St. Pete City Council commits to not 'going backwards' on plastic straw ban
A St. Pete city council member introduced an agenda item to look at lifting an ordinance that banned single-use plastic straws back in 2018.
He cited concerns over the legality of the ordinance following President Trump's executive order that ended the "forced use of paper straws."
The issue brought dozens of St. Pete residents to city hall, none of whom were in favor of changing the city's ban.
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Many in the St. Petersburg community thought the paper vs. plastic straw debate ended in 2018, because that's when the city passed an ordinance banning single-use plastic straws. However, the issue reignited on Thursday during a council meeting.
St. Pete Council Member Corey Givens Jr. introduced an agenda item to look at lifting that ban. He cited concerns with the legality of it, following President Donald Trump's executive order ending the "forced use of paper straws."
READ: Mote Marine Laboratory's Coral Gene Bank works to preserve coral species
Local perspective
The issue brought dozens of St. Pete residents back to city hall. None of them were in favor of changing the city's ban.
They all spoke in favor of what the city did seven years ago, and many characterized relitigating the issue as a "waste of time."
"This is on the right side of how we need to take better care of this earth," said one neighbor.
Follow FOX 13 on YouTube
Others pointed to the positive impact it has had on the business community and how non-plastic straw technology has evolved. They voiced concerns about a healthy and clean environment, sustainability and the threats microplastics pose to marine life and humans alike.
"In the seven years that have passed, microplastics have become more of a public health crisis in Tampa Bay, we know that trillions of microplastics exist in the environment- working their way up the food chain," said one speaker.
The other side
During some tense exchanges between council members, Givens spoke about his intentions on the ordinance.
"It's pointless to have an ordinance that infringes on individual rights and civil liberties without having the conversation with the entire community," he said.
MORE: You can eat these 5 invasive animals to help population control, US Fish & Wildlife Service says
Attorneys for the city said that, legally, the president's executive order against the "forced use of paper straws" has no impact on the city's ordinance.
"It speaks to federal use for procurement practices," an attorney for the city explained.
Dig deeper
Several local environmental groups have tacked the impact they've seen since the ban, with a 700% reduction in plastic straws removed from local waterways.
No one on council supported revisiting the ban on plastic straws.
"I am not willing to go backwards. This is a policy that needs to stay on our books," said St. Pete Council Member Brandi Gabbard.
In 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis left the use of plastic straws up to local governments, by vetoing a bill that sought to take that right from local municipalities.
The Source
The information in this story was gathered during a St. Pete city council meeting.
WATCH FOX 13 NEWS:
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA:
Download the FOX Local app for your smart TV
Download FOX Local mobile app:Apple |Android
Download the FOX 13 News app for breaking news alerts, latest headlines
Download the SkyTower Radar app
Sign up for FOX 13's daily newsletter
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump: ‘Very nice' of Hillary Clinton to float him for Nobel Peace Prize
President Trump expressed gratitude that former first lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had floated him for a Nobel Peace Prize if he were able to successfully negotiate an end to the war between Russia and Ukraine. 'If he could end it without putting Ukraine in a position where it had to concede its territory to the aggressor, had to, in a way, validate Putin's vision of greater Russia, but instead could really stand up to Putin, to make it clear there must be a ceasefire,' Clinton said during a recent episode of the 'Raging Moderates' podcast. 'If President Trump were the architect of that, I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize,' she said. Trump was asked for his reaction to those comments on Friday aboard Air Force One by Fox News anchor Bret Baier, who was traveling with the president to Alaska ahead of his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'That's very nice,' Trump responded. 'I might have to start liking her again.' Trump's meeting with Putin comes as he works to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, which he promised to do along the campaign trail last year. The president said earlier Friday he was prepared to 'walk away' from Friday's meeting with the Russian leader if Putin would not agree to terms Trump agrees with.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump seeks to sue California over clean trucking effort
The Trump administration is seeking to sue California to try to halt the state from enforcing its effort to electrify its truck fleet. The administration filed motions to join existing cases against the state over its rules seeking to reduce pollution and planet-warming emissions from trucks. The moves come after the Trump administration axed California's rules — but did so in a legally contested manner. Now, the Trump administration and truck makers are accusing the state of enforcing the now-overturned standards through its 'Clean Truck Partnership' under which truck companies agreed to follow the state's rules in exchange for some additional flexibility. The California Air Resources Board, which is in charge of the truck rules, declined to comment. At issue are California rules including the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, which would require a large percentage of trucks sold in the state to be electric by 2035. In 2023, a group of truck makers agreed to meet California's standards in exchange for some concessions from the state in what became known as the Clean Truck Partnership. Under the Clean Air Act, California is required to get federal approval for its auto regulations. The Biden administration approved the state's rule. This year, however, Congress and President Trump approved a resolution using the Congressional Review Act to overturn the approval of the California rule. The move occurred despite determinations from the Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, which said that it was not subject to the Congressional Review Act. Now, the Trump administration is arguing in court that California has sought to enforce its rules through the Clean Truck Partnership, describing the state's effort as a 'a stunning act of defiance.' Earlier this week, Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo Group North America sued the Trump administration to try to axe the state's rules and the partnership.
Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Exclusive: VA cancels employees' unpaid maternity leave
New and expecting parents who work at Veterans Affairs are getting approved maternity and paternity leave canceled after their union contract was terminated by the White House, according to two internal memos viewed by Axios. Why it matters: It's usually a scramble to stand up childcare options for new babies or figure out alternative arrangements on short notice. Those affected include people giving birth this week, or who just gave birth and are on maternity leave — and probably not checking email, says Andrew Feldman, a spokesman for the American Federation of Government Employees who has been talking to some impacted workers. Most VA employees are women. How it works: These workers aren't losing all their leave — 12 weeks of paid family leave is guaranteed under a federal law that President Trump signed during his first administration. But their union contract provided for another four weeks of unpaid time off on top of that. That's now gone. The big picture: The change may be a sign of the kind of fallout coming for federal employees as the administration's crackdown on federal unions continues. Catch up quick: Last week, the VA was the first federal agency to terminate a union contract — impacting roughly 400,000 employees — under the direction of a White House executive order. Reads one memo: In accordance with the..."termination of the master collective bargaining agreements on August 6, 2025, it has been determined that you are no longer entitled to the additional 4 weeks of 'contractual' leave without pay for maternity/paternity purposes." Another more detailed document viewed by Axios is unclear as to whether VA employees still even qualify for paid leave or other "labor obligations." It says: "VA will no longer follow Statute, CBAs [collective bargaining agreements], or any other labor obligations" for those employees who had their contract canceled." It is not clear what statute or labor obligations the document is referencing. The contract termination is creating a lot of anxiety, one VA employee tells Axios, asking for anonymity because they are fearful for their jobs. "This is exactly what we mean when we warn about the harms of union-busting; just days after tearing up union contracts, they're already rolling back basic rights for expecting mothers," said AFGE national president Everett Kelley. The other side: The VA confirmed the change. "Now that VA has terminated collective bargaining agreements for most employees, its parental leave policy is much more equitable," agency press secretary Pete Kasperowicz said in an email. He said all VA employees can request additional leave or leave without pay subject to the needs of the agency. And he says that the agency, under Pres. Trump, has improved health care wait times for veterans. Zoom out: The abrupt cancellation of a union contract is an unprecedented move at the federal level, says John Logan, a labor historian at San Francisco State University. "The Trump administration seems determined to strip collective bargaining rights and rip up existing union contracts from all federal workers who currently have them." The abrupt changes at the VA are making it difficult for the agency to hire doctors and nurses — 40% of the doctors offered jobs at VA hospitals turned them down in the first three months of this year, four times the rate the previous year, ProPublica reports.
