England's Ben Stokes and India's Gautam Gambhir race to the bottom in the moral high ground stakes
It didn't take long, of course. There was the finger wagging and verbals when Zak Crawley staged his late evening go-slow at Lord's.
Mohammed Siraj talked and nudged his way on to the naughty step in the same game. Now the captains and coaches are having a pop with the series on the line. You love to see it.
Lacking grace
Seeing your team take four wickets in 143 overs – or just two in 142, as it turned out – is enough to make even the most mild-mannered cricketer tired and emotional. And Ben Stokes could never be accused of being that.
His decision to try to guilt trip Washington Sundar out of a maiden Test century at the end of the fourth Test was misguided.
It also meant he ended the game under a cloud despite having scored a century, taken a five-for, and won the player of the match award. Milestones, eh?
But, over and above the debate about Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja hanging on till they made tons, there was merit in India staying out to bat the duration.
Both teams are weary, and there is a short turnaround till the final Test. Why not stay out there and put even more miles into the legs of England's bowlers?
Enter Gambhir
After the Stokes handshake shenanigans, India had assumed the moral high ground. Then, in blundered Gautam Gambhir in the race to the bottom.
The India coach might be one of the spikiest figures in the recent history of cricket, but he was absolutely within his rights to defend his players at the end of the game at Old Trafford.
What was less palatable was his fall out with the Oval groundsman as soon as prep started for the next game.
Lee Fortis, a giant of a man who definitely plays the heavy roller to Gambhir's light one, threatened to report India to the match referee as their players swarmed all over his lovely wicket at training.
"Groundsman in wanting people to stay off his grass shock" the headline might well have read.
'You have no right to tell us what to do,' Gambhir stropped. 'You are just a groundsman, nothing beyond that. You are just a groundsman.'
Lack of Grace Cup final: England 1-1 India.
Both barrels
'I just want him to sort of take a chill pill sometimes', Sanjay Manjrekar said of Gambhir, India's Captain Grumpy, after the coach's tetchiness in Manchester.
Not all would agree. Another former Indian opener, whose punchiness similarly supersedes his own physical stature, reckons India should keep going full bore.
Sunil Gavaskar was always going to be box office after the Old Trafford controversies. The India great-turned-commentator urged Shubman Gill to ask a question himself at the press conference. He said he would have queried why Stokes batted on so long before declaring England's innings.
'I know he will not, he is too nice a guy,' Gavaskar said of Gill. 'He is not like this SG [Gavaskar himself.] That SG [Gill] is different.'
The actual cricket
While the war of words is gathering pace, the players themselves are actually slowing down.
By all reports, Jasprit Bumrah will not be able to nurse his tender back through another Test so quickly after the toils of Manchester.
Short of a last-minute switcheroo, his name is likely to be missing from India's XI when Stokes and Gill trade team sheets ahead of the toss in South London.
England themselves are walking wounded and the bowling attack is running on fumes. Stokes himself will surely play, after saying that 'pain is just an emotion' after the last Test.
Whether Jofra Archer, Chris Woakes and Brydon Carse are all there alongside him seems unlikely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
7 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
England in driving seat as India reach 204-6 in 5th Test
England gained the upper hand after a rain-hit first day of the final Test against India at The Oval on Thursday as the tourists, needing victory to square the series, battled to 204-6, with all their big guns dismissed cheaply. England had to work hard for their breakthroughs and will be delighted to have got rid of KL Rahul, Ravindra Jadeja and Shubman Gill, the men who have tormented them throughout the summer, though captain Gill gifted his wicket with a suicidal run-out. Even though there are four days remaining, India's chances of fighting their way into a position where they could force a victory already look extremely slim. The overcast morning conditions had looked ideal for England's all-seam attack, even without injured captain Ben Stokes, but they lacked a cutting edge. Recalled Gus Atkinson trapped Yashasvi Jaiswal lbw for two as stand-in captain Ollie Pope finally got on the right side of a DRS review after 14 unsuccessful appeals last year. Rahul, with over 500 runs to his name from the first four matches, looked relatively untroubled before playing-on to Chris Woakes for 14 as India reached lunch on 72-2. Gill, averaging over 90 and with four centuries to his name in the series, then inexplicably set off for a non-existent single and was run out by four yards as bowler Atkinson had time to transfer the ball to his right hand before throwing down the stumps. Gill had started the day with all sorts of records in his sights but, by adding only 21, he achieved only a couple as his tally of 743 took him beyond West Indies' Garfield Sobers (722 in 1966) as the highest-scoring visiting captain and also moved him into the top nine for the most runs scored in a series in England - either for or against the hosts. After a rain-delayed restart, a wayward Josh Tongue, whose first over lasted nine balls and went for 12 runs, finally found his line to nip the edge of Sai Sudharsan's bat to dismiss him for 38. Tongue repeated the feat soon afterwards to remove Jadeja – who scored a superb unbeaten century in his team's rearguard action in the fourth Test - for nine and India were reeling on 123-5 with their big-hitters all gone, or in the case of Rishabh Pant, absent through injury. Dhruv Jurel, a ball after overturning an lbw decision against him, then got tucked up by Atkinson and was caught neatly at second slip by Harry Brook for 19. Karun Nair batted calmly to finish on 52 not out and Washington Sundar, another centurion last Sunday, was on 19 at the close as the impressive Atkinson finished the day with figures of two for 31 off 19 overs. It was a less enjoyable day for Woakes, who suffered a serious-looking shoulder injury after falling heavily as he dived to try to prevent a boundary in the final overs.
Khaleej Times
10 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
First Russian woman to complete English Channel swim opens up about UAE's endurance swimmers
Recently, Elvis Ali Hazarika, a highly accomplished Indian swimmer, made headlines once again by completing the English Channel swim, the iconic open-water swimming challenge from England to France, in a relay mode. A former South Asian Games silver medalist in 50m and 100m freestyle, the 41-year-old has been in hot pursuit of excellence since switching to open-water swimming eight years ago. His career highlights as an endurance swimmer also include a two-way swim between Cape Town and Robben Island. 'This journey wasn't just about endurance, strength, or cold waters — it was about the fire that burns within, and the love and support that surrounds you,' Hazarika wrote on social media hours after accomplishing the English Channel relay feat. While India may not have produced Olympic and World Championship medalists in the pool, Hazarika is the latest in a long list of endurance swimmers from the South Asian country. Endurance swimming in UAE So that brings us to the UAE, a melting pot of cultures and an elite sporting destination. The UAE has not only hosted the World Aquatics Swimming Championships (25m) in 2010 and 2021, but it has also produced swimmers who have qualified for the Olympics. So can we expect to see endurance swimmers from the UAE who can take on the world's biggest open-water challenges? If you throw this question at Natalya Pankina, a Dubai resident and the first Russian woman to complete the English Channel solo swim, you will feel a wave of optimism. 'It's not impossible. I am hopeful that somebody from the UAE will emerge and do this in the future,' said Pankina, who represented the Russian national open-water team for more than 10 years. Pankina then opened up about the challenges of becoming an elite endurance swimmer. 'To become a top (open-water) swimmer, you need to put in a lot of effort, you need to be mentally very strong,' she said. 'Also, the ability to cope with cold water in the sea is key. And last but not least, you need to be patient and wait for the right time after the right amount of physical and mental training.' Outdoor swimming is gaining momentum in the UAE with the Dubai Sports Council organising a host of open-water events, including the La Mer Open Water Swim and Arena Open Water Swim. 'In the last 10 years or so, open-water swimming has become more popular in the UAE,' said Pankina, who moved to Dubai in 2010. 'So many events now happen here, and even many Emiratis participate in them. So it's very encouraging to see this, and hopefully someone will emerge and take the big challenges (in the future).' Need full-time swimmers Pankina was an elite athlete who also came tantalisingly close to winning a medal at the 2007 World Championship, missing the bronze by 10 seconds in the 25km open-water event. The UAE, on the other hand, sees mostly amateurs jumping into the seawater. Two such Dubai-based amateurs are Maher El-Tabchy, a businessman, and Eric Robertsen, a banker by profession, who share a love for endurance swimming. In March this year, El-Tabchy and Robertsen joined hands and swam 29 kilometres from The World Islands to the Dubai shore to raise awareness about autism and juvenile arthritis. 'Both of them (Maher and Eric) are very good,' said Pankina, who trains swimmers at I Love Supersport academy. 'Maher is stubborn. Once he sets a goal for himself in terms of what challenge he will take, he goes hard for it. Eric is also very strong and dedicated, and I know he has the ambition to do the English Channel.' But having an ambition alone is not enough to be ready for the mother of all endurance swimming challenges. 'They (Robertsen and El-Tabchy) have their families, businesses and jobs to take care of. They are not full-time swimmers,' Pankina said. 'They have taken some open-water swimming challenges abroad, but to do the big ones like the English Channel, you need to be completely devoted to swimming. That's why it's not easy for amateurs." Making of an endurance swimmer Pankina, who was trained to be an elite endurance swimmer from a very young age, completed the English Channel Solo swim in August 2007, becoming the first woman from Russia to achieve the feat. She took eight hours and 11 minutes to cover the distance of 33 kilometres from England to France. 'If I had started the swim 45 minutes earlier, I would have broken the world record for women,' the 42-year-old recalled. 'My time was 20 minutes ahead of the world record until the last five kilometres, but the weather conditions and the currents changed dramatically, and I lost out on the world record. 'Having said that, finishing it and becoming the first Russian woman to do it was a great moment in my life because the English Channel swim is so famous. But I also did a lot of open-water challenges in Russia, which were even tougher because of the conditions, the water was so cold!' While Pankina is proud of her English Channel exploits, she hopes to produce a swimmer in the UAE who can put the country on the global map of long-distance swimming. 'The most important thing is to have a special mindset because it's a huge mental work, the mental challenge is even bigger than the physical challenge,' she said. 'I was part of the Russian national open-water swimming team for 11 years, so I know how it works. You have to train for many years and many hours, non-stop. Physically, you need different types of muscles for long-distance swimming.' So does the UAE have such swimmers? 'Yes, we have some good swimmers,' she said. 'But we need to be patient with them, and they need to be patient as well. It's going to take time, but, as I said, it's not impossible.'
The National
11 hours ago
- The National
Why Test cricket is not so boring, despite appearances
I'm no cricket fan. I watch it infrequently, and that too towards the end of a game – which means the last five overs or so – when you hear from seemingly every other Indian you know that there's excitement building. But the past few weeks of watching Test cricket without loathing that time in front of the TV (which is sometimes muted, depending on who the commentators are), has come as a surprise. Without getting into the weeds too much, a Test match is where two international teams play each other over five days, with each team batting twice (two innings each) with the aim of scoring more runs than the other team, while having to bowl all the batters out. Thankfully, these matches grow into the weekend. The anticipation builds. People stay put on sofas watching ball after ball, run after run, given reason occasionally to exult. The fifth and final Test match of India's tour of England starts on Thursday, ends on Monday. The series started in June and will end in August. It's been a summer of sporting distraction. To explain to cricket atheists what the fuss is can be pointless, especially as there can be instances, like last week, where after five days the match ends in a draw or a stalemate. It may be no use trying to persuade the uninterested that there is a pay-off to sticking with it, watching patiently for grit and character of these players to rise to the surface. Five days is just more demanding than a match that's over in 90 minutes, three hours or even eight hours, in any sport. Muscles begin to complain, and the consistency required can be mentally wearing for the players even as it is their job to overcome these obstacles. I don't remember the last time I voluntarily watched Test cricket. World Cup games are different; those are quicker, played over eight hours, often social affairs, and wickets always seem to fall just as you get up for a loo break. It is unremarkable perhaps to have found an interest – even astonishingly, respect – for a game that is hardly short of admirers, at least in Commonwealth countries where they are mostly played, and has been around since the 1800s. Its old-fashioned quality is partly why watching it can feel comforting. Its dipping viewership numbers, however, are understandable – especially given that Test cricket is not about instant gratification. It doesn't feel easy. It is not immediately rewarding. It requires patience, both playing it and watching it. Its essence seems to have delightfully little overlap with the constant turnover of TikTok or Insta reels. I don't remember the last time I voluntarily watched Test cricket. It is unremarkable perhaps to have found an interest – even astonishingly, respect – for a game that is hardly short of admirers Yes, you could watch 15-second highlights if you've missed chunks of the match, or just want to relive a segment of sporting excellence. But relying solely on them is taking a shortcut and not putting in the hours to 'stay with' and watch the bowlers, the fielders, the batters who've been at the crease (where they stand) for hours, chipping away, steadily accumulating runs, working for the team and displaying, you hope, at some point or another during the match: form, fitness, flair, strength, ability and determination, despite the exhaustion of playing the whole day in the sun. All these grand life themes are often on display on the field for five days. The duration though is not the least of what in the past I have found about the game to be brimming with tedium and just plain unwatchable. The monotony seemed lethal – a green field with specks in white uniform not moving around very much. The measured commentary, not too high or low pitched, little variation in tone, used to be ideal white noise to nap to (and can still be, depending on who has the microphone). Even as I can't claim to be able to tell the difference between a fielding position from a shot played or a ball delivered – what is a mid-off? what is a leg bye? why does no one yell 'Googly!' anymore? – it's not hard to know which players are having a bad day at the office, who's had a longer streak of terrible luck, and who is harnessing some preternatural gift to talk to the bat. This can be moving to watch. On a regular day, where exuberance isn't really an every-hour event, it's presumably alright to look forward to what moves you. And to root for the team that you do and see if they're up to the task. But those playing for the love of a vocation that demands all that raw stuff – endurance, steadiness of purpose and the steeliness to perform for your team and country – even as they're buoyed by several thousands of cheering fans in the stadium, and so many more remotely watching on screens, deserves a degree of admiration. It takes time perhaps to learn to see what it's about. And build an appreciation for the physical and mental calibre required. One then thinks of the work and practice that would have gone in for years before these players reach a level where they can take the stage, at the historic Lord's Cricket Ground in London, or at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, or Kolkata's Eden Gardens, or wherever. For that, regardless of the eventual score and who takes home the trophy, even an unwilling fan can at least willingly clap.
