Projecting The Tech Market For The Remainder Of 2025
As we move deeper into 2025, the technology industry stands at a critical inflection point
As we approach mid-year 2025, I look closer at how the tech market may fare for the rest of the year. In years past, projecting end-of-year tech trends was relatively straightforward. I would look at the fall orders that PC makers gave to their ODMs and study current and future consumer demands for new technology. However, given the instability of the overall market, driven by the uncertainty of tariffs, global conflicts, and supply chain problems, it is much harder this year to forecast how well the tech market will do during the rest of 2025.
As we move deeper into this year, the technology industry stands at a critical inflection point. The turbulence of the early 2020s- marked by pandemic-induced disruptions, supply chain shocks, and global economic uncertainty- has given way to a renewed sense of optimism, innovation, and strategic recalibration. Drawing on decades of observing technology adoption cycles, I see the rest of 2025 as a year where the groundwork laid in the past few years begins to bear fruit, but not without its share of new challenges and pivotal decisions for industry leaders.
The technology sector is set to grow robustly in 2025. After overcoming challenges from inflation and shifting consumer demand, the industry anticipates a 9.3% increase in global IT spending, led by double-digit growth in the data center and software segments. Artificial intelligence—particularly generative AI—drives this resurgence as enterprises rapidly shift from pilot projects to full-scale production deployments.
Worldwide spending on AI is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 29% from 2024 to 2028, signaling a passing trend and a foundational shift in how businesses operate and compete. The cloud, too, remains a critical enabler, allowing companies to scale AI initiatives, enhance cybersecurity, and deliver new customer experiences at unprecedented speed.
Without addressing the semiconductor industry, no discussion of 2025's tech market would be complete. After a robust 2024, the sector is set for even stronger growth this year, with revenues projected to increase by double digits. The relentless demand for generative AI chips-spanning CPUs, GPUs, and specialized accelerators for data centers and edge devices is reshaping the competitive landscape.
Four key trends will define the semiconductor space this year:
As someone who has tracked the PC and consumer electronics revolutions from their infancy, I see parallels here: just as the microprocessor unleashed waves of innovation in the 1980s and 1990s, today's AI-centric chips are setting the stage for entirely new categories of intelligent devices and applications.
With opportunity comes risk. The attack surface for cyber threats is expanding rapidly, fueled by the proliferation of IoT devices, generative AI, and the continued migration to cloud computing. In 2025, the global cost of cybercrime is expected to reach $10.5 trillion, making cybersecurity not just a technical priority but a board-level imperative.
Interestingly, generative AI is a double-edged sword: while it introduces new vulnerabilities, it also offers powerful new threat detection and response tools. Yet, only 24% of current generative AI projects are considered secured, leaving many organizations exposed. The industry must prioritize secure, trustworthy AI-embedding security in every layer of the technology stack.
Geopolitical risk is now a permanent fixture in tech strategy. Governments worldwide seek greater technological autonomy through export controls, trade barriers, and industrial policies. This is disrupting supply chains and alliances, prompting tech companies to diversify suppliers and manufacturing bases-often to countries like India and Vietnam-to reduce dependence on any single region, particularly China.
This trend is reminiscent of earlier eras when global events forced companies to rethink their sourcing and manufacturing strategies. Today's difference is the speed and complexity of change, driven by political and technological factors.
Regulatory pressure is mounting, especially around data privacy, AI ethics, and competition. The European Union continues to lead with stringent regulations, while the U.S. grapples with how best to oversee an industry it often struggles to understand fully. The challenge for tech leaders is to innovate within these constraints, ensuring compliance while pushing the possible boundaries.
On the consumer front, PC and smartphone sales are expected to grow by low single digits in 2025. While these markets are mature, innovation is far from stagnant. AI-powered features, better cameras, and enhanced connectivity drive upgrades, particularly in premium segments. The hybrid work trend accelerated during the pandemic and continues to shape demand for devices and home office solutions.
Several imperatives will define the remainder of 2025:
The technology industry has thrived on its ability to adapt, innovate, and anticipate the next wave. As 2025 progresses, companies that combine bold investments in emerging technologies with careful risk management will be best positioned to lead the next phase of the digital revolution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Broadcom Stock Your Ticket to Becoming a Millionaire?
Artificial intelligence (AI) is moving the needle significantly for Broadcom, and that trend could continue thanks to the huge addressable market it is serving. The chipmaker is now expected to clock stronger growth in the coming years thanks to AI. Broadcom's impressive growth and valuation make the stock an attractive buy. 10 stocks we like better than Broadcom › The artificial intelligence (AI) boom has supercharged Broadcom's (NASDAQ: AVGO) growth in recent quarters, with the company now getting a significant chunk of its revenue from selling custom processors and networking chips deployed by major cloud service providers in their data centers. The stock has made a big move in the past couple of months, jumping an impressive 41% as of this writing and going well past $1 trillion in market cap. The good part is that Broadcom is scratching the surface of a massive opportunity in the AI chip market that could help it sustain solid growth rates for a long time to come. Of course, buying just Broadcom and hoping that it will help you become a millionaire isn't a smart thing to do, as any cracks in the company's growth story could send the stock plunging. However, Broadcom looks like an ideal pick for investors aiming to construct a diversified million-dollar portfolio. Let's look at the reasons why. Broadcom released its fiscal 2025 second-quarter results (for the three months ended May 4) on June 5. Its revenue jumped 20% year over year to $15 billion, while adjusted earnings shot up at a stronger pace of 43%. AI played a key role in driving this robust growth. The company's AI revenue jumped 46% year over year to $4.4 billion, which means it's now getting almost 30% of its top line by supplying chips powering this technology. What's worth noting here is that Broadcom is anticipating further acceleration in its AI revenue in the current quarter, projecting $5.1 billion in revenue. That would be an improvement of 60% from the year-ago period. What's more, Broadcom CEO Hock Tan indicated on the latest earnings conference call that the company's AI revenue growth trajectory is sustainable. Tan remarked that the growth rate Broadcom is witnessing so far in fiscal 2025 "will presumably continue." That's not surprising, considering that Broadcom is now seeing stronger demand for its custom AI chips (known as XPUs) for inference purposes. Management says that the three existing customers who are deploying its custom chips in data centers for AI training remain firm in their infrastructure investment plans, despite the economic uncertainty created by the tariff war. At the same time, those three customers "are doubling down on inference in order to monetize their platforms," which is why the company anticipates "an acceleration of XPU demand into the back half of 2026 to meet urgent demand for inference on top of the demand we have indicated from training." A big reason why Broadcom should be able to sustain its impressive AI revenue growth rate is because of the massive addressable opportunity worth $60 billion to $90 billion that it sees for its AI chips by fiscal 2027 based on the three customers it's currently serving. Given that the company has generated $13.6 billion in revenue from sales of its AI chips in the first three quarters of the year, it still has a lot of room to grow in this market. That's especially true considering that another four hyperscalers are in negotiations with Broadcom for manufacturing custom AI processors. As a result, Broadcom may be sitting on a much larger AI-related addressable market, which explains why analysts have raised their growth expectations for the company following its latest results. Broadcom is trading at just under 38 times forward earnings as of this writing following its recent surge. While that may seem expensive at first, we have seen that the company's outstanding earnings growth justifies its rich valuation. Another important thing worth noting is that Broadcom's price/earnings-to-growth ratio (PEG ratio) based on its projected earnings growth for the next five years stands at just 0.66, according to Yahoo! Finance. The PEG ratio is a forward-looking valuation metric calculated by dividing a company's price-to-earnings ratio by its estimated annual earnings growth rate for the next five years. A reading of less than 1 means that the stock in question is undervalued, and Broadcom's multiple is well below that mark. All this makes Broadcom a solid growth stock to buy right now, since it seems built for terrific long-term upside and has the potential to contribute positively toward a million-dollar portfolio. Before you buy stock in Broadcom, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Broadcom wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Harsh Chauhan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Broadcom Stock Your Ticket to Becoming a Millionaire? was originally published by The Motley Fool Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
How Premier League transfers really work in 2025 – and are rules being broken?
Many of us have signed a footballer in our time. We've approached their club, negotiated a fee, spoken to the player's representatives, agreed personal terms, crossed our fingers for good news about the medical and finally completed the deal. But while Football Manager and other simulators might offer a representation of how transfers would work if everyone stuck to the letter of the rules, in the real world, these moves effectively happen in reverse. Advertisement 'It happens in the other direction,' an experienced football agent tells The Athletic. 'I dare say there's probably five per cent of clubs in the world that do it that (correct) way. The other 95 per cent always agree the player's deal in advance, or certainly the majority of the player's deal. 'Virtually no one is bidding for a player anymore without already knowing that they're going to come to their football club, or have a strong interest in signing for that club.' So, in a bid to demystify the process, here is a stage-by-stage breakdown of how a football transfer really happens in 2025, with the help of that agent and a former sporting director at a major UK club, who both wish to remain anonymous to protect relationships. Most clubs in the top levels of football now have large recruitment departments and extensive databases filled with research on players they may want to sign in future transfer windows. When the time is right, the club aiming to do the buying make contact with the player's representatives to assess the chances of getting a mooted move over the line. 'What has changed is that, historically, a lot of deals were very agent-led, because in the past agents probably had better networks than clubs,' says the agent. 'Now, with the advent of data, clubs know a lot more players. I would say in the past, it used to be 80 per cent agent-led and 20 per cent club-led, whereas now I would say it's 90 per cent club-led.' The sporting director we talked to says he has often been approached by agents in recent years proposing clients of theirs as possible signings, but that very few of those suggestions are taken further. 'I can't think of any times where there's been a player put to me that's been better than the players on our shortlist, or that we didn't already know was available,' he says. 'Now and again, you might get the one put to you that you didn't think would be feasible or didn't think you could afford and that can be interesting but, nine times out of 10, the players put to you by agents are below the standard of the ones already on your shortlist.' Clubs are not allowed to contact players who are under contract elsewhere, either directly or through their representatives, without written permission from the individual's current employers, according to Premier League rules. The exception to that is where clubs from another country can legally open negotiations from January in the year a player's contract is due to expire about a free-agent move when it does run out, while the Premier League's regulations say you can speak to targets from the third Saturday in May if their contract is up that summer. Advertisement In reality, though, clubs do negotiate terms with players or their representatives in private, often over deals that never come to fruition (because the club-to-club negotiations break down or the would-be destination team opt for other targets). This involves recruitment staff or sporting directors sounding out potential signings, usually via agents, to gauge their interest and assess possible costs. The agent and sporting director explained to The Athletic that this goes unpunished because clubs rarely, if ever, flag up that it's going on to the league — mainly because they are doing it too with players they are interested in. The Premier League has the power to investigate an illegal approach even if no complaint has been received, but any investigation would depend on enough information and evidence being available. 'Really, it's the way it's always worked,' says the agent. 'Very occasionally, a club might complain about it if they're going for promotion or trying to stay in a league and they think their player is being unsettled. But almost all of the time, they do nothing because they know they're going to do the same thing themselves in the next transfer window, and people in glass houses can't throw stones.' The rules remain in place, but clubs don't kick up a stink if they're being broken, so governing bodies don't sanction, and working around them has become accepted practice to help the transfer system run smoothly. Much of the groundwork for any transfer is done before sporting directors at the buying clubs get fully involved, with a modern recruitment team's responsibilities stretching beyond studying potential signings and compiling reports on them. 'They watch the players, then they will draw up their shortlist for a centre-forward, for example, and present that to me,' says the sporting director. 'It will contain everything in terms of the possible cost of the deal, and they won't present a player to me if they don't know the player is interested — or at least think he might be interested. Advertisement 'So at that stage, I will know that a player is interested, what the approximate salary is going to be and probably the approximate transfer fee. Even though nothing is finalised, I would say those presentations are usually accurate to about 85 or 90 per cent.' Once sporting directors decide a deal is feasible and attractive, arrangements will usually be made to speak discreetly to the player. In most cases, the selling club will be aware of the general potential for somebody to leave due to conversations with their agent, but they are usually unaware of specific conversations between players and specific buyers. The agent adds: 'I'd say 90 per cent of the time, the player will have either a telephone conversation or face-to-face conversation with the manager (usually via video call), sporting director or both at the buying club. 'That chat will involve, 'Where do you see me playing?', 'Where do you see the club going?', all this kind of stuff, and often they are quite selfish conversations about what incentives are there for the player. Those conversations normally come weeks in advance — as soon as clubs know where they're going to be next season (in terms of which division they will play in). 'But clubs will often have six or seven plates spinning for any one position. They might have the same conversations with six or seven players, then they will decide which one best suits them and best fits their budget. So a lot of the time, things won't go any further than those conversations and no one will ever find out about them.' Once those discussions are completed and a club has decided on their preferred target, the sporting director and the player's agent will attempt to come to a deal in principle on personal terms — wages, bonuses, et cetera. While, according to the rules, clubs should agree a transfer fee before the team doing the buying ever speak to the player involved, in 2025, the official bid is normally the final part of the process. Clubs want a high level of confidence a deal can be completed before lodging a bid with the player's current employers. And negotiations on transfer fees can sometimes be little more than a formality. Advertisement The player's agent, in an effort to make a deal as smooth as possible, will often obtain an 'asking price' from a selling club to pass on to would-be buyers, so suitors will know roughly where to pitch their opening offer. Clubs, however, tend to take such information with a pinch of salt. 'They give us a figure, which is never right, because they want to have us interested,' says the sporting director. 'It's almost always a bit lower than the club actually want. To be honest, whenever I get a figure like that, I normally add about 15 per cent to try to get to a realistic figure.' Negotiations over a fee can still involve much to and fro, especially if a club are reluctant sellers, or if more than one potential buyer is on the scene, at which point a bidding war can ensue. But even in those cases, a player may already have made a firm decision over where they would rather go. The agent says: 'Usually, we will say to any other clubs, 'The player prefers to go somewhere else, but we'll keep you updated'. Sometimes, if a club is especially reluctant to sell, players might take extreme action to try to force through a move. That may include refusing to train or play, or something less extreme.' Matheus Nunes was an example of a player staying away from training when he looked to secure a move from Wolverhampton Wanderers to Manchester City in the summer 2023 window. Players who do that risk punishment from their clubs, most likely fines, but in almost every case the benefits of getting the sought-after move far outweigh the feasible sanctions. 'I have never encouraged a player to down tools,' says the agent. 'I know some players and agents do it, but I've always thought that's too much. You have to show some respect to the club that is paying the player's wages. 'We do sometimes put in a transfer request and find a way to make that public, to apply a bit of pressure, but that is as far as I would ever go.' Once all the financial aspects are agreed, the final stage of a transfer is the medical. Contrary to common belief, these do not provide a binary 'pass-or-fail' outcome. Instead, they are a series of tests designed to inform the buying club of any medical or fitness issues that might make their investment a greater risk. Sometimes, though, the results that come back can lead to a transfer being renegotiated, or even cancelled altogether. In 2020, defender Nathan Ferguson's move from West Bromwich Albion to Crystal Palace was called off, then revived on renegotiated terms, after his medical revealed knee issues. A minor concern in these circumstances might result in the buying club seeking a reduced fee to reflect the added risk, while a bigger problem might see them pulling the plug altogether. Usually though, the results provide an all-clear and the deal proceeds as agreed, completing a process that happens the opposite way around to how many fans would expect.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could Investing in CoreWeave Stock Make You a Millionaire in 2025?
CoreWeave specializes in critical infrastructure services, providing access to GPU architectures through the cloud. While CoreWeave's business is booming, the stock might be overbought right now. An investment in CoreWeave has a lot of potential in the long run, and smart investors understand that timing is a consideration with a volatile stock like this. 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave › For the last couple of years, investing in the artificial intelligence (AI) industry likely meant you were buying stocks across the semiconductors, enterprise software, or cybersecurity industries. While these markets have thrived thanks to new AI-powered services, I see a new opportunity unfolding that is getting little coverage. As cloud hyperscalers such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Oracle continue investing in data center build-outs, the need for infrastructure services is rising. I'm not talking about the companies that are contracted to construct data centers or supply raw materials to manufacture chips, though. Rather, I'm more focused on how AI developers access the chip clusters that are stored in these data centers. One company leading the charge in infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) is CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV), which went public earlier this year. At the time of this writing, shares are up 300% since its IPO date. So, could CoreWeave be the next millionaire-maker AI stock? Read on to find out. By now, it's no longer a secret that cloud hyperscalers and other tech juggernauts like Meta Platforms or Elon Musk's new start-up, xAI, have been some of the biggest customers of graphics processing units (GPUs) and network infrastructure equipment from Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, and Broadcom over the last couple of years. While that's great news for chip designers, there are a couple of nuances to point out. First, matching chip supply with rising demand has been a challenge for semiconductor businesses recently. As such, supply constraint businesses are able to leverage high degrees of pricing power -- essentially making it more difficult for small companies in the playing field to purchase adequate hardware. This logjam is where CoreWeave is making a difference. CoreWeave offers a flexible model by which its customers can access GPU architectures through a cloud-based infrastructure. Essentially, CoreWeave is removing the middleman (i.e., chip manufacturers) for its customers -- giving them a more efficient, less capital-intensive mechanism to access high-performance GPUs as needed. While the use case CoreWeave is trying to solve may seem like a no-brainer, that doesn't necessarily mean investors should blindly invest in the company. Not only is CoreWeave stock up by a meaningful amount since its IPO earlier this year, but the majority of gains really occurred throughout the month of May. With that in mind, the valuation expansion pictured becomes even more pronounced. Given the share price trends illustrated, my concern around an investment in CoreWeave right now is that the stock has turned into a bit of a momentum opportunity. Given the ongoing upward trajectory of the stock, my suspicion is that CoreWeave has indeed made many people millionaires this year. However, the caveat I see is that most of those investors were either involved with the company prior to its IPO or bought shares shortly following the initial pop and subsequent drop in CoreWeave during April. For these reasons, I think it's unlikely that investing in CoreWeave at its current peaking valuation will turn you into a millionaire this year. With that said, I still find the company's value proposition to be compelling. And secular trends suggest that AI infrastructure spend, particularly on hardware, should reach the trillions over just the next five years. Those tailwinds bode well for CoreWeave. In my view, CoreWeave could be a millionaire-maker stock -- just not for long-term investors in 2025. I think a more prudent approach is to wait for a dip opportunity to scoop up shares at a more reasonable valuation. From there, holding on to your position for the long run as the AI narrative continues to unfold could one day turn your initial investment in CoreWeave into a lucrative multibagger position. Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Investing in CoreWeave Stock Make You a Millionaire in 2025? was originally published by The Motley Fool
