MK Party Chief Whip vote confusion
The 2025 and 2026 Appropriation Bill was passed on Wednesday night.
There was confusion when MK Party Chief Whip Colleen Makhubele voted 'YES' to the Appropriation Bill, despite her party maintaining it would reject the bill.
But she says she thought they were voting on another matter.
Makhubele then changed the party's vote and was heckled by MPs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Black Sash urges government to tackle corruption for better social grants
Free Market Foundation President Eustace Davie fears that social grants might discourage young people from making efforts to be self-reliant. Image: Supplied The government can still afford to pay social grants for the unemployed despite the US's 30% tariffs on local exports, which could result in the country shedding 300,000 jobs and losing billions of rand in tax revenue. Black Sash, a human rights advocacy group, said the government should stop corruption to afford social grants that are above the poverty line. The group commented after the Free Market Foundation lashed out at the government for what it described as making the grants a permanent income generation for the unemployed instead of providing skills and creating job opportunities for young people. Black Sash said the country does have a lot of money, which has been spent irresponsibly. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'We just need to tighten where we think we are losing money, such as corruption, so that we can redirect the money to the basic services rather than to say there is no money because of the tariffs,' said Black Sash's communications and media manager, Oliver Meth. Meth said the government should focus on creating job opportunities for young people. He said it was unjustifiable to say the country would run into bankruptcy if there was no money coming from another country. 'There is a lot of money in this country, but it's just that it's not directed to the right responsibility,' said Meth. He said every year, the country was facing an increase in unemployment. The Black Sash welcomed the government's move on June 1 to replace the Social Relief Grant (SRG), which paid each unemployed recipient R350 per month, with the Universal Basic Income Grant (UBIG), which increased the payment to R720. Black Sash had, in its May statement, described the introduction of UBIG as the reaffirmation of the Government of National Unity's commitment to ensuring long-term income support for those living in poverty and unemployed. The group had felt that R370 was far below the food poverty line and was insufficient to restore dignity or break the cycle of poverty. 'Black Sash stands ready to engage with policymakers and civil society to ensure that the Basic Income Grant becomes a transformative tool for building a more just, equitable society — one where everyone has the means to live in dignity,' read its May statement. However, Free Market Foundation President Eustace Davies released a statement on Thursday expressing fear that the grant would subject the unemployed to permanent dependency on government handouts. It was estimated in 2024 that there would be 9.24 million grant recipients in 2024/25, and the government had set aside R33.7 billion for this. Davies said the grant was defeating the government's purpose of making young people self-sustainable. He said that unemployed persons who attempt to earn even a modest income through part-time work, informal trading, or entry-level employment risk being immediately disqualified from the grant. 'The reward for productive effort becomes the loss of support,' said Davies. He said grants do not help recipients to progress in their lives, but instead, they remain idle. 'When the state creates a condition in which individuals are penalised for trying to lift themselves out of poverty, it arrests their development and saps their self-respect. A population so becomes compliant but not empowered,' he said. He said the state where grants were in a permanent arrangement could be an indication of economic failure. 'Unemployment remains structurally high, especially among the youth, and entrepreneurship continues to be stifled under layers of bureaucracy,' he said. Davies said South Africa should look at the model of Singapore and Switzerland, which he said were economically successful. 'In Singapore, the emphasis is on education, skills, and enterprise, not permanent grants. 'Switzerland keeps welfare limited and locally administered, with strong expectations of personal responsibility. 'For decades, Hong Kong allowed markets to allocate labour and capital with minimal interference. The result in each case was widespread prosperity,' he said. To keep financing the grants, Davies said, the Treasury will have to introduce taxes, which would mean punishing those who are already carrying the burden of employment creation, capital formation, and tax compliance. 'A policy that extracts more from the productive to fund inactivity cannot produce long-term stability or growth,' he said.
Mail & Guardian
8 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Born Free: Will President Ramaphosa survive until 2029? with Dr Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh
This week on Born Free , Khumo Kumalo and Otsile Nkadimeng sit down with political analyst and SMWX host Dr. Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh to unpack a pivotal moment in South African politics. With uMkhonto weSizwe's proposed vote of no confidence grabbing headlines, we examine what's driving it—and what's at stake. We also explore the shifting dynamics within the Government of National Unity , and how they may reshape the political landscape ahead of the 2026/27 Local Government Elections . The episode digs into upcoming leadership contests in the ANC and DA , breaking down the key players, internal tensions, and possible outcomes. Could these changes alter the direction of the country—and will President Ramaphosa serve out his full term? It's a grounded, in-depth conversation about power, leadership, and the future of South Africa.📌 Like, comment, and subscribe to Born Free for more bold, independent analysis from a new generation of South African voices. Khumo Kumalo is the visionary behind Misunderstood and the dynamic co-host of Born Free . Named one of the Mail & Guardian's Top 200 Young South Africans of 2024 , he is a bold voice in the country's evolving political discourse. As the author of Newsletter 94 (formerly Misunderstood), Kumalo delves into South Africa's complex history and shifting political landscape, reflecting on the dreams and realities of a post-apartheid nation. His passion for debate and current affairs was ignited at St John's College , later taking him to Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia , where he continued to sharpen his perspective on leadership and social change. Kumalo isn't just asking questions—he's challenging narratives, sparking conversations, and pushing South Africa's youth to rethink what it truly means to be Born Free . Otsile Nkadimeng is a published author, policy writer, and changemaker , balancing his role as a second-year university student with a deep commitment to youth empowerment. Recognized by News24 for his impact and awarded the Young Nelson Mandela Award in 2023 , he is shaping conversations on democracy, governance, and sustainability. As the Executive Director of SoWeVote , a platform he co-founded, Nkadimeng is making it easier for young South Africans to access critical information about politics and democracy. His advocacy extends beyond borders—he serves as a Youth Advisor to the Embassy of Sweden in Pretoria and is a fellow at the International Youth Think Tank , where he contributes to global youth policy discussions. Passionate about sustainability, he has co-founded and led multiple initiatives aimed at environmental and social progress across South Africa. Whether in civic engagement, international diplomacy, or grassroots activism, Nkadimeng is at the forefront of youth-led change, proving that young voices aren't just part of the conversation—they're leading it. Disclaimer: 'Born Free' is an opinion-based podcast and does not represent the views of M&G Media (PTY) LTD, its owners, affiliates, employees, or partners. The opinions expressed by the hosts and guests are their own and do not reflect the editorial stance of the Mail & Guardian.
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
MKP's fight against dual police ministers far from over
MK Party president Jacob Zuma says the country cannot afford two ministers in one portfolio. Image: MKP The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) says taxpayers cannot afford to pay for two ministers in one portfolio as it accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of violating his oath of office and failing to uphold the Constitution as required by that office. This was after Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave and appointed Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister. MKP leader, Jacob Zuma, has also given Ramaphosa until 10am on Friday to resign. In a letter dated August 4, Zuma said he will take action against Ramaphosa if he fails to adhere to the demand. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya said they were aware of the letter. 'The legal team will deal with that letter,' he said. The letter from KMNS attorneys, who act on behalf of Zuma, comes after the Constitutional Court last week dismissed the MKP's application to have a direct access to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave of absence, appointing Cachalia as acting police minister and establishing a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the corruption allegations in the police and judiciary. 'Various reasons have been offered in respect of the decisions which were impugned by our client and uMkhonto weSizwe Party in the Constitutional Court which found that it lacked exclusive jurisdiction and/or has no basis to grant the requested direct access. "As a result, our client has or sought urgent advice on possibly taking the relevant dispute(s) to the High Court and/or any other appropriate forum. It is assumed that you stand by the reasons previously given for the decisions announced on July 13, 2025,' reads the letter. The party's spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela added: 'The judges did not want to take a decision knowing exactly that the MK Party has a strong case. By placing Mchunu on leave of absence and appointing Cachalia as an acting police minister, the country (has) two ministers of police. Both ministers are acting.' Zuma, who said he is a concerned citizen, a voter and a former President, also demanded the date and time when Ramaphosa decided to place Mchunu on leave of absence and the decision to appoint Cachalia as acting police minister, as well as their current positions. 'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to place Minister Mchunu on leave of absence taken? When exactly (date and time) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police taken, communicated to him and to the public? 'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on August 1, 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate? What is the present, correct, full and official description of Mr. Senzo Mchunu? If the answers are the same, for how long is it envisaged that South Africa will have and pay for two Ministers of Police at the same time?' Zuma asks in the letter. He also wanted to know Ramaphosa's reasons for not dismissing Mchunu based on the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police boss Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, that Mchunu had ties to criminal gangs and meddled in police investigations into politically motivated murders. Zuma also wanted to know what is the public benefit in having two ministers of police, adding that one is active, while the other one is on leave. 'What were the reasons why one of the two Deputy Ministers of Police was not promoted to the position of Acting/Minister of Police as you did, for example, with Deputy Minister (Buti) Manamela who was subsequently promoted to Minister of Higher Education? What are the estimated costs to the taxpayers for the failure to act in a similar or consistent manner?' He said irrespective of the answers Ramaphosa might give, his conduct to place Mchunu on leave and appoint Cachalia remain illegal, irrational and unconstitutional. 'With the publicly available information as well as the pleadings and deliberations in the recent Constitutional Court proceedings, our client is of the view that, irrespective of any answers you might give to the above list of questions, the impugned conduct remains illegal and irrational and unconstitutional.' 'It may have been further compounded by the events which occurred between July 13, 2025 and August 1, 2025 and which have a continuing adverse impact on the South African citizens and taxpayers, including our client,' the letter read, adding that Ramaphosa should withdraw his decision to place Mchunu on leave and the appointment of Cachalia. 'Due to the obvious urgency and importance of the issues raised above, these demands must be fulfilled immediately but by no later than 10am on Friday, August 8, 2025, failing which all our client's rights are reserved, including the right to urgently approach the courts for appropriate relief, without any further notice to you.' Cape Times
