Major Bruma raid: 35 arrests and R20 million in counterfeit goods seized
Image: Supplied
Gauteng police arrested 35 people and seized counterfeit goods worth over R20 million during a major operation in Bruma, east of Johannesburg.
According to police, they acted on intelligence which led to the execution of search and seizure warrants under the Customs and Excise Act and the Counterfeit Goods Act.
The operation was part of a coordinated effort involving several law enforcement and regulatory agencies, aimed at cracking down on the illegal trade of fake goods.
They acted on intelligence which led to the execution of search and seizure warrants under the Customs and Excise Act
Image: Supplied
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
"Led by the SAPS National Counterfeit Goods Unit, the operation included support from the Gauteng Provincial Counterfeit Goods Unit, Crime Intelligence, Public Order Policing (POP), the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (Hawks), the Department of Home Affairs, SARS Customs, the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS), brand protectors, Crime Prevention Wardens, and private security companies.
"The operation resulted in the arrest of 35 individuals. One suspect was arrested for contravening the Counterfeit Goods Act while 34 foreign nationals were arrested for contravening the Immigration Act," the police said
Police in Johannesburg have seized counterfeit
Image: Supplied
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Safa boss Danny Jordaan's fight to ditch fraud charges stalled by NPA changes
Jordaan is accused of misusing R1.3 million from Safa for his personal benefit. A decision on South African Football Association (Safa) president Danny Jordaan's bid to have his fraud charges dropped has not yet been made, with the case postponed for further proceedings. On Friday, Jordaan, Safa chief financial officer (CFO) Gronie Hluyo, and businessman Trevor Neethling made a brief appearance before the Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Palm Ridge, Gauteng. The trio face charges of conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, and fraud, and are each out on R20 000 bail. Danny Jordaan seeks withdrawal of fraud charges State prosecutor Moagi Malebati told the court that no decision had been reached on all the accused's representations to have their charges withdrawn. He explained that a leadership change within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) had caused delays. 'The unfortunate part is that he left office before he could make a decision and sign off on his decision. 'We could not have the decision made as there was no DPP appointed,' Malebati said, referring to Johannesburg Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Andrew Chauke, who was recently suspended by President Cyril Ramaphosa. ALSO READ: Safa boss Danny Jordaan's lawyer stays after state's application fails Chauke has temporarily been replaced by former Northern Cape DPP Livingston Mzukisi Sakata. Sakata will assumed office on 1 September, according to NPA regional spokesperson Phindi Mjonodwane. Jordaan and Hluyo have also lodged a review application challenging a previous ruling that dismissed their section 342A applications to have the case struck off the roll. Additionally, they are contesting the Hawks' 8 March 2024 search and seizure at Safa's offices, seeking a court order declaring the search unlawful. Gronie Hluyo (L), Trevor Neethling (C) and Danny Jordaan appear at Palm Ridge Magistrate's Court n 15 August 2025. Picture: Gallo Images / OJ Koloti Jordaan and Hluyo are also challenging arrest warrants issued on 4 April 2024, alleging that the investigating officer withheld crucial information when applying for them. They further want authorities held in contempt of court for taking them into custody a day before the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria was set to hear their interdict application to prevent their arrest. Malebati confirmed that the outcome of the review application remains pending as the high court has yet to set a hearing date. 'Thieves and fraudsters' Defence lawyer Victor Nkwashu, representing Jordaan and Hluyo, argued that his clients' arrests had caused serious reputational harm to his clients and to Safa. 'The executives of Safa are rendered as thieves and fraudsters internationally. 'The question is what is the prejudice that the state will suffer if this matter is removed from the roll whilst they vindicate their names in the high court? 'Because if not, they will come and vindicate their names before this court. If the state succeeds, we'll be back here. It was not difficult to find them,' he said. The case has been postponed to 12 September. Jordaan was arrested on 15 November 2024 for allegedly misusing R1.3 million from Safa for his personal benefit. Meanwhile, Hluyo and Neethling are alleged to have enabled the misappropriation. NOW READ: Embarrassment for Safa as they can't pay salaries on time
SowetanLIVE
2 days ago
- SowetanLIVE
State witness in Joshlin Smith case granted prosecutorial immunity
The Western Cape high court on Wednesday granted full indemnity from prosecution to Lourentia 'Renz' Lombaard, the former accused who turned state witness in the Joshlin Smith case. This comes as the convicted trio, Kelly 'Racquel' Smith, Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis and Steveno van Rhyn, were denied leave to appeal their sentences and convictions, with the judge saying he doesn't believe any other court would come to a different conclusion. Judge Nathan Charles Erasmus ruled that Lombaard could not be prosecuted for the kidnapping of the six-year-old girl, noting that while she was aware of the arrangements and kept quiet, she played no role in the actual abduction. 'You may not be prosecuted for this offence,' Erasmus said. The decision was made after considering her testimony and the legal provisions under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act. State prosecutor Zelda Swanepoel told the court that Lombaard had made 'huge personal sacrifices' by leaving her home and children to enter witness protection and face intense cross-examination. 'The court must understand the nerve, a witness box is not an easy place to be in. The cross-examination was intense,' Swanepoel said. Lombaard's evidence was key in revealing that Joshlin had been sold to a sangoma for R20,000, a revelation that helped secure the convictions. Advocate Eben van Tonder, acting for Lombaard, said she had 'much to lose' and that this in itself incentivised her to be truthful. Defence lawyers for the three convicts continued to challenge the fairness of the trial, accusing the state of procedural violations, unlawful detention and withholding of information. Advocate Nobahle Mkabayi, representing Van Rhyn, claimed her client's confession was extracted under duress and that they had appeared in court 'bare-handed and clueless'. Advocate Fanie Harmse, for Appollis, argued that another suspect, Phumza 'Maka Lima' Sigaqa, was never charged despite evidence suggesting Joshlin may have been taken to her home. He also pointed out that Appollis had injuries when arrested, saying that his injuries cannot be wished away. The hearing was marked by tense exchanges between the judge and the defence, with Mkabayi accusing Erasmus of creating a hostile environment that denied her client the right to be heard. Erasmus dismissed the claims, saying both sides had been given equal opportunity to present their cases. TimesLIVE
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
State witness in Joshlin Smith case granted prosecutorial immunity
The Western Cape high court on Wednesday granted full indemnity from prosecution to Lourentia 'Renz' Lombaard, the former accused who turned state witness in the Joshlin Smith case. This comes as the convicted trio, Kelly 'Racquel' Smith, Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis and Steveno van Rhyn, were denied leave to appeal their sentences and convictions, with the judge saying he doesn't believe any other court would come to a different conclusion. Judge Nathan Charles Erasmus ruled that Lombaard could not be prosecuted for the kidnapping of the six-year-old girl, noting that while she was aware of the arrangements and kept quiet, she played no role in the actual abduction. 'You may not be prosecuted for this offence,' Erasmus said. The decision was made after considering her testimony and the legal provisions under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act. State prosecutor Zelda Swanepoel told the court that Lombaard had made 'huge personal sacrifices' by leaving her home and children to enter witness protection and face intense cross-examination. 'The court must understand the nerve, a witness box is not an easy place to be in. The cross-examination was intense,' Swanepoel said. Lombaard's evidence was key in revealing that Joshlin had been sold to a sangoma for R20,000, a revelation that helped secure the convictions. Advocate Eben van Tonder, acting for Lombaard, said she had 'much to lose' and that this in itself incentivised her to be truthful. Defence lawyers for the three convicts continued to challenge the fairness of the trial, accusing the state of procedural violations, unlawful detention and withholding of information. Advocate Nobahle Mkabayi, representing Van Rhyn, claimed her client's confession was extracted under duress and that they had appeared in court 'bare-handed and clueless'. Advocate Fanie Harmse, for Appollis, argued that another suspect, Phumza 'Maka Lima' Sigaqa, was never charged despite evidence suggesting Joshlin may have been taken to her home. He also pointed out that Appollis had injuries when arrested, saying that his injuries cannot be wished away. The hearing was marked by tense exchanges between the judge and the defence, with Mkabayi accusing Erasmus of creating a hostile environment that denied her client the right to be heard. Erasmus dismissed the claims, saying both sides had been given equal opportunity to present their cases.
