logo
Excess power capacity

Excess power capacity

Express Tribune2 days ago

Listen to article
Pakistan's power sector is mired in a tragic paradox, with citizens enduring relentless load-shedding and unaffordable bills. The nation pays Rs2.5 to Rs2.8 trillion annually to power plants that don't generate a single unit of electricity. This astronomical sum — equivalent to roughly 3% of GDP — epitomises a system where financial engineering trumps public interest, burdening consumers with costs for "capacity" that remains perpetually idle.
The roots of this scandal lie in flawed power purchase agreements (PPAs) signed with independent power producers (IPPs). These contracts guarantee fixed "capacity payments" regardless of actual electricity generation, transferring all operational and market risks to the public. As Pakistan's installed capacity grew to over 46,000 MW — driven significantly by over 2,800 MW added through net metering — the utilisation of existing plants plummeted. Thermal power, though still dominant at 55.7% of the mix, remains underused in the winter due to transmission constraints and seasonal demand fluctuations — winter demand is about 12,000 MW, compared to summer demand of about 30,000 MW.
Substandard transmission lines have been blamed for the failure to bring several new cost-effective plants online, notably Port Qasim, China Power and Lucky Electric. Instead, the government continues to rely on older, less efficient plants, resulting in a double whammy of unnecessary capacity payments and increased pollution. Capacity payments accounted for about 71% of the power purchase price last year and are projected to rise by one-third this year.
The guaranteed payments are also a sorry example of 'socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor', which is at the core of most of Pakistan's economic failings. Annual capacity payments exceed Pakistan's healthcare budget sixfold, and IPPs often inflate costs without fear of reprisal due to the sweetheart deals they were granted by every government over the past three decades. Meanwhile, millions of citizens are struggling to pay their inflated power bills.
While some PPAs have been terminated, the government still has much work to do to rectify the situation, including grid modernisation and continuing to encourage a shift to renewables and locally-sourced fuels. It is also worth noting that in most countries, revenue from capacity payments is reinvested into infrastructure and other efficiency improvements instead of being rerouted to shareholders. Here, IPPs and distributors both have the gall to demand government intervention to improve infrastructure for which they are already receiving 'free money'.
An egregious recent example saw one distributor, in response to criticism of its loadshedding policy, actually suggest that the government take over loss-making feeders while letting it reap all the profits. That such a suggestion could seriously be made is in itself a reflection of the power imbalance in the power sector.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FinMin's post-budget presser marred by journalist boycott
FinMin's post-budget presser marred by journalist boycott

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

FinMin's post-budget presser marred by journalist boycott

Listen to article Federal Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is addressing a post-budget press conference, stating that the government tried to provide as much relief as possible to the salaried class. Speaking in Islamabad, Aurangzeb said that out of a total of 7,000 tariff lines, 4,000 have been brought down to zero. He added that these tariff reforms are expected to boost the country's exports. Earlier, the finance minister arrived for the briefing accompanied by the Finance Secretary and the Chairman of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). However, journalists boycotted the press conference in protest over the absence of a technical briefing on the budget. Reporters noted that for the past 20 years, it has been standard practice to provide a technical briefing to journalists following the budget. This year, they said, the government broke that tradition. Later, the finance minister instructed relevant officials to persuade the journalists to return. Federal Budget 2025 In line with the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) conditions for fiscal consolidation, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb maintained a firm stance in the federal budget for 2025–26. Despite this, he extended limited relief to the salaried class and offered incentives aimed at the real estate and construction sectors, seeking to revive industrial activity and spur economic growth. However, the government also unveiled several new revenue measures. A carbon levy of Rs2.5 per litre will be applied to petrol, diesel, and furnace oil starting next fiscal year, with plans to double it the following year. Other tax measures include a 5 per cent levy on large pensions, an 18 per cent tax on imported solar panels, and an increased surcharge on electricity bills to cover both interest and principal debt repayments. Furthermore, the government announced it would begin phasing out tax exemptions currently granted to tribal areas.

Anti-digital, pro-realty sector budget
Anti-digital, pro-realty sector budget

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

Anti-digital, pro-realty sector budget

Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on Tuesday unveiled a Rs17.6 trillion budget, which attempted to limit fiscal expansion but taxation measures were clearly self-contradictory that on one hand would promote cash economy and fossil fuels but discourage these too on the other. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also introduced new taxes on the digital economy, pensioners and clean energy. Some of these measures were contradictory to the stated policy to discourage the cash economy. However, the Finance Bill 2025-26, also gave incentives for clean energy by taxing the internal combustion engine cars and fossil fuels. Despite high poverty and high unemployment, the government proposed to drastically reduce import duties from raw materials to finished goods, which the industry feared would lead to de-industrialisation of Pakistan. The economy has been opened for the foreign competition by lowering protection available to local industries. The finance minister said that the maximum custom duty slab has been reduced to 15% while a five-year plan had been given to abolish additional and regulatory duties. The inaudible budget speech, which Aurangzeb, delivered in the midst of rowdy opposition, clearly lacked in giving any policy direction. While the Finance Division tried to meet the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) requirement to meet fiscal targets, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) was not able to come up with the clear taxation policy. The Finance Bill 2025-26 appeared to be the most confusing document that any government produced in years. It revolved around going after the economy of the youth and the 21st century business practices. The government has proposed 18% sales tax on import of solar panels but it imposed Rs2.5 per litre carbon levy on use of petrol, diesel and furnace oil, showing the lack of clarity on the part of the government. Likewise, it increased the tax on cash withdrawals from banks from 0.6% to 0.8% to discourage cash economy and generate more easy money but it also imposed a new tax on digital services platforms in the range of 0.25% to 5%. The government also increased sales tax on 850 cc cars of the middle class from 12.5% to 18%. A new tax has been introduced on pensioners where the monthly pension of Rs833,000 has been taxed at the rate of 5%. The FBR was once again lacking in determining the policy, whether the government wanted to promote digital economy or cash economy. FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial cancelled the media briefing on the Finance Bill 2025-26, which was tantamount to compromising transparency and the right of the people to know about the measures that impact their futures. In his budget speech, the finance minister surprisingly stated that the "rapid growth in the online business and digital market places was creating problems for traditional businesses, therefore, it is proposed that e-commerce platforms, couriers and logistic services should be taxed at the rate of 18%. A tax official told The Express Tribune that the FBR would earn Rs64 billion by taxing the digital economy. The Finance Bill 2025-26 showed that the economic managers preferred the 19th century economy by providing some relief on purchase of properties but taxed the digital platforms of the 21st century. It has also proposed to ban economic transactions of ineligible persons, which include ban on purchase of properties, cars and investment in securities by persons whose assets do not match these purchases. Through the Finance Bill, the government also amended a host of other non-tax laws besides introducing two new legislations, the Digital Presence Proceeds Act 2025 and the New Energy Vehicles Adoption Levy Act, 2025. There might be constitutional questions, whether the new laws can be introduced through the Finance Bill. The government has proposed a total of over Rs415 billion worth of tax measures in the budget, said the senior tax official. These include Rs292 billion worth of FBR-related measures, Rs111 billion additional earnings by imposing Rs2.5 per litre carbon levy on petrol, diesel and furnace oil and Rs9 billion worth levy on conventional cars. Finance Minister Aurangzeb said that the IMF had also accepted the Rs389 billion worth enforcement measures. But he admitted that the FBR's tax-to-GDP ratio would remain below the IMF target of 10.6% in this fiscal year. The government has proposed these measures to extract a minimum Rs2.2 trillion from the sluggish economy in a bid to achieve next fiscal year's Rs14.13 trillion tax target. The petroleum and carbon levy target has been set at Rs1.47 trillion for the next fiscal year on the back of Rs80 per litre levy. The finance minister also announced some respite for the lower to middle income group salaried persons. He said that on the annual income of Rs1.2 million, the tax rate will be 2.5%, down from 5%. In the cabinet meeting earlier, there was an exchange of words between the finance minister and the Communication Minister Abdul Alaeem Khan, who had asked the prime minister to further increase the salaries for the government employees. On that the finance minister stated that this would require additional resources, prompting Khan to say that he was not a street vendor, who did not know that this required additional money, said a member of the cabinet on condition of anonymity. The prime minister decided that in order to give a 10% increase in the salaries, the tax rate for the lower middle income group should be increased from the proposed 1% to 2.5%, said the sources. On annual income of up to Rs2.2 million, the government has proposed to reduce the rate from 15% to 11%, on annual income of Rs3.2 million, the rate is reduced from 25% to 23%. There is no relief for the annual salaried income earners of over Rs4.1 million. However, the fine on highest income earners has been reduced from 10% to just 9%, which the finance minister called was necessary to stop "brain drain". Advance tax on sale or transfer of immovable property has been increased from 3% to 4.5% on the value of Rs50 million property. The rate is jacked up to 5% from 3% on Rs100 million property while it is further increased to 5.5% from 4%, if the value exceeds Rs100 million. However, on the purchase of the property the rate is reduced from 3% to 1.5%, from 3.5% to 2% and from 4% to 2.5%, depending upon the value of the property. The economic transactions by the ineligible persons have been banned, if the value of the new purchases is more than 130% of the value of the total assets. Tight fiscal path In order to stay in the IMF programme, the government has proposed a fiscally tight budget, although it created room for political spending too. The government has proposed a budget deficit of Rs6.5 trillion or 5% of the size of the economy. The total size of the budget is Rs17.6 trillion, which is 7.3% less than this year's original budget due to relatively lower allocations for the interest payments in fiscal year 2025-26. The proposed budget deficit is 1.8% of the GDP or Rs2.4 trillion less than the original estimates of this fiscal year. The deficit may still be appearing large in absolute terms. But it is, for the first time, lower than this year's gap, both in terms of size of the economy and in absolute numbers. The defence budget has been proposed at Rs2.55 trillion, which is 21% or Rs436 billion higher than this fiscal year due to war with India. The armed forces development programme has been marginally increased to Rs300 billion, which is far lower than what the military had demanded. The government is projecting gross federal revenues at record Rs19.3 trillion for next fiscal year, higher by Rs1.5 trillion. The gross revenues are based on the FBR's tax target of Rs14.13 trillion and Rs5.2 trillion non-tax revenues. The non-tax income will mainly come from the Petroleum Levy where the government wants to collect nearly Rs1.5 trillion and the Rs2.4 trillion profit by the State Bank of Pakistan. Out of the Rs14.1 trillion FBR tax collections, the provinces will get Rs8.2 trillion as their shares in the federal taxes under the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award. This leaves the federal government with Rs11 trillion net revenues for next fiscal year, which will not be sufficient to meet the interest payments and inclusive of all defence spending. The government will borrow Rs6.5 trillion in the next fiscal year to finance the Rs17.6 trillion total federal budget. Under the IMF programme, the four provinces are also required to save Rs1.46 trillion from their revenues as cash surplus to bring down the national budget deficit to Rs5 trillion or 3.9% of GDP. This is steeper fiscal consolidation and would require all the five governments to meet all their revenue and expenditures related targets. The interest payments will eat 47% of the budget and the federal government's net income —after paying the provincial shares — will be Rs2.8 trillion more than interest payments. The next year's interest payments are estimated at Rs8.2 trillion, which is lower than this fiscal year due to substantial reduction in the interest rates. The finance minister announced a Rs716 billion BISP programme aimed at expanding the net to over 10 million beneficiaries and adding more children in the conditional cash transfer programmes.

Petrol, HSD and furnace oil: Rs2.5/litre carbon levy imposed
Petrol, HSD and furnace oil: Rs2.5/litre carbon levy imposed

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

Petrol, HSD and furnace oil: Rs2.5/litre carbon levy imposed

ISLAMABAD: The federal government has proposed to impose a carbon levy of Rs2.5 per litre on petrol, high-speed diesel (HSD) and furnace oil in the next fiscal year 2025-26. The new tax will be implemented alongside the existing petroleum levy on petroleum products and is expected to generate around Rs46 billion revenue for the government during the fiscal year 2025-26. It will not apply to kerosene oil and light diesel oil (LDO). The same levy will be increased to Rs5 per litre to generate Rs95 billion in fiscal year 2026-27, sources said. The funds collected will be allocated towards green budgeting initiatives. The measure comes after the government concluded negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the fiscal year 2026 budget. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store