logo
Women-only US dating advice app Tea suspends messaging following breaches

Women-only US dating advice app Tea suspends messaging following breaches

CNA29-07-2025
WASHINGTON :The women-only U.S. dating advice app Tea has suspended direct messaging following a series of security breaches that exposed its users' personal details and sensitive communications, the company said on Tuesday.
In a series of posts to TikTok, Tea Dating Advice said it had taken messaging offline "out of an abundance of caution" after discovering the breach. The announcement followed a report last week in tech publication 404media that the company had inadvertently exposed the names, selfies, and identity documents of thousands of women, and a second report earlier on Tuesday that direct messages - including sensitive conversations around abortions and infidelity - had similarly been exposed.
The app - which boasts 4.6 million users - is pitched as a "dating safety platform" that women can use to steer clear of men who are adulterous, dishonest, or worse. As a TikTok video put out by the company last year put it, the app "makes the FBI work for us girlies so much easier."
Women on Tea are encouraged to share details about prospective dates, create alerts against men's names, and put red flags against men who are alleged to be unscrupulous and green flags against those who are not. "Everything is anonymous," the app promises users on sign-up. Reuters could not establish why the selfies and ID card data had lingered online.
Tea did not respond to requests seeking further comment. In its TikTok message, the app said the FBI was investigating the circumstances around the breach. The FBI declined to comment.
Eva Galperin, the director of cybersecurity at San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the premise behind the app - creating a kind of massive whisper network powered by anonymous users - was already "a little bit sketchy." She said the app's makers had made it worse by being "honestly negligent" about their security and that the disaster was compounded because "women are encouraged to share extremely sensitive information about themselves and others."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Singapore's Carro targets US IPO with over $3.8 billion valuation, sources say
Singapore's Carro targets US IPO with over $3.8 billion valuation, sources say

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Singapore's Carro targets US IPO with over $3.8 billion valuation, sources say

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox If successful, Carro's listing would be the largest South-east Asian IPO in the US since Shopee parent Sea's listing in 2017. SINGAPORE - Singapore-based Carro, South-east Asia's largest used-car online marketplace, is preparing for a US initial public offering (IPO) as early as 2026 that could raise up to US$500 million (S$642.6 million), according to sources familiar with the matter. The company is aiming for a valuation of more than US$3 billion (S$3.8 billion), according to the sources, who could not be named discussing confidential information. If successful, Carro's listing would be the largest South-east Asian IPO in the United States since Shopee parent Sea's 989.3 million listing in 2017 and the third biggest South-east Asian high-tech IPO in the US, according to LSEG. It would also be the first major automotive tech and artificial intelligence or AI-driven commerce start-up from Singapore to go public in the US. Carro is on track to deliver US$100 million in annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation by its fiscal year ending March 2026, one of the sources said. The IPO size is still under discussion and may change depending on market conditions, the sources added. Carro did not immediately respond to an email request seeking comment on Aug 6. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple World White House says Trump open to meeting Russia's Putin and Ukraine's Zelensky Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore ST and Uniqlo launch design contest for Singapore stories T-shirt collection Asia Malaysia plans barrierless toll system modelled after Singapore's ERP Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing Founded in 2015, Carro operates a digital platform that enables consumers and dealers to buy and sell vehicles, while also offering insurance, financing and after-sales services. Besides Singapore, it has a presence in markets across the Asia-Pacific region including Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong, its websites show. With over 4,500 employees across Asia-Pacific, Carro has raised more than US$1 billion in debt and equity from investors including Temasek, SoftBank and several other sovereign funds, according to its websites. A successful listing could pave the way for other regional unicorns such as Carsome, Traveloka and Xendit to follow suit. Beyond South-east Asia, a growing number of Chinese companies are also eyeing US listings, drawn by the potential for higher valuations despite ongoing geopolitical tensions. REUTERS

Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge
Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge

[WASHINGTON] A blockbuster study published in top science journal Nature last year warned that unchecked climate change could slash global GDP by a staggering 62 per cent by century's end, setting off alarm bells among financial institutions worldwide. But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released on Wednesday, challenges that conclusion - finding the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan. The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP it will have 'further information to share soon' - a move that would almost certainly be seized upon by climate-change skeptics. Both the original authors - who have acknowledged errors - and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth. Influential paper A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others. AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 per cent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. 'That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 per cent is a very big number,' scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP. When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. 'When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'' Hsiang said. 'We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making.' The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on Wednesday uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. 'We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next,' Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while 'there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community,' the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. Undeniable climate impact Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed. She told AFP the correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are 'extremely bad' regardless of the Kotz-led study, she said, and 'greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over.' 'Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption,' she also noted. Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 'as soon as we became aware of an issue' with the data and methodology. 'We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon,' he told AFP. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. 'One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science.' AFP

Google commits $1 billion for AI training at US universities
Google commits $1 billion for AI training at US universities

CNA

time9 hours ago

  • CNA

Google commits $1 billion for AI training at US universities

SAN FRANCISCO :Alphabet's Google on Wednesday announced a three-year, $1 billion commitment to provide artificial intelligence training and tools to U.S. higher education institutions and nonprofits. More than 100 universities have signed on to the initiative so far, including some of the nation's largest public university systems such as Texas A&M and the University of North Carolina. Participating schools may receive cash funding and resources, such as cloud computing credits towards AI training for students as well as research on AI-related topics. The billion-dollar figure also includes the value of paid AI tools, such as an advanced version of the Gemini chatbot, which Google will give to college students for free. Google hopes to expand the program to every accredited nonprofit college in the U.S. and is discussing similar plans in other countries, Senior Vice President James Manyika said in an interview. He declined to specify how much Google is earmarking in direct funds to external institutions relative to footing its own cloud and subscription bills. The announcement comes as rivals like OpenAI, Anthropic and Amazon have made similar pushes around AI in education as the technology pervades society. Microsoft in July pledged $4 billion to bolster AI in education globally. By evangelizing their products to students, tech firms further stand to win business deals once those users enter the workforce. A growing body of research has mapped concerns around AI's role in education, from enabling cheating to eroding critical thinking, prompting some schools to consider bans. Manyika said Google had not faced resistance from administrators since it began to plot its education initiative earlier this year, but "many more questions" about AI-related concerns remain. "We're hoping to learn together with these institutions about how best to use these tools," he said, adding that the insights could help shape future product decisions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store