logo
Dozens of BOULDERS now flying through space at high speed after Nasa test to shield Earth from asteroid smash goes wrong

Dozens of BOULDERS now flying through space at high speed after Nasa test to shield Earth from asteroid smash goes wrong

Scottish Sun16-07-2025
In April 2024, researchers noted that some of the largest boulders might have been set on a collision course with Mars
ROCKY HORROR Dozens of BOULDERS now flying through space at high speed after Nasa test to shield Earth from asteroid smash goes wrong
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THERE may be a flaw in Nasa's only defence against Earth-shattering asteroids, according to new analysis.
In 2022, the US space agency showed for the first time that Earth could indeed shield itself and mankind from "potentially hazardous" space rocks.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
The spacecraft rammed into the middle of the more than 500ft asteroid at around 15,000 mph (24,000 km/h), around 7million miles away from Earth
Credit: NASA
3
The mission was declared a success, as it altered Dimorphos' trajectory, but it also completely changed the shape of the asteroid
Credit: NASA
The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) spacecraft intentionally collided with the asteroid Dimorphos, to knock it off its course.
The spacecraft rammed into the middle of the more than 500ft asteroid at around 15,000 mph (24,000 km/h), around 7million miles away from Earth.
The mission was declared a success, as it altered Dimorphos' trajectory, but it also completely changed the shape of the asteroid.
But in doing so, chunks of debris were knocked loose from the asteroid by the impact.
Now, there are dozens of large "boulders" traveling in space with even greater momentum than predicted, a new study, published in The Planetary Science Journal, has cautioned.
The study raises doubts about the success of future asteroid-deflecting missions.
Analysing images captured by the European Space Agency's LICIACube satellite during DART, researchers were able track 104 boulders as they shot away from the asteroid.
Each hunk of celestial debris measured between 0.7 and 11.8 feet (0.2 to 3.6 meters) across.
They are moving with around three times more momentum than predicted, which is could be the result of "an additional kick" the boulders received as they were pushed away from the asteroid's surface, study lead author Tony Farnham, an astronomer at the University of Maryland, said in a statement.
"That additional factor changes the physics we need to consider when planning these types of missions," he added.
Terrifying video reveals what the impact of city-killer asteroid 2024YR4 hitting Earth in 2032 might look like
The team also noted that the boulders were arranged into unusual patterns.
"We saw that the boulders weren't scattered randomly in space," Farnham said.
"Instead, they were clustered in two pretty distinct groups, with an absence of material elsewhere, which means that something unknown is at work here."
To avoid any future asteroid doom, researchers must consider all the data - no matter how seemingly insignificant it seems.
"If an asteroid was tumbling toward us, and we knew we had to move it a specific amount to prevent it from hitting Earth, then all these subtleties become very, very important," study co-author Jessica Sunshine, an astronomer at the University of Maryland, said in the statement.
"You can think of it as a cosmic pool game. We might miss the pocket if we don't consider all the variables."
This is not the first time scientists have noticed something unexpected about the fallout from the DART mission.
In April 2024, researchers noted that some of the largest boulders might have been set on a collision course with Mars.
The debris could smash into the Red Planet in around 6,000 years, which may endanger any future human colonies living there - if Elon Musk gets his way.
Simulations based on LICIACube data also suggested that some of the smaller asteroid fragments could hit Earth in around 30 years.
Although these pose no threat to our planet, and might instead trigger an epic meteor shower.
However, despite all these uncertainties, smashing a spacecraft into an asteroid is still humanity's most viable option to protect ourselves from any real asteroid threat.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's NASA chief Sean Duffy expedites timeline for nuclear reactor on the moon
Trump's NASA chief Sean Duffy expedites timeline for nuclear reactor on the moon

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Trump's NASA chief Sean Duffy expedites timeline for nuclear reactor on the moon

President Donald Trump's NASA chief Sean Duffy has expedited the timeline to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, according to a directive obtained by The Independent . The space agency has already mentioned the benefits of developing fission surface power (FSP) on the moon and Mars. 'Relatively small and lightweight, fission systems are powerful and could enable robust operations on the Moon and Mars,' NASA writes on its website. The agency says it's currently working with the Energy Department and the space industry to design a fission power system that would provide at least 40 kilowatts of power. In a directive sent to the heads of NASA on July 31, Duffy, the acting administrator of the agency and Trump's transportation secretary, ordered that the nuclear reactor provide at least 100 kilowatts of power and be ready to launch by 2030. NASA chief Sean Duffy has expedited the timeline to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, according to a new directive () The directive, first reported on by Politico, mentioned China and Russia's joint effort to place a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s. The two U.S. adversaries first announced their plans in March 2024. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Duffy warned in the directive. NASA's Artemis campaign aims to establish the first long-term presence on the moon. During Trump's inaugural address, he said the U.S. would launch astronauts 'to plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars.' 'It is about winning the second space race,' a NASA senior official told Politico. An artist's concept of a fission power system on the moon (NASA) In Duffy's new timeline, a Fission Surface Power Program Executive will be designated within 30 days of the directive. The executive 'is empowered to provide reporting and updates with maximum transparency directly to the Administrator,' Duffy wrote. Within 60 days, NASA will ask for industry proposals for the nuclear reactor, according to the directive. The directive mentioned Trump's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year, which includes $350 million for a new program 'that will accelerate the development of high priority technologies for Mars, (i.e. FSP).' The funding would increase up to $500 million starting in the 2027 fiscal year. Trump's budget request also proposes a huge cut to NASA, with The Planetary Society, a global non-profit space organization, reporting it's the smallest budget proposed for the agency since 1961.

US to build nuclear reactor on the moon
US to build nuclear reactor on the moon

Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Telegraph

US to build nuclear reactor on the moon

The US is planning to build a nuclear reactor on the Moon as it seeks to push ahead in the space race. Sean Duffy, the new Nasa head, is preparing to announce plans to install a small reactor on the moon to allow astronauts to undertake lengthy missions on the lunar surface and pave the way for future Mars expeditions. A directive from the space agency, seen by The Telegraph argues that a reactor is necessary to stop rival superpowers effectively colonising the Moon and establishing US 'keep-out' zones. China and Russia previously announced a joint effort to put a reactor on the Moon by the mid-2030s, it notes. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' the directive says, referring to existing plans to explore the Moon and prepare for missions to Mars. Nasa needs to 'move quickly' to 'support a future lunar economy' and 'strengthen our national security in space', it adds. Solar panels are ineffective because nights on the Moon last the equivalent of two weeks on Earth. A Nasa official said: 'If we are going to have a habitable system on the Moon then we have to bring power.' He said small reactors were already in use on submarines and aircraft carriers. 'They solve the problem,' he added. Mr Duffy, who is also the US transport secretary, has directed Nasa to seek industry proposals for a minimum 100 kilowatt reactor to launch by 2030. The agency had already been working on a 40-kilowatt reactor to use on the moon by the early part of the next decade. Mr Duffy was named interim head of Nasa after Donald Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a tech billionaire and commercial astronaut. The move deepened a rift between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the SpaceX billionaire and until that point one of the president's closest political allies. Mr Musk, who had pushed for Mr Isaacman to be named to the top job, wrote on social media in May: 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good hearted'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store