Google Calendar removes Black History Month, Pride and other cultural events
Google's online and mobile calendars are no longer including references to Black History Month, Women's History Month and LGBTQ+ holidays, among other events.
The world's biggest search engine previously marked the beginning of Black History Month in February and Pride Month in June, but the events do not appear for 2025.
The removal of the holidays was first reported by the Verge last week. Google spokesperson Madison Cushman Veld told the publication that the listed holidays were not 'sustainable' for their model.
'We got feedback that some other events and countries were missing – and maintaining hundreds of moments manually and consistently globally wasn't scalable or sustainable,' the statement reads.
'So in mid-2024 we returned to showing only public holidays and national observances from timeanddate.com globally, while allowing users to manually add other important moments.'
The decision to no longer acknowledge Black, LGBTQ+ and women's holidays is another move on the growing list of changes that Google has made following the start of Donald Trump's second presidency.
The tech behemoth recently announced that they would be rolling back on their previous commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in their employment policies following the US president's orders to curb DEI in federal agencies in one of his first moves as president.
Google also revealed in late January that users in the US would see the name of the Gulf of Mexico changed to the 'Gulf of America' and that the company would start using the name 'Mount McKinley' for the mountain in Alaska currently called Denali after executive orders from Trump signed during his first day in office.
Many users on social media have expressed disappointment and frustration with Google's latest decision. Following the changes, users who wish to track events such as Pride Month, Black History Month and Indigenous Peoples' Month must now manually add them to their calendars.
It's not clear whether these changes will affect the Google Doodles, which usually celebrate these events with digital artwork on the website's homepage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 hours ago
- Reuters
Judge rejects class action for Google privacy lawsuit
June 10 (Reuters) - People who accused Google of illegally collecting their personal information, after they chose not to synchronize their Google Chrome browsers with their Google accounts, cannot sue the Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab unit as a group in a class action, a U.S. judge ruled. In a decision on Monday, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California agreed with Google that it was appropriate to address case-by-case whether millions of Chrome users understood and agreed to its data collection policies. "Inquiries relating to Google's implied consent defense will overwhelm the damages claims for all causes of action," Rogers wrote. She dismissed the proposed damages class action with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The judge also said Chrome users cannot seek policy changes as a group. David Straite, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, declined to comment on Tuesday. Sandi Knight, vice president of litigation at Google, in a statement said the company appreciated the decision, and that Chrome Sync has "clear privacy controls." Class actions let plaintiffs seek potentially greater recoveries at lower cost than they could in individual lawsuits. The decision followed a ruling last August by the federal appeals court in San Francisco, which said Rogers should consider whether reasonable Chrome users consented to letting Google collect their data when they browsed online. Chrome users pointed to Chrome's privacy notice, which said they "don't need to provide any personal information to use Chrome" and Google would not collect such information unless they turned on the "sync" function. Rogers had dismissed the case in December 2022. She said she oversees two other privacy cases against Mountain View, California-based Google, but the claims in those cases differed "significantly." The appeals court ruling followed Google's 2023 agreement to destroy billions of records to settle a lawsuit claiming it tracked people who thought they were browsing privately, including in Chrome's "Incognito" mode. The case is Calhoun et al v Google LLC, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-16993.
The Independent
14 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump plans to keep Starlink at the White House operational despite rift with Musk
President Donald Trump said he would maintain the White House 's operational ties to Starlink, the high-speed internet service owned by Musk's company SpaceX, despite their recent falling out. Speaking with reporters on Monday, the president was asked if he would split from the physical impact of Musk – such as getting rid the Tesla Model S that he purchased from Musk in March or Starlink technologies. 'I may move the Tesla around a little bit, but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service,' Trump told reporters on Monday. The president's comment arrives after he threatened to pull government contracts with Musk's companies, which are not only lucrative for the tech mogul but some are essential for the government – such as Starlink. Starlink provides quick internet access without the need for fiber cables or cellular towers by using low Earth orbiting satellites. When deployed, the satellites send signals to systems on the ground, providing internet access. A database of government contracts indicates the U.S. engaged in $4.1 million in contracts for Starlink in 2022, $1.9 million in 2023, less than $500,000 in 2024, and $22,000 as of June 2025. At least six federal agencies have active contracts with SpaceX for Starlink technologies. That includes the the Department of Defense, which has come to rely heavily on Starlink's services, according to NPR. When Musk began working as a senior adviser and head of the Department of Government Efficiency for the Trump administration, he reportedly deployed, or suggested deploying, Starlink technologies at the White House and other agencies. The General Services Administration considered using Starlink for internet access at the request of Musk's staff, NBC News reported. The Federal Aviaition Administraiton has begun testing Starlink technologies at several 'non safety' sites after Musk criticized the FAA's potential contract with Verizon, according to CNN. Tim Farrar, the president of the consulting company Telecom, Media and Finance Associates, Inc., told NPR that it would be tough for the government to move away from Starlink because other telecom companies are finding it 'very difficult' to catch up to it's abilities. Starlink has been instrumental in allowing people in rural areas to obtain internet access and helpful for militaries engaged in battle – the most prominent example being the Ukrainian army's use of Starlink to help fight against Russia's full-scale invasion.
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Netflix defies Trump tariffs with $1B investment
Netflix is making a huge international investment, despite President Donald Trump 's wishes. The streaming giant's CEO, Ted Sarandos, announced a $1.14 billion investment to help produce a pipeline of new shows in Spain . He made the declaration during a press conference in Tres Cantos, Spain, on Tuesday. Sarandos said the money will flow into the region between 2025 and 2028. It comes after the President said in May that he would slap a 100 percent tariff on any movie produced outside of the US . Netflix first started making content in Spain in 2015, producing well-watched shows like Money Heist. The major film and TV producer has continued to build production capacity, including a 10 soundstage studio complex in Madrid. 'Alongside your rich cultural heritage, vibrant entertainment industry and brilliant creative talent, Spain is also a great place to do business,' Sarandos said to an audience of journalists, movie producers, and local politicians. 'The last 10 years have been nothing short of extraordinary.' Trump's tariff announcement earlier this year has confused film production leaders, and offered little detail about how the levy would work in practice. 'Other countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States,' the President claimed on his Truth Social platform. 'Hollywood and many other areas within the USA are being devastated.' Like the sweeping tariffs placed on other industries — like 50 percent steel and aluminum levies or 25 percent automotive import fees — President Trump believes that the higher taxes will motivate increased investment in US production. Netflix's stock tumbled the day after the social media post . But it's impossible to know the knock-on impacts if Trump's policy was implemented. The White House hasn't revealed how it plans on assessing the value of international films before the tariff is applied. 'Although no final decisions on foreign film tariffs have been made, the Administration is exploring all options to deliver on President Trump's directive to safeguard our country's national and economic security while Making Hollywood Great Again,' White House spokesman, Kush Desai, said. In 2024, film industry experts reported a schedule of 5,048 total film and TV shoot days in Hollywood. That is good for a 36.4 percent drop from the five-year average. Other US production hubs, like Atlanta and Austin, have seen slower growth. Analysts worry that Trump's potential policy could make streamers slow down the number of shows they could produce. 'There's also a risk of retaliatory tariffs against American content overseas,' Barton Crockett, an analyst with Rosenblatt Securities, told Reuters. 'Raising the cost to produce movies could lead studios to make less content.' Hollywood production companies had already been in the crosshairs of back-and-forth tariff threats in the US trade war with China. Beijing is restricting the number of movies produced in Hollywood that can play in China, a move that can destroy the bottom line for multiple major US producers. Netflix's investment in Spain also comes as the company wrangles with regulators in other countries.
