logo
New satellite images show work at Iran's Fordow nuclear site after US bombing

New satellite images show work at Iran's Fordow nuclear site after US bombing

Independent30-06-2025
Satellite pictures taken in the week after the US airstrikes on Iran's three nuclear sites show activity at the Fordow facility, which Donald Trump claimed was 'completely and totally obliterated' in last week's attack.
Images from Maxar Technologies show construction vehicles including an excavator near one of the shafts at the Fordow nuclear facility which was struck by US bunker buster bombs on 22 June.
Other images show that the bombardment had completely caved in entrance tunnels to the site.
The images show several vehicles parked around the facility, as questions remain about just how much of Iran's nuclear capability was obliterated.
The US Secretary of Defense hit out at media reporting of the attack, after a leaked preliminary intelligence report found the attack had likely only set Iran's nuclear programme back by a couple of months.
Speaking at the Pentagon alongside the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff late last week, Pete Hegseth said 'anyone with two eyes' would recognise the damage done to Iran's facilities.
'First reports are almost always wrong. They're almost always incomplete,' he said, adding the facility had been completely 'destroyed'.
Hegseth cited several experts and other reports to back his claim up, including the Israeli Defence Force, the CIA director, US director of national intelligence. He also quoted Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson as saying 'our nuclear institutions have been badly damaged, that's for sure'.
General Dan Caine said the bunker-buster bombs 'went exactly where they were intended to go'.
But on Sunday, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog suggested Tehran could get its nuclear programme back up and running within months.
The International Atomic Energy Agency director general Rafael Grossi previously said Iran had told the watchdog it was planning to move its enriched uranium ahead of a suspected bomb attack, and that it was unclear whether that fuel had been destroyed in the bombardment.
"So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved," he said in an interview on Sunday.
Israel launched an attack on Iran earlier this month, saying Tehran was on the brink of developing nuclear weapons. It sparked a 12-day war, with Iran launching missiles at Israeli cities including Tel Aviv, before the US joined in with the nuclear site attacks.
Mr Grossi said the strikes on sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan had significantly set back Iran's ability to convert and enrich uranium, but the country still has capacity.
"They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi told CBS News in an interview.
"Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," he added, according to the transcript of the interview.
Western powers stress that Iran's nuclear advances provide it with an irreversible knowledge gain, suggesting that while losing experts or facilities may slow progress, the advances are permanent.
"Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology," Grossi said. "So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump: Journalists should be allowed into Gaza
Trump: Journalists should be allowed into Gaza

Reuters

time34 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump: Journalists should be allowed into Gaza

WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would like to see journalists gain access to Gaza to see humanitarian efforts. Israel has not allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza since the start of its war in October 2023, unless they are under Israeli military escort. "I'd like to see that happen. Sure," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "I would be very fine with journalists going. And it's a very dangerous position to be in, as you know, if you're a journalist, but I would like to see it."

UK's Lammy says Israel settlement plan 'must be stopped now'
UK's Lammy says Israel settlement plan 'must be stopped now'

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

UK's Lammy says Israel settlement plan 'must be stopped now'

LONDON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - British foreign minister David Lammy said Israeli plans to develop a settlement that would divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem marked a breach of international law and must be stopped immediately. "The UK strongly opposes the Israeli government's E1 settlement plans, which would divide a future Palestinian state in two and mark a flagrant breach of international law. The plans must be stopped now," Lammy said in an emailed statement.

Israel appears set to approve controversial settlement of 3,400 homes in West Bank
Israel appears set to approve controversial settlement of 3,400 homes in West Bank

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Israel appears set to approve controversial settlement of 3,400 homes in West Bank

Israel appears set to give formal planning approval to a highly controversial settlement project for more than 3,400 new homes – which has been frozen for decades – which critics say would split the occupied West Bank in half. Strongly opposed by the international community, the so-called E1 plan would extend the existing Jewish settlement of Ma'ale Adumim towards Jerusalem, further cutting occupied east Jerusalem from the West Bank, and further separating the north and south of the territory. The decision from the Supreme Planning Council, which meets next week, is expected to support the plan after rejecting objections by Israeli NGOs. The expected decision in favour comes as Israel's far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich – who backs both the plan as well as the imposition of Israeli sovereignty through the occupied West Bank – gloated that he believed construction on E1 would 'bury the idea of a Palestinian state'. Smotrich is a junior minister who also holds a position at Israel's defence ministry with oversight of planning issues in the occupied Palestinian territories. He was sanctioned along with fellow far-right minister Itamar Ben-Gvir by the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand in June for 'repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities'. Standing at the site of the planned settlement in Ma'ale Adumim on Thursday, Smotrich, a settler himself, said the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and US president, Donald Trump, had agreed to the revival of the E1 development, though there was no immediate confirmation from either. While approval for the plan would be a significant step, it remained unclear on Thursday how much buy-in Smotrich has from Netanyahu and the Trump administration. Netanyahu has not commented on Smotrich's remarks, while the US state department appeared to dodge the issue of E1 when questioned. 'Those in the world trying to recognise a Palestinian state will get an answer from us on the ground,' Smotrich said on Thursday, as he announced the plan's impending approval. 'Not through documents, not through decisions or declarations, but through facts. Facts of homes, neighbourhoods, roads and Jewish families building their lives.' The anticipated decision was immediately condemned by the EU. 'The EU rejects any territorial change that is not part of a political agreement between involved parties. So annexation of territory is illegal under international law,' European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said. The Norwegian foreign minister, Espen Barth Eide, said the move by Smotrich, an ultranationalist in the ruling rightwing coalition who has long advocated for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, showed that Israel 'seeks to appropriate land owned by Palestinians in order to prevent a two-state solution'. While a UN spokesperson called on Israel to reverse a decision that would end prospects of a two-state solution, the US state department was more evasive. Asked about Smotrich's statement that Netanyahu and Trump had agreed to the development, a spokesperson for the US state department said the US remained focused on ending the war in Gaza and ensuring Hamas will never govern that territory again. 'A stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region,' the spokesperson said, while referring to the Israeli government for further information. The fraught question of E1 – and whether the land will ever be built on – has become one of Israel's most interminable sagas, embraced by settler politicians but seen by more mainstream politicians as a red line over Washington's previous history of firm opposition. While Smotrich, whose increasingly unpopular far-right party would be unlikely to win any seats if elections were held today, has spent the past 24 hours grandstanding around the issue, any decision to meaningfully advance with actual building on E1 would probably have to be made by Netanyahu given the diplomatic ramifications. Reflecting the strong international opposition, the UK's Foreign Office said in July – when the issue of E1 re-emerged – that construction would be 'a flagrant breach of international law' threatening the viability of a future Palestinian state. Smotrich's remarks follow declarations in recent days by a growing number of countries of their intention to recognise a Palestinian state in the coming months, which Israel has condemned. The Israeli NGO Peace Now, which monitors settlement building, said: 'The Netanyahu government is exploiting every minute to deepen the annexation of the West Bank and prevent the possibility of a two-state solution. 'It is clear to everyone today that the only solution to the conflict, and the only way to defeat Hamas, is through the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. 'The government of Israel is condemning us to continued bloodshed, instead of working to end it.' First mooted in the 1990s by then Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, the E1 plan has barely advanced in the past 20 years amid recognition by successive Israeli governments of the depth of international opposition, including in Washington. However, even with the tacit approval of the Trump administration, movement towards building would have severe diplomatic ramifications for an already diplomatically isolated Israel, leading to speculation that even with planning permission the plan might not advance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store