
Why Trump Hasn't Turned on Syria's New Leader Amid Execution of US Citizen
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump's endorsement of Syrian Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa is being tested amid sectarian violence that has led to the execution-style murder of at least one U.S. citizen in the restive country's south.
But analysts and former officials say the situation is complicated by the murky nature of the carnage, with a number of groups both under and outside of the government's control involved in clashes, as well as the opposing roles of two U.S. allies, Israel and Turkey, and a lack of credible alternatives in Damascus.
For the past week, the Trump administration has pushed for a ceasefire, both between militias aligned with the Druze minority in southwestern Al-Sweida and Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes, as well as between Syria and Israel, which has conducted strikes on security forces accused of backing the Bedouins.
The situation took a grisly new turn in recent days when video surfaced appearing to show eight men being held at gunpoint and later shot to death at close range by armed individuals wearing military fatigues in Al-Sweida. One of the victims was said to be a dual Syrian-U.S. national. The State Department confirmed Monday that a U.S. citizen had been killed in Syria.
A picture shows a promotional poster bearing the portrait of Syrian Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa next to a defaced portrait of U.S. President Donald Trump, bearing the words "God is Greater" in Arabic, in the...
A picture shows a promotional poster bearing the portrait of Syrian Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa next to a defaced portrait of U.S. President Donald Trump, bearing the words "God is Greater" in Arabic, in the capital Damascus on July 9, 2025. More
LOUAI BESHARA/AFP/Getty Images
Media outlets later identified the slain American as 35-year-old Hosam Saraya, a dual Syrian-U.S. citizen living in Oklahoma City who was believed to be visiting family at the time of his murder.
As outrage builds among critics of Sharaa's government, Middle East experts who spoke to Newsweek cautioned that the scene on the ground is chaotic, and it is not yet clear who was behind Saraya's killing.
Aaron Y. Zelin, senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and founder of the Jihadology research network, said the deteriorating situation in Syria presents a "complicated issue" that limits U.S. options seven months after the downfall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"The question is: 'What's the alternative?' And I think that's been one of the biggest questions most people have had since the fall of the Assad regime," Zelin told Newsweek. "Because in many ways, the alternative to there being this government, it will most look likely look like what we saw last week, where it's just total chaos throughout the country."
Trump's Shift on Sharaa
Assad's ouster at the hands of an Islamist-led coalition headed by Sharaa's former Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) militant group in December marked a stunning reversal of the country's 14-year civil war, during which Assad was backed by both Iran and Russia. The move prompted initial hopes from Assad's opponents that Sharaa, who promptly appointed himself interim president, may stabilize the war-torn nation.
The incoming Trump administration initially appeared skeptical. Trump urged that the U.S. stay out of the "mess" in Syria, while his soon-to-be Vice President JD Vance likened the victorious insurgents to jihadis such as the Islamic State militant group (ISIS), which had targeted Christians and other minorities in Syria.
The remarks echoed past comments expressed by Trump that indicated his skepticism of rebel groups in Syria. While Trump twice ordered direct strikes on Syrian government sites in response to alleged chemical weapon attacks during his first administration, he remained largely opposed to regime change and sought to reduce the U.S. military presence in Syria.
The new White House was not alone in its doubts toward Sharaa, but the interim president was quickly courted by a number of regional leaders. His commitments to eschewing past extremist ideology and overseeing a more inclusive future for Syria were soon undermined, however, by violent clashes that appeared to target religious and ethnic minority communities in majority-Sunni Arab Syria, including Alawites, Druze and Kurds.
Syrian soldiers raise the Syrian national flag in front of the Syrian Defense Ministry building, which was heavily damaged by Israeli airstrikes, in Damascus, Syria, Saturday, July 19, 2025.
Syrian soldiers raise the Syrian national flag in front of the Syrian Defense Ministry building, which was heavily damaged by Israeli airstrikes, in Damascus, Syria, Saturday, July 19, 2025.
Omar Sanadiki/AP Photo
The violence drew repeated warnings from the State Department, but the Trump administration simultaneously sought to empower rather than weaken Sharaa's nascent government in an apparent bid to rein in the activity of the various militias that made up his victorious coalition.
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government railed against Sharaa, conducting strikes on Damascus and ordering a land incursion to seize further territory beyond the already Israel-occupied Golan Heights in southern Syria. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued threats to Israel as he sought to build regional support for Damascus' new ruler.
The turning point for the White House appeared to come in May when Trump met with Sharaa during a visit to Saudi Arabia and ultimately agreed to lift Assad-era sanctions on Syria, a decision for which Erdogan had advocated. The U.S. went on to remove the foreign terrorist organization designation of Sharaa's HTS just days before the latest violence in Al-Sweida erupted.
As the Trump administration pushed for a cessation of hostilities, the U.S. issued a rare rebuke of its closest Middle East ally, Israel, over its strikes against Syrian security forces and the Syrian Defense Ministry in Damascus, while calling on all sides to de-escalate.
"On the one hand, Israel wants stability on its border," Zelin said, "but with the Syrian government not being allowed to go in and create the order, then it makes the situation worse in some ways, because then local actors that are only in it for revenge don't necessarily care about statecraft."
"And so, a lot of people working on Syria in the U.S. government felt that Israel, in many ways, poured gasoline on a situation that no doubt was problematic and they're trying to resolve with local authorities, but made the situation last longer and led to more death than necessarily would have happened otherwise."
Newsweek has reached out to the Syrian Information Ministry and the U.S. State Department for comment.
Syrian Druze fighters pose for a photograph after Syrian government forces temporarily pulled out of the southern Al-Sweida governorate, on July 17, 2025.
Syrian Druze fighters pose for a photograph after Syrian government forces temporarily pulled out of the southern Al-Sweida governorate, on July 17, 2025.
SHADI AL-DUBAISI/AFP/Getty Images
'No Plan B'
Echoing Zelin, James Jeffrey, who previously served as U.S. special representative for Syria and special envoy for the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS during Trump's first administration, also argued that the White House saw few other options than help Sharaa restore order rather than further destabilize his rule.
"The administration knows there is no alternative to a unified strong Syria—or rather that the alternative is the horrors of Assad, the civil war and return of Iran," Jeffrey told Newsweek.
"Al-Sharaa has so far been successful de-escalating these crises—in eight months only two plus a minor one months ago with the Druze, and he does carry out investigations," he added. "None of this is perfect, but it is in stark contrast to the sad norm."
He cited the words of Trump's current envoy to Syria, Thomas Barrack, who told the Associated Press on Monday that there is "no Plan B" when it comes to Syria's current leadership.
Prior to his defeat and departure to Russia, the strongman Assad ruled Syria for nearly 25 years, more than half of which were mired in civil war between government factions, rebels and jihadis, with the U.S. later intervening in support of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to fight ISIS. Assad succeeded his father, Hafez al-Assad, who ruled the country from 1971 until his death in 2000.
U.S. ties with both Assads fluctuated over the decades, though Washington ultimately severed ties with Damascus in the early stages of the civil war, with then-President Barack Obama backing rebel groups until shifting aid to the SDF in 2015.
While publicly averse to becoming too deeply involved in Syria's complex, multisided and ongoing conflict and often critical of his predecessors' policies, Trump has remained active on the issue since coming to office in January.
President Donald Trump shakes hands with Syria Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on May 14, 2025.
President Donald Trump shakes hands with Syria Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on May 14, 2025.
Bandar Aljaloud/Saudi Royal Palace/AP
"On Syria, the first consideration is that the administration sees it as critically important even central to stabilizing the region," Jeffrey said. "It understands the problems."
These problem include, he explained, a "devastated state and society, armed ethnic/religious minority enclaves not enthused about a unitary Syrian state, external players—Israel and [Turkey] decisively, Russia and Iran for the moment less decisively—intervening, and last but most important central government security forces that are weak and to some degree tend to add fuel to, rather than calm, local conflicts as seen in Suwayda and earlier in Latakia."
No Guarantees
The degree to which Saraya's death may prove further incendiary remains to be seen.
But Jeffrey argued that it was likely to have some effect, if not a limited one, as was the case when a U.S. citizen was reportedly beaten to death by Israeli settlers in the West Bank earlier this month, prompting demands for a probe by the Trump administration, which earlier lifted its predecessor's sanctions on Israeli settlers accused of inciting deadly violence.
"Killing any American citizen, as we are seeing in Israel, at least in short term changes tone and substance of relations," James said.
The fallout for Damascus has the potential to be more serious. Though Trump continues to evaluate Sharaa as a potential partner for security in the region, the Syrian leader he once touted as a "young, attractive guy" with a "very strong past" and "a real shot at holding it together" runs the risk of alienating the White House should other factors outweigh the U.S. president's calculus.
"It would be a mistake, in my opinion, for anyone to believe that President Trump's stance on Syria—or anything else—won't change," Dareen Khalifa, senior adviser at the International Crisis Group, told Newsweek.
"Although it's hard to predict what would trigger a shift in his calculus...it could be photos or videos of sectarian violence, or it could be Israeli pressure, or a mix of both," she added, "but the bottom line is I don't think Damascus should take Trump's position for granted—and for what it's worth, I don't think they do."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Sheriff's Deputy Sued by Colorado After Allegedly Tipping Off ICE Agents
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Colorado sheriff's deputy is facing a lawsuit from the state's attorney general over allegations that he aided federal immigration agents in the arrest of a college student with an expired visa. Deputy Alexander Zwinck of the Mesa County Sheriff's Office has been accused of unlawfully sharing the student's personal information with federal agents, according to a lawsuit filed by Attorney General Phil Weiser. "State law specifies that Colorado law enforcement officers are dedicated to enforcing Colorado law and do not do the work of the federal government to enforce immigration law," Weiser said a statement. Newsweek has contacted the Mesa County Sheriff's Office for comment via email outside office hours. A banner to welcome immigrants is placed over the main entrance to the Denver City and County Building on February 26, 2018. A banner to welcome immigrants is placed over the main entrance to the Denver City and County Building on February 26, 2018. David Zalubowski/AP Why It Matters President Donald Trump has directed his administration to remove millions of migrants without legal status to fulfill his campaign pledge of widespread mass deportations. The White House has maintained that anyone living in the country unlawfully is considered to be a criminal. Colorado and Denver have enacted sanctuary laws designed to limit local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. These laws seek to protect undocumented immigrants by restricting the sharing of personal information with federal authorities and preventing local law enforcement from assisting in immigration arrests. Critics argue that sanctuary laws impede immigration enforcement operations. What To Know Zwinck allegedly shared personal information about a 19‑year‑old Utah nursing student—including her driver's license, vehicle registration and insurance—via a Signal group chat used by a regional drug task force that included Homeland Security Investigations personnel. On June 5, Caroline Dias Goncalves was pulled over by police in Fruita, Colorado, while on her way to Denver. Shortly after being let go by the officer, she was stopped again a few miles away in Grand Junction—this time by immigration agents. After learning from federal immigration officers in a group chat that the student had no criminal record but was in the country on an expired visa, Zwinck allegedly directed her to remain in his patrol car for about five minutes, questioning her about her accent and place of birth. According to the lawsuit, he then let her go with a warning but informed the agents of her vehicle description and travel direction, enabling them to intercept and arrest her. Zwinck apparently responded to news of the arrest with "rgr, nice work," and an ICE agent praised him as "interdictor of the year." On June 10, Zwinck allegedly repeated similar actions, sharing another individual's driver's license photo, vehicle details and location to assist with an immigration arrest. When informed that the person was wanted by ICE, Zwinck allegedly quipped, "We better get some b****in Christmas baskets from you guys," according to the lawsuit. Zwinck has been placed on paid administrative leave pending the conclusion of an internal review by the Mesa County Sheriff's Office. The sheriff's office previously said all its employees were removed from the Signal group chat involved in the incident. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against Colorado and the city of Denver, challenging what it calls sanctuary policies that it says obstruct federal immigration enforcement. In a complaint filed in May in the U.S. District Court in Colorado, federal officials argued that the state's and city's laws were intentionally crafted to hinder and discriminate against federal immigration authorities, violating the U.S. Constitution. The DOJ said the policies prevented cooperation with federal agents and undermined national immigration enforcement efforts. In 2019, Colorado passed House Bill 19-1124, which prohibits law enforcement from detaining individuals solely based on federal immigration detainers and restricts sharing personal information with federal immigration authorities without a court order. What People Are Saying Attorney General Phil Weiser said in a news release: "In this case, the driver was detained by immigration authorities because of actions by Colorado law enforcement despite the absence of any criminal activity on her part. Her detention for over two weeks is directly due to this violation of Colorado's laws. Because of this action, we are making clear that Colorado law enforcement's role is to advance public safety, not take on the responsibility of doing the work of federal immigration enforcement.


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran's President Issues Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country is ready to "hit deep into Israel again," if it comes under a new attack. "We do not rely on the current ceasefire, and we are not optimistic about it," Pezeshkian told Al-Jazeera Arabic in an interview weeks after the conflict with Israel and the United States. Newsweek has reached out to the Israeli prime minister's office for comment. Why It Matters The comments come as Iran faces threats of a renewed attack amid a fragile U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel. The U.S. and Israel said air strikes caused substantial damage to Iran's nuclear program, but have not completely destroyed it, raising the prospect of further attacks. President Donald Trump has threatened to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities if diplomacy fails, warning Tehran to abandon its ambitions to continue enriching uranium. A man climbs on the remains of an Iranian missile that fell at the settlement of Neria near Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank, on 29 June 2025, in the aftermath of the 12-day war... A man climbs on the remains of an Iranian missile that fell at the settlement of Neria near Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank, on 29 June 2025, in the aftermath of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. The 12-day war erupted on June 13, when Israel launched a bombing campaign in Iran that killed top military commanders and scientists linked to its nuclear programme. More MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/Getty Images What To Know "We are fully prepared for any new Israeli military provocation, and our armed forces are ready to strike deep inside Israel once again," the Iranian president said, adding that Israel downplayed the damages of Iran's strikes on its territory. Israel accuses Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons and destabilizing the region through proxy forces like Hezbollah and the Houthis and has vowed to continue its campaign against Tehran and its allies across the Middle East. Israel is believed to have nuclear weapons itself. Any negotiations with the U.S. must be based on 'win-win' terms, according to Pezeshkian. He told Al-Jazeera that the uranium enrichment program will continue. Tehran says it is only for civilian purposes, but it could also be a step towards building nuclear weapons. Iran has demanded U.S. guarantees that it will not be attacked and is seeking to negotiate sanctions relief in exchange for nuclear negotiations. The E3 group of European countries have warned they will trigger a "snapback" of sanctions on Iran by the end of the summer if Tehran does not make progress on a nuclear deal, a mechanism to reimpose sanctions if Tehran is found noncompliant, according to a 2015 deal. Leaders from Iran, Germany, France, and Britain are finalizing plans to discuss Tehran's nuclear program "in the coming week," a German diplomatic source told Newsweek on Sunday. What People Are Saying Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told Al-Jazeera on Tuesday: "We do not rely on the current ceasefire, and we are not very optimistic about it. That's why we have prepared ourselves for any possible scenario and any potential response. Israel struck us—and we struck back." Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Tuesday, as quoted by Maariv: "There is a possibility of renewing the war against Iran. "It is essential to formulate a plan that ensures Iran does not return to its nuclear and missile projects." U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday: "...we will do it again, if necessary!" What Happens Next Iran, Germany, France, and Britain are set to begin talks on Friday, marking the first public diplomatic meeting on Iran's nuclear program since the conflict.


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
EB-5 Visas, Gold Card Face Potential Surge in Demand: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. With the future of birthright citizenship under threat, immigration experts say any move to curtail the long-standing constitutional principle could lead to an increase in demand for legal residency programs like the EB-5 visa and President Donald Trump's proposed gold card visa. Why It Matters Birthright citizenship, grounded in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, currently grants automatic citizenship to anyone born on American soil, regardless of parental immigration status. This doctrine, known as jus soli, has long made the U.S. a hub for so-called "birth tourism," where foreign nationals enter the country, often on tourist visas, with the intent of giving birth, thereby securing American citizenship for their child. What To Know A person holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new gold card visa on June 12, 2025, in Shanghai, China. U.S. A person holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new gold card visa on June 12, 2025, in Shanghai, China. U.S. VCG via AP However, with rising political momentum among the Trump administration to limit or eliminate this right for children of undocumented parents, industry leaders say wealthy international families will look for new legal avenues to secure their children's future in the U.S. The constitutional guarantee of citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil originates from the 14th Amendment and was upheld by the Supreme Court in the pivotal 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark. In this decision, the Court determined that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was entitled to U.S. citizenship, setting a lasting precedent that has shaped immigration law ever since. The Constitution states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Ali Jahangiri, head of the EB5 Lending Alliance, told Newsweek, "Removing or restricting birthright citizenship would close a loophole used by many foreign nationals and shift demand toward investment-based and merit-based immigration pathways like EB-5 and Gold Cards, which provide more secure, legal, and long-term immigration solutions for wealthy families looking to secure a future for their children in the U.S." The EB5 program, which grants green cards to foreign nationals who invest a minimum of $800,000 in a U.S. business that creates at least 10 jobs, offers a direct path to permanent residency for the investor, their spouse, and children under 21. With birthright citizenship at risk, legal immigration channels for wealthy immigrants could become more viable. In February, the president proposed a gold card program that would offer U.S. residency to individuals who invest $5 million in the country. A key aspect of the proposed "Trump Card" visa is its territorial taxation model, which would tax recipients only on income earned within the United States—exempting them from U.S. taxes on their worldwide income. The program would target high-net-worth individuals, offering long-term legal residency in exchange for significant economic contributions to the U.S. "If the U.S. were to introduce a program like this, families who would have considered birth tourism might instead pursue a gold card for legal residency and a longer-term path to citizenship," Jahangiri said. However, not everyone is sold on the idea of a gold card, warning that it may face significant political and practical hurdles. "There does not appear to be broad or coordinated support within Congress for the program, even among Republicans, due to concerns relating to the viability of the program and its optics," Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown and former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, told Newsweek. "For example, many other countries that have implemented similar wealth-based immigration programs have ultimately rolled them back due to concerns relating to national security, money laundering, and limited long-term economic benefits, as well as criticism that citizenship or permanent residency could be purchased," she added. Meanwhile, a judge in New Hampshire on Thursday blocked Trump's order ending birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants from taking effect across the United States, using a class action ruling just weeks after the Supreme Court limited nationwide injunctions in Trump v. CASA without resolving the underlying constitutional question. What People Are Saying Ali Jahangiri, head of the EB5 Lending Alliance, told Newsweek: "If such changes were implemented, it would eliminate or greatly reduce the incentive for birth tourism as a path to U.S. citizenship for the next generation. This shift would likely drive increased interest in formal, legal immigration channels that provide clearer and more secure pathways to citizenship or permanent residency." Morgan Bailey, a partner at Mayer Brown and former senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, told Newsweek: "If the Trump Gold Card were to be implemented before the 2026 midterm elections, several key steps would need to take place. In the absence of Congressional backing, the Administration would likely attempt to roll out the program via executive action or regulatory rulemaking. While these pathways could raise legal questions, it is important to understand that such a program could move forward quickly. Under this Administration, we have already seen extraordinary policy shifts implemented, sometimes with legal risks, but also with considerable political impact such as the attempt to end birthright citizenship, the termination of certain country specific programs such as Temporary Protected Status and humanitarian parole programs, and the reshaping of various internal immigration procedures that would have previously been considered politically implausible." What Happens Next While any formal rollback of birthright citizenship will continue to face legal and political hurdles, the mere discussion of its removal is already prompting experts to prepare for a new wave of interest from wealthy individuals seeking secure and lawful alternatives.