Gov. Cox: Utah's housing crisis demands tough conversations with cities
As the closing keynote speaker at Stanford University's Abundance Agenda policy forum, Cox said the state is ready to use a more hands-on approach after struggling to get cities to make municipal affordable housing plans.
'We tried to do it the nice way, and if you want us to do it the heavy way we'll do that too,' Cox said. 'I'm okay being the bad guy on this one.'
Cox recognized that cities have had a lot to keep up with: during the past two years since Cox launched his initiative to catalyze 35,000 starter homes by 2028 the Legislature has approved at least 15 bills reforming zoning, financing and inspection for affordable homes.
One of the most significant pieces of legislation would make $300 million in public investment funds available to help local lenders offer low-interest loans for developers building affordable homes.
The other reforms specifically mentioned by Cox would allow condominiums to qualify for these low-interest loans and would update litigation protection around condos to decrease insurance costs.
'I'm at the stage where I'm just throwing everything against the wall and seeing if anything sticks and actually makes a difference,' Cox said.
As he has on a number of other occasions, Cox touted Utah's streak of No. 1 rankings which he said were the result of residents' ability to reject zero-sum thinking.
But, Cox said, the biggest obstacle to addressing Utah's housing crisis might be public opinion.
While Utahns worry about their children not being able to afford to live near them, Cox said, that fear is not always tied to an understanding that affordability follows from increased supply.
Speaking to students, scholars and policy advocates, Cox highlighted a recent appropriation Utah lawmakers made for a public opinion campaign about the importance of high density construction like the Daybreak development in South Jordan.
'Showing some real wins, some places where people love to live where there's actual density just helps change that narrative,' Cox said. 'I think we just need to do better PR when it comes to to building and growth.'
In 2025, the Utah Legislature gave $1 million to Utah Workforce Housing Advocacy, a non-profit trying to raise awareness about affordable housing through its Demand More Supply initiative. A year earlier, the Legislature gave another $1 million to the organization.
Utah Workforce Housing Advocacy was created in 2023 by Craig Weston, a high-end developer; Derek Brown, later elected as Utah attorney general; Matt Lusty, Cox's campaign manager; and Steve Waldrip, later appointed as Cox's senior housing adviser, who remains a member of the unpaid board.
'I've learned that that we need to do better on the messaging side of this, trying to get the public on our side I think is really important,' Cox said. 'Our big focus has been on our kids and grandkids.'
Utah's founding was based on the positive-sum mindset of pioneers settling an unwelcoming land, Cox said in his opening remarks. In order to maintain the state's success he said residents will need to prioritize abundance by rejecting 'false choices' between growth and quality of life.
Cameron Diehl, the executive director of the Utah League of Cities and Towns, has worked closely with the Legislature in recent years to bring down housing costs while maintaining local control.
On Thursday, Diehl pointed out, the Wasatch Front Regional Council considered five station area plans in Draper, Taylorsville and West Jordan around transit stops, looking to accommodate 15,000 housing units.
'Cities want to see more affordable home ownership opportunities,' Diehl said. 'But we plan for housing, we don't build the housing, and we can't control the market forces.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
34 minutes ago
- Axios
A wave of possible reform is headed for the 2026 Mass. ballot
More than 40 proposed ballot questions cleared last week's filing deadline for the 2026 election, covering issues like voting procedures, government transparency, voter ID and lawmaker salary. Why it matters: Bay Staters could weigh in on an unprecedented number of ballot questions next year as activists increasingly bypass lawmakers and head straight to voters to address pressing issues. Driving the news: If activists secure enough voter signatures, their legal language is approved and Democratic leaders at the State House remain inactive, voters will have to decide whether to introduce a robust new rent control system in Massachusetts. They'll also be asked about repealing the MBTA zoning law that mandates housing construction in communities with public transit. The intrigue: Ballot campaigns have formed on a number of government reform questions. Campaigns seek to require voter ID for in-person and mail-in voting. Other campaigns look to enact same-day voter registration on Election Day, eliminate legislative leadership stipends and create an open primary system to replace partisan voting. One potential question would extend the public records law to cover the Legislature and the governor's office. Between the lines: Policy advocates have increasingly turned to the ballot to get new laws on the books over the last decade as Beacon Hill's own lawmaking pace has slowed considerably. Massachusetts has only passed seven laws in 2025, placing the commonwealth dead last in legislative productivity according to a study by Fiscal Note. Only 0.1% of introduced bills have passed so far this year, by far the lowest percentage in the country. Lawmakers typically wait until their annual or biennial session deadlines in July or November to pass a flurry of legislation. What's next: Attorney General Andrea Campbell has until Sept. 3 to certify the petitions that meet constitutional requirements. Approved campaigns then have to gather 74,574 signatures by Dec. 3 and another set of 12,429 signatures if the Legislature doesn't act on the issue. The bottom line: Most of the proposed questions make up a wave of accountability measures meant to check the way Beacon Hill does business.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kern lawmakers not on board with Newsom's redistricting fight
Kern County's local lawmakers universally condemned proposals from Gov. Gavin Newsom to redraw the state's congressional district, but were mostly quiet about efforts by other states to do the same thing. The offices of each of Kern County's six lawmakers in the state Legislature and U.S. House of Representatives did not respond to The Californian's specific questions on the matter, but did give a statement on the plans in California largely defending the state's independent redistricting committee. "No political party should manipulate redistricting for their own gain. California voters have made it clear: Politicians shouldn't draw their own maps," Assemblyman Stan Ellis, R-Bakersfield, said in an email. "Gov. Newsom's efforts to skew the lines for more seats undermine democracy. We must prioritize the will of the people over partisan politics and uphold fair representation," he said. Yet a defense of democracy is precisely what Newsom and his supporters say California is trying to do. "He knows he's going to lose in the midterms, and we have the opportunity to de-facto end the Trump presidency in less than 18 months," Newsom told reporters on Aug. 4. "That's what's at stake. That's why we're putting a stake in the ground. We're not drawing lines just to draw lines; we're holding the line on democracy." Newsom was referring to efforts by the state of Texas to potentially redraw four of its Congressional districts. Current plans from Republican lawmakers in that state could potentially add five Republicans to the already narrowly divided U.S. House. Texas Democrats have fled the state in an effort to stall the process. Several governors — Democrats in Illinois and New York, Republicans in Ohio and Missouri — have indicated their willingness to enlist their state in a gerrymandering arms race if other states do the same. Newsom has met with state legislative leaders and suggested holding a special session on the matter. But Kern County's state lawmakers from both parties said they're not interested. "The governor's efforts to gerrymander Congressional districts is pure politics and voters will see it for what it is — an end run around the state's voter approved redistricting commission," state Sen. Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield, said in a statement. "I support Congressman Kevin Kiley's efforts to pass a federal law prohibiting changes to congressional district lines as the best solution to this partisan mess being created," she said. Kiley, a Placer County Republican, has proposed legislation that would prevent any new state maps from taking effect before 2030. Kern County's Democratic state Sen. Melissa Hurtado, did not respond to request for comment. Delano Assembly member Dr. Jasmeet Bains called efforts in Texas "an affront to democracy" and said she opposed any effort to circumvent independent redistricting. "(Texas') gerrymandered maps are an electoral fraud. I will not sit by and watch two political parties destroy the concept of fair elections," Bains said in an email. "This has become a race to the bottom where an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind. We don't need more ways for politicians to rig the system." Bains also called for courts to intervene. But that's not likely to happen, according to UCLA law professor Richard Hansen. "In 2019 the (U.S.) Supreme Court in the Rucho case held that federal courts would not intervene against partisan gerrymandering," Hansen said in an email. That decision — decided in a 5-4 split between the courts conservative and liberal justices — found the court had no 'judicially manageable standard' for determining at what point a partisan gerrymander becomes unconstitutional. The issue is particularly complex for Bains, who recently announced she was running for California's 22nd Congressional District, meaning she would be voting to redraw the very districts she's looking to win. The Associated Press reported Monday one of the proposals currently being considered in California includes the 22nd as one of the districts that would see right-leaning voters shaved and Democratic voters boosted, a shift that would make it likely a left-leaning candidate would prevail in each race. The district is currently held by U.S. Rep. David Valadao, one of California's nine Congressional Republicans. Even before the redistricting issue, the 22nd was seen as one of the most competitive in the nation with candidates able to pull in millions of dollars from outside donors. In an email, Valadao's campaign strategist Robert Jones defended the state's independent redistricting commission. "California voters made it clear in 2008 that they wanted an independent commission, not partisan politicians like Jasmeet Bains, drawing their own districts for their own personal gain," Jones said. "That's corruption of the highest order." Bains' role in the potential redistricting quickly became fodder for Republican campaigners. In a statement Wednesday morning, regional spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee Christian Martinez accused Bains of supporting Newsom's redistricting plans. Martinez acknowledged in a text to The Californian he had not seen a statement from Bains regarding the issue. On Thursday, after Bains made statement condemning the governor's plan, Martinez released a new statement calling on Bains to recuse herself from the process. Kern County's other congressional Republican, Vince Fong, said partisan gerrymandering was precisely what Californians voted against when they overwhelmingly supported the creation of the independent redistricting commission. "Newsom, flanked by Texas Democrats, announced that he stands ready to take power away from the Citizens Commission and place it back into the hands of Sacramento politicians to further his left-wing political agenda," Fong said in an email. "As a delegation we will fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections." Any new electoral maps drafted by the state Legislature would have to be approved by voters in California. It's not clear whether the public would approve of the measures. Several groups have come forward calling on the state not to abandon its independent redistricting process even as other states move to boost the number of seats for a specific party. "Our feeling is that once you break that safeguard, you don't just risk the one election. You set a precedent that future politicians could use," said Helen Hutchinson, interim executive director for the League of Women Voters of California. Hutchinson said Californians worked hard to take redistricting out of the hands of politicians and completely circumvent the process was "a race to the bottom." "We really understand that urgency and we think that authoritarianism is not an abstract. It's here and it's really dangerous," Hutchinson said. "But we think the way to fight it is not to abandon one of our greatest democratic reforms here in California, the idea is to lead with ideas and policies that inspire voters, not with shortcuts that further erode public trust in the government."
3 hours ago
Texas Legislature to take another swing at redistricting vote as Democrats extend their walkout
Texas Republicans will again try to convene the state Legislature Monday for a vote on redrawing congressional maps in their party's favor, an effort that already sparked a national political brawl and prompted Democratic lawmakers to leave the state to deny Republicans the quorum they need. The Republican majority is seeking to redraw five U.S. House districts at President Donald Trump's urging as he tries to avoid a replay of the 2018 midterms. Those elections installed a new Democratic majority in the U.S. House that stymied the president's agenda and twice impeached him. Now, Democratic-controlled states including California, New York and Illinois are threatening to retaliate against Texas and Trump by proposing their own redistricting, putting the nation on the brink of a tit-for-tat overhaul of congressional boundaries that are typically redrawn only once a decade. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said he'll call lawmakers back to the Statehouse again and again until enough Democrats show up to reach the 100-member threshold required to vote on the bill. Democratic leaders in other states are planning out their retaliatory redistricting plans if Abbott succeeds. 'Texas, knock it off. We'll knock it off. Let's get back to governing,' said New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on 'Fox News Sunday.' As for the Democratic lawmakers who bolted from Texas — some of whom have been appearing alongside the likes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker at news conferences — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the state's Supreme Court to remove some of them from office or give them a 48-hour warning to return. 'If they show back up in the state of Texas, they will be arrested and taken to the Capitol," said Abbott on 'Fox News Sunday.' When pressed about blue states' threats to retaliate — such as Newsom's proposal to effectiveely cut five GOP-held seats in California — Abbott argued that many had already squeezed the juice out of their gerrymandering and would be hard-pressed to push it further. Democratic leaders say Abbott's plans are nothing more than a power grab. 'They know that they're going to lose in 2026 the Congress, and so they're trying to steal seats,' Pritzker said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Past attempts by Texas Democrats to halt votes by leaving the state were typically unsuccessful, and several of the blue states face more hurdles to redistricting than Texas does. California, for example, has an independent commission that runs redistricting after each decade's census. Changes require approval from both voters and state lawmakers, who have said they plan to call a special election in November to set the process in motion.
