Brendan Taylor Added To Zimbabwe Squad After Completing ICC Ban
Taylor, 39, who was banned in January 2022 for failing to report a 2019 spot-fixing approach by an Indian businessman on time, has been added to the Zimbabwe squad for the second Test against New Zealand, scheduled to take place from August 7 to 11 at Queens Sports Club in Bulawayo.
Taylor, who was at the time also handed a one month suspension for failing a dope test which was linked to his intake of cocaine during the episode, was banned after admitting receiving USD 15,000 in 2019.
He was in solid form in red-ball cricket before the sanction, with scores of 92, 81 and 49 in his last three Test innings.
Few days before the ICC sanction, Taylor had made a stunning disclosure that he was blackmailed after "foolishly" taking cocaine during his meeting with an Indian businessman.
Reflecting on his own journey back into the Zimbabwe squad, Taylor was quoted as saying by ICC, "The last year and a half has certainly been dedicated to my return.
"I've put in an immense amount of work – from fitness to the technical side to diet – and I'm feeling a lot leaner, fitter and mentally stronger.
"I've thoroughly enjoyed this journey on my own, just rebuilding the blocks, and I feel in a wonderful space." The first Test between Zimbabwe and New Zealand is currently underway in Bulawayo.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ashwin rips into England's ‘reckless' cricket after dramatic collapse: ‘Cricketing gods punished England, helped India'
Former India spinner Ravichandran Ashwin didn't hold back his emotions while appreciating the efforts of pacer Mohammed Siraj and Prasidh Krishna which helped India beat England by six runs in the fifth and final Test match at The Oval in London but he also criticised reckless approach by Harry Brook who almost pulled the game away from India but failed to take England home after throwing away his wicket. Brook smashed a brilliant counterattacking century in a chase of 374 and added 195 runs for the fourth wicket alongside Joe Root, who also struck a ton. When the duo was batting, it looked as if England would seal the series on Day 4, but Brook tried to charge at Akash Deep and was caught by Mohammed Siraj. Krishna and Siraj then changed the momentum back in India's favour as India levelled the five-match Anderson-Tendulkar series 2-2. 'When he (Brook) walked into the crease at 100/3, England were not in the match at all and when he took those chances against Akash Deep, England were staring down the barrel and a big defeat was reckoning but when he got out it was the moment that Harry Brook could have cherished. He could have walked outside The Oval with his bat held high alongwith Joe Root who broke records after records and could have won the series 3-1 for England but he played reckless shot and it was his punished of that was why England lost the match and ended up drawing the series,' said Ashwin on his YouTube show Ash ki baat. 'As a captain, as a coach, you can proclaim to the world that this is your brand of cricket. They can say that Brook played the way we wanted him to play. He embraced our beliefs. All of this is easier said than done but Test cricket needs a certain amount of balance. Yes, I agree that this approach did get you runs in the first innings but in the fourth innings, if you are playing on 100 and the finish line is in sight, then it is your responsibility to see your team through,' he added. Ashwin went on to say that England disrespected cricketing gods and that was why the conditions changed in favour of Indian pacers out of nowhere. 'Brook definitely missed that opportunity and it all fell on Root's shoulders and for India's good, the conditions also changed, and such things happen when the cricketing gods are disrespected. The way England disrespected the cricketing gods, even the clouds came together, cried on the pitch and allowed the ball to move a lot,' said Ashwin.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Allahabad HC judge has made a mockery of justice, says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has passed a scathing order reprimanding an Allahabad High Court judge, choosing to name him while saying that he not only 'cut a sorry figure for himself but has made a mockery of justice'. The order brought to fore the Supreme Court's apprehensions about the High Court judiciary's performance. 'We are at our wits' end to understand what is wrong with the Indian judiciary at the level of the High Court. At times we are left wondering whether such orders are passed on some extraneous considerations or it is sheer ignorance of law. Whatever it be, passing of such absurd and erroneous orders is something unpardonable,' a Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan wrote in a 19-page order dictated in open court on August 4 and published on Tuesday. The apex court recorded that the High Court judge in question, Justice Prashant Kumar, found nothing wrong in a litigant filing a criminal case against a buyer in a purely civil dispute over an unpaid balance of money in a sale transaction. In fact, the Bench said the High Court judge had found that registering a criminal case for 'criminal breach of trust' would be a quicker way to get the unpaid balance. A civil suit would be too laborious and time-consuming. 'The judge has gone to the extent of saying that asking the complainant to pursue civil remedy for the purpose of recovery of the balance amount will be very unreasonable as civil suit may take a long time… It was expected of the High Court to know the well-settled position of law that in cases of civil dispute a complainant cannot be permitted to resort to criminal proceedings as the same would amount to abuse of process', the Supreme Court noted. Justice Pardiwala, the lead judge on the apex court Bench, asked how the ingredients of the offence of 'criminal breach of trust' would apply to a sale transaction. The offence would only arise if there was a fraudulent misappropriation of an 'entrusted' property. 'Mere transaction of sale cannot amount to an entrustment,' the apex court explained. Interestingly, even the local police had refused to lodge a criminal case, saying the nature of the dispute was purely civil. However, the Magistrate had gone ahead to register a criminal case, oblivious of the point that the dispute concerned only a sale transaction and payment of a balance amount. Justice Kumar had seconded the Magistrate's point of view, refusing to quash the criminal case. 'We are not taken by surprise with the Magistrate exhibiting complete ignorance of law as to what constitutes cheating and criminal breach of trust … However, we expected at least the High Court to understand the fine distinction between the two offences and the necessary ingredients to constitute the offence of cheating and criminal breach of trust,' the apex court rued. It further asked the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice to remove Justice Kumar from the criminal roster and not assign any criminal case to the latter till he demitted office. 'The Chief Justice shall make the judge concerned sit in a Division Bench with a seasoned senior judge of the High Court,' the Supreme Court noted.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
In a first ceasefire violation since Operation Sindoor, Pakistan Army indulge in ‘unprovoked' firing in Poonch
In the first ceasefire violation since Operation Sindoor in May, Pakistan army on Tuesday (August 5,. 2025) evening indulged in "unprovoked" firing on forward Indian posts along the Line of Control (LoC) in Poonch district of Jammu and Kashmir, official sources said. The Indian Army strongly retaliated and the exchange of small arms firing between the two sides continued for nearly 15 minutes in the Mankote sector, they said. There was no immediate report of any casualty, the officials said, adding security forces have been put on high alert all along the border in view of the ceasefire violation that coincided with the sixth anniversary of the abrogation of Article 370, which gave special status to the erstwhile State of J&K, and its bifurcation into two Union territories. The sources said that the firing from across the border started at 7.40 PM on forward posts and the Indian troops retaliated befittingly. Indian and Pakistani militaries engaged in intense clashes between May 7 and 10 after India launched missile strikes targeting terror infrastructure across the border to avenge the Pahalgam terror attack. The border clashes, however, died down after the two countries reached an understanding. At least 28 persons were killed in Pakistani shelling, missile and drone attacks along the LoC in J&K with 13 of these deaths reported in Poonch district alone.
