logo
Welsh Labour told to focus on young people, councils and tourism to win election

Welsh Labour told to focus on young people, councils and tourism to win election

Wales Online02-07-2025
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
The political scene in Wales is facing increasing examination as North Wales Live readers share their thoughts on Labour's record and future outlook. There's a significant sense of discontent among the public, especially concerning the Senedd, the Welsh Assembly.
It's clear that Labour in Wales holds a unique position, having maintained power for a prolonged period and still commanding substantial backing. Nonetheless, beneath the "Welsh Labour" label lies a diverse group of individuals rather than a cohesive unit.
The party's leadership in Wales is headed by a figure who wasn't the first choice among numerous elected members and didn't win a ballot of party members. Simultaneously, at the national level, the party leader, although triumphant in the leadership contest, is experiencing dwindling approval ratings.
These dynamics are critical, as Labour prepares for a demanding year ahead, confronting challenges on two primary fronts: the rising appeal of Reform's populist stance and the long-standing rivalry with Plaid Cymru.
One reader, Alwyn67 believes: "Personally, I think Labour will perform poorly in the next Senedd elections, primarily due to the party's unpopularity in Westminster. The vast majority of people I speak to barely know what the Assembly does, let alone name any of its successes over the past 25 years. To be fair, there have been some achievements; new primary school buildings, better covid response, free school meals, improved transport for example. However, policies like the Senedd expansion, the 20mph speed limit, and declining performance in NHS and education are areas where Labour seems unwilling to be honest about the shortcomings or acknowledge lessons learned.
"At Westminster, Labour is really struggling with the difficult realities the country faces - an ageing population, long-term issues caused by Covid, stubborn inflation, a massive public sector deficit (£120 bn per year), and an economy projected to shrink by another 5% over the next five years, on top of the 5% hit already caused by Brexit. Regardless of political leaning; Plaid or Reform voters, left or right, i can't see any easy way out of this. Things are likely to get worse before they get better. Just look at the debate currently going through Parliament on health-related benefits have risen from £20 bn in 2020 to £40 bn in 2025 and are projected to reach £66 bn by 2030. To manage that alone, spending would need to be cut by £26 billion over the next five years. And labour are trying to push through reforms that reduce that only reduce this by 3bn to 23 bn per year."
Dye feels: "There are probably less opportunities for young people in Wales than other parts of the UK. Wales' biggest asset is probably tourism. This current Welsh assembly has needlessly spent money on vanity projects to put themselves on the map instead of focusing on the Welsh economy. The poor infrastructure of getting to tourist locations, high level of parking charges, double Council tax rates for 2nd homes is destroying tourist businesses all over Wales. Poor funding to Councils has resulted in higher Council tax rates with less or poorer services. It's time to let someone else have a go of putting Wales back on its feet."
Expatboyo says: "After so many years of browbeating the people of Wales with their dictatorial ways, the consequences for Labour are becoming clear."
Jonesey1 writes: "Difficult choices to be made at the next election : Welsh Tories have little to no chance. Welsh Labour have mucked it up for a quarter of a century. Plaid Cymru are untested but are unassailably Welsh which might swing it for them. Welsh Liberal Democrats, maybe. Reform UK, no policies other than 'stop the foreigners'. Soooo, decisions, decisions, incapables or no-hopers."
Ofcourseitis comments: "A party on the edge hmm let's analyse why - 20mph, article 4, NHS, Pisa education results tourist tax, 10% hikes in council tax, Cardiff Airport, alcohol tax, meddling with school holidays, cancelling all road projects, meal deal bans, mandatory Welsh lessons, trees in Africa, fields for concerts, active travel routes, net zero everything, anything else?"
SCATHINGPEN thinks: "If Labour retain control of the Assembly (sic) after next year's elections in Wales then Wales is finally and irrevocably finished. If it's bad now, wait and see a few years down the line if Labour continue to hold power."
Toxteth O'Grady thinks: "North Wales is an afterthought in both Cardiff and Westminster. We would be better off aligning with our closest neighbours over the border. They are also hard done by by the London based and obsessed political parties."
Weneedpie questions: "It will be interesting to see how the new polling system work in Wales, and whether with the 'closed proportional list system' it more closely resembles voting cast. In other countries a voting system such as this tends to lead to closer outcomes, with no party gaining enough seats for overall control. Plaid Cymru and Labour in alliance maybe? There is still a long way to go and a week is a long time in politics, but I hope people vote on the issues, and the policies and are not persuaded by a social media party with its cult leader and no costed policies nor yet a party leader for Wales. We really do not need an overlord from Clacton telling us what to do."
Do you feel that the Welsh Labour party's days are numbered? Comment below or HERE to join in the conversation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Monmouth Conservative candidate defects to Reform UK
Former Monmouth Conservative candidate defects to Reform UK

South Wales Argus

time25 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Former Monmouth Conservative candidate defects to Reform UK

Hannah Jarvis, a former deputy chairman of Monmouthshire Conservatives who has stood for the Welsh Conservatives in two general elections and two Police and Crime Commissioner elections, announced her switch to Reform UK, citing the party's commitment to veterans and national priorities. Ms Jarvis, a veteran and mother of two who recently returned from delivering medical supplies to troops in Ukraine, said: "It's time to put country first, and Reform UK are the only party that recognise the concerning state our nation is in and that are serious about tackling the issues that matter to the people of Wales and the UK." She highlights the amount of support for Reform UK that is growing across Monmouthshire. Ms Jarvis said: "I have been overwhelmed at the amount of support for Reform across Monmouthshire, reflecting the strength of feeling of the need for a real change in the county and country – as the polling shows. "The Conservatives have ignored the concerns of the membership for too long and the diminishing party shows just how far they've fallen." She believes Reform UK is the only party prioritising the needs of the armed forces and veterans, pointing to its proposals for a dedicated veterans ministry and an Armed Forces Justice Bill. Her defection follows those of South East Wales MS Laura Anne Jones and former Monmouthshire Conservative chairman Barrie O'Keefe. Ms Jones said: "It's clear with every day that passes that Reform has all the momentum in Welsh politics. "It is great to hear that Hannah is now coming on board too, with her experience and tenacity. "Reform Wales have only just got started, and over the coming months we intend to show everyone our made-in-Wales plans to Reform Wales." She says that Reform is the 'only party' offering 'real change' from what she calls the 'failures of establishment parties at both end of the M4.'

Migrants will be allowed into UK from France for up to three months
Migrants will be allowed into UK from France for up to three months

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Migrants will be allowed into UK from France for up to three months

Migrants in France will be handed a visa to live in Britain for up to three months if they apply through Labour's new 'one in, one out' deal. Details of the new Anglo-French scheme published by the Home Office today revealed applicants will be able to come to this country while their final application is considered. Documents said each successful applicant who meets a number of criteria would be 'granted entry clearance to come to the UK for a period of up to three months' after completing an online application. They will not be allowed access to public funds and will also be barred from working or studying during the initial three month period, while the Home Office considers whether it will grant a longer visa. It is unclear where the migrants will be housed, however, opening the prospect of them being placed in taxpayer-funded hotels. Furthermore, it is not known what would happen to migrants allowed into Britain under the scheme if their applications were later refused. The Home Office also confirmed applicants could be penalised of they fail to 'present for travel to the UK, without reasonable excuse, when directed by the Home Office'. The number of people accepted from France will have a 'cap' equal to the number of small boat migrants who are sent back under the deal, the documents showed. But the Home Office was unable to confirm the level of the cap. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'There are scant details as yet but this risks turning into yet another wide open door into the UK. 'It is not clear what will happen if the Home Office accepts people whose applications are rejected later on, and whether they can be removed. 'And what if the Home Office accepts people without being able to remove the same number to France due to legal challenges? 'There are a lot of unanswered questions and this risks descending into yet another Labour borders farce.' It came after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs'. Migrants who arrive by small boat from tomorrow could face being selected for the scheme and placed in detention. Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The agreement with Emmanuel Macron's government will lapse at the end of June next year – just 47 weeks away – unless it is renewed. Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,350 would be returned before the agreement expires. By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of the year, up 49 per cent on the same period last year. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are poised to bring legal challenges – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. Steve Valdez-Symonds of Amnesty International UK said: 'We anticipate that this deal is likely to face legal challenges from people who quite reasonably will resist being swapped around like mere fodder rather than addressing the claim for asylum they have made. 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy. 'If and when there is some real detail on how this deal is intended to work, Amnesty will of course consider what further steps we ought to take.' Natasha Tsangarides, of the charity Freedom from Torture, said: 'While this pilot offers a pathway to sanctuary for a small number of refugees, it will rely on the mass detention of survivors of torture and persecution. 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery. 'A more secure world for everyone depends on international cooperation not only to ensure safety for survivors but also to stop repression.' From tomorrow, any new Channel arrivals will be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent, and assessed by Border Force officials. Any selected for the returns scheme will be transferred to short-term immigration holding facilities operated by the Home Office, such as those at Heathrow and Gatwick airports. After further assessment, they could be sent to an immigration removal centre to await return to France. The first migrants will be returned by the end of August and detention space has already been set aside for the launch of the scheme. The deal was agreed by PM Sir Keir Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron last month after a summit at Downing Street.

‘Nail in the coffin': Jeremy Corbyn criticises Angela Rayner over allotment sales
‘Nail in the coffin': Jeremy Corbyn criticises Angela Rayner over allotment sales

ITV News

timean hour ago

  • ITV News

‘Nail in the coffin': Jeremy Corbyn criticises Angela Rayner over allotment sales

Jeremy Corbyn has criticised Angela Rayner for approving the sale of eight allotment sites in England since Labour took power, in order to raise money for councils budgets. The former Labour leader - who launched a new party with Zarah Sultana in July - said the government is putting a "nail in the coffin" for allotment holders. Rayner, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, has approved the sale of sites in Somerset, Oxfordshire, Hertfordshire, Nottinghamshire, West Sussex, Derbyshire and Kent. Under the Allotments Act 1925, land that is designated "statutory allotment" cannot be sold or repurposed without ministerial consent. Corbyn is a keen horticulturist and has been using an allotment near Islington, North London, for 22 years. Writing in The Telegraph, he said the move will "fill many with dismay". "Allotments have always been under threat from developers. Now, that threat seems to have government backing, which makes the future of these precious spaces even more perilous," he wrote. He added: "Once lost, they never return. Their loss makes us all poorer, as we become more and more detached from how food is grown and how nature interacts with us. "Allotments provide a vital space for community cohesion, biodiversity and social solidarity. These parcels of land, that cannot be individually fenced, provide growing space for many people." However, Corbyn has argued that "instead of contemplating sales of these wonderful spaces, the Government should be encouraging the growth of allotments, or where there is insufficient land, the growth of community and school gardens." While he acknowledged that social housing is "desperately needed", he disagreed that we should "sacrifice" allotments to build it. "Is this Government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon? The battle for the grass roots is on!" Green Party peer Jenny Jones also criticised the decision, saying "it seems there are no green spaces that are safe under this Labour government." "Allotments are valuable spaces to promote physical and mental health, help with local food security, encourage a gift culture amongst allotment holders and their neighbours, and offer a sanctuary for nature," she said in a statement. "Labour should know that they are especially important for people who don't have the privilege of their own garden, i.e. many of those who vote - or used to vote - Labour." She added that councils need to be offered "proper funding by central government, not pushed into selling off these vital community assets." In a statement, the National Allotment Society (NAS) said they wanted to "reassure plot holders and the wider public that no changes have been made to the statutory protections afforded to allotments in England and Wales." They added that statutory allotments cannot be sold or disposed of without following strict legal procedures, and without consultation with NAS. "We are aware of the allotment sites mentioned in the press," they said. "In each of those cases, due process has been followed, and in some instances alternative or replacement allotment provision has been secured as part of the disposal process." A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) spokesperson said: "We know how important allotments are for communities, and that is why strict criteria is in place to protect them. 'The rules on the sale of assets have been in place since 2016 and have not changed. 'Ministerial approvals for the sale of allotments in 2024 were lower than the average for recent years.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store