logo
Russia to provide state support for ailing coal industry

Russia to provide state support for ailing coal industry

Reuters30-05-2025
MOSCOW, May 30 (Reuters) - The Russian government said on Friday it had agreed to support the struggling coal industry, including by deferring tax payments, as well as by limiting dividends and bonuses to top management.
Russian coal producers face a number of challenges, including international sanctions over Ukraine. According to the government, the country's coal exports fell almost 8% to 213 million tonnes last year, while production rose 1.3% to 438 million metric tons.
The European Union, which previously depended on Russia for around 45% of its coal imports, banned supplies from Russia in 2022.
Under the government measures, Russian coal companies will be granted a deferral of mineral extraction tax (MET) and insurance contributions until December 1 2025.
The possibility of debt restructuring is envisaged for indebted companies, taking into account the position of the Central Bank of Russia, the government added.
Russia's NEFT Research consultancy said Russia's coal exports have been declining due to the international sanctions, rising transportation costs and weaker demand.
It cited energy ministry data, which showed that the Russian coal industry had lost 1.2 trillion roubles ($15 billion) since 2022 due to the sanctions, including the loss of lucrative markets in Europe and difficulties in getting payment for supplies.
($1 = 78.5000 roubles)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Salmond staffer rejects Sturgeon claims in book as ‘obviously false'
Former Salmond staffer rejects Sturgeon claims in book as ‘obviously false'

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Former Salmond staffer rejects Sturgeon claims in book as ‘obviously false'

Nicola Sturgeon's new book contains 'falsehoods at worst, fabrications at best' about her predecessor, Alex Salmond's former chief of staff has claimed. Geoff Aberdein, who worked for Mr Salmond when he was first minister, hit out at Ms Sturgeon, saying: 'I was brought up that you didn't speak ill of the dead. 'But I think if you're going to speak ill of the dead, at least make your claims accurate.' He told the Holyrood Sources podcast that Mr Salmond's widow Moira was 'particularly upset and frustrated at a lot of what has been said' about her late husband, who died suddenly in October 2024. Mr Aberdein continued: 'I think it was important to set out and correct the record not just because Alex is not in position to defend himself, but for myself as well and the series of other officials and civil servants that have contacted me.' Claims that Mr Salmond was the person who leaked the story of the sexual harassment allegations against him are 'obviously false', Mr Aberdein insisted. He said that when his former boss took the phone call to say the story about the allegations was being published by the Daily Record he was actually meeting lawyers to 'draft a legal summons to prevent Nicola Sturgeon's Government from making the allegations public'. Mr Aberdeen said: 'To suggest Alex was simultaneously leaking documents deeply damaging to his reputation whilst at the same time paying lawyers a lot of money to get a court order to prevent publication of the same material is just utterly absurd.' Mr Salmond went on to be acquitted of all the charges against him in a court case in 2020. Mr Aberdein also dismissed claims by Ms Sturgeon that Mr Salmond 'didn't read' the white paper on independence which had been produced by the Scottish government in the run up to the 2014 referendum. In her recently published memoir, Frankly, Ms Sturgeon spoke out about her 'cold fury' with her former leader over his 'abdication of responsibility' on the key document. Mr Aberdein – who said he would not be reading the book – accepted that his former boss 'delegated the responsibility for drafting the white paper to Nicola Sturgeon'. However he insisted: 'To suggest, as I think was the purpose of this story, that he wasn't engaged in the process of a prospectus for independence is utterly nonsense. The former Salmond chief of staff also rejected claims that Mr Salmond was 'apparently against same-sex marriage' – saying that this was 'demonstrably false'. Mr Aberdein told the podcast Mr Salmond had 'declared his personal support for gay marriage for the first time' in a newspaper article in April 2011. And he added that while the SNP election manifesto that year had pledged to consult on the issue Mr Salmond 'chose to come out… excuse the pun, the turn of phrase, ahead of that result, to say that he personally supported it.' With the SNP having won the 2011 Holyrood election, Mr Aberdein recalled 'being in the room with advisors, civil servants and indeed ministers about how we would go about reassuring different sections of our society about that legislation, particularly religious leaders and other civic leaders'. He also made the 'obvious point' that 'if Alex Salmond didn't want legislation to be progressed, he was the first minister of a majority SNP government, it wouldn't have been progressed'. Mr Aberdeen said: 'The point falls down on that alone.'

States members to vote on suspension of deputy
States members to vote on suspension of deputy

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

States members to vote on suspension of deputy

The committee which oversees the conduct of States members, is set to bring forward proposals to suspend Deputy Philip Ozouf for 28 days for breaching the code of announcement has been made after an investigation by the commissioner of standards into whether he had brought public office into disrepute after speeding offences in November upheld complaints that Deputy Ozouf's offence and his failure to attend three parish hall enquiries, breached several codes of conduct for States Ozouf has yet to respond to the BBC to provide a comment. Standards and conduct The breaches identified included not fulfilling his public duty by breaking the commissioner said the fact Deputy Ozouf did not engage with the investigation in a timely manner undermined public panel of politicians which oversees the standards and conduct of States members have now put forward a proposal to suspend Deputy Ozouf from the States Assembly for 28 will vote on that on 9 September and if they support the suspension, then it will take place with immediate effect.

Why Donetsk matters so much for Ukraine's defences against Russia
Why Donetsk matters so much for Ukraine's defences against Russia

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Why Donetsk matters so much for Ukraine's defences against Russia

A key takeaway from the summit in Alaska is that Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly wants to freeze the war in Ukraine along its current front line in return for the surrender of the rest of Donetsk holds about 70% of the region (oblast), including the regional capital of the same name, after more than a decade of fighting in which Donetsk and neighbouring Luhansk have been the bleeding heart of the Russia to gain all of Donetsk would cement its internationally unrecognised claim to the oblast as well as avoiding further heavy military Ukraine to withdraw from western Donetsk would mean the grievous loss not just of land, with the prospect of a new exodus of refugees, but the fall of a bulwark against any future Russian we look at why the territory matters so much. What does Ukraine still control? According to an estimate by Reuters news agency, Ukraine still holds about 6,600 sq km (2,548 sq miles) of territory in a quarter of a million people remain there, local officials said urban centres include Kramatorsk, Slovyansk, Kostyantynivka and forms part of Ukraine's main industrial region, the Donbas (Donets Basin), though its economy has been devastated by the war."The reality is these resources likely will not be able to be accessed for arguably a decade at least because of the [land] mines..." Dr Marnie Howlett, departmental lecturer in Russian and East European Politics at the University of Oxford, told Reuters."These lands have been completely destroyed, these cities completely flattened."Resignation and betrayal: What handing Donbas to Putin would mean for UkraineUkraine in maps: Tracking the war with RussiaWhat security guarantees for Ukraine would actually mean Where is the territory's military value? A recent report by the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) describes a "fortress belt" running 50km (31 miles) through western Donetsk."Ukraine has spent the last 11 years pouring time, money, and effort into reinforcing the fortress belt and establishing significant defense industrial and defensive infrastructure," it from the region speak of trenches, bunkers, minefields, anti-tank obstacles and barbed forces attacking in the direction of Pokrovsk "are engaged in an effort to seize it that would likely take several years to complete", the ISW are certainly part of the Ukrainian defence but so is the topography."The terrain is fairly defensible, particularly the Chasiv Yar height which has been underpinning the Ukrainian line," Nick Reynolds, Research Fellow for Land Warfare at the UK-based Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), tells BBC he adds: "If you look at the topography of the Donbas, eastern Ukraine in general, overall the terrain doesn't really favour the Ukrainians.""The city of Donetsk is high ground. It's all downhill as you go west, which isn't great for the Ukrainians in terms of running defensive operations. "That's not just about drawing in for the close fight or difficulties going up and down hill, a lot of it is also about observation and thus the ability to co-ordinate artillery fires and other forms of fire support without putting drones up."Likewise bits of high ground are better for radio wave propagation, better for co-ordination of drones."Chasiv Yar, which the Russians recently claimed to have captured, "is one of the last bits of high ground the Ukrainians control", he via satellite imagery, whether provided by Ukraine's international partners or commercial, is very important, Reynolds notes, "but it is not the same as being able directly to co-ordinate one's own tactical missions". Does the Russian military need all of Donetsk? Western Donetsk is just a small part of a front line stretching some 1,100km but it has seen some of the fiercest Russian attacks this were Moscow to channel its ground forces in any different direction, it is doubtful whether they would make any better progress."In the south, the front line in Zaporizhzhia is now very similar to the one in the Donbas, so that would be just fighting through extensive defensive positions as well," says Reynolds."The Russians face the same problem trying to bash through in the north, so they certainly wouldn't be pushing on an open door." Would Ukraine be able to rebuild its defences further west? In theory, in the event of a peace deal, the Ukrainians could move their line back further would, of course, be the issue of unfavourable terrain, and building deep defences would take time, even with the help of civilian contractors not having to work under fire. But theory is one thing and Rusi's land warfare research fellow cannot see the Ukrainian military giving up western Donetsk without a fight."Even if the Trump administration tries to use ongoing US support or security guarantees as leverage," Nick Reynolds says, "based on previous Russian behaviour, based on the explicitly transactional approach that the US administration has taken, it is hard to see how the Ukrainian government would want to give up that territory." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said his country will reject any Russian proposal to give up the Donbas region in exchange for a ceasefire, arguing that the eastern territory could be used as a springboard for future attacks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store