to read — the transmission was short and ominous. Meerut, 70 kilometers away, was distraught. Earlier in the day, sepoys (Indian troops in the British army) had rebelled, refusing to salute a foreign crown. Following this, the British officers issued a warning that any soldier backing the rebellion would be disarmed and chained. In Delhi, the message reachednot via horse or any other mode, but via a pulse in copper wires and tapping keys. By nightfall, when the connection with Meerut conked out, Todd sent his aides to survey the damage. When they did not return, he went himself and never returned. Hours later, an urgent message was tapped out to the Telegraph Office in Ambala: 'We must leave office. All the bungalows are on fire, burned down by the sepoys of Meerut. They came in this morning. We are off. Mr. Todd is dead, I think. He went out this morning and has not returned yet. We heard that nine Europeans were killed.' This was perhaps the last message wired from the telegraph office and possibly the first about freedom from oppressive British rule. The 1857 rebellion had lit the fire of mutiny awakening the people to the path of independence. Barely a 100 metres away opposite to the Telegraph office, the Mutiny Memorial was built in 1863 to honor soldiers of the British Indian Army who died during the revolt. In 1972, on the 25th anniversary of Indian independence, the Indian government renamed the Mutiny Memorial as 'Ajitgarh', the place of unvanquished. A plaque in memory of the officers and soldiers of the Delhi Field Force, whom the British considered rebels, was also installed. Today, the Telegraph Memorial stands not in silence, but in silent remembrance of the place as an enduring symbol of courage and where once wires shook with urgency for a nation's awakening. In that final message, the British heard the end of their rule and heard the start of the Indian voice. Not every revolution rages, some start as a whisper through copper, bearing the burden of a people poised to rise.
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
‘Hounded by this govt for 10 years': Rahul Gandhi defends Robert Vadra as ED names him accused in Gurgaon land deal case
A day after the Enforcement Directorate named Robert Vadra as an accused in a money laundering case linked to a land deal in Gurgaon, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi came forward to defend his brother-in-law. Rahul said that Vadra has been hounded by the government for the last ten years. Robert Vadra is the husband of Congress leader and MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. 'My brother-in-law has been hounded by this government for the last ten years. This latest chargesheet is a continuation of that witch hunt. I stand with Robert, Priyanka and their children as they face yet another onslaught of malicious, politically motivated slander and harassment,' Rahul wrote on X (formerly Twitter). He added: 'I know that they are all brave enough to withstand any kind of persecution and they will continue to do so with dignity. The truth will eventually prevail.' My brother-in-law has been hounded by this government for the last ten years. This latest chargesheet is a continuation of that witch hunt. I stand with Robert, Priyanka and their children as they face yet another onslaught of malicious, politically motivated slander and… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) July 18, 2025 Besides filing a chargesheet in the case, ED has also attached 43 immovable properties linked to Vadra and his entities including M/s Sky Light Hospitality Pvt Ltd and others. On Thursday, Vadra's office said that the present proceedings were 'nothing more than an extension of the political witch hunt by the present government.' 'Vadra is aware of reports suggesting that the Directorate of Enforcement has filed a Prosecution Complaint naming him as an accused before the Rouse Avenue Courts, Delhi. As the Court is yet to even take cognizance of the matter, he has not had the opportunity to examine the Prosecution Complaint. As a law-abiding Indian citizen, he has always and will continue to extend his fullest cooperation to the authorities and he is confident that at the end of it all, the truth will prevail and he will be cleared of any wrongdoing. He is looking forward to the opportunity to defend himself and clear his name in Court,' it stated. The ED investigation was based on an FIR, registered on September 1, 2018 by Gurgaon police, alleging fraudulent purchase of 3.53 acres of land situated in village Shikohpur, Sector 83, Gurgaon by Vadra through his entity M/s Sky Light Hospitality Pvt Ltd from M/s Onkareshwar Properties Pvt Ltd on February 12, 2008.
Hans India
a few seconds ago
- Hans India
Religious Groups Protest Poultry Advertisement Using Sacred River Name
A private veterinary college advertisement in Madhya Pradesh's Harda district has triggered religious sensitivities after featuring a hen named 'Narmada', prompting local communities to file formal complaints with district authorities. The controversy erupted when members of the Narmada Brahmin Samaj and other local residents discovered that one of the birds featured in the college's promotional material bore the name of the revered Narmada river. The community considers the river sacred and views it as a maternal figure that sustains life across the region. Ashok Parashar, president of the Narmada Brahmin Samaj, emphasized the religious significance of the river, stating that Narmada represents faith for multiple communities and serves as a life-sustaining force rather than merely a geographical feature. He argued that associating the sacred name with poultry was inappropriate and disrespectful to their religious beliefs. The objection quickly gained momentum, with community members organizing a demonstration at the district collectorate. They submitted a formal memorandum to Joint Collector Sanjeev Nagu, demanding immediate removal of the name from all advertising materials. The official acknowledged receipt of the complaint and assured protestors that appropriate measures would be implemented to address their concerns. However, the college administration has clarified that they were not responsible for naming the bird. Rajiv Khare, the institution's director, explained that the advertisement was promoting various poultry breeds available for sale. The names 'Narmada', 'Kadaknath', and 'Sonali' were originally assigned by the Jabalpur poultry center from which the college had purchased the birds. This explanation has not satisfied the protesters, who continue to press for the name change regardless of its origin. The incident highlights the delicate balance between commercial activities and religious sentiments in Indian society, where sacred names and symbols hold deep cultural significance. The controversy reflects broader tensions that can arise when commercial enterprises inadvertently intersect with religious beliefs. While the college maintains that the naming was unintentional and originated from their supplier, the community's response demonstrates the importance of cultural sensitivity in advertising and marketing practices. The district administration now faces the challenge of mediating between the college's explanation and the community's demands, while ensuring that religious sentiments are respected without creating undue restrictions on legitimate business activities. The resolution of this dispute may set precedents for how similar conflicts between commercial interests and religious beliefs are handled in the future.
