&w=3840&q=100)
Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $200 million in Autopilot crash case
The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars.
The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months.
The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial.
This will open the floodgates, said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.
The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident.
Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied.
In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there.
It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Elon Musk's latest shocker to Google and OpenAI with Text-to-Video feature on Grok, but with a twist; only THESE users will have access
New Delhi: Elon Musk has added a new Text-to-Video feature to GrokAI. This feature of Grok AI will create videos based on text commands. It will give tough competition to the text-to-video generation of Google's Veo3 and OpenAI's Elon Musk has named this feature Imagine. As the name suggests, this feature will work to generate videos based on your imagination. How did Musk share this information? Elon Musk has given this information from his X handle. Musk said in his post that users will be able to use this new Imagine feature by updating their X app. However, users will be kept on the waitlist for the Grok Imagine feature. This Imagine feature of Grok will generate excellent videos through text commands. This feature will work on Grok's latest large language model. Update your app and request to be on the waitlist for @Grok Imagine — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 2, 2025 What is the controversy over Imagine? Like Gemini Veo3 and Sora, videos can be generated in it based on text prompts. However, a new spicy mode will be given in GrokAI's Imagine. In this, users will be able to create a 6-second video clip. However, controversy has also come up regarding this feature. Many users say that obscenity will be promoted through this feature. Who will get access to Imagine? X Premium users will currently be given beta access to the GrokAI Imagine feature. However, the company will choose selected users for this. Those who are heavy users of Grok AI will be given beta access to beta Imagine first. Apart from this, Valentine mode has also been added to GrokAI. Beta access to this feature has also been given to premium users. Valentine mode has an imaginary character, with whom users can interact and share their heart. It will work like a digital friend for the users.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Electric cars: Still needing a push?
People have been dreaming about electric cars for a long time. In fact, the first electric car, called the Electrobat, was already driving around in 1894! And in 1909, an electric car even beat a petrol (gasoline) car in a traffic race. So why aren't electric cars everywhere by now? Right now, only about 25 out of every 100 cars sold in the world are electric. That may sound like a lot, but most of these cars are made and bought in just one country — China. That means in the rest of the world, most people still use petrol or diesel cars, called ICE cars (short for internal combustion engine). Even Tesla, the most famous electric car company, is struggling. It's selling fewer cars in Europe, and it's making less money. One big reason Tesla made so much money before was by selling something called carbon credits — basically, rewards from the government for making clean cars. But those rewards are starting to go away, especially in the US. And soon, people in the US will also lose a big $7,500 discount they got for buying electric cars. China also spent a huge amount of money — around $231 billion — to help its electric car industry grow. Now, Chinese carmakers are building more cars than people want to buy, which is causing problems. This raises a big question: If electric cars are really the future, why do they still need so much help from governments? When Henry Ford built his Model T car in 1908, it cost $850. Within a few years, he made it so efficiently that it cost only $300 — and millions of people bought it. He didn't need any government help to do that. Electric cars are amazing for the planet. But maybe, just maybe, they need to learn how to survive without help — and roll forward on their own four wheels. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Hire Americans': Miami hotel slammed for outsourcing front desk to India
A video that shows the front desk of a Florida hotel being manned by a virtual receptionist has sparked outrage in the United States. The video has raised concerns about American jobs being outsourced to other countries at a time when the anti-immigrant sentiment is at an all-time high. A video of a virtual receptionist at an American hotel has sparked outcry (Instagram/@languageguy1) Video of virtual front desk staffer sparks outrage The video was first shared by Pete Langs (@languageguy1) on TikTok and Instagram. It shows Langs checking into his room with the help of a man who sits not at the front desk but appears on a screen during the check-in process. 'Do you need one room key or two room keys?' the virtual front desk employee asks Langs, who replies, 'Two, just in case I lose one.' The receptionist, speaking over a video call through the screen, issues further check-in instructions and generates the registration form. 'Miami virtual check in at hotels!' Langs wrote while sharing the video on TikTok and Instagram. The video was reposted on X, where it sparked outcry against Indians for 'stealing' American jobs. Although there is nothing in the video to indicate that the front desk employee is Indian or not living in the US, viewers surmised from his appearance and accent that he belongs to the subcontinent. 'Hire Americans' 'Miami hotel has outsourced their front desk to India. Guests are checked in virtually on video call with an Indian representative,' read the caption on X. 'More American jobs outsourced overseas. At some point this should just become illegal. If you make money in America, you should hire Americans'. The comments section of the video was therefore quickly flooded with outrage as Americans blamed Indians for taking jobs. Many people also slammed the hotel for outsourcing the front desk role to someone sitting outside the US. 'So American jobs are being taken by Indian people overseas AND AI at the same time. Two slaps in the face,' a user said. 'The irony is people will hate the Indians who are just doing a job while completely ignoring the American bosses and shareholders who actually made the decision to outsource these jobs in the first place,' another pointed out. 'It's up to people to actually walk out. The problem is these hotels are cheaper than everyone else because they're hiring outside the country,' a third added.
