The UK is losing its small fishing boats – and the communities they support
But there are fewer boats than a generation ago, fewer working fishers, and fewer incentives for young people to enter the industry. What was once the beating heart of a coastal community is at risk of becoming a memory in many areas.
Inshore and small-scale fishing boats are those vessels that fish predominantly within 6 nautical miles of the coastline and are usually under 10 metres in length. They make up nearly 80% of the UK fishing fleet. Since they operate close to shore, these boats supply local markets and often land directly onto beaches and into small harbours. Inshore fisheries don't just catch fish, they sustain local economies, cultures and ways of life – but they are disappearing.
Research conducted by ourselves and colleagues confirms that the entire fleet is in decline across the UK. However, this decline is being unevenly felt around the country.
In England alone, between 2008 and 2022, 495 active fishing vessels were lost, equivalent to 20% of the total. Smaller boats were hit hardest: vessels less than 10 metres long declined by 22% – nearly double the 13% fall in larger boats.
These losses are even more severe when fishing activity is taken into account. Days at sea for the under-10 metre fleet fell by 44%, and employment dropped by nearly half (47%).
These numbers don't just reflect a shrinking fleet. Smaller vessels are less able to fish further afield in response to changing fish stocks, bad weather or increasing pressure from other sea users. This suggests that inshore and small-scale fishing families bear a disproportionate share of the challenges faced across the entire fleet.
And once the last boat has gone from a harbour, with all the knowledge of where and how to fish, it is a way of life that could be lost forever.
Why are we losing boats?
The reasons for the decline are complex and shaped by local contexts. Competition for space, restricted access to fishing grounds, insufficient quotas to target diverse fish stocks, limited access to markets, an ageing workforce – all of these things contribute. But there is a deeper problem: a policy framework that prioritises fish stocks and economic yield over people and places.
Too often, fisheries policy in the UK and internationally has focused on sustainability as predominantly a biological problem. Are fish stocks recovering? Are total catch levels within safe limits? These are important questions, but they miss half the story.
A fishery is not just an ecosystem, it's a community. The people who fish, mend nets, manage harbours and sell seafood are integral to the sustainability of coastal life. Without them, we lose not just jobs but a whole chain of economic and social support. Fish processors, boat builders, local shops and, in more rural or island locations, even the basic viability of essential services like schools and healthcare can depend on the continued presence of fishing families.
While small-scale fisheries may be marginal from the perspective of national GDP, fewer boats often means fewer families – and the erosion of a community which makes a seaside town more than just a tourist backdrop. As fishing fades, so too does a sense of local character and identity: elements that distinguish these towns and connect them to their maritime heritage.
What would it take to stem the loss?
A number of solutions are frequently discussed, including quota systems designed to meet community needs, improved harbour facilities for small boats, more visible training opportunities and clearer pathways for young people to enter fishing.
Inshore and small-scale fishers also need to have their voices heard, and to trust their experiences and insight will help shape the future of coastal communities. But lasting change also requires a shift in mindset: to see fishing not just as a source of seafood but as part of a sustainable future for coastal Britain.
The UK government has an important role to play in recognising and addressing the challenges faced by smaller vessels. This aligns with international commitments the UK has already made to support small-scale fisheries, which call for the fair distribution of marine resources and protection of cultural heritage.
But it is not just policymakers who can make a difference. Buying locally landed fish, supporting fishing festivals, learning about local seafood and simply chatting to fishers on the beach or at the harbour – these small acts all help show that people value this work and want it to continue.
The small fishing boats still seen bobbing in UK harbours are more than working vessels – they are signs of a living culture. For those willing to learn the trade, fishing offers a viable independent livelihood and a strong connection to community and the sea.
If we want our coastal communities to thrive, not just survive, action is required before the last boats leave the shore for good.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Sarah Coulthard receives funding from the Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.
Ainsley Hatt and Phoebe Lewis do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Most popular baby names in Dudley revealed
NEW data has revealed what the most popular baby names were in the Dudley Borough last year. Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) released at the end of July have revealed which names were the most sought after for newborns in 2024. Overall in England and Wales, the top three most popular girls' names were Olivia, Amelia and Lily, while leading the boys' rankings were Muhammad, Noah and Oliver. In Dudley, the most popular name for baby girls was Olivia. There were 42 baby girls named Olivia born in the borough in 2024. Leading the boys' ranking was Jacob. In 2024, there were 50 baby boys named Jacob born in Dudley. Parents in the borough seemed to be more unique when it came to naming baby boys last year, with Olivia being the overall most popular name in England and Wales, but Jacob not featuring in the top 10, coming in at number 30 nationally. How does Dudley compare to the rest of the West Midlands? The ONS data also revealed the top 10 baby names for the region as a whole, including the areas of Dudley, Sandwell, Wolverhampton, Walsall, Coventry and Birmingham. Top 10 baby girl names in the West Midlands for 2024: Olivia (254 babies) Amelia (234 babies) Isla (208 babies) Ivy (187 babies) Freya (185 babies) Elsie (183 babies) Lily (182 babies) Ava (181 babies) Poppy (180 babies) Florence (171 babies) Top 10 baby boy names in the West Midlands for 2024: Muhammad (994 babies) Noah (427 babies) Mohammed (397 babies) Oliver (313 babies) George (307 babies) Arthur (305 babies) Leo (296 babies) Luca (260 babies) Arlo (257 babies) Theodore (256 babies)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Do DWP make calls on Sundays or is it a scam?'
People have questioned whether it was normal for the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) to contact them at weekends, or if they were being targeted by scammers. A number of Reddit users reported receiving calls on Sunday, which they thought was unusual. One forum user said their mum had received a text requesting a phone call within an hour to discuss their mandatory reconsideration for Personal Independence Payment (PIP). READ MORE: Morrisons making 'important' change to parking spaces, baskets and trolleys But due to it being sent on Sunday, it made them slightly suspicious. The post read: "My mum got a text about how they want to speak to us in an hour to discuss about the PIP mandatory reconsideration we submitted. "Is this usual for them to call on a Sunday or is it a scam?" One response read: "Someone has commented on another post that they were called today and the DWP agent said they were working overtime to clear a backlog. "That may be why there have been a few posts about Sunday calls. Makes sense!" A second wrote: "Well I don't care what day of the week they call me, I just wish they would hurry up! "I'm heading into nine weeks since submitting my mandatory reconsideration and the stress is really getting to me." Another said: "This is the second post I've seen about a Sunday call today I hope it genuine and not a scam did they call of a landline number or unknown?" This prompted a response from the original poster, who confirmed it was official contact. They said: "Yes, it was genuine and I got the outcome I was hoping for."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How York walls were saved
JONATHAN FRENCH reveals the real story of how the York walls- our precious city landmarks - were saved IN 1799 the Corporation petitioned Parliament for an Act to enable them to demolish the York walls. This petition was supported by the local newspapers and public meetings. Most cities in England had removed their walls by that time. The only exception was Chester where they were restored to provide a public walkway. However the petition was not taken forward. One suspicion was that Archbishop Markham, a close confident of the George III, may have used his influence. The Archbishops of York had the right to collect tolls on Lammas fair in August and they were determined to protect their interests. Matters came to a head when the Corporation demolished the Skeldergate postern in 1807 without consulting the Archbishop. The Church took the matter to court which ruled in the Archbishop's favour. This judgement was reinforced when the Corporation attempted to remove the Micklegate barbican in 1812 and the new Archbishop, Vernon Harcourt, obtained an injunction to prevent it. Enhanced aerial view of Walmgate Bar, c 1900. Picture: Explore York Libraries and Archives The city faced a crisis of accessibility. Its population doubled between 1800 and 1830 and new buildings beyond the walls led to traffic jams at the main gatehouses. In the 1820s, the Corporation, now working in consultation with the Archbishop, removed the barbicans at Micklegate and Monkgate, while preserving the gatehouses. Attitudes to the city's mediaeval past were changing. William Hargrove, latterly editor of the York Herald, in his 1818 history of York celebrated its mediaeval heritage and advocated restoring the walls to create a walkway for the visitor. The formation of the Yorkshire Philosophical Society (YPS) in 1822 provided an organisation for these antiquarian interests. Recommended reading: Whatever happened to York Castle? A sad story of a lost city landmark Is it time to redesign York's coat of arms - and what would we put in it? Recognise this derelict York building - it's quite different today The creation of St Leonard's Place by 1830 exposed structural weaknesses in Bootham Bar. The Corporation initially agreed to demolish the whole gatehouse but a campaign led by Canon William Vernon Harcourt, president of the YPS and the son of the Archbishop, convinced the Corporation to reverse their position. The Archbishop agreed to the removal of the barbican, subject to an agreement that the Walmgate barbican should be retained. York painter William Etty has been is given the credit for this success due to a misleading biography after his death. He was a supporter of preservation and his letter writing was influential but he was absent from the city in this period. Statue of William Etty in Exhibition Square, erected in 1911. Photo - Explore York Libraries and Archives Mutual Ltd It was the Archbishop's suggestion that the York Footpath Association should organise a subscription for the restoration of the southern walls and work commenced in 1831. Further subscriptions were raised to restore the Fishergate walls. Walmgate Bar itself was restored using money from the Great North Railway Company's payment to breach the walls at Barker Tower in 1842. From then on, the Corporation funded restoration but it took a long time to complete. The last stages around Dean Park were delayed when the Dean and others objected to visitors looking down on their gardens but a popular movement in the city persuaded them to back down, enabling final completion by 1889. The role of the Archbishops was well understood at that time. Alderman Brown, a longstanding Councillor said ironically that whilst the Corporation began the century attempting demolition of the walls against Cathedral opposition, 90 years later it completed wall restoration despite Cathedral opposition.