logo
American President is a Top Trump when it comes to language

American President is a Top Trump when it comes to language

Americans, being linguistically conservative, continue to use the word correctly, whereas the relatively slovenly British started to abandon it about the end of the 17th century.
Donald Trump is not an elegant orator and freely uses colloquialisms; sometimes even words that the Chambers Dictionary once categorised as 'not in polite use'.
However, his speech is syntactically more precise than that of any other prominent politician.
Robin Dow, Rothesay.
Read more
Bus-t up
On a recent BBC News at One there was a report about plans to introduce free bus travel down south for young people aged between 16 and 22.
The report mentioned that in Scotland we've had free bus travel for 5–22 years olds since 2022.
On the follow-up Scottish news there was a report describing how the authorities are considering measures to deal with the anti-social behaviours that plague our buses, and the possibility of bus passes being withdrawn for offenders.
Problems have increased dramatically in the past three years due to a minority of young bus users travelling to places quite distant to their home and causing trouble either on the bus or at their destination.
A few months ago, there were reports of serious problems on buses in the Kelso area, which regularly led to police involvement. In Edinburgh there have been many cases where bus services have been stopped on certain routes due to anti-social incidents, particularly during the fireworks season.
So, England, be aware!
Brian Watt, Edinburgh.
Centre of attention
I am writing a book about Chesters Management Centre, which was located in Bearsden, Glasgow.
Part of the University of Strathclyde, it operated from 1955 until 1976.
It was a residential management training college, with accommodation for 100 participants. Each year about 1,000 people were attending management courses.
I would love to hear from anyone who has memories of Chesters Management Centre.
My home is in the village of Aberuthven, near Auchterarder, Perthshire.
Please contact me through my personal email, profgordon@hotmail.com or by telephone, 077-622-76693.
If anyone would like a face-to-face meeting, I will be delighted to meet with you.
Gordon C. Anderson, Auchterarder, Perthshire.
Worrying trend
On page eight of Wednesday's Herald there was a photograph of people running through the water at some speed.
The caption underneath reads: "Migrant families wade into the sea in an attempt to board a small boat."
I studied the picture carefully. Rather than seeing 'families', as the caption suggests, the photo shows over 70 young men.
There are only two females and a child, towards the rear of the group.
With reportedly more than fifty thousand illegal immigrants landing in the UK since Labour came to power, the proportions in the image are surely typical, and should be a cause for concern.
James Martin, Bearsden.
Brought to book
Libraries gave us power.
So goes the first line of 'Design for Life' by Manic Street Preachers.
It's a reference to 'Knowledge is Power', the legend carved in stone above a library in Newport, near the Welsh band's home.
Here in cosy, soi-disant 'progressive' Scotland, it would be nice to think that we too would embrace this ethos. To be accepting of books or writing, irrespective of whether the content offends, provokes profound disagreement, or sets us on edge.
No matter how egregious we deem such content to be, banning or proscribing books is the stuff of totalitarianism.
Yet over at the National Library of Scotland, they appear to have a different take, certainly based on the removal of a gender-critical book from an exhibition, at the behest of NLS staff ('Scots National Library accused of 'cowardice' over exclusion of gender critical book', The Herald, August 14).
Perhaps the staff didn't feel comfortable with the content, but that's neither here nor there.
It's a library, not a protest group.
Unless, of course, they are so intolerant of other views, based on seeing life through their ideological prism, that they can't abide to entertain for one second a diversity or difference of opinions. (Such irony.)
So now they hold the power over knowledge. Why not go the whole hog and burn the gender-critical book?
On which note, a Google search confirms that the NLS keeps a copy of Adolf Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' in the building.
Assuming this is true, it seems we're now so enlightened in Scotland, and such is the health of public debate, that the staff of our nation's foremost repository of books, writing and knowledge are comfortable working in an institution that protects and preserves a book written by the racist, fascist, instigator of the world's worst conflict and the Holocaust.
Yet they can't handle women speaking their mind forcefully on a subject of controversy and heated view points.
Wow. Just wow.
Colin Montgomery, Edinburgh.
Wolfish ways
We are informed that Scotland's national library banned a book about feminists' fight against Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-identification law, after staff complained its contents were ''hate speech'' comparable to racism.
American President Thomas Jefferson argued that if the facts in a book were false they should be disproved, and if the reasoning was fallacious it should be refuted, concluding: ''But for God's sake let us freely hear both sides''.
Unpopular ideas must be given a hearing and criticism encouraged.
Without unhampered criticism of public figures and public policy a democracy would soon deteriorate.
To quote Jefferson again: ''To demand the censors of public measures to be given up for punishment is to renew the demand of the wolves in the fable that the sheep should give up their dogs as hostages of the peace and confidence established between them.''
Censorship in the National Library of Scotland… for heaven's sakes!
Doug Clark, Midlothian.
Author Charles Dickens... was he one of the Victorians who had strange ideas? (Image: Rochester Museum)
Body bafflement
Some people look back on the Victorian era with amusement, if not scorn, for some of the attitudes of the time.
For instance, covering up table legs lest they inflame the passions of gentlemen with little self-control.
I wonder if, in a century's time (should humanity last that long), people will look back with incredulity at the "Sturgeonian" era in Scotland, when it was thought that women could have male appendages.
Brian Johnston, Torrance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘What the f--- was that?' My nine hours at Trump's bewildering summit
‘What the f--- was that?' My nine hours at Trump's bewildering summit

Telegraph

time2 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘What the f--- was that?' My nine hours at Trump's bewildering summit

After travelling 2,000 miles, enduring a three-hour security screening and arguing over seating arrangements with the Russian media, expectations were high for the meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The early signs were positive – a warm handshake, a ride along in 'The Beast' and the claim by Russia that talks could last 'six or seven hours'. But that feeling came to a screeching halt inside the press tent at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, when a press conference was called just three hours in – and it emerged that the wider bilateral talks had been scrapped. The two leaders appeared on stage for just 12 minutes. There was no ceasefire and they did not take a single question. 'What the f--- was that?' one American journalist exclaimed. 'Is that all?' Indeed, it was. The first surprise of Mr Trump and Putin's post-summit press conference was that the Russian leader was the first to speak. After the two men had taken their place behind their respective podiums, almost the entire room had their eyes fixed on Mr Trump, assuming that the US host would lead the conversation. So when Putin first opened his mouth, you could almost hear the sounds of heads whipping towards the Russian leader. Mr Trump eventually followed suit, and for the first time in his second term, spoke very briefly. Twelve minutes later, it was all over. The press pack, who had flown more than 2,000 miles to the most remote state capital in America in the hopes of witnessing history, were left shouting into the abyss. Colleagues looked around in bewilderment. Almost immediately, chatter between journalists turned from astonishment to frustration, as we realised that the pair had spoken for a twentieth of the painstaking time that it took for us to each be individually screened by the Secret Service that morning. In the few days before the highly-anticipated summit, we had scrambled to secure hire cars and accommodation in Anchorage, which turned out to be as scarce as details of what the two leaders agreed in their talks. Space in Anchorage was precious. With a handful of hotels already bursting with anglers capitalising on the peak salmon season, there was no room at the inn. Some of the Russian delegation were relegated to dorms normally reserved for university students. We also faced accommodation woes. But my colleague, Dom Nicholls, managed to secure us a 26-foot-long Winnebago, affectionately nicknamed the 'Tel Force One', which became an office, recording studio and our sleeping quarters. Some were not so lucky. Angry members of the Russian press pack shared pictures of military camp cots erected on bare hardwood gym floors, prompting taunts about the state of American hospitality. Frustrations were compounded when, upon arriving at the media tents, our Russian counterparts found that their mobile data roaming did not work. In the end, they were able to connect to the special WiFi generously provided by the US Air Force. Security delays prompted outcry from some American journalists who were concerned that Russian reporters would get better seats at the briefing. 'Can we make sure Americans are seated before the Russians?' one disgruntled journalist asked. 'This is America, after all,' another added. The two media camps were being kept apart on separate buses. In the press tent, it was a similar scene. With Russian media lodged on one side, cables hidden under blue and yellow rubber covers acted as a de facto border. A smoking area beside a handful of portable toilets appeared to be exclusively used by chain-smoking Russians. But even they appeared bewildered by the underwhelming press conference, immediately scampering from the press tent via the snack bar to their awaiting bus once it had concluded. After Mr Trump left the venue and the roar of Air Force One receded, we were left wondering how the most consequential diplomatic summit in recent memory could produce so little. Ukraine was shut out of the talks, with no invite for Volodymyr Zelensky, much to the chagrin of his European allies. Given what a non-event the whole thing turned out to be, they may be relieved that they were not required to make the journey.

'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks
'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks

ITV News

time31 minutes ago

  • ITV News

'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks

After talks with President Trump, Putin has hinted a deal is immiment, as ITV News US Correspondent Dan Rivers reports A deal on ending the war in Ukraine has not been reached, despite the efforts of US President Donald Trump during face-to-face talks with Russia's President Putin in Alaska. On Friday, the two leaders greeted one another on the tarmac of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. They shook hands and smiled for pictures together before making their way to Trump's presidential limousine. They spoke for around two and a half hours before delivering a joint news conference. Standing next to Putin, Trump said: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. 'And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' However, Trump also admitted: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Putin claimed they had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' The meeting marked the Russian president's first time on US soil in more than a decade. Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. The US President pledged he would bring about an end to the conflict, which began after Russia 's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, on his first day in the White House. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, 'we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon'. When Putin smiled and offered, 'next time in Moscow,' Trump said 'that's an interesting one' and said he might face criticism but 'I could see it possibly happening'. The Russian president also praised the talks in the press conference, describing them as a "reference point" from which the conflict could be resolved. He went on to say he hoped they would mark the start of restoring "businesslike, pragmatic relations" between the two countries. Meanwhile, the UK's Ministry of Defence has said British personnel are ready to arrive in Ukraine just "days" after Moscow and Kyiv agree to put fighting on hold. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a "Multinational Force Ukraine", a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. "Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities," an MoD spokesperson said. It follows stern remarks from Trump last month, where he revealed a deadline for Russia to negotiate a ceasefire or face heavy tariffs, following his "disappointment" in Putin. At the beginning of August, Trump announced the repositioning of US nuclear submarines over what he described as "inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. The war has caused heavy losses on both sides and drained resources. Ukraine has held on far longer than some initially expected since the February 2022 invasion, but it is straining to hold off Russia's much larger army.

The first casualty of war is truth
The first casualty of war is truth

Scotsman

time31 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

The first casualty of war is truth

Bruce Whitehead On Monday morning the news was sinking in of the killing of six journalists in Gaza as they reported on Israel's relentless war on a largely civilian territory occupied by starving families. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I am sick of writing about atrocities in Gaza. In 2009 I drove there with humanitarian aid collected by Scottish Muslim, Jewish and Christian faith groups, after up to 1400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis died when Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert – recently invited onto British TV news programmes as a 'moderate' – breached a six-month ceasefire by ordering the killing of seven Hamas fighters. With a dozen vehicles we travelled through eastern Europe to deliver first aid, food, toys and healthcare supplies to areas of Gaza City flattened by Israeli bombs. As a journalist I witnessed the effects of bombardment on innocent civilians which killed an estimated 300 children. Crushed concrete buildings, donkey carts picking their way through mounds of rubble. 16 years on, western journalists are barred from Gaza, so it's impossible to verify Israel's claims about the conflict on the ground. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With the deaths of Al Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif, Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa and freelancer Mohammad al-Khaldi – sheltering in a cloth tent near a hospital – Israel has almost snuffed out the last source of evidence of its genocidal campaign. The BBC still has its own freelancers sending footage of the slaughter of starving Palestinians in food queues, but surely they too are in mortal peril. I have called on my union, the National Union of Journalists, to demand that the Foreign Minister David Lammy summon the Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely for a formal British diplomatic protest. Many of my former BBC and ITN colleagues work for Al Jazeera, and this is the latest in a long and shameful tale of targeted Israeli raids on journalists. In May I paid tribute on behalf of the NUJ to all journalists killed at work, at Workers' Memorial Day in Princes Street Gardens. My words then are appropriate today: 'The deaths of journalists remind us yet again that the first casualty of war is Truth.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store