Mass deportations coming? 350,000 Venezuelans at risk as Trump pushes Supreme Court for legal status cut
The
Trump administration
on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to strip temporary legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelans, potentially exposing them to being deported.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
India's Rafale-M deal may turn up the heat on Pakistan
China's support for Pakistan may be all talk, no action
India brings grounded choppers back in action amid LoC tensions
The Justice Department asked the high court to put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that kept in place
Temporary Protected Status
for the Venezuelans that would have otherwise expired last month.
The status allows people already in the United States to live and work legally because their native countries are deemed unsafe for return due to natural disaster or civil strife.
GIF89a����!�,D;
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
A federal appeals court had earlier rejected the administration's request.
President
Donald Trump
's administration has moved aggressively to withdraw various protections that have allowed immigrants to remain in the country, including ending TPS for a total of 600,000 Venezuelans and 500,000 Haitians. TPS is granted in 18-month increments.
Live Events
The emergency appeal to the high court came the same day a federal judge in Texas ruled illegal the administration's efforts to deport Venezuelans under an 18th-century wartime law. The cases are not related.
The protections had been set to expire April 7, but U.S. District Judge Edward Chen ordered a pause on those plans. He found that the expiration threatened to severely disrupt the lives of hundreds of thousands of people and could cost billions in lost economic activity.
Chen, who was appointed to the bench by Democratic President Barack Obama, found the government hadn't shown any harm caused by keeping the program alive.
But Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote on behalf of the administration that Chen's order impermissibly interferes with the administration's power over immigration and foreign affairs.
In addition, Sauer told the justices, people affected by ending the protected status might have other legal options to try to remain in the country because the "decision to terminate TPS is not equivalent to a final removal order."
Congress created TPS in 1990 to prevent deportations to countries suffering from natural disasters or civil strife.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's military move: Was it in response to Los Angeles riots or a long-planned strategy against Democrates and Kamala Harris?
President Donald Trump has signaled that the military deployment in Los Angeles may just be the beginning, hinting at similar actions across other Democrat-led cities as protests intensify over his immigration crackdown. Speaking from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump defended the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, where demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement in recent days. 'This is the first—perhaps of many,' Trump said. 'If we didn't hit this hard, you'd see the same thing erupt across the country. But let me be clear: If others try this, they'll be met with equal or greater force.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo The president added that his administration would not tolerate violent protests targeting ICE operations and vowed strict enforcement of deportation policies. Notably, Trump had floated the idea of using military force in Democrat-led cities during his 2024 campaign, proposing federal intervention to combat unrest or gang violence. 'In cities where there's been a total breakdown of law and order, I won't hesitate to send in federal assets, including the National Guard, until safety is restored,' he said at the time. Live Events According to The New York Times , nearly 5,000 troops are already present in the Los Angeles area. Reuters reported that 700 Marines were in a staging area in Seal Beach, about 30 miles south of the city, awaiting specific deployment orders. As of Tuesday, 2,100 National Guard members had been activated in the region—more than half the planned total. Both Marines and National Guard personnel are restricted from making arrests and are tasked solely with protecting federal facilities and personnel. Trump's remarks and actions have sparked fears of broader federal crackdowns in Democrat-controlled cities across the U.S., raising questions about the political motivations behind the military mobilization.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election dispute joins a long list of controversial US presidential results from Thomas Jefferson to George W Bush Jr
Historical parallels to Kamala Harris election dispute As questions surrounding the Kamala Harris election result continue to unfold in court, the controversy draws on a long history of disputed US presidential elections. From the earliest years of the republic to the modern era, contested outcomes, allegations of fraud, and constitutional ambiguity have repeatedly tested the resilience of American democracy. The latest case, allowed to proceed in New York's Rockland County, challenges the validity of several voting machines used in the 2024 election. Filed by SMART Legislation, the lawsuit alleges that votes for Kamala Harris were undercounted or missing entirely from machines in towns like Ramapo. Affidavits from poll workers and voters suggest ballots showed zero votes for president while including votes for other contests, raising concerns about possible machine malfunctions or tampering. Also read: Kamala Harris election result: Trump's victory under scrutiny as lawsuit filed - here's what could happen next by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo This case, while unlikely to affect Donald Trump's presidency, brings renewed focus on electoral transparency and echoes the legacy of past presidential contests that reshaped US election law and public trust. From Jefferson to Bush: six disputed presidential elections In 1800, the Electoral College delivered a tie between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, both receiving 73 votes. The House of Representatives required 36 ballots to award the presidency to Jefferson. The deadlock prompted the Twelfth Amendment, which separated presidential and vice-presidential votes to avoid future stalemates. Live Events A similar issue surfaced in 1824 when Andrew Jackson secured the most popular and electoral votes but lacked a majority. The House chose John Quincy Adams instead, triggering Jackson's accusations of a 'corrupt bargain.' His eventual win in 1828 led to reforms demanding greater voter participation and scrutiny of elite political deals. Abraham Lincoln's 1860 victory with only 40 per cent of the popular vote triggered Southern secession. His win, reflecting a deeply divided electorate over slavery, came despite his absence from ballots in several Southern states. The dispute ultimately cascaded into the Civil War, underscoring how electoral fractures can deepen national crises. Also read: Kamala Harris voters 'erased' in Rockland? New York lawsuit to probe vanishing ballots: What we know so far In 1876, Democrat Samuel Tilden won the popular vote and led in the Electoral College, but 20 electoral votes from four states were contested. A bipartisan commission awarded them to Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. In return, Hayes agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South, a deal known as the Compromise of 1877. This political resolution ended Reconstruction and enabled state-level disenfranchisement of Black voters. Fast forward to 1960, John F. Kennedy's razor-thin win over Richard Nixon raised concerns over vote manipulation in Illinois and Texas. Allegations pointed to organized political machinery in Chicago and strategic ballot management in Texas. Nixon declined to challenge the result, citing national unity, though doubts persisted. In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore's battle hinged on Florida's 25 electoral votes. Machine errors like 'hanging chads' and inconsistent ballot designs such as the 'butterfly ballot' caused major confusion. The US Supreme Court halted recounts in Bush v. Gore , awarding Florida, and the presidency, to Bush by a margin of just 537 votes. Rockland County lawsuit: new scrutiny on voting machines The Kamala Harris election result lawsuit centers on irregularities in Rockland County, where five voting machines in Ramapo reportedly recorded zero presidential votes despite ballots including selections for down-ballot races. Voters and poll workers submitted affidavits confirming they cast votes for president. Also read: Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024 Election integrity advocate Susan Greenhalgh cited the rarity of such discrepancies, questioning whether software updates made before the election contributed to machine errors. The updates were made by Pro V&V, a private firm, with minimal public disclosure. Judge Rachel Tanguay's decision to allow full discovery will enable attorneys to access internal machine logs and request sworn testimony. The case's next hearing is scheduled for September 22, 2025. What the Kamala Harris election result case could mean While the lawsuit is unlikely to affect the 2024 presidential outcome, it may influence broader election reforms. Legal experts say a full hand recount could expose vote-counting inconsistencies and spark legislative changes on machine certification, ballot design, and voter access laws. Also read: 2024 US Presidential election is under scrutiny as lawsuit claims discrepancies in Rockland County, New York The case also offers an opportunity for officials to improve voter confidence by ensuring transparent and verifiable election systems. As with previous disputed elections, the outcome may shape how future contests are administered and perceived, especially in an era of intense partisanship and evolving technology.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Panchayat's new Season 4 to be released early on fans' demand. Here is the new official date and where to watch
Looks like democracy in Phulera works faster than we thought. In a clever twist that blurred the lines between fiction and fanfare, Panchayat Season 4 is arriving earlier than expected, thanks to an interactive campaign that let fans 'vote' their way to an earlier release date. Originally slated for July 2, the highly anticipated season of the beloved TVF show will now premiere on June 24 on Amazon Prime Video . The streamer confirmed the updated release date with a tweet that captured the show's signature flavour: ' Shuru ho chuka hai election. Manju Devi ya Kranti Devi, kiski hogi selection #PanchayatOnPrime, New Season, June 24.' — PrimeVideoIN (@PrimeVideoIN) Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo Election campaign The quirky promotional campaign was rolled out like an actual village election, where fans were asked to choose between Manju Devi (Neena Gupta) and Kranti Devi (Sunita Rajwar)—and in doing so, decide when the show should drop. The online election sparked a hilarious virtual showdown, with fake manifestos, rap battles, and wild promises ranging from 'airbag-fitted cycles' to 'village runways.' In the campaign video, Sachiv Ji (Jitendra Kumar) played the voice of reason, proposing the unique idea: if fans voted in time, the show could premiere early. That was all it took for fans to support their candidate and, more importantly, unlock Season 4 sooner. The buzz also saw Pradhan Ji (Raghubir Yadav) and Vikas (Chandan Roy) rapping for Manju Devi's campaign, only to be hilariously countered by Bhushan a.k.a. Banrakas, singing for his wife Kranti Devi. The playful tone and rustic wit that define the show were on full display in the campaign—an effective teaser for the drama, laughs, and emotional moments fans can expect in the new season.
