China-US 90-day tariff truce should be extended, Global Times says, World News
BEIJING — The 90-day tariff truce agreed by the United States and China during trade talks in Switzerland last weekend is too short, China's state-backed Global Times said on Friday (May 16), as envoys from the world's two biggest economies regrouped in Korea.
During the Geneva summit, the US agreed to cut the extra tariffs it imposed on Chinese imports last month to 30 per cent from 145 per cent for the next three months, while China commited to cutting duties on US imports to 10 per cent from 125 per cent.
"The window for mutually beneficial co-operation should extend far beyond a mere 90-day period," said the Global Times, which is owned by the newspaper of the ruling Communist Party, People's Daily, and has often been first to report China's next steps in trade disagreements over the last few years.
"Hopefully, the US side will build on the outcomes of the recent talks and continue to meet China halfway."
Beijing also agreed to pause or remove the non-tariff countermeasures it has imposed against the US since April 2, although China so far has only paused its decision to add around 50 US firms to various lists restricting their ability to trade and invest.
In addition to easing the curbs, China agreed to lift export countermeasures issued after April 2, raising prospects for the lifting of restrictions on rare earth minerials, which Beijing has not yet clarified its position on.
Analysts say Beijing is unlikely to rush to announce how exactly it will meet all of its pledges.
"There is no point in China clarifying the non-tariff barriers it plans to lift to give itself the flexibility it wants," said Dan Wang, China director at Eurasia Group.
"The tariffs will likely go back up 90 days and China may sign some purchase agreements, but the non-tariff barriers will be important in future talks," she said.
China's commerce ministry did not respond specifically to questions on what non-tariff barriers it would lift — rather than pause — during a regular Thursday news conference.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met Chinese trade envoy Li Chenggang on Thursday on the sidelines of an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting on South Korea's Jeju Island.
Neither side has provided details on the substance of that meeting.
[[nid:717930]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US Secretary of State Rubio seeking sanctions investigation of Harvard, NYT reports
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is pushing to investigate if Harvard violated sanctions. PHOTO: REUTERS US Secretary of State Rubio seeking sanctions investigation of Harvard, NYT reports US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is pushing to investigate whether Harvard University violated federal sanctions, The New York Times reported on June 11 , citing people familiar with the matter and documents reviewed by the newspaper. Mr Rubio is pushing to investigate if Harvard violated sanctions by collaborating on a health insurance conference in China that may have included officials blacklisted by the US, the paper said. The university has been conducting an internal review into the involvement of the Chinese state-run group Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps at the conference, the paper added. Mr Rubio signed off on a recommendation to the Treasury Department in May to open an investigation, the report said. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. A Harvard spokesman declined to comment to the New York Times. Harvard University did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside regular business hours. The Trump administration has launched a multi-pronged attack on the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges. The Treasury and State Department declined to comment to the New York Times. The agencies did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US, China reach deal to ease export curbs, keep tariff truce alive
[LONDON] US and Chinese officials said on Tuesday (Jun 10) they had agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade tensions. At the end of two days of intense negotiations in London, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts 'meat on the bones' of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. But the Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets and some of the recent US export restrictions 'in a balanced way', but did not provide details after the talks concluded around midnight London time (2300 GMT). 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick said, adding that both sides will now return to present the framework to their respective presidents for approvals. 'And if that is approved, we will then implement the framework,' he said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. US President Donald Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3 per cent, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a 'significant headwind' for nearly all economies. The deal may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding US complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model. The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington. 'They are back to square one but that's much better than square zero,' Lipsky added. The two sides have until August 10 to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or tariff rates will snap back from about 30 per cent to 145 per cent on the US side and from 10 per cent to 125 per cent on the Chinese side. Global stocks have recovered their hefty losses after Trump's April 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement and are now near record highs. Investors burned by earlier turmoil offered a cautious response to the deal and MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan rose 0.57 per cent. 'The devil will be in the details, but the lack of reaction suggests this outcome was fully expected,' said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone in Melbourne. 'The details matter, especially around the degree of rare earths bound for the US, and the subsequent freedom for US-produced chips to head east, but for now as long as the headlines of talks between the two parties remain constructive, risk assets should remain supported.' Signs of the curbs loosening surfaced in China, as several Shenzhen-listed rare earth magnet firms, including JL MAG Rare-Earth Innuovo Technology and Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan said they have obtained export licences from Chinese authorities. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains. In May, the US responded by halting shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued. A resolution to the trade war may require policy adjustments from all countries to treat financial imbalances or otherwise greatly risk mutual economic damage, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on a rare visit to Beijing on Wednesday. Customs data published on Monday showed that China's overall exports to the US plunged 34.5 per cent in May, the sharpest drop since the outbreak of the Covid pandemic. While the impact on US inflation and its jobs market has so far been muted, tariffs have hammered US business and household confidence and the dollar remains under pressure. Beijing-based lawyer Peter Wu, 28, saw the talks as 'a good signal' even if details were not fully negotiated. 'I feel that fighting a trade war in the context of global integration is a lose-lose situation for both sides. I naturally hope that my motherland will be better,' he said. China, Mexico, the European Union, Japan, Canada and many airlines and aerospace companies worldwide urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, according to documents released on Tuesday. Just after the framework deal was announced, a US appeals court allowed Trump's most sweeping tariffs to stay in effect while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that they exceeded Trump's legal authority by imposing them. The decision keeps alive a key pressure point on China, Trump's currently suspended 34 per cent 'reciprocal' duties that had prompted swift tariff escalation. REUTERS
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Jetstar Asia closure could lead to higher fares for regional flights, say analysts
SINGAPORE: Jetstar Asia's closure could result in higher fares for flights out of Singapore to popular destinations around the region, analysts told CNA. The Singapore-based budget airline announced on Wednesday (Jun 11) that it will be ceasing operations on Jul 31 following rising supplier costs, higher airport fees and intensifying competition among low-cost carriers. "In general, the slight reduction in capacity, coupled with the demand, could drive (fares) up," said Mr Alfred Chua, Asia air transport editor for aviation publication FlightGlobal. "I expect this could happen on the metro cities' routes (such as) Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta, where they compete with other low-cost carriers." Mr Joshua Ng, a director at Alton Aviation Consultancy, said: "I think what we'll see (is) that in the near term, there's going to be a likely price increase as some of these passengers that Jetstar Asia was supposed to fly are now going to fly on other airlines." As more seats on other airlines are filled, prices will rise, he added. But in the medium to longer term, airlines will assess their strategies and potentially increase their flight frequencies to the routes that Jetstar Asia used to operate. This would cause prices to return to where they were before, he said. "This will be a matter of supply and demand in the market, where the prices of tickets will eventually shake out." Apart from the prospect of rising fares, the loss of Jetstar Asia also means that there will be four exclusive routes that will no longer be served – as things currently stand. Of the 16 destinations Jetstar Asia serves, 12 are also served by 18 other airlines, but four – Broome in Australia, Labuan Bajo in Indonesia, Okinawa in Japan and Wuxi in China – are not. "Their exit will mean some of these points will be left without any direct links to Singapore," said Mr Chua. "This in turn impacts, in some way, Changi's plans to grow its international city pairs." During the groundbreaking ceremony for Terminal 5 last month, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said that Changi Airport aims to grow its city links from over 170 currently to more than 200 in the mid-2030s. Mr Chua said the closure of Jetstar Asia is unlikely to affect plans for Terminal 5 since it is not a very big player in Singapore. He added that the airline was also unlikely to move to the new terminal. CAN THE GAP BE FILLED? Mr Mayur Patel, head of Asia at aviation data consultancy OAG Aviation, said that the closure of Jetstar Asia will leave a temporary gap in Changi Airport's passenger capacity and number of scheduled flights. According to Changi Airport Group, Jetstar Asia operates about 180 weekly services at the airport. In 2024, the airline carried approximately 2.3 million passengers at Changi Airport, accounting for about 3 per cent of Changi's total passenger traffic that year. "I would say those slots can be replaced but that will take time under the current conditions," he said. These conditions include supply delays in new aircraft, which has held airlines back on their expansion plans, as well as the relatively higher airport fees at Changi. He said that some of the capacity may be replaced by Indian or Chinese carriers, which are seeing high traffic volumes from their respective markets into Singapore. "There will be repivoting and shifting of airlines that will take up those slots," he said. He added that Terminal 4, which Jetstar Asia operates out of, would "feel a bit empty" in the meantime. Mr Chua added that for the unique city links served by Jetstar Asia, other low-cost carriers like Scoot could step in to fill the demand. "I say Scoot because they have the Embraer E190-E2 (planes), which can help 'right-size' some of the thinner routes that a Jetstar Asia A320 was not able to fill," he said. Scoot is set to have all nine Embraer E190-E2 jets – a smaller aircraft than the A320 – added to its fleet by the end of this year. For other regional destinations that are not unique to Jetstar Asia, Alton Aviation's Mr Ng said Scoot, as the other Singapore-based low-cost carrier, is the "obvious candidate" to step in. It is also "quite conceivable" that airlines such as AirAsia and Citilink would want to take over Jetstar Asia's slots from Singapore to Kuala Lumpur or Jakarta, he said. HOW DID IT COME TO THIS? Challenges facing Jetstar Asia, which is part of Australia's Qantas Group, were touched on by the airline's chief executive officer John Simeone during an interview with CNA last year. He said that there has been increases in the company's costs, which it was working on. Mr Patel and Mr Chua said that the writing was on the wall when Jetstar Asia made the well-publicised move to Terminal 4 in 2022. "As a member of the Qantas Group, the airline was meant to help feed traffic to the Qantas network through Singapore," said Mr Chua. "Qantas operates from Terminal 1, as (do) most of Jetstar Asia's codeshare partners, and so the shift has made it less convenient for the connecting passengers." In 2022, Jetstar Asia went public with its discontent with CAG's decision, but eventually agreed to move to Terminal 4. CAG said then that discussions had started in 2019 and that it had been experiencing tight capacity during peak hours. It added that moving Jetstar to Terminal 4 would "provide headroom" to support airlines' growth at Changi Airport. Mr Ng said that before the COVID-19 pandemic, around 10 per cent of customers on Qantas flights had a connecting Jetstar Asia flight. That figure is now around 5 per cent. Mr Patel said that the way the episode played out may have made Jetstar Asia feel like they were "not part of the ecosystem" at Changi Airport. "That's something Jetstar evaluated and (decided) they can put their assets somewhere else to get better returns," said Mr Patel. "Why focus on something where we don't get acknowledged?" COSTS Mr Chua said that Jetstar Asia's departure signals that Changi Airport may not necessarily be ideal for low-cost airlines to operate from. Jetstar Group CEO Stephanie Tully said on Wednesday that the airline has seen "really high cost increases" at its Singapore base, including double-digit rises in fuel, airport fees, ground handling and security charges. CAG and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) announced in November last year that airlines will have to pay higher landing, parking and aerobridge charges from April 2025. They said then that they had engaged the major airlines on the revised charges, and would give a 50 per cent rebate on the increases for the first six months. Mr Chua said: "Cost is one issue, but also the availability of slots, especially before we have a three-runway system, does not make sense for a small foreign low-cost carrier. "The added cost, potential lack of attractive slots and connectivity, will not be favourable to smaller low-cost carriers." Could this dull Singapore's shine as a regional aviation hub? Mr Chua said that Singapore will still attract new airlines, even with Jetstar Asia's closure. "Operating from other airports could be at lower cost, but it's also not Singapore," said Mr Chua. "There are no alternative 'Singapore' airports," he added. "If they want to operate to Singapore, it will be to Changi, and if they see there is demand for them to operate here, they will." Singapore remains an attractive destination for business and leisure visitors, and people in Singapore also have a high propensity to travel, said Mr Ng. "I would say that for airlines, whether you're full-service carriers or low-cost carriers, Singapore is naturally high on the list of airports that they would want to serve," he said, noting that Changi Airport is the gateway to Singapore. Airport fees and supplier costs may be higher, but it is probably worth it for the airlines, he said.
