
India's Missile Power: A Step Ahead of Pakistan in Range, Reach, and Readiness
New Delhi: India and Pakistan—two nuclear-armed neighbours—have long been racing to build stronger missile systems. While Pakistan has made progress with support from other countries, India's home-grown missile program has gone much further. Thanks to years of hard work, innovation, and focus on self-reliance, India now stands ahead in both quality and quantity of missiles. Here's how India's missile systems are stronger than Pakistan's—whether in terms of range, variety, or advanced technology. Longer Range and Stronger Reach
Pakistan's most powerful missile, the Shaheen-III, can travel up to 2,750 km—enough to cover most of India. But India's Agni-V missile can fly over 5,000 to 8,000 km, reaching even China, Europe, and beyond. The full Agni series, from Agni-I to Agni-V, gives India the ability to respond to different threats at different distances.
More importantly, India has submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) like the K-4, with a range of 3,500 km. This gives India strong second-strike ability—meaning, even if attacked first, it can strike back from hidden submarines. In contrast, Pakistan's missile range stays within South Asia. India's far-reaching missiles offer strategic power that Pakistan simply doesn't have. More Advanced and Varied Missile Types
Pakistan's missile collection mainly includes short and medium-range weapons like the Nasr (70 km) and Ababeel (2,200 km), plus cruise missiles like Babur and Ra'ad. These are useful for close-range or regional use.
India, however, has a much wider variety. The BrahMos, developed with Russia, is a supersonic cruise missile that travels at Mach 3 and can be launched from land, sea, air, and submarines. In comparison, Pakistan's Babur is subsonic and slower.
India also has missiles like Pralay (500 km) and Shaurya (700 km) that are quick to launch and highly accurate. In 2024, India tested a hypersonic missile that flies at Mach 9—something Pakistan hasn't achieved yet. This broad range of missiles means India can handle many types of threats, quickly and effectively. Strong Missile Defense System
India has built a Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system to shoot down incoming missiles—even nuclear ones. It has two layers:
PAD (Prithvi Air Defence) for high-altitude interceptions.
AAD (Advanced Air Defence) for lower-level threats.
This system can stop missiles coming from as far as 5,000 km away. On top of this, India has also bought the Russian S-400 air defense system, adding another layer of protection.
Pakistan has only just started working on a basic missile defense system like Hatf-IX, which is still in its early stages and far less capable. India's defense systems reduce the chance of successful enemy attacks and give it a huge advantage in any future conflict. Made in India: Innovation and Independence
Pakistan's missile program relies heavily on help from China, North Korea, and Iran. For example, Pakistan's Ghauri missile is based on North Korea's Rodong-1. This dependence makes it hard for Pakistan to create new or original systems on its own.
India, in contrast, has focused on building its own technology since the 1980s, when the Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme (IGMDP) was launched by Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. India learned to make everything from ring-laser gyroscopes to composite rocket motors. Even under Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) restrictions, India developed most of its missile systems indigenously. Today, more than 90% of India's missiles are made with Indian technology. This protects India from foreign sanctions and delays—something Pakistan still struggles with. Matching Pakistan's Tactical Missiles
Pakistan's Nasr missile is built for use in battles close to the border. It carries a small nuclear warhead and is aimed at countering India's stronger army. But India has an answer—Prahaar (150 km) and Pralay (500 km), which are just as effective and more accurate.
India also has air-launched missiles like Rudram-II and BrahMos-A that can strike deep inside Pakistan without even crossing the border. These are great for precision strikes, like targeting terrorist camps. With these tools, India can neutralize Pakistan's short-range missiles and tactical advantages. Ready for the Future
India isn't just focused on today—it's preparing for tomorrow. New developments include:
MIRVs (Multiple Independently Targetable Re-entry Vehicles) for missiles like Agni-Prime, which can hit multiple targets with one missile.
Hypersonic glide vehicles that are faster and harder to stop.
Scramjet engines and advanced satellite navigation for better control and speed.
Pakistan has also tested its Ababeel missile with MIRV features—but it's still in early testing. India's upcoming Phase-III BMD is being built to stop even hypersonic threats, keeping it far ahead of regional rivals. Conclusion: India's Clear Advantage
India has built a powerful missile force that beats Pakistan's in range, variety, technology, and defense. While Pakistan has made progress with missiles like Shaheen-III and Babur, India's Agni-V, BrahMos, and BMD systems place it in a whole different league.
Most importantly, India's focus on self-reliance means it can keep improving without depending on others. With a missile program that is both strong today and ready for tomorrow, India remains one step ahead—defending its borders and making its mark as a global missile leader.
(The author Girish Linganna of this article is an award-winning Science Writer and a Defence, Aerospace & Political Analyst based in Bengaluru. He is also Director of ADD Engineering Components, India, Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of ADD Engineering GmbH, Germany. You can reach him at: girishlinganna@gmail.com)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024
Kamala Harris won the U.S. elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024: A new report is stirring fresh debate about the outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, claiming that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were even cast. The bombshell allegation raises a serious question: Did Kamala Harris actually win the 2024 election ? According to the investigative piece from Daily Boulder, a private lab quietly implemented sweeping changes to voting machines used in over 40% of U.S. counties ahead of the 2024 race. Those changes, the report claims, were made with no public notice, no formal testing, and no third-party oversight. What changes were made to voting machines before the 2024 election? The report centers around Pro V&V, a federally accredited lab responsible for certifying voting machines in key states like Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, and California. In early 2024, the lab reportedly approved updates to ES&S voting systems, which included: New ballot scanners Printer reconfigurations Firmware upgrades A new Electionware reporting system Instead of labeling these as major changes, Pro V&V classified them as 'de minimis,' a term typically reserved for insignificant tweaks. This classification allowed them to bypass public scrutiny and avoid triggering full-scale testing or certification processes. But watchdog group SMART Elections wasn't convinced. In their words: Live Events 'This wasn't just a glitch in some sleepy county. It was a stress test of our entire system.' Soon after the machines went live, complaints began to surface. Were votes miscounted or ignored in key counties? In Rockland County, New York, several voters testified under oath that their ballots didn't match the official results. Senate candidate Diane Sare reportedly lost votes in precinct after precinct: In one district, 9 voters claimed they voted for Sare, but only 5 votes were recorded. In another, 5 voters swore they supported her, but only 3 votes appeared. It wasn't just third-party candidates who saw odd results. In multiple Democratic-leaning areas, Kamala Harris's name was reportedly missing from the top of the ballot entirely. Voters said they couldn't even find her name to select. These same areas had high support for Democrats like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, yet Harris received zero votes—a statistical anomaly that defies traditional voting patterns. Even more shocking: Donald Trump received 750,000 more votes than Republican Senate candidates in these districts. As reported by Dissent in Bloom, a political Substack, 'That's not split-ticket voting. That's a mathematical anomaly.' Who is behind Pro V&V, and why is there no oversight? At the center of the controversy is Jack Cobb, the director of Pro V&V. While he doesn't appear in the headlines, his lab certifies the machines that millions of Americans use to vote. According to the report, once the controversy began to gain traction, Pro V&V's website went dark, leaving only a phone number and a generic email address. No public logs. No documentation. No comment. Pro V&V is certified by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC). However, once accredited, labs like Pro V&V face no real public oversight. There is no hotline, no review board, and no formal process for the public to challenge or remove them. The EAC itself has four commissioners, two of whom—Benjamin Hovland and Donald Palmer—were appointed by Donald Trump during his first presidency. Even if wrongdoing were discovered, the process to revoke a lab's accreditation is slow, murky, and entirely internal. There are no public hearings and no outside investigations. As of June 2025, Pro V&V remains fully accredited and uninvestigated. Could Kamala Harris have actually won the election? The question is no longer whispered in political corners—it's being asked outright. In May 2025, Judge Rachel Tanguay ruled that allegations raised by SMART Elections were credible enough to move forward. The case, SMART Legislation et al. v. Rockland County Board of Elections , is scheduled for hearing this fall. While the lawsuit won't change the outcome of the election—Congress already certified Trump's victory—it could set off wider probes, from state investigations to federal criminal inquiries. Political writer John Pavlovitz openly questioned the result, writing: 'Kamala Harris may have won.' During the campaign, Harris reportedly drew massive crowds, high early voting numbers, and strong poll performances in swing states. Her debate showing against Trump was widely viewed as dominant—Trump even skipped the second debate. And yet, despite that momentum, Trump won. Adding fuel to the fire, Elon Musk, who vocally supported Trump, posted cryptic tweets during the 2024 cycle, including: 'Anything can be hacked.' Later, Musk stated: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election.' Trump himself added to the speculation, telling supporters: 'He [Musk] knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.' The upcoming court case could become a pivotal moment in election security history. The lawsuit claims that a private company quietly changed voting machines in over 40% of U.S. counties—and no one knew until after the votes were counted. The implications are serious: Could future elections be altered without oversight? Should the EAC change how it certifies and monitors voting labs? Is the public being kept in the dark about the technology behind their vote? SMART Elections warns this isn't just about one race: 'If one underfunded watchdog group can dig up this much from a quiet New York suburb, what else is rotting in the shadows of this country's ballots?'


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
11 Years of Modi Govt: From tomorrow, Centre to spotlight G20, Operation Sindoor, pension reform and more
Operation Sindoor, the successful hosting of the G20 summit in Delhi, the evacuation of Indians from Sudan and Ukraine, and a surge in defence exports: these will headline the national security achievements to be showcased by the Narendra Modi government as it marks 11 years in office on Tuesday, The Indian Express has learnt. In addition, the government will highlight other flagship policies and decisions implemented since it assumed power for a third consecutive term last year. These include the Cabinet's approval of caste enumeration in the upcoming census to secure accurate data for policymaking, and the rollout of a unified pension scheme to provide assured pensions to central government employees. The inauguration of India's first vertical lift sea bridge—the Pamban rail bridge—and the clearance for the Jammu-Srinagar Vande Bharat Express are also part of the list. Also on the list is progress under several flagship schemes since returning to power in 2024: guaranteed income via MSP, a special national mission to boost domestic production of pulses and reduce import dependency, steady access to electricity in rural areas, and affordable urea for all, among others. According to officials, the broader themes of the government's planned campaign include: serving the poor and marginalised, infrastructure development, Nari Shakti, the northeast, farmer welfare, national security and foreign policy, and ease of doing business. Government schemes and initiatives will be grouped under these categories, with Cabinet ministers and Ministers of State expected to play a key role in messaging. Officials told The Indian Express that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B) began collating major reforms, achievements, and initiatives from the last 11 years—as well as progress made since June 2024—as early as April, to design a creative campaign. I&B Secretary Sanjay Jaju is learnt to have written to all ministries requesting relevant inputs for the campaign. Additionally, the I&B Ministry is learnt to have sought from other ministries a list of suitable locations for media tours to showcase the on-ground implementation of government schemes. According to officials, the tours aim to provide journalists an opportunity to interact with beneficiaries and other stakeholders, and to witness outcomes first-hand. The month-long media tours are intended to highlight success stories, innovations, and best practices in a bid to raise public awareness of the government's programmes and initiatives.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
CEC Kumar to speak on electoral integrity at IDEA Stockholm Conference
Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) of India Gyanesh Kumar has been invited to deliver the inaugural keynote address at the International IDEA Stockholm Conference on electoral integrity on 10 June. Kumar, who is leading a delegation of senior officials, interacted with members of the Indian diaspora in Sweden on Monday ahead of the conference. He is also scheduled to hold one-to-one bilateral meetings with the Chief Election Commissioners of nearly 20 countries, including the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, South Africa, Indonesia, Mexico, Mongolia and Switzerland. 'The massive scale of the Indian elections and the magnitude of the logistics involved in the exercise evinces keen interest amongst the Election Management Bodies (EMBs) across the world. Over 100 participants representing around 50 countries are taking part in the conference,' the Election Commission said in a statement. Kumar's keynote address comes at a time when questions have been raised in India over the neutrality of the Election Commission of India (ECI). On Saturday, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi criticised the ECI's functioning and raised concerns about electoral integrity in a column published in multiple newspapers. Gandhi called the recent Maharashtra election 'a blueprint for rigged elections' and alleged that the next instance of 'match fixing' would occur in the Bihar polls. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis responded in a separate column, accusing Gandhi of 'insulting' India's democratic processes and the people's mandate. 'The people have rejected Rahul Gandhi, and in retaliation, he is rejecting the people and their mandate,' Fadnavis wrote. Despite the public exchange, Gandhi has not formally submitted a letter to the ECI with his claims. According to established procedure, any constitutional body, including the ECI, requires an official written communication to issue a formal reply. India's ranking in the Electoral Democracy Index of the V-Dem Democracy Report 2023 has declined to 108th, from 100th in 2022. Since 2017, the report has categorised India under the 'electoral autocracy' classification. The ongoing international conference on electoral integrity and Kumar's participation are expected to draw attention to both the scale of India's electoral operations and the domestic discourse around democratic institutions.