Shubman Gill's aggression at Lord's a little out of character, but that's captain standing up: Ricky Ponting
The closely fought game saw plenty of drama on the field, including an animated flare-up between Gill and the England openers towards the end of the third day of the Test.
India had managed to equal England's first innings total of 387, and wanted to squeeze in two overs in the remaining six minutes of play. However, that wasn't possible as the English openers took their time to get ready, and Gill exchanged words with Zak Crawley and then Ben Duckett.
Former Australia captain Ponting understood why Gill's aggressive action at Lord's was met with surprise.
'That was a little out of character from what I've known from Shubman in the past. I am sure everyone that was there watching it, and I know you would know him quite well, that's not what he's generally like,' Ponting told The ICC Review.
But Ponting also sympathised with Gill, saying it was a case of a young captain taking a stand for his team under the circumstances.
ALSO READ | Gill brings back 'spirit of the game' debate, saying England batters walked out late during Lord's Test
'That's the captain standing up for his team, that's a captain really wanting to show that it's his team now and this is the way that we're going to play the game, and also, I guess, wanting to give a little bit back,' he added.
India lost the Test by 22 runs to trail the series 1-2. The fifth and final Test begins here on Wednesday.
Ponting felt that Gill acted in a manner similar to former captain Virat Kohli.
'I think that's him starting to put his stamp on his team. And a lot like Virat (Kohli) did, similar ways like that. Rohit (Sharma) probably was never as outwardly aggressive, I guess, especially to opposition players. I know he (Rohit) would quite often get aggressive with his teammates and try to bring the best out of them that way. But I love watching Shubman stand up for what he thought was right in the game last week,' he said.
Ponting has played Tests in England across four separate tours, and twice as captain (2005 and 2009). He said that the pressures of such a high-profile tour could get to a skipper.
'The UK can be a hard place to play. The crowds, as much as they love their game, can be as hostile a place to play as anywhere in the world. The media there, when you're in a big series, when it's an Ashes series or when it's England and India, the media always feel like they're right on top of your back as well,' Ponting said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
'He has only himself to blame': Rishabh Pant's reckless shot sparks debate
Rishabh Pant (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: India's Rishabh Pant suffered a foot fracture during the ongoing Manchester Test against England after attempting a reverse sweep on Day 1. The injury occurred when he was on 37, as Chris Woakes delivered a yorker that struck Pant's right toe, reportedly causing the fracture. Despite the setback, Pant resumed his innings on Day 2 and battled through the pain to notch up a gritty half-century before falling to Jofra Archer . His injury has now cast doubt over his availability for India's second innings and reignited conversations around the use of injury substitutes in Test cricket. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Former England captain Geoffrey Boycott, speaking on The Telegraph Podcast, criticised Pant's shot selection and said the injury was avoidable. 'It is always sad when a player gets hurt and affects his ability to play a part in the game—especially someone as talented as him. But he has only himself to blame,' Boycott said. Poll Do you think Rishabh Pant's injury could impact India's performance in the match? Yes, significantly Yes, but not too much No, it won't affect the team Not sure 'They were nicely in control, batting orthodox—there was no need to try something outrageous. Rishabh tries amazing strokes. When they come off, people are astonished and cheer him, and that is the essence of his batting. But when they don't, it can look silly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Smart Are You Really? This Test Will Surprise You Try Now Undo India were building a strong position. Some might say that's just his nature, but if he can't bat in both innings, it might cost India the match. He's that important,' he added. Shardul Thakur opens up on being under bowled, gives inside details on Rishabh Pant The incident has sparked fresh debate over allowing like-for-like substitutions in Tests. Speaking to TalkSport Cricket, former England batter David Lloyd offered his take: 'I'm probably against runners, but I'm in favour of substitutes for external injuries. It does open a can of worms, but if it's a break and medically he's out for six weeks, then maybe a like-for-like replacement is worth considering. Not something like replacing a batter with a spinner, though.' For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
IND vs ENG Test: 'Where's he been?' – Nasser Hussain slams India's tactics over delayed Washington Sundar spell
Washington Sundar of India reacts during Day Three of the 4th Test. (Getty Images) Former England captain Nasser Hussain has sharply criticised India's tactical decisions on Day 3 of the fourth Test at Old Trafford, particularly Shubman Gill 's delay in bringing Washington Sundar into the attack. India introduced Sundar only in the 69th over, with England cruising at 305/2. Despite a wicketless first session, Sundar struck quickly after lunch, removing Ollie Pope for 71 and then Harry Brook for 3, offering India a glimpse of fightback on a day otherwise dominated by the hosts. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! In his column for the Daily Mail, Hussain expressed disbelief at the delay: 'It was astonishing. You could tell he was full of confidence by the way he spoke so boldly about winning at Lord's, after taking four wickets, and I haven't seen a spin bowler in England get such beautiful drift, even against the wind.' Poll Should Washington Sundar have been introduced earlier in the attack? Yes, definitely! No, the timing was fine. Hussain referenced Sundar's 4/22 in the second innings at Lord's, and stressed that he should have been used far earlier: 'They completely overlooked bowling Washington Sundar… not turning to him until the 69th over when England were 305 for two. He made an impact the moment he was introduced… leaving you wondering: where's he been?' Hussain also questioned India's bowling approach to Joe Root, who scored a majestic 150 to help England reach 544/7 at stumps, with a commanding 186-run lead. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like IQ Worldwide - Test your Intelligence, know your IQ Score Try Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola Shardul Thakur opens up on being under bowled, gives inside details on Rishabh Pant 'The way India bowled to Joe Root was baffling too. On the quickest, bounciest pitch in the country historically, he received just two bouncers up until lunch on day three.' He noted that Root now intercepts the ball 27 centimetres closer to the bowler than he did in 2018, and India should have targeted him with short balls, forcing him on the back foot. With Root now second on the all-time Test run-scorers list, behind only Sachin Tendulkar , and England firmly in control, India's decisions — particularly Gill's Sundar snub — are coming under increasing scrutiny. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Rishabh Pant Has Only Himself To Blame": England Great Tears Into Injured India Star
Rishabh Pant 's foot injury has left a huge void in Team India's batting lineup in the ongoing Manchester Test against England. Pant, who was retired hurt after fracturing his foot on Day 1, walked out to bat on Day 2 despite being in visible pain. He batted for a while and completed his half-century before Jofra Archer uprooted his stumps with a peach of a delivery. It is not clear whether Pant will bat in the second innings. England great Geoffrey Boycott shared his views on Pant's injury, saying that while it was an unfortunate incident, the player has no one but himself to blame. "It is always sad when a player gets hurt and affects his ability to play a part in the game. Especially someone as talented as him. But he has only himself to blame," Boycott said on The Telegraph Podcast. Boycott pointed out that there was no need for Pant to play that short considering how India were in control at that moment. "They were nicely in control, batting orthodox, there was no need to try something outrageous. Rishabh tries amazing strokes. When they come off, people are astonished and he is cheered, and that is the essence of his batting. But occasionally when it does not, it can look silly. India, yesterday, was getting themselves to an excellent batting position. On one hand, many would say that is his nature, but on the other hand, him not batting in both innings might cost India the match. It will affect the runs they could add to that innings. He is that good," he added. Pant was batting at 37 on Day 1 when he was injured while attempting to reverse sweep a Chris Woakes yorker, which ended up hitting him on the toe and resulted in a reported fracture on his right foot. Pant's injury once again sparked the debate of whether substitutes should be allowed for injuries in Test cricket. Former England batter David Lloyd was in favour of the idea in case of an external injury like Pant. "I probably am against runners, but I am pro substitutes for an external injury. It opens up a can of worms, it really does. But if it is an external injury, a break, and medically he isn't going to be fit for six weeks, you could have a like-for-like substitute. So that's something else that you've got to consider. Not like replacing a batter with a spinner, though," said Lloyd while speaking to TalkSport Cricket.
