Shubman Gill's aggression at Lord's a little out of character, but that's captain standing up: Ricky Ponting
The closely fought game saw plenty of drama on the field, including an animated flare-up between Gill and the England openers towards the end of the third day of the Test.
India had managed to equal England's first innings total of 387, and wanted to squeeze in two overs in the remaining six minutes of play. However, that wasn't possible as the English openers took their time to get ready, and Gill exchanged words with Zak Crawley and then Ben Duckett.
Former Australia captain Ponting understood why Gill's aggressive action at Lord's was met with surprise.
'That was a little out of character from what I've known from Shubman in the past. I am sure everyone that was there watching it, and I know you would know him quite well, that's not what he's generally like,' Ponting told The ICC Review.
But Ponting also sympathised with Gill, saying it was a case of a young captain taking a stand for his team under the circumstances.
ALSO READ | Gill brings back 'spirit of the game' debate, saying England batters walked out late during Lord's Test
'That's the captain standing up for his team, that's a captain really wanting to show that it's his team now and this is the way that we're going to play the game, and also, I guess, wanting to give a little bit back,' he added.
India lost the Test by 22 runs to trail the series 1-2. The fifth and final Test begins here on Wednesday.
Ponting felt that Gill acted in a manner similar to former captain Virat Kohli.
'I think that's him starting to put his stamp on his team. And a lot like Virat (Kohli) did, similar ways like that. Rohit (Sharma) probably was never as outwardly aggressive, I guess, especially to opposition players. I know he (Rohit) would quite often get aggressive with his teammates and try to bring the best out of them that way. But I love watching Shubman stand up for what he thought was right in the game last week,' he said.
Ponting has played Tests in England across four separate tours, and twice as captain (2005 and 2009). He said that the pressures of such a high-profile tour could get to a skipper.
'The UK can be a hard place to play. The crowds, as much as they love their game, can be as hostile a place to play as anywhere in the world. The media there, when you're in a big series, when it's an Ashes series or when it's England and India, the media always feel like they're right on top of your back as well,' Ponting said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gautam Gambhir, chief curator clash at The Oval
New Delhi: India head coach Gautam Gambhir was involved in a heated verbal argument with the chief curator at The Oval, venue of the fifth Test against England which starts on Thursday. In videos that have surfaced on X, Gambhir in the incident that happened on Tuesday can be seen animatedly pointing a finger at Lee Fortis and with some words audible, including 'You don't tell us what to do'. India's head coach Gautam Gambhir and support staff interact with a groundsman during a training session at the Oval ground, in London. (PTI) India's batting coach Sitanshu Kotak is then seen stepping in, taking Lee away and having a brief conversation with him. India assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate also joins Kotak during his conversation with Lee, while Gambhir, standing away, continues to make his point as he stands on the edge of a batting net. Later in the news conference on Tuesday, Kotak said: 'When we were having a conversation near the pitch they had sent a man to send a message for us to stay 2.5m away from the pitch. We were wearing joggers, so it was awkward.' 'We know curators are overprotective and possessive about the square. What he (Gambhir) said about the head coach is his opinion and I don't want to comment. We did nothing wrong, we were wearing rubber spikes. Even the bowlers were not wearing spikes. 'The curator also needs to know that the people he is talking to are highly skilled and intelligent people. You can be protective about the square, but not arrogant. It is not an antique that you can't touch or it will be broken. He said we are trying to grow the grass but we were wearing joggers so we didn't see the problem. 'The curator yelled at support staff when they were getting an ice box. It weighs 10kg. Gambhir objected to the way he spoke with the support staff. The way he spoke irked Gambhir as it would any head coach. Everyone knows the curator at The Oval is not the easiest person to deal with. We won't be lodging any official complaint,' he added. Kotak clarified that the wicket has grass like other venues, barring Manchester which saw the only drawn Test. The series has not been short of drama. Words were exchanged between India captain Shubman Gill and England openers Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett in the final moments of Day 3 in the Lord's Test. India accused England of employing time wasting tactics to deny them the opportunity to bowl a second over, and possibly get an early breakthrough. In the fourth Test at Old Trafford, words were exchanged when late in the final session of the match after Ben Stokes offered to shake hands on a draw and Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, batting on 89 and 80 respectively, insisted on carrying on, having battled to thwart England's bid for victory. Stokes was heard saying, 'Jaddu, do you want to get a Test hundred against Brook and Duckett?' Jadeja responded, 'What do you want me to do, just walk off?' Crawley, who stood close by, chipped in: 'You can, just shake your hand.' Jadeja and Sundar both scored hundreds before the draw was eventually agreed. India's stand, to let the two batters reach the landmark, has largely been endorsed. India trail the series 1-2, but having managed to keep the series alive by drawing the Old Trafford game, can hope to push for victory to finish on level terms. The latest incident promises to add more drama to the build-up for the Oval Test.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
ENG vs IND: KL Rahul — The grace of resistance
For a team that has, across this series, often appeared the more rounded and resourceful, India came perilously close to finding itself 3–1 down. Instead, it left Manchester with the series alive. A 2–2 score-line was still within reach. The draw it earned was not the product of weather or time lost. Gloomy skies lingered through much of India's second innings, but the rain never arrived. The resistance came from bat and mind, not in the least, from opener KL Rahul. I first met Rahul by the poolside at the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru in 2017. I was part of the PR team for the Karnataka Premier League, and an auction was due in a couple of days. Rahul was around for a shoot. Someone asked me to grab a quick Q&A with him. He was already part of the Indian setup by then, but there was no entourage, no theatre. Just a player who answered every question with clarity, patience, and a studied calm — as if deflecting attention with the same soft hands he used to play late. That was my first glimpse of his quiet discipline. Watching him at Old Trafford, it struck me again how little the essential temperament had changed. Rahul playing a kneeling drive during an Intra-squad match that seemed to distill his method in a single movement — high elbow, hard hands, balance held a fraction longer than necessary. | Photo Credit: BCCI/X Even before the series began, there were signs. A photograph of Rahul in action during a quiet, intra-squad match in Beckenham was lauded online for artfully capturing his craft. Rahul played a kneeling drive that seemed to distill his method in a single movement — high elbow, hard hands, balance held a fraction longer than necessary. The ball disappeared, but he remained exactly where the stroke demanded him to be, composed and precise. It was not a shot that sought applause. It was an act of alignment. At Old Trafford, he brought that same stillness into sharper focus. Earlier in the week, Kevin Pietersen had posted a reflection that seemed to echo across the Old Trafford outfield: 'Cricket is a team sport played by individuals. It's actually more of an individual sport than one thinks.' It's the kind of statement that sounds provocative until you watch a Test unfold. Sessions ebb and flow. Matches turn on a single spell or a solitary stand. And then it becomes plainly true — especially when one of those individuals chooses stillness over spectacle. Rahul remains a curious case in Indian cricket. Elegant in method, classical in set-up, yet oddly unfulfilled in record. Until this tour, he had never made more than one hundred in a Test series or crossed 400 runs. His average hovered, stubbornly, in the low thirties. And yet, few batters have looked more at home in English conditions in recent times. ALSO READ | ENG vs IND 4th Test: The theatre of refusal At Old Trafford, he reminded everyone what a proper opener looks like. There was a quietness to his innings. Unshowy, even subdued, but it had weight. This was the fourth time in as many Tests that he had crossed fifty, a run of consistency that has long eluded him. His half-century came in 141 deliveries and featured just three boundaries. It was an innings shaped less by strokes than by stillness; Rahul doing his usual thing: playing late, picking his moments, and being decisive about what to play and what to leave. His defence was immaculate, his tempo deliberate. For long stretches, he played the silent partner to Shubman Gill's more expressive repertoire. Together, they added 184 runs. A stand that began with India at none for two, and will now go into the books as the highest third-wicket partnership in Test history after a team has lost both openers without scoring. The previous best — 105 by Mohinder Amarnath and G. Viswanath at Melbourne in 1977 — was left far behind. They batted for 417 deliveries, the longest stand by Indian batters in England since 1998. Not since the days of Rahul Dravid and Sourav Ganguly at Trent Bridge has time been occupied so meaningfully by an Indian pair here. Bit by bit, the needle moved. The ball grew older, the pitch quietened, Ben Stokes wasn't bowling. The advantage wasn't seized all at once but accumulated slowly, through spells and sessions. Eventually, as ever, England turned to its captain. Stokes had not bowled on day four, and his body remains a reluctant partner. But he willed himself through two morning spells. Grimacing, pausing, stretching, he summoned the delivery that broke through — a skidding in-swinger that tailed in and trapped Rahul on the pad. The ball kept low, a true Old Trafford grubber, and Rahul, with barely a glance at the umpire, walked. Ben Stokes of England celebrates after dismissing KL Rahul of India during Day Five of the 4th Rothesay Test Match between England and India. | Photo Credit:The dismissal felt heavier than a mere number. Rahul's 90 won't find space on a list of milestones, but it mattered more than most hundreds. It was the kind of innings that rearranges conversations. With it, he became the first visiting opener to cross 500 runs in a Test series in England since Graeme Smith's 714 in 2003. Only Gavaskar has made more as an Indian opener on English soil. Rahul now has 511 runs this series, and 1125 career runs in England, already past Virat Kohli's tally. If form and conditions permit, he may soon overtake Dravid (1376) and Gavaskar (1152) on that list too. He had faced the conditions, played the pitch on its terms, and absorbed the rhythms of a Test match that seemed to drift before snapping back into tension. In the end, he did enough. The series is still alive. A final word remains unsaid. And in the margins, Rahul's innings will linger. Not for its brilliance, but for its restraint. In a series that has often veered between chaos and collapse, this was a rare moment of poise.
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
'Why Declare Late?': Sunil Gavaskar's Question Ben Stokes After Manchester Draw
Sunil Gavaskar criticized England's Ben Stokes over the handshake controversy with India's Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar after the Old Trafford Test. Sunil Gavaskar slammed England skipper Ben Stokes in the handshake controversy that erupted out of the dramatic final moments in the Old Trafford Test on Sunday, July 27. The legendary Indian batter questioned Stokes' entitlement for feeling miffed at being refused the handshake offered to India's spin allrounders Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar to conclude an early draw in Manchester. Having worked extremely hard for their defiant pair of knocks on a deteriorating surface on Day 5, Jadeja and Washington were on 89 and 80 not out when they denied Stokes' handshake, as he accepted fate for his team and sought an end to the proceedings at the start of the final hour of play. Stokes wore a look of bemusement before he and the rest of the English players exchanged words in anger with Jadeja and Washington, who stood their ground firmly. Even as Stokes expressed his frustration by introducing part-timer Harry Brook and Joe Root for the final few overs, Jadeja and Washington only walked off after having recorded and celebrated their much-deserved hundreds. The England skipper's attitude didn't at all please Gavaskar, who had an interesting request for Indian captain Shubman Gill about the incident. The Little Master also praised the Indian team for standing up to the task and keeping the series alive by batting for five sessions, with knocks of great substance also coming off the bat of opener KL Rahul (90) and captain Gill (103). 'Satisfied? I am proud," Gavaskar said when asked for his immediate reaction to India's courageous display. 'I am enormously proud of this team for what they have done. I mean, just four wickets [fell]. Whatever the pitch might have been – good pitch, flat pitch – whatever it is, they stuck around there under pressure." 'The question can be asked: Did England bat too long before they declared? When India gave England 600-plus runs to chase at Birmingham, some of the England players who came out for the press conference said, 'India were scared, and that's why they gave us 600 runs.' But I also remember reading somewhere earlier on when England were in India 'Give us 600 runs. We will chase anything.' That's what India did, but you ended up 336 runs short. So that is just bravado, a little bit of loud talk." view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
