Pam Bondi Fast Facts
Here is a look at the life of US Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Birth date: November 17, 1965
Birth place: Tampa, Florida
Birth name: Pamela Jo Bondi
Father: Joseph Bondi, educator
Mother: Patsy (Hammer) Bondi
Marriages: Scott Fitzgerald (1997-2002, divorced); Garret Barnes, (1990-1992, divorced)
Education: University of Florida, B.A., 1987; Stetson University College of Law, J.D., 1990
Fourth-generation Floridian.
Bondi's father was mayor of Temple Terrace, Florida, in the 1970s.
First woman to serve as Florida's attorney general.
During her eight years as attorney general of Florida, Bondi unsuccessfully brought cases that aimed to undermine the Affordable Care Act and fought to keep the state's ban on same-sex marriage.
Early 1990s – Bondi begins working at the Hillsborough County, Florida, State Attorney's Office.
2005 – Bondi adopts a dog from the Humane Society of Pinellas County that was brought from Louisiana following Hurricane Katrina. In 2006, Steven and Dorreen Couture of Louisiana sue Bondi and the Humane Society, seeking the return of their dog. In 2007, the Coutures and Bondi reach a settlement, and the dog is returned to the Coutures.
December 2009 – Bondi leaves her job as a prosecutor at the Hillsborough County State Attorney's Office and enters the race for Florida attorney general.
November 2, 2010 – Bondi becomes the first woman elected as Florida's attorney general.
2011-2019 – Serves as attorney general of Florida. She is reelected in 2014.
2013 – Bondi comes under criticism for persuading the Florida governor at the time, Rick Scott, to postpone an execution because it conflicted with a fundraiser for her reelection campaign. She later apologized.
2019 – Joins the administration of US President Donald Trump. She works on Trump's legal team during his impeachment hearings.
2019-2025 – Partner at Ballard Partners LLC.
November 21, 2024 - Trump names Bondi as his pick for US attorney general after his original nominee, Rep. Matt Gaetz, drops out.
February 4, 2025 - Senate votes 54-46 to confirm Bondi as US attorney general.
February 5, 2025 – Bondi is sworn in as US attorney general.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
The real 'Epstein files' story is misunderstood. Here's what the government is still keeping secret.
The ghost of Jeffrey Epstein is haunting the Trump administration. Among his many campaign promises, President Donald Trump said he would make government files related to the now-dead financier and sex trafficker public. So far, the effort has fallen flat. In February, Attorney General Pamela Bondi published about 350 pages of documents. All but one three-pager had previously been made public through court proceedings. Some of the documents were redacted when they had previously been published in full. "The Epstein files: Phase 1," as Bondi's binders were titled, disappointed those hoping for new revelations about the financier. Months later, Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have not released anything else. Meanwhile, the Justice Department has fought or been unresponsive to Freedom of Information Act requests for documents about Epstein in its possession and lawsuits seeking to enforce those requests. The issue resurfaced last week when Elon Musk, during his brief and public feud with Trump, accused the president of holding up the release because "he's in them." Many members of the public are eagerly awaiting some sort of "Epstein client list," but it's unlikely one will turn up. No such list is referenced or even alluded to in all of the thousands of pages of records that have already been made public. Nor are we likely to get any revelations about some sort of shadowy sex-trafficking operation involving various members of the international elite, which isn't consistent with claims made in lawsuits. That's not to say that there aren't still lingering questions that the unreleased documents could clarify. The US government's files, if made public, could help answer some of the mysteries about Epstein. Depending on what the documents reveal, they may also bring new scrutiny on how the Justice Department handled its investigations and fuel litigation against Epstein's estate, which has over $100 million remaining in assets. Questions about Epstein have persisted since his death by suicide in 2019, in a Manhattan federal jail. How did he get so rich? Did he really have connections to intelligence agencies? Why didn't the FBI pursue him sooner? The public already has plenty of records related to Epstein, much of it stemming from a lawsuit that Virginia Giuffre, his accuser who killed herself in April, filed against Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking girls to Epstein for sex. Over the years, Business Insider has catalogued Epstein's flight logs, published a version of his "little black book" of contacts, and reported on his estate's victim compensation program. While Bondi has been under the most scrutiny over the "Epstein files," other agencies also have the opportunity to release records. The Federal Aviation Administration and the US Marshals Service haven't published unredacted versions of Epstein's flight information. And the CIA and other intelligence agencies have been quiet on the question of any files they may have. Here are the Epstein documents that the government has kept secret, and that could arrive in future "Epstein files" drops: Evidence seized in the 2019 criminal investigation The biggest cache of documents could come from the Manhattan criminal investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. In 2019, following the publication of the Miami Herald's "Perversion of Justice" series that reported on how Epstein got a light plea deal in 2007, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York opened a new investigation into the financier. On the same day the FBI arrested Epstein in July 2019, agents raided his Manhattan mansion and collected computer hard drives, message books, photos, CDs, and other records. Following Epstein's death in jail about a month later, law enforcement agents searched his properties in the US Virgin Islands. The FBI has declined to make public any of these records beyond a small amount entered into evidence during Maxwell's criminal trial. "Phase One" of Bondi's "Epstein files" included a list of some of the evidence obtained in the investigation. Business Insider filed a FOIA request for the records last year. The FBI declined the request. Business Insider appealed the denial and pointed the FOIA office to Bondi's public remarks promising to release the "Epstein files." The agency gave a May 16 date to resolve the appeal. After that deadline passed, the agency said it would take at least another three months to handle the appeal. The conservative government watchdog organization Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department in April over the rejection of a similar FOIA request, which is still pending. The Justice Department hasn't responded to Business Insider's requests for comment. Epstein's hard drives Maxwell's Manhattan criminal trial featured hard drives that might solve a mystery from the Palm Beach investigation into Epstein. During the earlier criminal investigation in Florida, detectives searching Epstein's Palm Beach house found that "six computer hard drives in the house had been hastily removed, leaving dangling wires attached to monitors in several areas of the house," according to Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown's book about the investigation. Years later, in Maxwell's trial, one FBI agent testified they found a box full of hard drives while raiding Epstein's Manhattan mansion. Evidence in Maxwell's trial shows that one of the drives contained data from the early 2000s. It's unclear what was on the hard drives removed from the Palm Beach house. Other evidence seized in the 2007 investigation The public doesn't have all the evidence collected during the investigation into Epstein between 2005 and 2007. Palm Beach County has made some of the material public, and other files have surfaced in various civil lawsuits. Much of it remains redacted, partly to protect the privacy of victims. Radar Online filed a lawsuit against the FBI in 2017 seeking to enforce a FOIA request for the material. A federal judge rejected the suit in 2024. It's on appeal. Alan Dershowitz, who represented Epstein during the Palm Beach investigation, has pushed for making the material public. He says the FBI should release any interview notes and recordings that may mention him, and that he waives any privacy concerns. Dershowitz says the records would disprove the sexual misconduct allegations brought against him by Virginia Giuffre. Dershowitz and Giuffre reached a settlement after a long legal battle in which she agreed she may have mistaken him for someone else. Dershowitz said he viewed some of the records as part of a civil lawsuit involving Epstein, but they are sealed. "They're in court. I've seen them," Dershowitz told Business Insider. "And if they were unredacted, they would give you the names of lots of people who were accused — some falsely accused, some truthfully accused." Epstein grand jury records Federal court rules and Justice Department policies sharply limit the disclosure of information from grand jury proceedings. The public doesn't have a full accounting of all the evidence presented to grand juries in Manhattan when prosecutors were preparing indictments against Epstein and Maxwell. Some evidence in the 2006 Florida grand jury was made public last year through litigation, following the passage of a state law pushed by Gov. Ron DeSantis. Investigation into Epstein's death A 2023 Justice Department inspector general report about Epstein's death in the Manhattan Correctional Center concluded that he killed himself. FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy, Dan Bognino, have backed up the conclusion in media interviews — much to the ire of some right-wing influencers who believe he was murdered. The 128-page report details how the jail failed to prevent Epstein's death, but the Justice Department hasn't released much of the underlying evidence it collected. Mark Epstein, his brother, has demanded data from the 911 call that was supposed to be made after jail officers found Jeffrey Epstein dead. The NYPD said it was unable to find any records of the call when Business Insider asked for them in June 2023 after the release of the report. Business Insider filed a FOIA request with the Justice Department inspector general earlier this year requesting transcripts of interviews with key people around Epstein at the time he died, information about inmate interviews, phone call records, and photos and videos referenced in the report. The office says it has "a backlog of FOIA requests and very limited resources with which to process requests" and hasn't provided a timeline for completion. In recent interviews, Patel and Bognino said the FBI would publish video of the area outside Epstein's cell demonstrating no one else entered it. "There's just no way that you could have run an op and had people go into that cell and not have any video of it," Patel told podcaster Joe Rogan earlier this month. Investigation into Epstein's plea deal The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility completed a report in 2020 about US Attorney Alexander Acosta's "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a light plea deal for his conduct in 2007. The office has not released all of the underlying evidence for that investigation. Business Insider filed a FOIA request for that information earlier this year, and the agency acknowledged the request without saying if or when it would provide the records. All of the Epstein flight logs While many of Epstein's private flight records were disclosed by the Federal Aviation Administration and through litigation, certain periods have gaps. The US Marshals Service could also publish its documents from its inspections of his planes, which flew between the US Virgin Islands and the US mainland. The FAA and the US Marshals Service did not respond to requests for comment. How the FBI missed Epstein earlier Across several legal complaints, dozens of Epstein victims have alleged that the FBI failed to stop him earlier, ignoring tips and pleas as early as the 1990s. The FBI has not said whether it's in possession of intake forms or other records of those complaints. In court, the Justice Department has avoided answering whether it has looked for them. The agency asked a judge to dismiss the most recent lawsuit, filed in Washington, DC, on procedural grounds. The request is pending. If the FBI were to find records from the 1990s and early 2000s, they could shed more light on what Epstein was doing during that time period, and whether the FBI took any action. "Unfortunately, the FBI continues to fight survivors of Jeffrey Epstein despite their public proclamations otherwise," Jordan Merson, an attorney representing Epstein accusers in the lawsuit, told BI.
Axios
11 hours ago
- Axios
Pam Bondi: LA protesters "very different" to Jan. 6 rioters Trump pardoned
The Trump administration is "not scared to go further" in its response to Los Angeles ' ongoing fiery protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Wednesday. Why it matters: President Trump has referred to protesters as "insurrectionists" and has already taken the rare steps of federalizing California's National Guard and deploying the Marines to LA, prompting reporters to ask Bondi whether he'll next use emergency powers under the Insurrection Act. California's Democratic leaders have expressed strong opposition to the federal response, and Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) have traded insults as they blamed each other for the unrest. What they're saying: "Right now, in California, what we're doing is working," Bondi said, after being asked about whether Trump would invoke the 1807 law that allows presidents to deploy U.S. troops to quell domestic unrest. "By bringing in the National Guard, by bringing in the Marines, right now, to back them up, to protect our federal buildings, to protect highways, to protect the citizens," she said during her briefing with reporters. "So, right now, in California, we're at a good point. We're not scared to go further. We're not frightened to do something else if we need to." Bondi expressed hope that the federal action and the downtown night-time curfew that LA Mayor Karen Bass imposed on Tuesday to address looting and vandalism would bring the situation under control. Of note: Newsom in a Tuesday night address said that Trump is "not opposed to lawlessness and violence, as long as it serves HIM," adding: "What more evidence do we need than Jan. 6th?" A reporter asked Bondi whether there was a double standard in the administration defending law enforcement during the current protests when Trump pardoned most of the roughly 1,500 Jan. 6 rioters during his first day back in office. "Well, this is very different," Bondi said. "These are people out there hurting people in California right now. This is ongoing." State of play: There have now been six days of ICE protests in LA, and they've triggered similar demonstrations nationwide.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kansas faces $3.77B in Medicaid cuts, thousands to lose coverage under Trump's bill: report
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Kansas will lose more than $3 billion in Medicaid funding, and thousands of Kansans will lose access to health insurance under Trump's proposed bill, according to a new report. New modeling shows 13,000 fewer Kansans would be able to enroll in Medicaid under the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' recently passed by the U.S. House, and the state would lose $3.77 billion in total Medicaid funding. Man charged in death of Platte County sports reporter shot on I-29 The modeling showed $2.29 billion in lost federal Medicaid funding alone—and $3.77 billion when combined with associated state funding losses over a 10-year period. Such losses would likely lead to higher uninsured rates and more financial struggles for rural hospitals already on the brink of closure. These results were recently released by Manatt Health, which conducted the analysis at the request of Kansas health philanthropies United Methodist Health Ministry Fund and REACH Healthcare Foundation. The two organizations wanted to better understand the financial and enrollment impacts of the bill, which would cut $700 billion from Medicaid and is awaiting a vote in the Senate. Medicaid, the public health insurance program that covers more than 366,000 Kansans, is funded jointly by the state and federal government. It provides low-income parents, children, seniors and people with disabilities with health insurance. Adults who do not have children do not qualify for Medicaid in Kansas. 'If this bill passes, it will cause long-lasting harm to thousands of families across Kansas and seriously threaten the survival of rural hospitals across the state,' said Brenda Sharpe, president and CEO at REACH Healthcare Foundation. The analysis shows Kansas will face significant coverage losses and funding reductions over the next 10 years. Manatt said the losses are even greater than shown in the analysis, as data limitations made it unable to model all the provisions in the bill. The estimates do not account for prohibitions on states setting up any new provider taxes or increasing assessments for other providers. That will cause Kansas health care providers, including nursing homes and other health providers, to lose critical funding over time and cause them to become even more financially vulnerable, Manatt said in a news release Wednesday. Coverage losses due to the bill's changes to the Affordable Care Act's Health Insurance Marketplace also couldn't be modeled. However, they will result in additional Kansans losing health insurance, according to Manatt. Not only will the bill remove people's health insurance, it also will remove food assistance. The bill includes $300 billion in cuts from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). 'Congress is trying to rush a plan through the process that will take health care and food assistance away from tens of thousands of Kansans, including children, seniors and people with disabilities,' said David Jordan, president and CEO at the Health Fund. 'At a time when hospitals are trying to keep their doors open and working families are struggling to keep a roof over their heads and food on their tables, we cannot afford these cuts.' Kansas already has more hospitals at risk of closure than any other state in the country. A recent report from the University of Kansas School of Nursing highlights the growing 'maternal care desert' in Kansas. Manatt said 63 rural hospitals are currently at risk, and 87% of Kansas rural hospitals are operating in the red. These hospitals struggle to survive with existing federal funding – and provisions in the bill would cause them to lose billions, making it even harder to stay open. When rural hospitals close, it removes job opportunities and access to health care, creating a ripple effect in small communities, Manatt said. You can read the full report below or by clicking here. Medicaid-Cut-Impacts-to-KansasDownload Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
