Pythons can devour bones thanks to unique stomach cells
Herpetologists have spent years trying to understand how bones are not only safe and healthy for the serpents, but how their biology manages to regulate when and how many bones to digest. Now, researchers believe they have identified an explanation hidden inside the 'crypts' of specialized cells. Their findings are published this week in the Journal of Experimental Biology.
A team co-led by zoologist Jehan-Hervé Lignot at France's University of Montpellier began peering inside Burmese python intestines using light and electron microscopy in an effort to better understand their dietary cycle of fasting and feeding. Lignot soon spotted tiny, unidentified objects along the snake's intestinal lining, or epithelium.
'When I started analysing the 'spheroids' I initially thought it could be some bone fragments. But this rapidly proved to be wrong,' Lignot told Popular Science. 'And, then, came the hypothesis that the particles could be produced by the intestine and by a specific cell type.'
A subsequent morphological analysis proved the theory correct: the spheroids were being produced from calcium, iron, and phosphorus within a newly identified type of cell. Specifically, the particles resided in what Lignot described as a 'crypt' inside these narrow, specialized cells—but it wasn't initially clear what these cells were programmed to do.
To find out, researchers studied the pythons' intestinal cells after feeding them three different diets—a standard fare of whole rodents, a low-calcium variant of 'boneless prey,' and a version that featured boneless rodents with higher-than-normal injections of calcium.
Pythons subsequently lacked the same calcium- and phosphorus-heavy particles when only fed boneless food. But when either snacking on regular bone-in rodents or a calcium-rich diet, snake cell crypts featured plenty of calcium, phosphorus, and iron spheroids. Additionally, those pythons' droppings contained no bone fragments, showing that they had been dissolved entirely.
Lignot noted that while experts have previously located similar particles in insects and crustaceans, his team is the first to see something similar in vertebrates. Since then, he and his collaborators have also identified the bone-digesting cell in multiple other python and boa species, as well as the venomous Gila monster.
As for how many bones an average python in the wild can digest, Lignot isn't quite sure—but he did offer a quick estimate.
'[It's a] tough question… snakes can grab a prey that can be more than 30 percent of [its] body mass,' he said. 'If we consider, as in humans, that our bones represent about 9-10 percent of our body weight, you can therefore have a significant amount of ions coming from the prey's skeleton that is completely dissolved in the stomach.'
While Lignot has since moved on to other research areas, he hopes other investigators continue to search for the newly pinpointed cell type in other vertebrates.
'An evolutionary analysis would be awesome,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Modern medicine has its scientific roots in the Middle Ages − how the logic of vulture brain remedies and bloodletting lives on today
Nothing calls to mind nonsensical treatments and bizarre religious healing rituals as easily as the notion of Dark Age medicine. The 'Saturday Night Live' sketch Medieval Barber Theodoric of York says it all with its portrayal of a quack doctor who insists on extracting pints of his patients' blood in a dirty little shop. Though the skit relies on dubious stereotypes, it's true that many cures from the Middle Ages sound utterly ridiculous – consider a list written around 800 C.E. of remedies derived from a decapitated vulture. Mixing its brain with oil and inserting that into the nose was thought to cure head pain, and wrapping its heart in wolf skin served as an amulet against demonic possession. 'Dark Age medicine' is a useful narrative when it comes to ingrained beliefs about medical progress. It is a period that stands as the abyss from which more enlightened thinkers freed themselves. But recent research pushes back against the depiction of the early Middle Ages as ignorant and superstitious, arguing that there is a consistency and rationality to healing practices at that time. As a historian of the early Middle Ages, roughly 400 to 1000 C.E., I make sense of how the societies that produced vulture medicine envisioned it as one component of a much broader array of legitimate therapies. In order to recognize 'progress' in Dark Age medicine, it is essential to see the broader patterns that led a medieval scribe to copy out a set of recipes using vulture organs. The major innovation of the age was the articulation of a medical philosophy that validated manipulating the physical world because it was a religious duty to rationally guard the body's health. Reason and religion The names of classical medical innovators like Hippocrates and Galen were well known in the early Middle Ages, but few of their texts were in circulation prior to the 13th century. Most intellectual activities in northern Europe were taking place within monasteries, where the majority of surviving medical writings from that time were written, read, discussed and likely put into practice. Scholars have assumed that religious superstition overwhelmed scientific impulse and the church dictated what constituted legitimate healing – namely, prayer, anointing with holy oil, miracles of the saints and penance for sin. However, 'human medicine' – a term affirming human agency in discovering remedies from nature – emerged in the Dark Ages. It appears again and again in a text monks at the monastery of Lorsch, Germany, wrote around the year 800 to defend ancient Greek medical learning. It insists that Hippocratic medicine was mandated by God and that doctors act as divine agents in promoting health. I argue in my recent book, 'Embodying the Soul: Medicine and Religion in Carolingian Europe,' that a major innovation of that time was the creative synthesis of Christian orthodoxy with a growing belief in the importance of preventing disease. Establishing an intellectual framework for medical study was an accomplishment of early medieval scholars. Doctors faced the risk of being lumped together with those who dealt in sorcery and pagan folklore, a real possibility given that the men who composed the Greek medical canon were pagans themselves. The early medieval scribes responsible for producing the medical books of their age crafted powerful arguments about the respectability and piety of the doctor. Their arguments manifest in illustrations that sanctified the human doctor by setting him parallel to Christ. This sanctification was a crucial step in including medicine as its own advanced degree program at the first universities that were established around 1200 in Europe. Thus began the licensing of healers: the elite 'phisici' – the root of the English word 'physician' – trained at the university, along with empirical practitioners like surgeons, herbalists and female healers who claimed a unique authority to treat gynecological illnesses. Today, religious dogmatism is often equated with vaccine hesitancy and resistance to basic scientific truths like evolution. But deeply religious thinkers of the past often saw rational medicine as an expression of faith, not something endangering it. Herbal remedies were scribbled into the margins of early medieval works on theology, history, church sacraments and more. This suggests that book owners valued such knowledge, and people of all classes were actively exchanging recipes and cures by word of mouth before writing the most useful ones down. The body in nature Though the Dark Ages is a period from which no case histories survive, we can still form a picture of an average healing encounter. Texts from that period emphasize the need for the doctor to be highly learned, including being well read in philosophy, logic, arithmetic and astronomy. Such knowledge enabled healers to situate their observations of sick bodies within the rules that governed the constant transformations of nature. There was no way to perceive the internal state of the body via technology – instead, healers had to be excellent listeners and observers. They sought to match the patient's description of suffering with signs that manifested externally on the body. The inside of the flesh could not be seen, but the fluids the body excreted – sweat, urine, menstrual blood, mucus, vomit and feces – carried messages about that invisible realm to the outside. The doctor's diagnosis and prognosis relied on reading these 'excreta' in addition to sensing subtle changes in the pulse. Medieval people were detailed investigators of the natural world and believed the same forces that shaped the landscape and the stars operated inside bodies formed from the same four elements of earth, water, air and fire. Thus, as the moon's waxing and waning moved the ocean tides, so did it cause humors inside the body to grow and decrease. The way the seasons withered crops or provoked tree sap to flow might manifest in the body as yellow bile surging in the summer, and cold, wet phlegm dripping in the winter. Just as fruit and meats left untouched began to rot and putrefy, so did dregs and undigested material inside the body turn poisonous if not expelled. Standing water in ponds or lakes generated slime and smell, and so were liquids sitting stagnant in the body's vessels seen as breeding grounds for corrupt vapors. In this sense, the menstrual cycle was representative of all bodies, undergoing internal transformations according to seasonal cycles and periodically purged in order to release pent-up fluids. According to this logic, health depended above all on maintaining the body's relationship to the physical environment and ensuring that substances were passing through their proper transformations, whether it was food turning into humors, blood disseminating throughout the body, or excess fluids and wastes leaving the body. Bloodletting was a rational therapy because it could help rebalance the fluids and remove toxins. It was visible and tangible to the patient, and, to the extent that we now better understand the placebo effect, it may well have offered some kind of relief. Fasting, purging, tonics and, above all, monthly dietary regimens were also prominent tools healers used to prevent and relieve sickness. Several medical books, for instance, specified that consuming drinks with cinnamon in November and pennyroyal in August could recalibrate the body's temperature in winter and summer because one drink was warming while the other was cooling. Some medieval remedies – such as one produced from wine, cow bile, garlic and onion to heal eye infections – were later proven to be likely effective in treating sickness. But whether these remedies worked isn't the point. For medieval doctors, vulture brains and cow bile operated according to the same logic that continues to inform research today: Nature operates in mysterious ways, but rational deduction can unlock the hidden mechanisms of disease. The M.D. has direct roots in the Dark Age elevation of 'human medicine.' Before mocking medieval doctors, consider how popular juice cleanses and detox regimens are in the 21st century. Are we really so far from humoral medicine today? This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Meg Leja, Binghamton University, State University of New York Read more: Poison or cure? Traditional Chinese medicine shows that context can make all the difference Medieval illustrated manuscripts reveal how upper-class women managed healthy households – overseeing everything from purging, leeching and cupping to picking the right wet nurse Medieval medical books could hold the recipe for new antibiotics Meg Leja does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why Your Farts Smell So Bad, According to Science
Reviewed by Dietitian Karen Ansel, M.S., RDN Key Points Passing gas is a normal part of digestion. But sometimes things can get unusually smelly. To find out what's normal and what's not, we spoke with digestive health experts. Food intolerances, digestive disorders and eating too much fiber are common culprits. Nobody likes to talk about farting. But gas production is a normal byproduct of digestion. In fact, most people toot an average of 8 to 14 times per day (sometimes even more). Luckily, most farts are odorless, but not always. So, why do farts sometimes smell so awful, and what can you do about it? To find out, we asked digestive health experts to share their insights on what is going on behind the scenes, tricks to combat smelly farts and when to be concerned. What Causes Farts to Smell? You Started Eating More Fiber Fiber does all kinds of great things for your body, like preventing constipation, helping with weight management, regulating blood sugar and lowering cholesterol. But if you suddenly start eating loads of it, things could temporarily get kind of stinky. 'It's pretty normal for the smell of your farts to change depending on the foods you're eating, especially if you're working on increasing your fiber intake,' says Amanda Sauceda, M.S., RDN. That's because higher-fiber foods take time to digest, so as they sit in your gut, they begin to ferment. That doesn't mean you shouldn't eat fiber. 'Your gut microbiome needs some time to adjust to the increased amount of fiber, which it uses as fuel and also produces gas as a result,' says Sauceda. Once your gut adjusts to your new eating pattern, things will likely start to calm down. In the meantime, try to increase fiber slowly rather than all at once. If you're wondering if some high-fiber foods are more problematic than others, the answer is yes. For instance, functional fibers, like inulin, that are added to foods to boost their fiber content, can sometimes be to blame for smellier gas. One unlikely, yet trendy, place you'll find inulin is in prebiotic sodas, says Sauceda. So, if you've recently started drinking prebiotic soda and your farts are smelling off, that might be the reason. You Eat Lots of High-Sulfur Foods Another factor to blame for stinkier gas is sulfur-containing foods. 'The pungent smell of passed gas is mostly due to sulfur-containing compounds that are produced when bacteria in your gut break down undigested food products,' says gastroenterologist Adam Pont, M.D. '[While] this is a normal part of digestion, the odor intensity may increase if you eat foods high in sulfur.' And the list of sulfur-containing foods is long. Cruciferous veggies like cauliflower, broccoli, cabbage and arugula are all major offenders. So are eggs, ham, beef, chicken and fish., That's not a reason to give them up though, especially since they're packed with nutrients that do your body good. But if things are smelling off, try to ease back on the cruciferous veg a bit and add in more non-cruciferous veggies. You Have a Food Intolerance If you've noticed that your farts are especially pungent and are accompanied by other symptoms like bloating or diarrhea after you eat specific foods, you might have a food intolerance. For instance, some people are unable to fully digest lactose in dairy products or fructose from fruit and honey. Many people can eat these without issue. But if you have a lactose or fructose intolerance, you aren't able to fully break down these sugars in the small intestine. Instead, they travel intact to the colon, where bacteria that live there break them down and produce excess and potentially foul-smelling gas. Just because you have a lactose or fructose intolerance doesn't mean you have to avoid dairy or fruit entirely. 'There are lower-lactose foods, like yogurt or hard cheeses, as well as completely lactose-free products,' says Sauceda. If fructose is an issue, try eating fewer high-fructose apples, pears, cherries, mangoes, figs and watermelon and opt for other fruits instead. You're Constipated Constipation isn't just uncomfortable. It can also cause smellier-than-normal farts. Common constipation symptoms include having less than three bowel movements per week or having stools that are dry, hard or difficult to pass. The problem is that when you aren't pooping regularly, bacteria and odor can build up. Fortunately, making small adjustments to your diet and lifestyle can help tackle constipation and the stinky wind that comes along with it. For less constipation, try slowly upping your fiber intake, drinking more water, managing stress and incorporating movement into your day. You Have a Digestive Disorder Gas and bloating are common symptoms of several digestive disorders like celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). But it's not just about the amount of gas. 'There is even thought that those with digestive disorders may remark on more stinky types of farts,' says Sauceda. 'People with inflammatory bowel disease have remarked on more odor compared to those without IBD.' It's not their imaginations, either. One study found that people with IBD really do have smellier farts, most likely due to unfavorable changes in their gut bacteria. Speaking of bacteria, you may also experience funky-smelling gas if you have a bacterial overgrowth called SIBO (short for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth). This can result in excessive fermentation and odor when bacteria produce gas while breaking down food, explains gastroenterologist Ritu Nahar, M.D. When to Be Concerned 'While occasional bad-smelling gas is normal, there are a few signs that may warrant medical attention,' says Nahar. 'If the foul odor is persistent and accompanied by other symptoms like bloating, diarrhea, unintentional weight loss or fatigue, it could indicate an underlying condition such as celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease or a gastrointestinal infection.' An unusually strong or constant odor without any change in diet is also cause for concern, she says. 'In those cases, it's a good idea to check in with a health care provider to rule out more serious digestive issues,' she advises. Our Expert Take Tooting is a normal and healthy part of digestion. While most farts are fairly odorless, there are times when you may notice that they are a bit more pungent. Don't panic! Smelly farts can be caused by a variety of factors, like eating more fiber- or sulfur-rich foods. They can also be the result of food intolerances, digestive disorders and even constipation. While digestive health experts say the occasional foul-smelling fart is nothing to worry about, you might want to follow up with your health care provider if you also start experiencing other symptoms like diarrhea or weight loss. Otherwise, small tweaks like easing up on fiber or eating smaller servings of cruciferous veggies, eggs, dairy, meat, chicken and fish or avoiding high-fructose fruits may help. Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Fox News
6 hours ago
- Fox News
Cigarette butts make roads stronger than ever before
Cigarette butts are the most littered item on the planet. People toss out an estimated 4.5 trillion cigarette butts each year, and that number may double by the end of 2025 as e-cigarette use grows. These small, toxic waste items pollute city streets, beaches and waterways. They also take years to break down. But that may be starting to change. Scientists have developed a way to recycle cigarette butts into asphalt, creating roads that are both stronger and more sustainable. Research teams from the University of Granada in Spain and the University of Bologna in Italy have studied the process closely, highlighting its potential to improve road performance while cutting down on waste. Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my Modern road construction often relies on additives to improve the strength and flexibility of asphalt. Some road-building materials already use cellulose fibers like those found in cigarette filters. That sparked the idea to take used butts, clean them up and put them to work. E-cigarette filters are especially promising. They are longer and packed with fibers like cellulose and polylactic acid (PLA) fibers, making them ideal for reinforcing asphalt. The recycling process involves several steps: 1. Collecting and sorting: Filters from traditional and e-cigarettes go through a collection and cleaning process. Ash and residue are removed, leaving behind usable fiber material. 2. Shredding and mixing: Machines shred the cleaned fibers and combine them with synthetic hydrocarbon wax, which serves as a binder. 3. Pellet formation: The blended material is pressed, heated and cut into small pellets that can be easily stored and transported. 4. Asphalt integration: These pellets are added to reclaimed asphalt and bitumen. During heating, the pellets melt and release reinforcing fibers that strengthen the final asphalt mix. Up to 40% of the final road material can come from these recycled components. Recycled cigarette butts make asphalt stronger, more flexible and longer-lasting. The fibers released during mixing act as micro reinforcement, improving fatigue resistance and helping roads withstand heavy traffic and temperature changes. The wax in the pellets lowers the temperature needed to mix asphalt, reducing both energy use and emissions during production. Beyond performance, this method gives cigarette waste a second life. By repurposing billions of discarded filters, cities can reduce litter and pollution while building more sustainable infrastructure. This technique is still emerging, but interest is growing worldwide. In Bratislava, Slovakia, city officials have already started collecting cigarette butts specifically for road construction. One road built with this recycled asphalt is already in use, setting an example for other cities to follow. As more pilot projects roll out and awareness spreads, cigarette butts could shift from toxic litter to a valuable resource in sustainable infrastructure. Recycling cigarette butts into asphalt solves two problems at once. It clears toxic waste from public spaces and makes roads that last longer. This approach turns one of the world's most common pollutants into a valuable construction material. As more cities explore cleaner, smarter infrastructure, this kind of solution could play a big role in the future of street design. Would you support roads built with recycled cigarette butts in your city? Let us know by writing to us at Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
