Microsoft files legal action against information-stealing malware Lumma Stealer
Synopsis
Microsoft's DCU helped in the "takedown, suspension, and blocking of malicious domains that formed the backbone of Lumma's infrastructure," via a court order from the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Georgia, the blog said. The US Department of Justice said on Wednesday it has seized five internet domains used by malicious cyber actors to operate the LummaC2 information-stealing malware service. The FBI's Dallas Field Office is investigating the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Was Jeffrey Epstein the reason behind Melinda French Gates' divorce from Bill Gates?
Did Jeffrey Epstein kill himself, or was it a cold-blooded murder? Finally, there's an answer to that long-looming question. After years of conspiracy theories and speculations over Epstein's death, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Deputy Director Dan Bongino revealed on Wednesday that there is nothing in the infamous American financier's file that might indicate that he died by any other way than suicide. While alive, Epstein ruined countless lives with his sexual abuse and sex-trafficking activities. The exact number of Epstein's victims remains uncertain, but estimates suggest that over 250 individuals were subjected to his abuse. However, those were not the only ones impacted by Epstein. Turns out, he had a massive contribution to the divorce of Melinda French Gates, who called it quits with Microsoft founder Bill Gates after 27 years of marriage. What happened? In May 2021, Melinda French Gates and Bill Gates announced their divorce after 27 years of marriage, sending shockwaves through the philanthropic and tech worlds. While the couple cited irreconcilable differences, Melinda has since revealed that Bill's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein played a significant role in the dissolution of their marriage. A deepening rift The relationship between the Gates and Epstein began in 2011, after Epstein had served a 13-month sentence for soliciting prostitution from a minor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tecno Pova Curve 5G - India's Slimmest 5,500mAh Curve TECNO Mobile Buy Now Undo Bill Gates met Epstein to discuss philanthropy, but Melinda was uncomfortable with the association. In 2013, she reportedly warned Bill about his meetings with Epstein, describing them as a "turning point" in their relationship. In a 2022 interview with CBS Mornings, Melinda stated, 'I did not like that he'd had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein. I made that clear to him.' She also recounted meeting Epstein once and finding him 'abhorrent' and 'evil personified,' an encounter that left her with nightmares. The final straw Reports suggest that Melinda began consulting divorce lawyers in October 2019, around the same time the New York Times reported on Bill's meetings with Epstein, including an overnight stay at Epstein's New York mansion. These revelations were reportedly a catalyst for Melinda's decision to end the marriage. The aftermath: While Epstein's role in the Gates divorce is a significant factor, it was not the sole reason. Melinda has indicated that there were multiple issues that contributed to the end of their marriage. However, Epstein's involvement undeniably played a pivotal role in their decision to part ways. The retrospection: After the divorce, Bill Gates has expressed regret time and again over his association with Epstein, acknowledging it as a 'substantial error in judgment.' In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, the Microsoft co-founder admitted that his decision to meet with the late convicted sex offender was 'foolish'. Gates explained that his initial interactions with Epstein were motivated by the hope of leveraging the financier's connections to support global health initiatives. However, he acknowledged the meetings were unwise and ineffective. "In retrospect,' Gates told WSJ, 'I was foolish to spend any time with him. And he, sort of, got time with various people by spending time with other people.' He added, "So yes, I think I was quite stupid. I thought it would help me with global health philanthropy. In fact, it failed to do that it was just a huge mistake." On the other hand, Melinda claimed the relationship had 'reached fever pitch' after the New York Times released a damning report on his connections to Epstein. She shared that the article about Epstein, whom she referred to as 'evil personified' in the interview, 'raised serious questions about Bill's conduct—questions that suggested he had betrayed not only our marriage but also our values." Following the divorce, Melinda has focused on her philanthropic efforts through Pivotal Ventures, an investment and charitable firm she founded. She has committed to advancing women's rights and participation in various sectors, including politics and business. Bongino updated Fox News on the investigation into the Epstein file, as conspiracies continue to float that he was murdered in prison, and said, "The evidence we have in our files clearly indicates that it was, in fact, a suicide. We do have video. It's not the greatest video in the world. I don't want to set expectations on fire." Bongino added, "However, the video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there. There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide." One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 days ago
- First Post
Behind bankruptcy plea of London start-up: It hired 700 Indian engineers to pose as AI tools
A major AI scandal has shaken the tech world as once valued at $1.5 billion, has filed for bankruptcy. The company, backed by Microsoft and a Qatari sovereign fund, falsely claimed to build apps in minutes using AI, while actually relying on hundreds of human engineers in India. read more Behind bankruptcy plea of London start-up: It hired 700 Indian engineers to pose as AI tools London-based once valued at $1.5 billion and backed by Microsoft and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, has filed for bankruptcy after it was revealed that its so-called was mostly done manually by engineers in India, According to a report from The Times of India. According to the report, round 700 Indian engineers were while developing apps. The startup had raised over $445 million by promoting its AI-based app development platform. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The company marketed its platform as using AI to build apps quickly, powered by a digital assistant named 'Natasha.' Most of the coding was done manually However, reports revealed that most of the coding was actually done manually by Indian tech workers, while the company falsely presented their work as AI-generated. The collapse of The collapse began in May 2025 when lender Viola Credit seized $37 million from accounts after discovering the company had inflated its 2024 revenue by 300 per cent. Founder Sachin Dev Duggal had claimed $220 million in sales, but an audit revealed the actual figure was just $50 million. All engineer, no AI Concerns about AI claims had surfaced as early as 2019, when The Wall Street Journal reported that the platform largely depended on human engineers rather than real AI. Former employees described it as 'all engineer, no AI,' according to the report. The scheme fully unravelled when the new CEO, Manpreet Ratia, who replaced Duggal in February, discovered the extent of the financial misreporting. US prosecutors have since launched an investigation and requested access to the company's records and customer data. Biggest AI startup collapse downfall is considered the biggest AI startup collapse since the ChatGPT-driven investment boom began. The company now owes $85 million to Amazon and $30 million to Microsoft in cloud computing bills. About 1,000 employees have lost their jobs. 'AI washing' in the time of boom The case has sparked renewed concerns over 'AI washing', a growing trend where companies rebrand traditional services as AI-powered to attract investment during the current tech boom.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
Builder.ai faked AI with 700 engineers, now faces bankruptcy and probe
Once valued at $1.5 billion, collapsed after it was exposed for passing off human-written code as AI-generated, triggering global layoffs, audits, and regulatory scrutiny Founded in 2016 by Sachin Dev Duggal, — previously known as — positioned itself as an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered no-code platform designed to simplify app development. Headquartered in London and backed by major investors including Microsoft, the Qatar Investment Authority, SoftBank's DeepCore, and IFC, the startup promised to make software creation "as easy as ordering pizza". Its much-touted AI assistant, Natasha, was marketed as a breakthrough that could build software with minimal human input. At its peak, raised over $450 million and achieved a valuation of $1.5 billion. But the company's glittering image masked a starkly different reality. Behind the curtain: 700 engineers, not AI Contrary to its claims, development process relied on around 700 human engineers in India. These engineers manually wrote code for client projects while the company portrayed the work as AI-generated. The façade began to crack after industry observers and insiders, including Linas Beliūnas of Zero Hash, publicly accused of fraud. In a LinkedIn post, Beliūnas wrote: 'It turns out the company had no AI and instead was just a group of Indian developers pretending to write code as AI.' Red flags as early as 2019 AI narrative had long drawn scepticism. A 2019 investigation by the Wall Street Journal found that most of the coding was done manually, with the AI capabilities largely exaggerated. Former employee Robert Holdheim sued the company for $5 million, claiming he was fired after flagging concerns over deceptive practices. Legal filings revealed had misled investors by claiming apps were '80% built' by AI, though the supporting tech was barely functional. Other ex-employees later confirmed the company was 'all engineer, no AI'. Financial irregularities and collapse In early 2025, a leadership shake-up saw Manpreet Ratia replace Duggal as CEO in a bid to restore investor confidence. But Ratia discovered the company had massively inflated its 2024 revenue — claiming $220 million when actual income was closer to $50 million. An independent audit exposed the discrepancy, prompting lender Viola Credit to seize $37 million from accounts. Left with only $5 million in restricted funds, the company's operations across five countries — including India, the UK, and the US — came to a standstill. With regulatory issues freezing fresh capital, failed to pay staff, leading to nearly 1,000 layoffs. Allegations of financial misconduct Further inquiries suggested may have engaged in 'round-tripping' with Indian social media firm VerSe to inflate sales numbers — a tactic that helped attract investment. The company reportedly owes $85 million to Amazon and $30 million to Microsoft in unpaid cloud services. A US federal probe is underway, with investigators seeking access to its financial and client data. Public admission and bankruptcy filing In a statement on LinkedIn, admitted defeat: 'Despite the tireless efforts of our current team and exploring every possible option, the business has been unable to recover from historic challenges and past decisions that placed significant strain on its financial position.' The company has begun formal bankruptcy proceedings in jurisdictions where it operated, including India, the UK, and the US. AI hype vs. startup reality downfall has reignited concerns around 'AI washing' — branding basic tech services as AI to capitalise on investor excitement. Phil Brunkard of Info-Tech Research Group noted that many startups 'scaled fast without robust technology or governance', riding a wave of unchecked hype. With regulators now probing how AI firms market their products, the episode has become a cautionary tale. What was sold as an AI revolution turned out to be a conventional outsourcing firm cloaked in buzzwords. The result: employees out of work, millions in investor losses, and renewed demands for transparency and accountability in the AI startup ecosystem.
