Janus CEO: CLO ETFs Held Strong Amid Market Volatility
CLO ETFs experienced no 'dislocations or surprises' during the April volatility, and the structures behaved 'exactly as we had anticipated,' said Ali Dibadj, CEO of Janus Henderson Investors.
As reported by Bloomberg and the Financial Times, CLO ETFs listed in the U.S. swung to wide discounts in early April—on average, more than 1% on April 4—as investors made large withdrawals during the market volatility.
Even the $20 billion Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA), by far the world's largest CLO ETF, was changing hands more than 1% below its net asset value (NAV).
CLOs, or collateralized loan obligations, are securities providing exposure to an actively managed pool of loans made to companies—typically private equity.
The CLO pool is then sliced into tranches, ranging in seniority from AAA to equity, with each tranche enjoying different claims on the cash flows of the loans as well as protections from credit losses.
JAAA Leads Among CLO ETFs
JAAA launched in October 2020 and has demonstrated very strong asset-gathering ability. Janus Henderson boasts roughly an 80% market share in the category.
Speaking at the group's first-quarter earnings call, Dibadj said, 'Investors in this ETF … tend to be medium- to long-term holders. That said, there are also some shorter-term investors, and that is where you can see the turnover in the market that creates the volatility.'
The outflows highlighted that ETFs with somewhat illiquid underlying securities can detach from NAV in stressed scenarios, with the ETF itself acting as a price-discovery mechanism.
For Dibadj, however, the redemptions from Janus Henderson's ETFs were soaked up as expected, with 'very little impact' on the CLO market or the underlying portfolio.
'We have seen no dislocations or surprises. In fact, we have been quite pleased with how the market reacted—in a very measured and disciplined way—exactly as we had anticipated, even given the scale of our position.'
Janus Henderson debuted a European iteration of JAAA in January, and the fund has gathered $101 million in assets since inception.
This article was originally published at etf.com sister publication ETF Stream.
Permalink | © Copyright 2025 etf.com. All rights reserved
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Akre Capital Seeks $12.2B Mutual Fund to ETF Conversion
The investment fund space is poised to see another mutual fund-to-ETF conversion—a growing trend as more asset managers look to take advantage of the structural benefits of funds that trade more like stocks. On Thursday, Akre Capital Management announced that it had proposed the conversion of its Akre Focus Fund to the actively managed Akre Focus ETF (AKRE). If approved by shareholders, the conversion is expected to take place in the fall of 2025, according to a press release. The AKRE Focus fund, which was launched in 2009 and has approximately $12.2 billion in net assets as of May 31, seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation by selecting companies based on factors related to their business, management and reinvestment. The proposed conversion is expected to provide shareholders with enhanced tax efficiency, increased transparency and lower costs, according to the press release. The fund's prospectus shows that the current expense ratios range from 0.98% to 1.32% depending on share class and that the ETF's proposed unitary fee is 0.98%. In March, Akre Capital applied for an exemption that would allow its mutual fund to offer an ETF share class, but it is no longer pursuing that option. 'In our effort to deliver the significant benefits of the ETF structure to our mutual fund shareholders, we evaluated three options: launching a standalone ETF (clone), converting the mutual fund to an ETF and introducing an ETF share class within the mutual fund,' John Neff, CEO and CIO at Akre Capital explained to in an emailed statement. The firm determined that converting the mutual fund to an ETF would be in the best interest of its shareholders. 'This conversion represents an upgrade to a superior structure,' Neff added. 'In contrast, launching a standalone ETF would offer no benefit to existing shareholders, while introducing an ETF share class could create unnecessary confusion for investors and platforms.' Akre isn't alone in trying to take advantage of the tax advantages, lower expense ratios and intraday tradability ETFs have over their mutual fund counterparts. CFRA Research reports that last year, mutual funds (excluding money market funds) experienced $579 billion worth of net outflows, while $1.1 trillion moved into ETFs. Just last month, the world's largest asset manager, BlackRock, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to convert the BlackRock GA Disciplined Volatility Equity Fund (BIDVX) and BlackRock GA Dynamic Equity Fund (BIEEX) to | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘They are in shock': Indian students fear Trump has ended their American dream
For weeks, Subash Devatwal's phone has not stopped ringing. Some of the calls have been from distressed students, at other times it is their panicked parents, but all have the same question – is their dream of studying in the US still possible? Devatwal runs an education consultancy in Ahmedabad, the main city in the Indian state of Gujarat. It is one of thousands of such organisations that exist across the country, helping Indian students achieve what many consider to be the ultimate symbol of success: getting into an American university. It has long been a booming business for Devatwal. Families in India will often invest their entire life savings to send their children to study in the US and last year there were more than 330,000 Indians enrolled at American universities, more than any other foreign nationality, overtaking Chinese students in numbers for the first time in years. But this year the situation looks drastically different. As Donald Trump's administration has taken aim at international students – first implementing draconian screening measures over political views and then last week ordering all US embassies globally to indefinitely pause all student visa interviews – many Indian students and their families have been left in limbo. Trump's unilateral decision to block Harvard University from admitting international students, which was later blocked by the courts, also caused widespread panic and stoked fears that foreign students at other universities could get caught in the president's crosshairs. 'The students are in shock. Most of them spend several years preparing to study in the US,' said Devatwal. He said many of his clients were now hesitant to pursue a US degree, given the high levels of turmoil and uncertainty following the Trump administration's new policies. Indian students can expect to pay between $40,000 to $80,000 (£29,500 to £59,000) a year on tuition alone to study in the US. In previous years, Devatwal's organisation sent more than 100 students to American universities but this year he said the number had dropped to about 10. Instead, families were shifting their focus to the UK and other European countries. A recent analysis by the Hindu newspaper estimated a 28% drop in Indian students going to the US in 2025. 'Families contribute their savings, take out loans from banks and borrow from relatives, all in the hope that the student will secure a good job abroad, repay the debt, and build a promising future,' said Devatwal. 'In such uncertain circumstances, parents are understandably reluctant to let their children take such a risky path.' Brijesh Patel, 50, a textile trader in Surat, Gujarat, said he had been saving money for over a decade to make sure his son could go to a US university, including selling his wife's jewellery and borrowing money from relatives. 'Everyone in the family wanted our son to go to the US for his studies and make something good of his life,' said Patel. His 21-year-old son, who he asked not to be named for fear of retribution by the US authorities, had secured a place at two American universities for his master's degree and Patel had already paid 700,000 rupees (£6,000) to consultancies who helped with the applications. But amid the turmoil under Trump, Patel said his son was being advised not to even apply for his student visa, due to the uncertainty and high probability of rejection. 'We simply can't take that risk. If our son goes now and something goes wrong, we won't be able to save that kind of money again,' he said. However, Patel said he was not willing to give up on the family dream just yet. 'I am an optimist, and my son is willing to wait a year,' he said. 'We're hoping that things improve by then. It's not just my son who will be living the American dream, it's all of us: my wife, our relatives and our neighbours. I've struggled my whole life – I don't want my son to face the same struggles here in India.' The fear among prospective and current students was palpable. Several Indian students studying in the US declined to speak to the Guardian, fearing it could jeopardise their visas. In India, a student selected in December to be one of this year's Fulbright-Nehru doctoral fellows – a highly competitive scholarship that pays for the brightest students to study abroad at US universities as part of their PhD thesis – said the applications of their entire cohort had recently been demoted back to 'semi-finalists'. The student, who asked to remain anonymous over fears it would affect their application, said they had invitation letters from top Ivy League universities for the fellowship, which is considered one of the most prestigious scholarships in the US, but now everything was up in the air. 'We are supposed to start in October and our orientation was scheduled for May, all the flights and hotels were even booked, but then it all got cancelled. Now we've been informed all our applications are under review by the Trump administration,' said the student. They said it had caused 'huge panic and anxiety' among those accepted. 'I know a lot of people are going back through their social media, deleting things and doing a lot of self-censoring.' Piyush Bhartiya, a co-founder of the educational technology company AdmitKard, said many parents who had been set on sending their children to the US were rethinking their plans. He cited one example of a student who had been admitted to New York University for the coming year but was instead planning to go to the London School of Economics after the US visa interviews were paused. Bhartiya said Indian students primarily went to the US to study Stem subjects – science, technology, engineering and maths – and so the focus had shifted to other countries strong in these areas. 'Germany is the main country where students are shifting to for Stem subjects,' he said. 'Other countries like Ireland, France, the Netherlands, which are also gaining substantial interest in the students. At the undergraduate level, the Middle East has also seen a lot of gain in interest given parents feel that it is close by and safer and given the current political environment they may want their kids closer to the home.' Among the Indian students forced to abandon their plans is Nihar Gokhale, 36. He had a fully funded offer for a PhD at a private university in Massachusetts, but recently received a letter saying the funding was being withdrawn, as the university faced issues under the Trump administration. 'It was quite shocking. I spoke to people at the university, and they admitted it was an exceptional situation for them too,' said Gokhale. Without the funding, the US was financially 'out of the question' and he said he had an offer from the UK he now intended to take up. 'For at least the next three or four years, I'm not considering the US at all,' he said. • This article was amended on 4 June 2025 to correct a conversion error. An earlier version said that 700,000 rupees was £68,000 instead of saying £6,000.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%
The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Nato allies were 'very close, almost near consensus' to an agreement to significantly raise targets for defence spending to 5% of GDP in the next decade. The Trump administration official indicated he expected the increased target to be agreed at a summit in The Hague later this month – and confirmed that the headline figure was to be split into two parts. 'This alliance, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities. That combination constitutes a real commitment,' he said. Hegseth was speaking at a press conference at Nato headquarters in Brussels after the morning session of an all-day meeting of defence ministers from the 32-country transatlantic military alliance. 'I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there,' Hegseth told reporters. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to Nato.' Nato's current target level for military spending, agreed at a summit in Cardiff in 2014, is 2% of GDP, but Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that European allies and Canada do not spend enough compared with the US. In an attempt to avoid Trump wrecking the first Nato summit of his second term, the alliance's new secretary general, Mark Rutte, proposed a 3.5% plus 1.5% target, though there is some ambiguity about the target date. Initial reports suggested that Rutte wanted allies to hit the target from 2032, though earlier this week British sources suggested the date could be 2035. Sweden's defence minister said he would like to see the target hit by 2030. Only Poland currently exceeds the 3.5% target for hard military spending at 4.32%, according to Nato figures, while the US defence budget, the largest in the alliance, amounts to 3.4% of GDP, at $967bn (£711bn). The UK spends 2.33% of GDP on its military, but has pledged to increase that to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% some time in the next parliament. Earlier this week the prime minister, Keir Starmer, declined to set a firm date for the UK achieving 3% as he unveiled a strategic defence review. Related: Why is defence such a hard sell? The same reason Starmer is struggling in the polls | Martin Kettle Rutte will visit London on Monday to meet Starmer before the summit. Downing Street said the prime minister and the secretary general would 'talk about how we ensure all allies step up their defence spending now in order to respond to the threats that we face now'. Germany's defence minister, Boris Pistorius, said Berlin would need up to 60,000 additional troops to meet new Nato targets for weapons and personnel. 'We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy,' the minister said on Thursday. Germany, which currently spends 2.12% of GDP on defence, had been singled out by Trump as a laggard in spending, though until Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Berlin had been reluctant to be a leader in European military spending, partly due to the memories of the militarism of the second world war.
