'Distrust and complete lack of collegiality developing within Cabinet'
Ivan Yates has claimed that property developers are 'pulling their hair out' over the current Government and that there is a growing 'distrust' within Cabinet.
Speaking on his Path to Power podcast with Matt Cooper, the former Fine Gael TD also claimed that the relationship between the Tanaiste and the Taoiseach, Micheal Martin, is 'not great'.
First addressing the worsening housing crisis in Ireland, Mr Yates said that developers have told him that 'the first big problem is Simon Harris.' Ivan Yates has claimed that property developers are 'pulling their hair out' over the current Government and that Simon Harris has 'a complete lack of focus'.
'[They see] a complete lack of focus, distracted,' Yates began. 'And that's ok when you're Taoiseach, but it's not ok when you're Tanaiste. He hasn't settled into the role.'
The former Newstalk presenter went on to claim that there is now a lack of camaraderie within Cabinet, and he already fears that this Government's days may be numbered. Tanaiste Simon Harris speaking to media outside Government Buildings, Dublin. Pic: Cillian Sherlock/PA Wire
'The relationship, apparently, between Harris and Micheal is not great,' Yates claimed.
'There is a distrust developing within the Cabinet about leaking. There is a complete lack of collegiality which is actually leading to… an incoherent Government.'
Yates went on to issue a stark warning, suggesting that if a corner isn't turned soon, the Government may collapse. Taoiseach Micheal Martin. Pic: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
'Micheal needs to stop running around like a blue-a**ed fly and actually start listening to people.
'Because if he doesn't get a new narrative in place by September, this Government is goosed.'
I was about to give up on Path to Power. The last few weeks have been dull. All they've talked about was Trump, Pope, Tariffs etc. If I want to get opinions on Trump I'll listen to much better informed American pods.
Producers of this show (Noel Kelly) should realise their… pic.twitter.com/8LuWt0qeyn
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
2 hours ago
- Extra.ie
'Radical reset' of housing policy needed as targets to be missed by 10,000 AGAIN
Housing targets will be missed by up to 10,000 units again this year and will fall short for the next several years, can reveal. Officials in the Department of Housing have warned Minister James Browne that the number of new homes built this year is likely to fall 'somewhere in the low 30,000s', compared to a target of 41,000. Internal briefing documents prepared for the Housing Minister, obtained by under Freedom of Information legislation, also raised concerns over the construction of desperately needed homes into the future. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael were accused of having 'misled' voters in the run up to last November's election, when they claimed 40,000 homes would be built last year but only 30,300 were delivered. 18/02/2025 Dublin Ireland. Fianna Fail Minister for Housing James Browne talking to the media on his way into today's cabinet meeting at Government Buildings. Photo: Sasko Lazarov/© In a statement to Extra, Mr Browne admitted this year's output will fall far short of target. He said it was 'difficult to see a pathway off the lower than expected base from 2024'. The Fianna Fáil TD insisted he is 'interrogating every area' that is delaying delivery of housing and 'demanding faster outcomes as soon as possible'. Ahead of the last election, the Government revised its housing targets upwards to account for Ireland's soaring population. Over the course of this Government's lifetime, the aim is to build 303,000 new homes – starting at 41,000 this year and ramping up to 60,000 by 2030. But there is already open admission within Government that their targets for 41,000 new homes this year and 43,000 next year will be widely missed, as the upward momentum in housing has evaporated. The documents prepared for the minister highlight the 'almost complete retrenchment of private international capital since 2022' as a 'significant factor' that will affect the delivery of housing in the coming years. Housing Development: Pic: Getty Images Institutional investors play a central role in the development of apartments and the 80% reduction in international capital since 2022 has led to a sizeable reduction in supply. The officials highlight that the pipeline for new apartments is slowing, with a 39% dip in planning permissions in 2024 'reflecting a general downward trend from the peak in 2020 and 2021'. This is already being felt in apartment completions which equated to 29% of all home completions in 2024, a drop of 7% from the previous year. The officials wrote: 'Delivery of apartments will be potentially constrained in coming years given the fall in institutional investment since mid-2022, and its slow return to date.' This depleted pipeline has placed the Government's housing targets beyond 2026 at risk, officials warned. They stated: 'The decline in overall approvals, as well as apartment approvals, has implications in the longer term for the delivery of Government's revised housing targets, with approvals falling short of the quantum needed to hit targets in 2026 and subsequent years.' Mr Browne said recently that he felt the Economic Social and Research Institute's prediction that 34,000 new homes would be built this year and 37,000 next year is probably broadly accurate. The internal documents prepared for Mr Browne by his officials in April state that an output in the low 30,000s this year is likely. They wrote: 'Published forecasts project between 32,000 and 35,000 new homes will be completed in 2025 – the forecasts will fluctuate as the year progresses, but somewhere in the low 30,000 range seems most realistic at this stage factoring in early feedback from the construction sector.' Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage James Browne TD speaking to the media in the Government Press Center following today's Cabinet meeting, Dublin. Photo: Sam Boal/Collins Photos The officials noted that while 'the emerging consensus from published forecasts' at the start of 2025 is between 32,000 and 35,000 new homes this year 'all forecasts should be treated with considerable caution at this stage'. They stated: 'A degree of circumspection is advised as a more conservative projection of 30,000, give or take, is mooted by stakeholders closer to residential construction sector.' Mr Browne said: 'I am seeing many of the same forecasts as are publicly available and most of them have the same trajectory for the year, which is in the low 30s, which seems realistic at this stage in the year – it would be difficult to see a pathway off the lower than expected base from 2024.' He said that he is 'interrogating every area' that is delaying delivery of housing and 'demanding faster outcomes as soon as possible'. Mr Browne added: 'I've been pulling together what's needed to boost delivery, including a revised National Planning Framework which will help increase our capacity and accelerate home building. The Housing Activation Office will hone in on the ground to address barriers impacting housing development. 'The buttons I press now may not feel like they have immediate impact but what I do now will impact home building for years and we have to get it right. I'm serious about that. Sorting out planning can be laboured – it is a rules-based process for many good reasons. That doesn't mean we aren't tackling it to speed it up. 'Measures to help scale-up delivery are being considered in the context of the next housing plan.' The officials pointed to planning permissions for 49,212 units that have not commenced in Dublin as one potential solution over the medium term. Of those, 7,272 are on sites where construction had started while 5,875 are being held up as they are the subject of a judicial review. Last week, Mr Browne announced plans to allow for the extension of planning permissions for developments that are set to expire and have not yet commenced. The permissions can be extended for up to three years. The proposals will also allow planning permissions subjected to or going through a judicial review to apply for a retrospective suspension of the permission for the duration of the judicial review. Pic: Sam Boal/Collins Photos Sinn Féin's housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin told Extra: 'The ESRI and Central Bank, in their recent presentation to the Oireachtas Housing Committee, said that without a significant change in policy and investment, the new Programme for Government targets can not be met. 'All of the indicators are going in the wrong direction. 'Only a radical reset of housing policy, as recommended by the Housing Commission and Sinn Féin can start to undo the damage of years of bad Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael housing policy.' Mr Browne is set to unveil his new housing plan next month, prior to the Dáil's summer recess. Viability is a core challenge facing the sector, particularly in relation to apartments, with the Department of Finance in the process examining proposals to tackle funding challenges. It is expected that changes to apartment regulations will be made in an attempt to reduce the cost of building. The documents highlight the surge in the price of materials, which are now 33% higher than in January 2021. Officials wrote: 'Input cost inflation quickened for the second month running and was the steepest for almost two years.' The CSO's Wholesale Price Index for building and construction materials shows material input costs continue to rise. The Government has also been deciding on whether to retain, replace or amend the Rent Pressure Zones, which limit annual rent increases to 2%. It appears removing the 2% cap is now the plan. RPZs have been highlighted as a barrier to investment by institutional investors. Uisce Éireann has also warned that it will need an additional €2billion to connect new homes to the supply if it is to keep pace with increased housing targets. The housing officials pointed to issues in water and energy connections as one reason for the shortfall in completions last year as well as the Government's incentivising of commencing new developments.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Police clash with Los Angeles protesters as opposition to Trump intensifies
Federal agents clashed with demonstrators in Los Angeles on Sunday as police used teargas and 'less-lethal munitions' to disperse massive crowds of people protesting against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and his deployment of the California national guard against the will of the state's elected leaders. Thousands of Angelenos swamped the streets around city hall, the federal courthouse and a detention center where protesters arrested in days before are being held. They also brought a major freeway to a standstill. Vocal and boisterous, the crowd for large parts of the day was mostly peaceful. But tensions flared several times. On Sunday afternoon, police used teargas to disperse groups of protesters gathered near the detention center. And in the evening, officers fired round after round of flash-bangs in an attempt to push the protesters back up the freeway off-ramps. Los Angeles police leaders said officers had been shot at with commercial-grade fireworks, and had rocks thrown at them. Mr Trump's decision to deploy national guard troops into Los Angeles, against the wishes of state and local officials, has sent shockwaves through American politics. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, and other Democratic governors have sharply criticized the move, describing it as an 'alarming abuse of power'. Mr Newsom has called on the administration to rescind the 'unlawful' deployment. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' Mr Newsom said. Mr Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 national guard on Saturday night following two days of clashes between demonstrators and US immigration authorities. The decision marked a stunning escalation in a broad crackdown on immigrants following raids across the country, which have triggered protests. Protesters confront a line of U. National Guard. Picture: AP Photo/Eric Thayer Mr Trump's federalisation of the guard troops is the first time an American president has used such power since the 1992 LA riots. At that time, widespread violence broke out in reaction to the acquittal of four white police officers for brutally beating Black motorist Rodney King. By Sunday morning, some 300 national guard troops had been deployed to the city. As the day began, two dozen of them appeared to news crews outside the federal complex as though intent only on posing for photographs. By afternoon, thousands of protesters had gathered downtown. Protesters at the metropolitan detention centre peacefully confronted heavily armed national guard soldiers. 'We're not afraid of you!' one protest organiser with a bullhorn, John Parker, yelled. One of the many banners on display read: 'National Guard LOL.' Graffiti reading 'Fuck ICE', 'LAPD can suck it' and 'Kill all cops' covered every building and wall in the immediate vicinity. The LAPD declared the protest an 'unlawful assembly', ordering everyone in the area to leave or face arrest. Still, the protests continued for hours. Police reported arresting a number of people. Officers began patrolling the area on horseback. The California highway patrol attempted to remove people from the nearby 101 freeway. Popping sounds could be heard throughout the area as protesters chanted 'Go home' and 'Shame'. Journalists and protesters were reportedly struck by projectiles. Los Angeles police said two officers were injured after being struck by motorcyclists attempting to 'breach a skirmish line'. Throughout the afternoon, there were isolated episodes of vandalism — graffiti sprayed on buildings and vehicles, and a protester who damaged the side mirror of a parked car he passed. A line of spray-painted Waymo driverless cars, one with a smashed windshield, were later set on fire. By Sunday evening, tensions had risen. Protesters continued to obstruct the freeway even after authorities had attempted to forcefully clear them out, with demonstrators throwing garbage and rocks at police. Mr Newsom and the Los Angeles mayor, Karen Bass, had urged protesters throughout the day to stay peaceful, and doubled down on their plea on Sunday evening. 'Protest is appropriate to do, but it is just not appropriate for there to be violence,' Bass said. The LAPD chief, Jim McDonnell, on Sunday evening called the violence 'disgusting'. Mr McDonnell said officers had been pelted with rocks, and shot at with commercial grade fireworks. He said those engaged in violence were not among the people demonstrating against the immigration raids, but are 'people who do this all the time'. Mr McDonnell said he would initially not have called for the national guards' deployment. But, he said, 'looking at tonight, this thing has gotten out of control'. Earlier on Sunday, Ms Bass said the national guard deployment was 'the last thing Los Angeles needs', adding that she had discouraged the administration from doing so. 'I was hoping to prevent this situation from happening,' Ms Bass said. 'Our city is still trying to recover from the wildfires.' 'We do not need to see our city torn apart,' she said, adding that people are 'terrified'. The national guard are deployed around downtown Los Angeles. Picture: AP Photo/Eric Thayer Mr Trump's move has been followed by the threat of even more escalation. The US Northern Command said in a statement that about 500 marines from Twentynine Palms, California, about two hours east of Los Angeles, are in 'prepared to deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support the DoD's protection of federal property and personnel efforts'. Earlier, Pete Hegseth, Mr Trump's defense secretary, had raised the possibility of deploying US marines on to the streets of LA. Mr Newsom has called the potential deployment of US marines 'deranged'. He and other California leaders have been adamant that local officers had adequately responded to the protests on Friday and Saturday. 'Law enforcement authorities from the city and county of Los Angeles are safeguarding public safety, and, as demonstrated by the robust law enforcement response yesterday evening to protect federal facilities, local law enforcement resources are sufficient to maintain order,' Mr Newsom wrote to Mr Hegseth. Kristi Noem, the Department of Homeland Security secretary, criticised Mr Newsom's stance on ABC's Face the Nation. She said: 'If he was doing his job people wouldn't have gotten hurt the last couple of days … Governor Newsom has proven that he makes bad decisions.' The independent Vermont senator Bernie Sanders called the situation a threat to US democracy. 'We have a president who is moving this country rapidly into authoritarianism,' he told CNN. 'He does not believe in the rule of law.' In a joint statement, Democratic governors on Sunday condemned Mr Trump's deployment of the California national guard as an 'alarming abuse of power'. Tensions in Los Angeles had begun on Friday, when protesters clashed with law enforcement officials conducting immigration raids on multiple locations in the sprawling city's downtown. On Saturday, US immigration authorities extended enforcement action into Paramount, a majority Latino area south-east of Los Angeles, and were met with more protests outside an industrial park. A standoff developed between border patrol personnel in riot gear and gas masks and protesters. As demonstrations continued, law enforcement deployed teargas and protesters also threw objects at them. At least one car was set alight. Mr Trump then promised to send in the national guard. Mr Newsom immediately condemned the move: 'The federal government is taking over the California national guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles – not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle,' Mr Newsom said later. 'Don't give them one.' Mr Trump has long promised mass immigration raids across the US after campaigning in part last year on anti-immigrant sentiment. Since he returned to office Ice raids have increased, in particular targeting some areas traditionally left alone such as court houses where immigrants might be attending hearings. Immigration officers could be in California in heightened numbers for a month, a Democratic congresswoman has been told. Nanette Barragán, the US representative who has Paramount in her constituency, said she has been told to prepare for a large presence of ICE agents in California. 'We've been told to get ready for 30 days of enforcement. Thirty days of Ice enforcement,' Ms Barragán told CNN, adding that their presence is 'going to escalate the situation'. The Guardian Read More Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg, ministry says
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Rules for renters: What are the planned reforms and will they work?
What's happening to the rules governing renting? A proposed overhaul of rules is going before Cabinet on Tuesday morning. It would see a significant shake-up in the rental market in the months ahead. What are the current rules? Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) were introduced in 2016 to cap rent increases in areas where there was a very high demand for housing and rental homes. Initially, RPZs were confined to large urban centres but, as the housing crisis deepened, more and more areas were designated RPZs. In these locations, as it stands, rent increases cannot be greater than the rate of inflation or 2 per cent – whichever is lower. What are the changes proposed? The Government is planning to keep the caps for existing tenancies, at least to a large degree, while easing restrictions on rent increases for newly built homes. The plan – and it has yet to be agreed – would see the current RPZ annual caps not apply to new buildings constructed after a certain date, with the rents in qualifying properties instead to be tied to inflation. [ Rent controls to be eased for new builds in planned 'pressure zones' reform Opens in new window ] And why would the Government create what looks like a two-tiered rental system? In fairness, there is already a two-tiered system, with some properties in RPZs and some not, so what the Government is considering is a three-tiered system. READ MORE What is the market currently like for rents? Rents are climbing faster than at any point over the past 20 years, with the national monthly average between January and March surpassing €2,000 for the first time, according to a report from That compares to a low of just €765 in 2011. Why are rents climbing so fast? Much of that increase is down to a lack of supply. There were just 2,300 homes available to rent nationally on May 1st, down 14 per cent year-on-year and the third-lowest total for May in 20 years. In a properly functioning market that number should be closer to 10,000. Why is supply such an issue? There are many, many reasons but the author of the report, Trinity College Dublin economist Ronan Lyons, has said changes made to rent controls in 2021 when rent caps were reduced from 4 per cent to 2 per cent 'dramatically reduced the ability of Ireland's rental sector to attract the capital needed for new supply, the ultimate remedy for the shortage'. And this overhaul is aimed at attracting that capital, is that correct? That is the rationale, certainly. The thinking is that if rent restrictions are eased for new apartments, more money will pour into the sector and more apartments will be built, which will ease the pressure on the market as a whole. Will the owners of these new builds be able to charge what they want? They will be able to charge what the market will bear, for sure. However, there is some good news for people who are renting now: under the proposals the existing cap of 2 per cent will remain in place – at least for existing tenancies, but landlords will be able to increase the rent to the market rate between tenancies, something which is not permitted under the current rules. [ Ireland's rising rents: 'Our budget would have been €1,300 a month, there isn't even anything listed for that' Opens in new window ] Surely that will incentivise landlords to evict their current tenants so they can get new ones in and charge them more? That is undoubtedly a fear. Under the proposals going before Cabinet, there will be more protections put in place for renters for a minimum of six years. During that period, there will be restrictions put in place on no-fault evictions. At the end of a six-year period, a landlord will be able to reset the rent to the market rate. Opposition parties have questioned the adequacy of these planned protections. Will the changes work? That is the big, big question. It is undoubtedly in the Government's interests that it does work. Part of the Government's pitch to voters in the run-up to the last general election was that the State had turned a corner on housing and that the supply of new homes would hit 40,000 in 2024. Completions instead fell by 7 per cent to 30,000. Housing commencements, which indicate future supply, have also fallen off a cliff, with housing starts in the first quarter of 2025 eight times down on last year and at their at their lowest level since 2016. The rate of building when it comes to apartments is even worse. What are interested parties saying about the proposals? Many are unconvinced. The housing charity Threshold has welcomed the degree of security it will give to tenants if restrictions on no-fault evictions are imposed for a six-year period. However, it stressed that it could actually push more people into homelessness if the RPZs are diluted. Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin dismissed the plan as 'utter madness' and said renters were being punished for Government housing failures by even higher rents and greater uncertainty. Mary Conway of the Irish Property Owners Association was downbeat for other reasons. 'There seems to be so many tiers to it and, while the institutional investors are getting favoured, there is nothing for the small property owners and nothing happening for rural areas – that is our biggest concern.' Ian Lawlor or Roundtower Capital, which funds building projects, said the proposals increased rather than reduced uncertainty, adding what was needed was all-party buy in for a 10-year plan 'to deliver these houses at scale'. He warned that the new measures would show those currently in the market that they were not valued. 'Small investors are leaving the market [and] they'll continue to sell up and leave.' Dr Lyons was more upbeat about the measures. He said, while the 'devil would be in the detail', it was a 'qualified positive' step. 'I don't think it's going to make that much a difference between the older and the newer stock. The more important change to me is the resetting when the tenant leaves. 'I think one of the biggest challenges institutional investors have is the combination of very low annual increases and the inability to reset when a tenant leaves. It's certainly not everything investors would have wanted but it might be considered a step in the right direction to encourage new rental supply. So I think it is a qualified positive.'
